March 14, 2013 (#1287)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt March 14, 2013:
Bill Gates Candour Reveals Delusions of Grandeur:
"Rich Boy Gates wants Obama to Have More
Bypassing Congress, It's Old-Fashioned, Sour,
Says the U.S. System should Be Like Britain,
Where the Real Rulers are Kept Well-Hidden,
You See, Marketing-Made Geniuses Like Old Bill,
Think Business Moguls should Rule the Hill,
Slow Debates and Arguing within the Congress
Are Impeding Movers and Shakers of Progress,
Rockefeller says Philanthropists should Participate
In Governance, Because it's Their Natural Fate,
Yes, The Great Tax-Free Charitable Institutions
Want to Force Through More Revolutions
Where Themselves, as Experts, Should Rule Over All,
So the Old-Ways Republic Just has to Fall"
© Alan Watt March 14, 2013
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - March 14, 2013 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND –
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 14th of March 2013. For newcomers, as always, make good use of the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com and help yourself to the information there, lots of audios for free download. You’ll find the sites listed on the .com site all have transcripts too in English for print-up of a lot of the talks I’ve given; not all of them but quite a lot of them. You can also go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts in other languages. Remember too, that you are the audience that bring me to you. I don’t bring on advertisers as guests and so on. I don’t push products to save your lives or make you live till you’re 500 years old or whatever. I just tell you what’s happening in the world, why it’s working the way it is, why things are going the way they go. Because you find you’re living through a big system, a big system with lots of planning at the top, like a pyramid basically with a capstone at the top, and a need-to-know basis too for all the layers, all down to the bottom.
If you look at the dollar bill, for instance, they always have that same old pyramid there, very ancient symbol of course. You’ll see the grass growing round about it, like weeds, and that’s what they actually say, that the weeds are the general population. Because all those who are higher up, you see, above the rest of the population, live off of the population. As Manly P Hall and others talked about too, that basically this is the law of nature; this is what they really believe in the top. And they call themselves pragmatists, they’re very pragmatic people, and therefore it’s their right to do so. That’s how the world is really structured. The whole con is make people believe they’re free, to believe they have… even though all the evidence points against it when you look around you and you read the daily papers. The fact is too, you find the big boys too, teach you to love your servitude as well; they have many techniques of doing that too. They always pick the youth of course. The youth are very easy to bring in because they’re very idealistic and they can go for idealism, and create new forms of the next generation, through the youth. And that’s been done with every tyrant down through history; it’s still happening today of course.
So anyway, help yourself to that, find out what's happening, and you can support me by buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. [Order and donation options listed above.] And straight donations are seriously welcome, because as I say, I don’t ask for income from anywhere else. And years ago I thought about coming out to tell the people what was really going on, what I had studied basically for many, many, many years. Because I knew from a very early age – we had good libraries in Scotland actually – with all of the big players at the time, who were designing the future. And they gave their books out there. They worked in think tanks. They had obviously a very high authority to work in international think tanks to plan the future, not like some sort of happy Christmas wish list. They actually did it on authority from a very high source obviously. So I knew that governments were really much lower down on the scale of things than whatever run the world. And that truly is the way it is.
You’ll find the big foundations, private foundations, disguised as charitable foundations, who run the biggest think tanks on the planet, are really fronts for the international bankers; they are tax-free foundations. These guys who hire the NGOs, who create massive lobby groups, full-time paid lobby groups working for these foundations who lobby governments to get agendas through, they run the world. And they actually call it the parallel government. Many of the big players themselves have called it that too in the past, including Margaret Thatcher, who said that when she retired, she says, she joined it. And she says, we don’t retire when we leave as Prime Ministers or presidents either, because we all know each other, we know all the high bureaucrats, how things work in the world, and we can get things done quietly, behind the scenes, without being responsible to the public. They are the doers for the big plan. Back with more after this.
Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix. I’ve mentioned for years that the big boys, of course, even though they bypass democracy when it suits them of course... I mean, what is democracy anyway? I mean, how much input do the public have on anything? I know in Canada, and even in the local governments in Canada, even in Sudbury not far from where I am, one of the people who questioned the elections one year, got right into Ottawa and he asked them, what is democracy? Because he was complaining about a guy, a local candidate in Sudbury. They were told, democracy is the right for people to vote someone in; when they get in, it doesn’t matter what they do. It doesn’t matter what they do, at all. You can’t recall them either; they can do whatever they want. So, the only duty you have, if you live in a so-called democratic society, is to vote for somebody.
