January 29, 2013 (#1259)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

 

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 29, 2013:

France's Debt, Gastronomic and Economic:

"Whole Middle East is Torn Asunder,
Yet Nations are Hungry for More Plunder,
Now Mali is Bombed by the French
Whose National Debt is Hard to Quench,
Bankrupt Britain is also Involved,
Their Perpetual Debt is Never Solved,
The Public Pays for Military Operations
The Loot Goes to Private Corporations,
For Hundreds of Years Wars went Wild
Paying Off Debt to the Family Rothschild"
© Alan Watt Jan. 29, 2013

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – Jan. 29, 2013 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

 

Hi, folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 29th of January, 2013.

For newcomers, I always suggest you make good use of the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You’ll find lots of audios for free download, where I go through the history of the system you’re born into. And it truly is a system. A very intricate system that was developed a long time ago; a long-term plan, you might say, a goal. Many goals, actually. But part of it was to bring in a world community or a world government, under one authority. And of course, the Royal Institute for International Affairs, that was their project. Another name for them too is the Council on Foreign Relations. They have branches in every country across the world. And for over the whole 20th century, they were working towards, through wars and various other techniques to make countries amalgamate together through treaties – binding treaties – and eventually they formed the EU bloc and we’re still going into the American bloc. And they’ve got a bloc now, for some of the Latin American countries, as well and the Far East/Pacific Rim region. They’ve been working for a hundred years, just to get all this done – to bring in a world system. But not just to have hands across the sea and happy people and smiling faces, but to actually rule the world in a scientific manner, a world which they claimed was already overpopulated even back then, a hundred years ago. And they wanted to bring in a new type of society for the future to serve themselves (the elite) better, down the road.

And so you’ve been brought up, as I say, in a scientifically controlled society. And even your reality is given to you, and I really mean that. Your complete reality is given to you. First, by your parents, because they were indoctrinated by a scientific fashion and they pass it on to you and the cartoons take over; even children’s stories because authors are given extra cash to embed little stories about PC topics into their stories too. Then they get into school and further indoctrination and right through college/university. It’s amplified too; it never leaves you. So, you’re given your opinions, right along the way, in fact. And once you leave or you’re working, you’re too busy to be bothered with what’s happening on the planet, what’s going on. So, I go through the history of all of this and the organizations that work it all upon you and the big foundations that have trillions of dollars at stake to make it happen.

Remember too, that you are the audience that bring me to you. You can help me go by buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and you can also donate. So, remember, from the US to Canada, you can still use personal checks or international postal money orders from the post office. You can send cash or use PayPal. Across the world, Western Union, MoneyGram and PayPal. And straight donations are seriously, seriously welcome.

And, as I say, it’s hard for most folk, once your conditioning has taken effect, to ever work out of it. It’s quite a process, actually, for those who through various circumstances are forced to go through it, through their own circumstances; when they start to ask: “why is everything falling apart?” “why is the world the way it is?” “why aren’t I getting ahead?” and so on. And then you start to catch on, little by little as to what’s really happening in the world. And some people get really angry, really upset. Some people describe it as like the death of someone. First you feel anger and depression and frustration, and you go through all these moods finding out that democracy doesn’t exist, and you do. You go through all of this to realize that for well over a hundred years every president and prime minister has been picked by the Council on Foreign Relations and that’s from their own historian, Professor Carroll Quigley. Back with more, after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi folks. We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And, as I say, this system is quite... it’s a very old system, at least the plan is very, very old. And I’ve mentioned before that the Royal Institute for International Affairs really was formed out of two groups. One was Baron Rothschild in London and also Cecil Rhodes. They got together and founded the Rhodes Foundation and they also planned to take over the resources of the planet. And those that have studied Cecil Rhodes’ history, it’s quite fascinating how they fomented wars across South Africa and blamed the Boers, of course, just to get the British military involved, and get them in to do the dirty work and pay all the money, of course, and so that they could take it over and grab all the diamonds and gold and so on. Quite the tactic they used. And even the BBC did a whole series on that at one time. But then this group merged with the Alfred Milner Group – Lord Alfred Milner – who was actually German and bankers too. And they got together and formed this big society, Royal Institute for International Affairs. And, again, the agenda was to be the same: taking over all the world’s resources, running the world properly and bringing in a new scientific type of society, where people wouldn’t get born unless they needed you to fulfill a job. And they have many front people working for them. They brought in eugenics into their system as well. H.G. Wells worked for them, as a propagandist and many, many others. That’s how you change people’s opinions. It’s primarily through fiction; stuff that carries you off when your firewall is down, when you’re watching or reading fiction. So the embedded stuff gets into your mind and you think, oh I guess that’s possible or maybe it should be that way, etc etc. And they had a big influence on the world.