Now, it’s quite easy once you have all the somebodies belonging to certain groups and parties especially. It’s a bit of a joke, because someone who wants to climb the ladder will smell the wind basically and they’ll know who is going to get in next, depending on how unpopular the present party happens to be. So they know which way the wind goes and if they have the right contacts too they’ll get up there. And you’ve got to be a bit psychopathic anyway to be a politician, a salesman really, a salesman’s attitude, and lies must come easily to you, and you must be able to always put a smiling face on whatever you’re saying no matter what it is, and talk round subjects rather than at subjects or about subjects.
So the world you live in is, again, a manipulated managed system really and the general population are given very little attention at all. You’re given more propaganda in fact, to keep you happy and out of things. Most of the people are really oblivious to what’s happening in the world. They have been trained to sort of leave it to the better people above them. That’s how they think of them, they’re sort of special, better people that come out of special wombs, and things just get done, and they can play. The whole thing is about getting by, paying your rent or your mortgage or whatever and getting by month per month, and playing as much as you can. Psychiatry will back that up, because psychiatry was invented, actually, to be part of the system and to bring in a so-called expert opinion on what’s normal, what isn’t normal and so on, down the road, for political purposes, which is getting used now. Because now you’re getting labeled: Are you normal politically? Or do you have abnormal ideas politically? and all this kind of stuff. You’re getting categorized; we’re all being categorized all the time.
So anyway, we are heavily manipulated at the bottom level. Even with the Internet too, years ago I mentioned articles where they said that the Internet wouldn’t really emancipate people. It could be used, certainly, by the big boys themselves, who naturally have more control over the Internet since they can put up as many sites as they want and as much money behind them as they want to get as many viewers or listeners as they want, to push particular agendas. Because that’s how the people are, they’re already trained that the biggest must be the best, just like television. So it’s easier for them to get things moving, and even their color revolutions, now of course with their cell phones and everything else too, and their tweeting, etc., all of that is being used by the big boys for their own advantage.
So we’re very easy to manipulate at the bottom level, because most folk... and it’s not their fault. They’ve all been trained. In fact, they’ve been really crippled in a sense by the educational system and the general schooling not to think or reason for themselves. In fact, that’s imperative that you stop thinking for yourselves and just accept things by authority. Whatever they say, the school teacher is the authority figure, believe what they say, parrot what they say and you’ll get on in life. And then you’re okay, you’re normal then, you see; that’s it. Whereas at very elite private schools it’s the opposite. You’re encouraged to reason. You’re encouraged to argue in fact, on the basis of reason and rhetoric. Of course that’s why they’ve got a different agenda for those people in the higher schools. It’s very, very simple. And I’m not just making this up. This is all in their own books in fact. Many of them have talked about it themselves and written their biographies, etc; I’m talking about the big power players themselves.
But this agenda, even with the sham democracy that we have... I mean, how can you have democracy when all the major things that have happened, even in your own lifetime, like taking all of your industry to China, did they ever ask any of the peoples if they wanted that to happen? Of course not. Governments one after the other signed integrating deals with the GATT treaty, again, creating a private group – the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs – and with the World Trade Organization, again something the public hadn’t even heard of and weren’t told of until it was all done. And that allowed your companies to not just get up and go, they had actually agreed, through all these agreements over the many years, that when it happened the taxpayers would fund all those factories to move so as the corporations wouldn’t lose any money, and we’d also pay for their setup, and any losses incurred for the first 10 to 15 years. So as I say, that’s democracy for you.
For other folk of course, on the far left, they think democracy is more and more government, more and more programs, more and more welfare, and so on. They never push for more jobs. Isn’t that weird, you know? And of course they know that too, because they’re controlled just like the right wing is too, by the same bunch. One group rules them all. But again, at this stage democracy is still a bit of a nuisance at times, when the governments are so overt in what they do, when they must keep up the façade that there is such a thing as democracy. They have complained about it many, many times especially in the US. Because the US is a different system than most other countries. Most other countries copied the British system because they were part of the old British Empire; they still are actually. Whereas in the US of course there was a separation of the powers and the divisions of government, a sort of check and balances. It doesn’t work that well nowadays because once again you have cliques, or groups, or private organizations within government.
The Council on Foreign Relations admits that, at least their own historian did, Carroll Quigley, that they put presidents and prime ministers in different countries, and they put the high bureaucrats in too, in all governments. So you have these cliques who have a different agenda than the electorate even know about. In other words, they want to bring it to more like Britain though. Where Britain, I mean, Britain is still under royalty. Everybody who works for government in Britain or any British institution, even the postmen and the police and the military, swear to the Queen, not to the people of Britain or to the British government. So, they still call it a democracy. So it’s all farce, you see.