But the big empire, even of the Rothschilds, is something else, altogether. There’s an article I’ll put up tonight. It’s from the Haaretz paper. And it’s about Baron Rothschild – that’s Benjamin de Rothschild – and it’s quite funny. It says he’s

“... put the 4-billion-euro family fortune in the hands of his wife, Baroness Ariane de Rothschild”

 

Alan: Now, you could scrap the “4” and probably put “40” or “405” and a “TR” there, trillion, I think, more like the family fortune, because really, I mean in the 1800’s they owned about three-quarters of the wealth of the world, so I’d imagine it’s at least the same today, or maybe even more. And these guys lend to nations. That’s why it’s so safe for them to lend. They don’t speculate and this kind of stuff; in fact, the Baron is quite interesting. He talks about the speculators that brought on the crash in the US and Britain and elsewhere and how they should all be in jail. He said they were just robbers and thieves. But he himself, of course, he doesn’t speculate in these little trivial things, like “get rich quick”. He makes long-term plans like his whole family has done. But they also lend to nations. They lend to whole nations and that’s far, far safer, isn’t it, because when the nation goes bankrupt, then you can say to them, well pay me some way or another, and then the guys say, well we’ve got no money left.  Well what have you got, what’s your assets? You’ve got a military, use it. That’s the kind of things they do. Anyway, I’ll put this article up here. He doesn’t mention that part of it on it, of course, but that’s always been the way. If you wonder why France and all these other countries are involved and starting to get their share of the plunder, across the Middle East and elsewhere, it’s because someone’s put the heavy and the lien on them; that’s why it happens. So, I’ll put this link up tonight for those who want to peruse it.

And also, this article is quite interesting too, because Israel is famous for putting out false stories against their potential enemies. And it says here,

“Did Israeli government officials aggressively promote an unsubstantiated story about an explosion at an Iranian nuclear facility?”

 

“According to Ali Gharib at The Daily Beast, yes. He writes that it is ‘an object lesson that shows just how far some press—and even Israeli government officials—have gone down the rabbit hole on Iran issues by propagating a story reported on a conspiracy website.’ Reports have been circulating for days claiming there was such an explosion at the Iranian enrichment facility at Fordow.”

 

Alan: Fordow, it’s called.

“It might have just disappeared, but Israeli officials started pushing the story in the press, without citing any evidence, of course.”

 

Alan: And it says,

“The story first popped up three days ago on WND [World Net Daily], written by an author going by the pseudonym Reza Kahlili who claims to be a former CIA spy in Iran. But Kahlili is unreliable, to say the least: among other outlandish claims peddled by Kahlili, he wrote that Iran already has nuclear weapons. But that didn’t stop all kinds of news media repeating Kahlili’s unsubstantiated claim. The website of the Israeli paper Yedioth Ahronot ran a story on Saturday that began, ‘WND, an American news website affiliated with the Right, reported Friday that a mysterious explosion has destroyed a significant portion of Iran’s Fordo nuclear facility.’”

 

Alan: And it says,

“On Sunday, the Jewish Press ran a story riddled with punctuation errors that cited WND and Yedioth, reprinting parts of the latter’s story in full. And another story today at the Jewish Press, under a credulous headline, admitted the story might not be right in its ...”

 

Alan: Stuff, and so on. Anyway, it just shows you... and I’ve often wondered, because World Net Daily sometimes has amazing claims. There was one a while back where they had said about 400 Iranian madmen or something, were heading to the States to cause all kinds of mayhem. Stuff like that. And Iraqi types and all that, just all heading here to do us all in and stuff like that. It makes you wonder what sides they’re all on. Or are they all on the same side, I wonder sometimes.

And Google... we all know this because we’re living in a society that’s getting worse and worse. It’s supposed to get worse and worse by the way, because that’s why they gave you the computer, the Internet and everything else, was to get you hooked on it so they could track you and everything you do and know all about you. What you chat about, what you think about, what your interests are. And I’ve mentioned before, the Pentagon actually... and I’ve read the articles from the Pentagon, where they have virtual you and me and everybody else and they can actually play games on them, knowing your whole personality profile; how you would react in certain situations. And they set up these things in a virtual reality and use your avatar sort of thing.  Anyway, they’re also at it again, of course, and they’ll always get at it, because, you see, it’s part of the world intelligence establishment, Google. That’s who set it up: NSA. They set it up in the first place, and MI6 and so on. That’s why no one can touch them really.  It says,

“Google is embroiled in its biggest privacy battle yet in the UK over reportedly tracking users’ online habits.”

 

Alan: There’s nothing new in that. It says,

“At least 10 UK citizens began legal action with dozens more lining up. According to media estimates up to 10 million Britons could join in. Google is accused of evading security settings on Apple’s devices and Safari’s web browser in order to keep tabs on people’s online preferences. This is the first group claim over privacy issues that the tech-giant is facing in the UK, the lawyer behind the action Dan Tench told The Guardian. ‘It is particularly concerning how Google circumvented security settings to snoop on its users. One of the things about Google is that it is so ubiquitous in our lives and if that’s its approach, then it’s quite concerning,’ Tench said. On top of that there are plans in the works to launch an umbrella privacy action suit, which could potentially bring in millions of people in the UK. Google executives reportedly received a letter from two users prior to the launch of legal proceedings. The tech-giant is being sued for breaches of privacy and confidence, computer misuse and trespass, and breach of the Data Protection Act of 1998. Claimants want Google to reveal how much data was secretly collected, for how long, and how the information is being used. The point of the claim is not to make money off Google, but to send a message, argued a privacy campaigner working on the legal claims, Alexander Hanff.”

 

Alan: Is his name. So, I don’t know if it’ll go any further because, as I say, it’s an essential part of intelligence too. And that’s what it’s used for. Of course it is.

This is an interesting article too. It’s quite different. It says,

“Burn, burn - Africa’s Afghanistan”

 

Alan: And it talks about the Frenchman’s Mirage fighters over, you know, in the latest, Mali and so on.

“Apparently, it’s a no-brainer. Mali holds 15.8 million people - with a per capita gross domestic product of only around US$1,000 a year and average life expectancy of only 51 years - in a territory twice the size of France (per capital GDP $35,000 and upwards). Now almost two-thirds of this territory is occupied by heavily weaponized Islamist outfits. What next? Bomb, baby, bomb. So welcome to the latest African war; Chad-based French Mirages and Gazelle helicopters, plus a smatter of France-based Rafales bombing evil Islamist jihadis in northern Mali. Business is good; French president Francois Hollande spent this past Tuesday in Abu Dhabi clinching the sale of up to 60 Rafales to that Gulf paragon of democracy, the United Arab Emirates (UAE).”

 

Alan: So, you see, wars are great business for countries that are broke. And, as I say, France has been liened on by the big bankers, heavily. It says,

“The formerly wimpy Hollande - now enjoying his ‘resolute’, ‘determined’, tough guy image reconversion - has cleverly sold all this as incinerating Islamists in the savannah before they take a one-way Bamako-Paris flight to bomb the Eiffel Tower. French Special Forces have been on the ground in Mali since early 2012. The Tuareg-led NMLA (National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad), via one of its leaders, now says it’s ‘ready to help’ the former colonial power, billing itself as more knowledgeable about the culture and the terrain than future intervening forces from the CEDEAO (the acronym in French for the Economic Community of Western African States). Salafi-jihadis in Mali have got a huge problem: they chose the wrong battlefield. If this was Syria, they would have been showered by now with weapons, logistical bases, a London-based "observatory", hours of YouTube videos and all-out diplomatic support by the usual suspects of US, Britain, Turkey, the Gulf petromonarchies and - oui, monsieur - France itself. Instead, they were slammed by the UN Security Council - faster than a collection of Marvel heroes - duly authorizing a war against them. Their West African neighbors - part of the ECOWAS regional bloc - were given a deadline (late November) to come up with a war plan.”

 

Alan: Which is a joke, for these blocs in Africa.

“This being Africa, nothing happened - and the Islamists kept advancing until a week ago Paris decided to apply some Hollandaise sauce.”

 

Alan: And bomb the hell out of them, in other words. Back with more, after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix. Talking about Mali and what’s really going on there. And it says,

“It all started with a military coup in March 2012, only one month before Mali would hold a presidential election, ousting then president Amadou Toumani Toure. The coup plotters justified it as a response to the government’s incompetence in fighting the Tuareg. The coup leader was one Captain Amadou Haya Sanogo, who happened to have been very cozy with the Pentagon; that included his four-month infantry officer basic training course in Fort Benning, Georgia, in 2010.”

 

Alan: And here’s where it gets interesting.