Anyway it says here… Bill Gates: I wish Obama had more power, he says. Now, this is the idea that they’ve talked about in different foundations. Many of the big clubs and foundations have talked about giving more power to expert authorities to run the world, to bypass democracy. The idea was to use philanthropists. They had articles too, by the big foundations themselves, put out by the Rockefeller foundation and so on, that they should participate more in world governance, you see, experts and philanthropists, and the rich men who had already made it, you see. So here it comes and Bill Gates says…
Bill Gates: I wish Obama had more power
The Microsoft chairman bemoans the fact that there isn't enough power in the U.S. presidency and wishes it were a little more "like the U.K."
news.cnet.com / Chris Matyszczyk / March 14, 2013
One of the many lovely things about engineers is that they like to get things done.
Bill Gates is an excellent example. You might not always like how he gets things done -- or even what gets done -- but done it gets.
The lack of ability to get things done is one of the Microsoft chairman's greatest frustrations.
He expressed this quite eloquently yesterday when being interviewed at Politico's "Playbook Cocktails" event.
Indeed, as the Daily Caller reports, he said he sympathized with President Obama for having to work with some of the halfwits in Congress.
Well, he didn't quite put it like that.
Refusing to answer who was his favorite president, Gates did venture: "You don't run a business like this." (Alan: So, see, these guys see the country collectively, and all the businesses, as one big business. I’ve said that before, that’s how they’ve always seen it. That’s how your tax boys run it too. Collectively it’s all one big business.)
He also added that he wishes that President Obama had, well, the kind of power Gates had at Microsoft.
He said: "Right now it feels like I wish there was slightly more power in the presidency to avoid some of these deadlocks. So I think what he (Obama) wants to do and what he's actually able to do, the gap is so big there that it's hard to know in some ways." (A: So he was kind of obfuscating some of the things here, but the fact is he wants him to have more power and just get things done by, I guess, Executive Order in other words, and maybe even change some laws so as that he can take more power for himself.)
He said: "Some days I wish we had a system like the U.K. where, you know, the party in power could do a lot and you know, you'd see how it went and then fine you could un-elect them."
But what he doesn’t mention of course, in the British system, I have never seen a party in Britain that’s come in and changed anything major, and then the next party, their opposite party comes in and tosses it all out. They keep it going, whatever it was, change, they keep going. Because it’s all a joke. It’s all a joke, folks. But this is, as I’m saying, what they’re really pushing for in the States now too. And it’s also in the Politico and the Daily Caller as well, the same articles. I’ll put them all up tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. But that’s what they’re pushing for, as I say. Also this one here, there’s a video with it too, I’ll put that up too so you can hear what he actually said himself.
Gates: Government putting up immigration hurdles - politico.com / JESSICA MEYERS | 3/13/13
Bill Gates: ‘Some days I wish we had a system like the UK’ to give Obama more power [VIDEO] - dailycaller.com / 03/14/2013 / Nicholas Ballasy
But remember too, that the philanthropists really do believe they have the right to interfere in world governmental policies, because they know there is a world government of a sort, and their foundations all interconnect together to make it happen. I mean, this guy is all over the planet giving out or funding all these special health care for women – we know what that really means – and also vaccinations for children all over the place. And he actually is up there on YouTube saying that these vaccinations will help reduce the population. I mean, what does that mean? Is that making folk healthier? Well, they’re certainly getting some agenda done. Back with more after this.
Hi folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Also too, since 9/11 in 2001 we’ve had so many changes in society that people can’t even keep up. Most have adapted to them, gradually, or some even quickly in fact, and gone along with everything. They think it’s all quite natural now that there is no real privacy anymore. That is reinforced by the Internet and all the laws they’ve pushed out there too, telling you, frequently, that all your data is being collected on everything that you do. So people are being trained constantly and it’s all being reinforced. Even the articles about further intrusion, I mean how far can you go when they’re already doing it all? So you understand, when they keep telling you more and more intrusion, there’s not more at all. They’re just reinforcing it, to make sure you subconsciously get the point, that everything you do is being monitored and you’re accepting it. See, the whole point is legally you’re accepting it. And that is an agreement, legally, if there’s no comeback from you on anything. So the public agree to the changes. And that’s how the historians will write it down too, the public accepted the changes and there was no outcry etc., etc., etc.