“Essentially, Sanogo was also groomed by AFRICOM, under a regional scheme mixing the State Department’s Trans Sahara Counter Terrorism Partnership program and the Pentagon’s Operation Enduring Freedom. It goes without saying that in all this ‘freedom’ business Mali has been the proverbial ‘steady ally’ - as in counterterrorism partner - fighting (at least in thesis) al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). Over the last few years, Washington’s game has elevated flip-flopping to high art. During the second George W Bush administration, Special Forces were very active side by side with the Tuaregs and the Algerians. During the first Obama administration, they started backing the Mali government against the Tuareg. An unsuspecting public may pore over Rupert Murdoch’s papers - for instance, The Times of London - and its so-called defense correspondent will be pontificating at will on Mali without ever talking about blowback from the Libya war. Muammar Gaddafi always supported the Tuaregs’ independence drive; since the 1960s the NMLA agenda has been to liberate Azawad (North Mali) from the central government in Bamako. After the March 2012 coup, the NMLA seemed to be on top. They planted their own flag on quite a few government buildings, and on April 5 announced the creation of a new, independent Tuareg country. The ‘international community’ spurned them, only for a few months later to have the NMLA for all practical purposes marginalized, even in their own region, by three other - Islamist - groups; Ansar ed-Dine (‘Defenders of the Faith’); the Movement for Unity and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO); and al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).”

 

Alan: It’s quite fascinating. I don’t know if you understand this because you find in the writings of Kissinger and other ones and Brzezinski and so on, they talked about the best plans – long before all of this started, right after 9/11 in fact – on how to, basically, take down all these countries that were on the same list as the PNAC countries list to take down, which we’ve pretty-well done most of them except Iran. And they said then, the best thing to do was to destroy all their infrastructure – in other words, you put them to the stone age and then you put in your puppet governments, but you also start funding all the different factions of the Muslims, so that they’ll perpetually fight each other forever and be completely ineffective from then on. And that’s what they’ve done. And it’s not just there. It’s also gone into Mali and other places too. So, I’ll put this link up tonight for folk who really care about what’s actually really happening.

And this article too, is interesting. It says,

“Israeli and Jewish aid officials are denying an Israeli TV report alleging that Ethiopian immigrant women...”

 

Alan: These are Ethiopian Jews. They’re Falasha Jews.

“... have been coerced into taking contraceptive shots.”

 

Alan: It’s not just pills. It’s the shots. And they’re controversial types of shots.

“The report, which aired Saturday night on Israeli Educational Television, charged that coercive contraception is behind a 50 percent decline in the Ethiopian birth rate in Israel over the last decade. Ethiopian women interviewed in the program, called ‘Vacuum’ and hosted by Gal Gabbai, said they were coerced into receiving injections of Depo-Provera, a long-acting birth control drug, both at Jewish-run health clinics in Ethiopia and after their move to Israel. Rachel Mangoli, executive director of the WIZO chapter in Katz Village, told the TV show that she realized something was amiss when during a full year in her Ethiopian program just one Ethiopian baby was born. ‘I went to the health clinic and I was told that Ethiopian immigrants were given the contraception because they couldn’t be relied upon to take the pills every day,’ Mangoli said. In the report, a woman identified as S. said she was told at the Jewish aid compound in Gondar, Ethiopia, ‘If you don’t get the shot, we won’t give you a ticket.’”

 

Alan: To immigrate to Israel.

“She recalled, ‘I didn’t want to take it. They wanted me to take it. But I didn’t know it was a contraceptive,’ she said. ‘I thought it was an immunization.’ Another Ethiopian interviewed for the program, Amawaish Alane, said, ‘We said we won’t accept the shot. They told us, ‘You won’t immigrate to Israel. You also won’t come into this clinic. You won’t get help and medical treatment.’ We had no choice,’ Alane said. ‘That’s why we took the shot...’ The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, which runs the health clinics in Ethiopia for prospective immigrants to Israel, says it offers contraception among its array of services but that it is purely voluntary.”

 

Alan: And then it says,

“‘At no time did JDC coerce anyone into engaging at family planning at its clinics. Those options were totally voluntary and offered to women who requested it,’ a JDC spokesman in New York said.”

 

Alan: But then you’ve got today’s article:

“Israel Admits Birth Control Program for Ethiopians.  Concedes Immigrants Were Given Contraceptive Shots”

 

Alan: So, one day they’re denying it and the next day they’re admitting it. And they were given the contraceptive shots, “which likely accounts for a decline in their birth rate.” Well, I’d imagine so. And it says here that:

“A government official has for the first time acknowledged the practice of injecting women of Ethiopian origin with the long-acting contraceptive Depo-Provera. Health Ministry Director General Prof. Ron Gamzu has instructed the four health maintenance organizations to stop the practice as a matter of course. The ministry and other state agencies had previously denied knowledge or responsibility for the practice, which was first reported five years ago.”

 

Alan: Five years ago they reported it.

“Gamzu’s letter instructed ‘all gynecologists in the HMOs not to renew prescriptions for Depo-Provera for women of Ethiopian origin if for any reason there is concern that they might not understand the ramifications of the treatment.’”

 

Alan: Well, they were lying to them and saying they were inoculations and immunizations. Just shows you, eh? Some are more equal than others in such societies. Back with more, after this break.

{Break ♫- You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network, because you can handle the truth!}

Hi, folks. I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about the big system we’re living in. And you know, you’ve got to really be careful with all the news because everything’s got a spin on it. And everything’s really given the stamp of approval before it’s given to the public. There’s been so many lies to do with the wars that have been ongoing since the 90’s, you know, with Gulf War I straight on through, that you’ve got to really keep the facts straight and remember for yourself. The only true historian is yourself, if you’ve got memory at all as to what happened when and so on and the accounts given at the time as to the accounts given later on and so on and so on, because they keep changing the stories. And truth goes down the memory hole, of course, especially with so much of it being up on the Internet these days. Once it’s gone, it’s gone. Anyway, people will probably remember that:

“Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that use of chemical warfare was ‘totally unacceptable’”

 

Alan: But then out came after this:

“Leaked emails from defense contractor refers to chemical weapons saying ‘the idea is approved by Washington’”

 

Alan: And it says:

“U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime’”

 

Alan: And so,

“Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country. A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme 'approved by Washington' is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons. Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons....”

 

Alan: So they’re getting the stage ready for the release of chemical weapons to blame it on the Syrians, of course. And it says here,

“War games...”

 

Alan: And so on. Anyway, I’ll put this up tonight too, for those who want to have a little look at it. But I mean this is pretty standard stuff. And it’s difficult to ever find truth on what’s going on. Remember they say the first casualty of war is truth. And that’s true, because everything is propaganda. And they must always try and get the public’s support on their side so that you’ll allow them to go off and slaughter people for whatever reason it’s going to be, although it’s never the one they really tell you.

Also, an article came out too about the UK. It says,

“UK troop abuse of Iraqis ‘systemic’”

 

Alan: And it says,

“Nearly 200 Iraqi civilians are fighting a High Court battle...”

 

Alan: In London...

“...for a fully independent public inquiry into allegations that British troops committed ‘terrifying acts of brutality’ following the invasion of Iraq. Two judges were told women, the elderly and children were among the victims as soldiers went in search of individuals to detain and interrogate. A judge-led inquiry is being sought into accusations that British interrogators were guilty of unlawful killings as well as torture in British-controlled detention facilities between 2003 and 2009.”

 

Alan: So, we’ll see if that goes anywhere, but I wouldn’t count on it. You know, you just don’t count on it, because you’re up against the big powers. And this article’s quite interesting too. I generally don’t read stuff from Global Research, because I remember the one who heads it all, I think he’s pretty-well communistic in his values. They have great articles. They have very good articles and they certainly do their homework. They’ve got lots of students, I think, working with them too, to really dig up stuff. But, I remember when the head fella went off to talk to the Marxist meeting in Germany a few years ago and I saw the article about it in a French ad where he was talking to the international Marxists of the year meeting. And I guess it’s a Marxist push; that’s their whole spin. Anyway, some of their articles are awfully good and here’s one here and it talks about Nicolas Sarkozy and so on and Mr. Hollande:

“The military adventures of Nicolas Sarkozy and François Hollande in Afghanistan, Ivory Coast, Libya, Syria and now in Mali are hotly discussed in the French army.”

 

Alan: This might make more sense and fill in the missing pieces.

“And the opposition they face is at a critical point. Some examples: In 2008, when Nicolas Sarkozy had just changed the mission of the French soldiers in Afghanistan to become supplementary forces of the U.S. occupation, the Chief of Staff of the Army, General Bruno Cuche, refused to send in Leclerc tanks. The crisis was so profound that President Sarkozy took advantage of the first opportunity to force General Cuche to resign. In 2011, it was Admiral Pierre-François Forissier’s turn. The Chief of Naval Staff had publicly expressed his doubts about the operation in Libya which, according to him, took the French forces away from their primary mission of defending the homeland. In 2012, General Jean Fleury, former Chief of Staff of the Air Force, was even more explicit in saying that France has neither the vocation nor the means to attack Syria. Over the past five years, the senior officers - most often very observant Catholics - have become convinced that the power of the French army has been diverted by presidents Sarkozy and Hollande to serve private or foreign interests, U.S. and Israeli.”

 

Alan: I think it’s also to do with what I mentioned at the beginning, it’s when the big, big bankers can demand to countries that are broke, well, you’ve got assets, use your military. It says,

“This is confirmed by the very organization of recent external operations. Since 2010, most of them have escaped the command of Chief of Defence Staff, Admiral Edouard Guillaud, to accrue to the command of General Benedict Puga, from the Elysée. This paratrooper, a specialist of Special Operations and Intelligence, embodies both dependence on Israel and the revival of colonialism. It was he who oversaw, in Egypt, the construction of the steel wall to complete the closure of the Gaza Strip, turning it into a giant ghetto. We know that Nicolas Sarkozy did not enjoy contact with the military. François Hollande, on his part, flees their company. Thus, when he went to Lebanon to urge President Michel Suleiman to support the secret war in Syria, on November 4, he did not see fit to greet the French contingent of UNIFIL. This affront is not attributable to disdain, but to Hollande’s his fear of coming into contact with them.”