But part of it too, is to reform even the general media. Now, the media has always been part of the big system. Of course it has. And they’ve always gone along with certain laws and plans, in the past anyway, especially in times of war and what they can report, what they can’t report, and they’ve all been used for propaganda purposes too. But we also have the Council on Foreign Relations that admits that all through the US and Britain and other countries now too, they pretty well own the media. All the top reporters on television and newspapers are all members – they’ve all been asked to be members; you can’t just go and join it – and the editors and owners too, are members as well. So they have their own rules and regulations in this organization, this private organization, and they decide what you’re going to be told or not. But they can still once in a while have a little dig at somebody they don’t like so much. But that’s to all change now too.
I’ve mentioned it too, that Britain and Australia have now put forth laws – they’re into law now – on reforming the media on what they can say, what they can’t say and so on. In other words, complete censorship... for the occasional, I guess for the free papers that are out there that don’t come under all the regular rules of the big boys. Anyway this one is from Australia and it says…
Media giants divided over law reform plan
abc.net.au / Mar 13, 2013
I’ll put that up tonight too; I won’t bother reading it on the air because I’ve read something similar before. But it’s amazing how it all works together at the same time in different countries. Doesn’t it? It shows you the power of coordination, if you own a big corporation that runs the world, doesn’t it? Because everything happens that way. All the laws that are passed, you’ll find, in your own countries, are passed in every other country at the same time. And I saw that years ago when I traveled across Europe and each country you went to you’d find, my God they’re passing the same laws as Britain did and France did, and Norway did and Sweden did, and at the same time. But no country tells you that everybody else is passing that same law at the same time, so you think it’s just your national government that’s doing it. It’s been like that for a long, long time.
And the United Nations too, is one of the biggest organizations that passes or actually puts the laws on the books; they draft them up and just hand them to the governments to sign. The same as the private organizations. And by the way, the UN is a private organization, for those who don’t know it. The Council on Foreign Relations is a private organization. The Royal Institute of International Affairs is a private organization. Private, completely private, and they all are. And so is the Gates Foundation by the way, and here they are going to countries deciding, basically, how to bring the populations down and so on. Think about that. So anyway, as I say, your media isn’t going to help you, I’m afraid. Because they’ll give you lots of stuff too that will make you say, oh that’s terrible, that’s terrible, that’s bad, that shouldn’t be happening... EMOTIVE things to get you worked up, but really that you can’t do anything about. But they don’t tell you anything, the nitty-gritty stuff of what’s really behind anything, what the big long-term agenda is, what the goals are, who’s involved and so on. And the only time someone at the top falls from grace is when they haven’t been paying their dues to the big club that they belong to. Really that’s what it is.
This article too is to do with how the movies work. I mean, they used to in Britain play old, old American reruns, sometimes 10, 15, 20 years out of date basically. But they used to do a series called Get Smart and it was a comedy about the CIA. Even then they showed you the hand printing to get into buildings and so on, with the hand scanners and eye scanners and so on and fingerprint scanners. Since then of course there have been many, many movies where you’ve seen people take prints off of people’s drinking glasses, make up ones with plastic and so on, and then use them to take access. Well…
Brazilian doctor used 'fake fingers' made of silicon to sign in absent colleagues in 'ghost worker' scam
dailymail.co.uk / Becky Evans / 13 March 2013
So apparently she had all these spare fingers when she was caught; they were all plastic ones with the fingerprints; and she covered for about six guys who didn’t bother turning up most of the time. I guess she got paid for it too, but she took the heat as well. But it just shows you this sort of thing. It doesn’t matter what they make, you see, at this level, see, it’s not necessary. They know that. All of this stuff is getting you used to the idea that eventually, obviously, they’re going to chip you. That’s what they’re going to tell you. Well, see, everything else can be faked, you can get a contact that will change your iris scan and the whole bit, somebody else’s contact, you know, or something taken from their eye basically, and copied. You’ll even find opticians, they’ll be scanning that too and photographing this stuff too, making a killing off it, if they’re not doing it already, and making contacts for other people to use. So they’ll have to say, oh we’ll have to put an implant in you. That’s what all these articles are for. That’s the only purpose for them. It’s not just trivia. Most of them, they’re just trivia, but it’s also to reinforce that they’re going to have to… Well, what else can they do? We’ve got to be safe. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix. Now, the media, as I say, spins things and it’s quite safe to put little exposés like this about Dick Cheney out; they don’t really care, and of course it’s no harm to Cheney whatsoever. But this is from the Times and it says…
Dick Cheney: The Architect of the Iraq War
thetimes.co.uk / March 14, 2013
(A: ...which is not true; he wasn’t the architect of it at all, because the PNAC group had talked about it in the early 90s, and published articles twice in the 90s, about the list of countries they wanted to take out. And we know what the neocons were, of course. They were all neocons, meaning that they basically had allegiance to another country. But anyway, this is their spiel here and it says…)
Dick Cheney, the architect of the Iraq war, has used the tenth anniversary of the start of the conflict to defend the invasion, America's misuse of intelligence and the use of torture techniques.