 

Alan: He’s afraid of his own military.

“The crisis of confidence has reached a point where the security service of the Elysée fears a military attempt on the life of the President of the Republic. Thus, January 9, at the President’s address to the French armed forces, at the 12th regiment of Cuirassiers d’Orléans base, the Elysée required the neutralization of weapons. The firing pins of assault rifles and machine guns were removed, and pistols were also incapacitated. Ammunition was confiscated and stored in sealed bags. Such a measure had not been taken since the Algerian crisis, sixty years prior.”

 

Alan: So, going to see a parade, they couldn’t have any live ammo or workable firearms on site.

“When François Hollande said: ‘The military community is a family, with the active units and reserves (…) I know the stability, solidarity and I also appreciate the sense of discipline, cohesion and even of discretion’, the behavior of his security services belied his words. The President is afraid of his armed forces. He distrusts his soldiers because he knows he cannot justify the missions he assigns to them. This crisis will not fail to deepen if the president continues his commitment to extending covert operations to Algeria. Moreover, since the suspension of conscription and the professionalization of the armed forces, many recruits are drawn from Muslim families from Algeria. They will not fail to react emotionally to the rampant recolonization of their parents’ homeland.”

 

Alan: So it’s quite a good little article. And it shows you too... but who has put the lean on them... who’s put the lean on them to get the cash in, you know? Because, as I say, there’s no doubt about it, France is in a bad way. And I’ll read an article later about how bad they are at the moment.

Also, tonight too, this is an interesting little website to do with... you know that countries are regarded as corporations; they’re all down in some book somewhere as corporations. And this one says:

“Are Corporations Masquerading as Government in Australia & World Wide?”

 

Alan: And it’s interesting to see where they’re all listed.

“Would you be surprised to find a company with the same name as your country registered with the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) in Washington DC? Well, guess what?! Among those listed as corporate entities by the United States SEC are: Israel, Turkey, Italy, Hungary, Sweden, Finland, Argentina, Colombia, Brazil, The Philippines, South Korea, Japan, Jamaica, South Africa, Canada, Australia… and my personal favourite (and I quote) ‘Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Alberta as represented by Alberta Investment Management Corp.’”

 

Alan: So, I’ll put this article up. It’s quite interesting, because it does go into the legalities of what you think you are and what your country is and the corporate world, how they see it themselves. It’s quite interesting.

And another one I’ll put up tonight too, is about the constitution and it’s from a Georgetown law professor, Louis Michael Seidman, who says,

“I’ve got a simple idea: Let’s give up on the Constitution. I know, it sounds radical, but it’s really not. Constitutional disobedience is as American as apple pie. For example, most of our greatest Presidents -- Jefferson, Lincoln, Wilson, and both Roosevelts -- had doubts about the Constitution, and many of them disobeyed it when it got in their way. To be clear, I don’t think we should give up on everything in the Constitution. The Constitution has many important and inspiring provisions, but we should obey these because they are important and inspiring, not because a bunch of people who are now long-dead favored them two centuries ago.”

 

Alan: So, it’s the same old stuff that they’ve been teaching in university to do away with it altogether. And out with it all will go your rights and freedoms, which is going all out. It’s all going anyway, isn’t it? I mean, for goodness sake, let’s be honest here. It’s all been snatched away over the years.

Also, this article here:

“France is ‘totally bankrupt’”

 

Alan: Says the:

“...jobs minister... as concerns grow over Hollande’s tax-and-spend policies”

 

Alan: His name is Michel Sapin and he says:

“‘There is a state but it’s a totally bankrupt state’ Unemployment and living costs have spiralled since party came to power; President trying to revive economy through cutting spending by £51billion. Finance minister Pierre Moscovici said: ‘Mr. Sapin’s comments were inappropriate and tried to blame Nicolas Sarkozy’s government.”

 

Alan: But the fact is they’re broke and they’re getting leaned on, by, you know, big guys to use their military and so on to get the cash in and oil and gold and diamonds and everything else they can get their hands on. To pay it off, that’s what you do. That’s what governments are also used for. Bankers often see them, governments, as just an extension of their own business. I hope you understand that. That’s really the way it is. So it says,

“France’s Socialist government was involved in a vast damage limitation exercise today after a senior minister admitted that the country was ‘totally bankrupt.’ Colleagues of Michel Sapin, secretary of state for employment, insisted that he was merely highlighting the faults of the last conservative administration, after the minister said the government’s tax-and-spend policies are just not working.”