President Bush’s Vice-President who was the most hawkish advocate of an attack on Saddam Hussein (A: He wasn’t just the only one. There was Wolfowitz, there was all the different ones in that same group, and other guys too who had dual citizenship in other countries, wanted this country taken out.) Still stands by some of the most discredited evidence used to go to war, which featured in the British government’s dodgy dossier, and reflecting on the heavy cost and consequences of the invasion. He insists, if I had to do it all over again, I’ll do it in a minute. (A: Well that’s exactly what Tony Blair said too. It also came out today that Tony Blair and of course Bush had met long before the Iraq invasion and discussed it and so on. There was even an article that came out today, I won’t even put it up because it’s so disgusting, by Richard Haass from the Council on Foreign Relations saying that he thinks that the Iraq war could have been a mistake but he understands why the US had to do it. He says they had to do it to show the world that they weren’t powerless anymore, and to force democracy on other countries. So they used Iraq, basically, just blew them up just to teach all the rest of the world a lesson, the ones that weren’t democratic. I mean, basically that’s what he said. It’s all hogwash because they were all part of it at the time; they were all in on it, and what they were doing it for too. So anyway I’ll put this article up tonight too; it’s not very long. It’s not really worth mentioning.)
But this article is from Washington’s Blog and it goes on to say…
Cheney Admits that He Lied about 9/11
washingtonsblog.com / March 8, 2013
In a documentary soon to appear on Showtime, “The World According to Dick Cheney,” [Cheney said] “I got on the telephone with the president, who was in Florida, and told him not to be at one location where we could both be taken out.” (A: He says. This is when it happened, 9/11.) Mr. Cheney kept W. flying aimlessly in the air on 9/11 while he and Lynn left on a helicopter for a secure undisclosed location, leaving Washington in a bleak, scared silence, with no one reassuring the nation in those first terrifying hours. (A: This is his story, which is nonsense.)
“I gave the instructions that we’d authorize our pilots to take it out,” he says, referring to the jet headed to Washington that crashed in a Pennsylvania field. He adds: “After I’d given the order, it was pretty quiet. Everybody had heard it, and it was obviously a significant moment.”
In other words, Cheney pretended that Bush had authorized a shoot-down order, but Cheney now admits that he never did. In fact, Cheney acted as if he was the president on 9/11. (A: Well looking at George Bush I guess somebody had to, eh? Why do you think they put him in the front-man position for, him, of all people?)
Cheney lied about numerous other facts related to 9/11 as well. For example, Cheney:
- Falsely linked Iraq with 9/11 (A: ...and it’s true.) (indeed, the entire torture program was aimed at establishing such a false linkage; and Cheney is the guy who pushed for torture, pressured the Justice Department lawyers to write memos saying torture was legal, and made the pitch to Congress justifying torture. The former director of the CIA said Cheney oversaw American torture policies) (A: He was overseeing it.)
- Falsely claimed that spying on Americans, torture, the Patriot Act, the Afghanistan war, the Iraq war and the “war on terror” were all necessitated by 9/11 … when all of them started or were planned before 9/11 (A: And they were, in the 90s they were planned, by the US, by the PNAC group [Project for the New American Century].)
- Falsely stated that an attack such as 9/11 was unforeseeable (A: ...an unforeseeable event...), when Al Qaeda flying planes into the World Trade Center and Pentagon was something which American military and intelligence services – and our allies – knew could happen (A: So it wasn’t unforeseen at all. They had already covered every possible scenario that could possibly ever happen basically.)
- Falsely pretended that he was out of the loop during the 9/11 attacks
- Falsely blamed others for 9/11, when Cheney was in charge of all of America’s counter-terrorism exercises, activities and responses on 9/11. (A: And it’s got a link here…) See this Department of State announcement and this CNN article …
See, they’re constant liars. What gets me is the mainstream, like the Times and all the rest of them, don’t mention any of this stuff, even though they printed it all before at the time. See, reality is constantly being changed, constantly being changed. Nowadays they do it very quickly; they can do it within months or a year. And this is years later, they’re still changing it all. And of course, heads will never roll for any of this stuff that they’re doing, when governments and private… remember, the PNAC group was a private group, who all ended up in government, at the top of government, of a whole nation, like the military of the US. I mean, that’s a powerful private group to get in there, isn’t it? Under the neocons. The biggest military on the planet and here’s their whole agenda, already mapped out; they’d published it many years before. It’s astonishing this can happen. And the media is quiet about it.
Now, also, back in the 90s, every government in the world got together in France to sign an agreement, and every country had sent bureaucrats over – they were there for maybe one or two years hammering out the deals – to do with foreign investment, under the GATT and the treaties and so on, so that private companies could come into any other country, which before was taboo; it just couldn’t be done that way. Number one, if you’re a country and a nation you’re supposed to take care, number one, of your own people. That was always what national countries were about, having a nation in the first place. Food security was a priority. So the governments would get involved and would stop exporting lots of grain, for instance, when there wasn’t going to be enough at home, or if it was going to cause too much of price increases back home. Well that’s all gone now, because everything is global, you see, through these free trade deals.
So in France they signed all these deals, and also, if a country wants to come into your country, any country at all, and set up whatever kind of organization, they can bring in their own workers; we’re seeing that across the world now. So you can’t forbid that. If you try and forbid them bringing in their own workers they can sue the nation; that’s already happened in other countries too, where they’ve been sued, successfully sued, and the taxpayer ends up paying the massive fines. They can also bring in workers, and hire local workers, and they want to, eventually, according to this treaty, pay your workers in your country the equivalent wages that they get paid back in their old countries, like, say, India or China. And if you complain about that, because that’s way below your minimum wage, they’ll sue you again, and they will win, through the World Trade Organization. It’s all been signed.
So technically you have no nations anymore, except for the reasons to be taxed upon. That’s the only purpose of having it anymore, if you haven’t figured it out. And eventually that’s going to go global too. But it says here…
Chinese firm puts millions into U.S. natural gas stations
reuters.com / Nichola Groom / Mar 14, 2013
(Reuters) - ENN Group Co Ltd, one of China's largest private companies (A: Now, how come China’s got a large PRIVATE company? How private can it be when China is still marked down as communist, and it’s the People’s Republic of China, which it supposedly owns all the businesses in China. Hmm?), is quietly rolling out plans to establish a network of natural gas fueling stations for trucks along U.S. highways.
(A: Now, the US is fracking all over its own land now and for years they’ve been pushing for fracking, which people really didn’t want because eventually it does pollute the land, there’s no doubt about it, the ground. At the land subsides too; it starts collapsing when you create these deep caverns of nothingness under the ground. Everything collapses in on itself too and then houses have to move out of the area, etc., etc. And they pump all these chemicals in too, for the hydraulic fracking and this stuff gets into all the groundwater. So anyway, the thing is, they are fracking America, Canada, Australia is doing it, they just put a plan into Australia to do it there. Germany is doing it. And even little Bulgaria has got an agreement to do it. Everybody is going to go fracking, you see. The whole idea, when they were pushing it for years, to get the public won over, they said, well you see we have to be sustainable. Canada has to be sustainable. America has to be sustainable. Self sustainable. And I mentioned last month or so, the article, well now that they’re getting that out of the ground in the US, and getting public money thrown at it, so that America can have its own private gas you see, for its own people, now they’re exporting it to India. Right. Well this one is about China, you see. And it says…)
China's largest private companies is quietly rolling out plans to establish a network of natural gas fueling stations for trucks along U.S. highways.
With plans to build 50 stations this year alone, ENN joins a small but formidable group of players -- including Clean Energy Fuels Corp and Royal Dutch Shell Plc -- in an aggressive push to develop an infrastructure for heavy-duty trucks fueled by cheap and abundant natural gas. Clean Energy is backed by T. Boone Pickens and Chesapeake Energy Corp.
The move is yet another example of China's ambition to grab a piece of the U.S. shale gas boom. Just last month, Sinopec Group said it would pay $1 billion for some of Chesapeake's oil and gas properties in the Mississippi Lime shale.