 

Alan: And it says,

“ Just half a year since his party came to power, Mr Sapin yesterday told radio listeners: ‘There is a state but it is a totally bankrupt state.’ That is why we had to put a deficit reduction plan in place, and nothing should make us turn away from that objective.’ While the admission was unlikely to have been intentional, it highlighted huge concern at President Francois Hollande’s handling of the economy.”

 

Alan: So, I’ll put this link up tonight too for those who really care, you know.

I mentioned too, before, but it’s interesting that Davos wants 14 trillion dollars of your cash money to “green” the economy. I’ll put that one up again, because it’s quite interesting.

And also, Cuba’s Raul Castro assumes the presidency of the bloc of Latin American and Caribbean countries. Big moves going on, eh? Big moves. And it says,

“Cuban President Raul Castro assumed the presidency of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States on Monday in a demonstration of regional unity against U.S. efforts to isolate the communist government through a 50-year-old economic embargo. Castro was warmly welcomed by his colleagues as he spoke Monday at the closing ceremony of the CELAC summit in Santiago, taking over the rotating presidency from Chile. He described what he called ‘a common vision for the Latin American and Caribbean homeland,’ saying that CELAC ‘joins the 33 independent nations of our America to build a space for national sovereignty and encourage integration.’”

 

Alan: I wonder if it’s going to start all the old wars off again with the US School of Americas and all that stuff that went on for years before. It says,

“‘It’s one more sign that Latin America wants Cuba to fully integrate to regional bodies, even though Cuba, unlike the rest of Latin America, has a one-party state,’ said Phil Peters, Cuba analyst and vice president of the Lexington Institute think tank outside Washington. Many of the leaders speaking in Santiago described CELAC as a counterweight to the economic and political power of the United States, which for decades froze Cuba out of the Organization of American States and other regional groupings.”

 

Alan: So, there’s Cuba at the head of it now. And we’ll have to see what the plans are for that. And also I’ve mentioned before how the whole carbon tax scam, they’re claiming it’s crashing right now. They want money (your money) to inject into it to keep it going. I’ll put that link up again too. That’s the real reason for it. They want your cash to get it really, really going. It’s an absolute necessity for the big world powers – the guys who run the world, that is – to get this carbon con going because it’s to change all of our lives from birth to death (how we behave, what we eat, what we don’t eat, all that kind of stuff, where we live, how we live); that’s what it’s about too. So, I’ll put that up, as well. And I hope you’ll realize that’s what it’s really all about. It’s not just cash. But it’s a great side economy for the guys who get lots of money for nothing. LOTS of money for nothing. Fantastic, eh?

And also, in Britain, another country that’s had to get involved in more wars because they’re getting leaned on too by the big bankers. Their big stores (the big chain stores) are all collapsing it says.

“Britain’s retailers are dropping like flies, with music giant HMV, photography specialist Jessops and video rental chain Blockbusters all forced into administration...”

 

Alan: That’s receivership...

“...in the last few days. And there is doubtless more pain on the way. Here, we reveal some of the most likely contenders for closure.”

 

Alan: So, they’ve got Argos and another one, Mothercare. There’s another one, Dixon’s Rental, Curries and PC World and then others listed too that they think will all be next. They’re all falling one after another like dominos. So, they’ll have to get more wars going, you see, and plunder more assets. You know, get more assets in from other countries and they’ll use their military to do it, of course.

This article too is very, very good. It says,

“If ‘Assault Weapons’ Are Bad…Why Does DHS Want to Buy 7,000 of Them for ‘Personal Defense’?”

 

Alan: Understand terminology, understand how it’s used; I mean it’s a science in propaganda. And if they want to get them off of you, they call them assault weapons; when they order them themselves, they call them “personal defense weapons.” Sounds a bit different, eh, totally different. “Personal defense weapon.” In fact, if folk in America say, well, they want to take our personal defense weapons away, it would sound like it’s a nasty thing to do. So, you should maybe stop calling them assault weapons, eh? But it says here,

“The Department of Homeland Security is seeking to acquire 7,000 5.56x45mm NATO ‘personal defense weapons’...”

 

Alan: {Laughs}

“... also known as ‘assault weapons’ when owned by civilians. The solicitation, originally posted on June 7, 2012, comes to light as the Obama administration is calling for a ban on semi-automatic rifles and high capacity magazines. Citing a General Service Administration (GSA) request for proposal (RFP), Steve McGough of RadioViceOnline.com reports that DHS is asking for the 7,000 ‘select-fire’ firearms because they are ‘suitable for personal defense use in close quarters.’ The term select-fire means the weapon can be both semi-automatic and [fully] automatic.”