The natural gas bounty is also expected to help wean the U.S. transport industry off its dependence on diesel fuel made from imported crude oil, and the trucking industry is in a big push to use more of the domestically produced fuel. (A: But they’re also exporting it abroad as well. So eventually, if the whole thing was, we’re going to run out of oil, we’re going to run out of oil, we’ve got to be self-sufficient – why would you export anything out of the country? Huh? to foreigners too... and let foreigners run it all? [Alan chuckles.] We’re global... Sorry, we’re all global now, you see, we’re all one big happy world, with very rich folk across the world running everything now.)
Nearly half of the garbage trucks sold in the United States last year run on natural gas. They are able to refuel at dedicated stations at their home bases. To convince the far larger market for long-haul trucking to run on natural gas, truckers need to know they can refuel along their highway routes. (A: And of course they give them a couple of bucks off a gallon to start it, which will go up and up as it gets more popular. It’s all worked out that way.)
Now, I’ve mentioned before that the Royal Institute of International Affairs, that wanted to bring in an expertly-run world, by people who were already incredibly rich, the richest people on the planet, and they should be the natural ones to rule the world since they were already stinking rich, and provided, remember, that the ones at the top had shown that they’d held onto power and wealth through their families, for quite a few generations; that was a stipulation. They also said that through the creation of private central banks they would unify them under a super union basically, and this super union would then work with the International Monetary Fund which they also set up, but this super union would be under the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland. This has all happened. This is how it’s working today.
Now if you really have separate countries and all the rest of it, why would you get the World Bank... have you looked up to see what the World Bank is? It says…
Global growth to remain tepid until 2015, says World Bank
bdlive.co.za / Mariam Isa / March 5 2013
(A: Well the World Bank works with the Bank for International Settlements and they decide on all the currency exchanges and all the rest of it, and they decide too who they’re going to give loans to and who they’re not going to give loans to, you see, from the Bank for International Settlements and The International Monetary Fund. They decide who’s going to live and who’s going to die, who’s going to prosper and who’s going to get poor. This is what they do. So, so much for free competition and all the rest of it. The whole thing is controlled now, exactly as they said a hundred years ago they’d do, before they set up these particular banks. Now, we all pay money into the World Bank. Your governments signed deals with the United Nations to throw money at the World Bank, just to be members, and they can demand on you how much they need or want from you, even if you’re going to get nothing back. But they still classify it as a private bank. What a con that is, eh? So it says here…)
GLOBAL growth will not get seriously under way until 2015, with industrialised countries stagnant until then (A: Which ones are the industrialized countries?), the World Bank’s chief economist, Kaushik Basu, said on Tuesday.
There was a "moral urgency" for emerging countries to think of ways to keep their growth rates up during this period of sluggish economic expansion, he said at a public lecture in Johannesburg during a visit to South Africa.
"I do feel that there will be a certain period of global slowdown up to 2015 ... the global recovery will be small until then," Mr Basu said.
His view is in line with consensus. Old Mutual Investment Group South Africa economist Johann Els said on Tuesday that loose monetary policy in many countries would not offset tight fiscal policy, keeping global growth tepid for a couple of years. (A: Now, you’re being trained to go into austerity. It’s interesting we’re all going into austerity at the same time, and people at the World Bank and the Bank for International Settlements are the ones that seem to be in charge of forcing austerity on the whole planet. Isn’t that quite interesting? They run it all. They run it all. So there you go.)
And this one here too. We had the Jimmy Savile scandals of course, and the ongoing BBC scandals where they’re still arresting people, because the whole thing was a cesspit for years at the BBC, and everyone who had anything to do with the BBC, or even met any of the guys there, knew that was all going on for a long, long time. And they can’t go too high on the scale because there are too many high-ups in the British government, retired and still there, and people who are Lords and all that, involved in it too. But you’ve got to wonder about people as well who hand their children over to celebrities. I mean, they do. I can remember when Polanski ran off from the US, Roman Polanski, because a woman came forward and I think it was Jack Nicholson was collecting young girls, where they had been brought in to model or something for studios. He’d convince their mothers to let him take them for a ride. He’d take them to Polanski’s home; and he’d get them in the bath and of course rape them, Polanski would that is. And these mums just hand their children over to famous faces, and they’re on all of these faces, like it was a natural thing to do, you know. Well here’s one…
Internationally acclaimed artist
'sexually abused young girls in nighties after blindfolding them'
dailymail.co.uk / Kerry Mcdermott / 11 March 2013
(A: Where did he get these young girls, eh?)
A famous artist sexually abused young girls after blindfolding them and dressing them in Victorian-style nighties, a jury heard today.
Graham Ovenden, 70, is accused of offences against four children aged from six to 14 who posed for him between 1972 and 1985.
Ovenden's work includes nude and semi-nude portraits of young girls. (A: Who in their right mind is going to hand over their children, aged 6 to 14, to this guy? I mean, what’s wrong with them? I’m talking about the parents. You know what I’m saying? What happened to society? Back with more after this.)
Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix. And also to do with corruption, corruption is normal now. It’s normalized in society. It’s probably always been there to some degree or another but it’s much, much worse today because everyone is awfully greedy, and you have the me-me generation that are now up there, helping me sort of thing, that’s themselves. And we see articles all the time about it, like this…
Ex-Detroit mayor convicted of widespread corruption after he stole nearly $1 million and spent cash from charity for needy city residents on yoga lessons, golf clubs and travel
Dailymail.co.uk / Mar 11, 2013
Kwame Kilpatrick has been convicted of corruption charges today after a five month trial
The politician took bribes, rigged contracts . . .
They all do that at the top, because all the city contracts or state contracts go through their hands and there’s always kickbacks and so on for getting contracts. They all do that. And Canada’s had the same problem. And that’s normal today. That’s just the way things are. And then you get this one here. [Alan chuckles.] The other one was peanuts. It says…
Nearly 60 charged in Florida gambling scandal
as lieutenant governor quits amid probe
foxnews.com / March 13, 2013 / Associated Press
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Florida's lieutenant governor resigned and nearly 60 other people were charged in a scandal involving a purported veterans charity that authorities said Wednesday was a front for a $300 million gambling operation. (A: [Alan chuckles.])
The organization, Allied Veterans of the World, runs nearly 50 Internet parlors with computerized slot machine-style games, which are normally legal in Florida if most of the proceeds go to charity.
But investigators said the organization's executives gave precious little to veterans and lavished millions on themselves, spending it on boats, beachfront condos and Maseratis, Ferraris and Porsches.
Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi called the alleged scam "callous" and "despicable" and said it "insults every American who ever wore a military uniform."
Lt. Gov. Jennifer Carroll was not among those charged but resigned a day after she was questioned by investigators. (A: Well I’m sure she... it might happen yet.)
The public relations firm she co-owned, 3 N&JC, did work for St. Augustine-based Allied Veterans. A Navy veteran who served in the Gulf War, Carroll also appeared in a TV ad in 2011 promoting the organization's work on behalf of veterans and their families.
Authorities refused to discuss any ties between the 53-year-old Republican and the investigation. Her aides had no comment.
Carroll said in a statement Wednesday that neither she nor the public relations firm was targeted in the probe, and she stepped down so that her ties to the organization would not be a distraction for Republican Gov. Rick Scott's administration. (A: In other words, a deal has been reached.)
The investigation involved 57 arrest warrants and 54 search warrants issued in Florida and five other states: South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Nevada and Pennsylvania. As of midafternoon, 49 people had been arrested. Allied Veterans' 49 parlors in Florida were raided and shut down.
Authorities said they seized about 300 bank accounts containing $64.7 million, as well as sports cars and other property.
Bondi said that when charges are formally filed next week they will include racketeering, conspiracy, money laundering and possession of slot machines.
"It is shameful that Allied Veterans of the World allegedly attempted to use the guise of charitable organization to help veterans in order to lend credibility to this $300 million gambling scheme," she said.
A telephone number listed for Allied Veterans was disconnected. Emails to an address on the group's website were not returned....
Gerald Bailey, commissioner of Florida's Department of Law Enforcement, said the arrests are only the first wave of the investigation and the second wave will look at the "large sums" of money spent on lobbying and donations to political campaigns. (A: ...to pay everybody off; cops, you name it, everybody is on the take. Everybody is on the take, folks. It’s worse than the Soviet system, what it used to be, and modern Russia is. That’s the way it’s all going in this modern moral-relativity, atheistic society.)
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Bill Gates Wishes Obama Had More Power
& More on Above
Bill Gates Pushing the "Rule by Authoritarian Experts Solution"
Australia and Media Censorship Laws
Brazilian doctor used 'fake fingers' made of silicon to sign in absent colleagues in 'ghost worker' scam
Cheney on Iraq---"I'd do it all Over Again in a Minute"
Cheney Admits Lying About 9/11
China Investing in US Natural Gas Fill-up Stations for Trucks
World Bank Decides which Nations Rise and which Nations Remain in Stagnant Economy
Ex-Detroit Mayor Convicted of Corruption
Florida's Lieutenant Governor Quits amid Massive Multi-million Dollar "Charity" Gambling Scam
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"