 

Alan: That’s the difference too, from the ones they sell to civilians. You can’t get fully automatic. And it goes on about... it keeps calling them personal defense weapons. So, you got to start using the same term, “personal defense weapons”, folks. Back with more after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. All these links, remember, I’ll put up tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com after the broadcast. And, talking about the so-called assault rifles or personal defense weapons – which is far better, you know, it sounds better, because if they’re taking your personal defense away from you, that’s not a nice thing is it? But that’s how they word it themselves. It depends who’s got them. And there’s a lot of links on this website too, from the government ones too, for their request for these new rifles and so on, and so on and so on, and the different press releases that came out from the different people involved in the legislation, as well. So I’ll put that up tonight.

Also, interesting too, in so-called “up-and-coming” economies... how can they still call China an “up-and-coming” economy? like it’s still Third World. You know what I’m saying? Everything is made in China for the whole planet now. And we’re still actually building hospitals and all that, through the different trade agreements we gave them. So anyway, it says,

“BEIJING — How does one eat a banana gracefully?  With a knife and fork, slicing it into thin slivers  —  of course!”

 

Alan: It’s all about finishing schools for Beijing’s Olympics and so on, different things as well. But it’s also to do with the massive service industry. Complete service industry, if you get my drift, for folk going over to China, foreigners going over, and how most folk nowadays are coming from China and so-called up-and-coming countries and not from the old countries that are all falling apart, like Britain and elsewhere. And they go to learn it in Switzerland and they do a six-week course there and so on. A six-week course for finishing school costs around $20,000 there. Eh? So, they’re now bringing a finishing school and all their techniques back to China. And it’s going to really take off big time. So, I’ll put that up tonight too, to show you who’s coming up in the world, who’s going down and so on.

And then British troops, again, because they’re getting leaned on, have to get involved in Mali. They’re sending 200 to 300 so-called personnel to advise; they always start with advisers; that’s how Vietnam started too, the advisers, but they send troops in and then they bring more troops in and more troops in and more troops. Mind you too, they’ve got a lot of land to plunder yet and a lot of minerals and oil, gold and stuff that’s never been tapped before, so they’ve got to keep plundering to keep the bankers happy, because we’re all broke apparently.

Then this is an interesting article here too from the New York Times. It says,

“Oh to Be Jewish in China”

 

Alan: And he says it’s surprising that in China they know what being a Jew means and they say:

“Ah, so clever!’ the Chinese person will say with a nudge. ‘So good with money! The Chinese and the Jews — we have so much in common!’”

 

Alan: It says here. And they talk about,

“Aside from visits to the Chabad community center for the High Holy Days and Passover meals shared in Jewish friends’ courtyard homes, little differentiates me from the thousands of other Europeans living in China’s capital.”

 

Alan: The interesting part is it goes into how old Judaism has been in China; that there have been different communities in the past. Other ones have blended into China’s stream over many years. But there’s more business people over there and Jewish communities as well. It also goes into the fact that “During World War II, tens of thousands of Jews fleeing Nazi Germany were welcomed in China.” And it’s true. I’ve talked about the Fugu Plan. A good book to read, written by a Japanese rabbi, and he talks about how they set up Shanghai under agreement with the big bankers in America, to make it a free zone for Jews, where the Japanese wouldn’t touch them at all and they were quite safe there. The Japs just went around killing the Chinese folk, but they left all these refugees quite safe. Vidal Sassoon was in charge of it. He had the biggest casino house in the whole of Shanghai before that all happened. But he was in touch with the bankers back in the US to make this deal because they were still lending money to Japan, remember. That is fact they set up the whole military-industrial complex for Japan for World War II.

From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God or your gods go with you.

{Closing Music ♫}

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

Family Values---Baron Benjamin de Rothschild

Israeli Officials Peddle False Story of Explosion in Iran

Google Faces UK Class-Action Lawsuit

Mali---Africa's Afghanistan

Were Ethiopian Women Forced into Contraception?

Israel Admits Birth Control Program for Ethiopians

US Backed Plan to Launch Chemical Weapon Attack on Syria and Blame it on Assad

UK Troop Abuse of Iraqis Systemic

France's President Afraid of Own Military

Are Corporations Masquerading as Government in Australia and World-Wide?

CBS---"Let's Give Up on the Constitution"

France is Totally Bankrupt

Davos Calls for $14 Trillion for "Greening Global Economy"

Cuba's Raul Castro now President of Latin American and Caribbean Bloc

Carbon Prices Crash

Britain's Retailers go Under

When DHS buys "Assault" Rifles, they call them "Personal Defense" Rifles

Finishing School for "Emerging" Economies

Britain's Deepening Involvement with Mali

Oh, to be Jewish in China