October 8, 2007 (#22)




Title Copyright Alan Watt October 8, 2007:

© Alan Watt October 8, 2007


Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - October 8, 2007 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes and Callers' Comments)








"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen


There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on


Is the truth so elusive, so elusive as you can see
that it ain't enough baby
To bridge the distance between you and me
There's a list of grievance 100 miles long
There's a code of silence and it can't go on



Hi folks, this is Cutting Through the Matrix, on a very rainy day up in Ontario, Canada. Actually, three rainy days and three nights of rain too. It is October 8th, 2007.


For newcomers, please look into the cuttingthroughthematrix.com site for free downloadable shows from years ago going through the history of the world up to the present time or look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts which you can get and download in the languages of Europe.


Speaking of Europe and speaking of The Council on Foreign Relations, which I'm about to do, I'm going into some of the latest developments on this particular organization and its influence on Europe, because The Council on Foreign Relations, this unelected but very heavily backed body of people, comprising mainly of journalists and ex-politicians, the parallel type government. The ones who pushed the European Union. The ones who are pushing and are behind the America Union. In fact, they drafted up the legislation for it. They've now opened up a European Council on Foreign Relations Office and they've put up their own website with their statements of principles and their agenda, so they're out in the open, at least in Europe. Once again, it's a misleading title because they use Council on Foreign Relations, they are not a governmental body. However, they influence governments because so many of their members are in all governments and this started off with The Royal Institute for International Affairs back in Britain in the early 1900’s, late 1800’s from the Cecil Rhodes Foundation. They merged with the Lord Alfred Milner Round Table Society; debating society and they call themselves The Royal Institute for International Affairs. They were given a Royal Charter on behalf of those who ruled Britain, not the governments, but the people who had always ruled Britain, the big aristocratic families to exist; and they were given lots and lots of funding and power. They also own the press or at least work for the press, generally both, in all countries in fact.


For their non-commonwealth countries, they decided to call themselves branches of The Council on Foreign Relations. Once again, it sounds very official, governmental but it's no more federal than the Federal Express. It's just a title to mislead the public. However, on many newscasts you'll find experts being pulled up from The Council on Foreign Relations in the U.S. and Canada and giving their commentaries on circumstances within the countries. Most people think they're a department of government but they're not. We should get that straight. They are a private organization that have sworn allegiance to a much higher body; a body comprising of ex-prime ministers, ex-politicians, ex-presidents. I'll be back with more on this particular topic after the following messages.



"Everybody Knows" by Leonard Cohen

Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
Everybody knows the war is over
Everybody knows the good guys lost
Everybody knows the fight was fixed
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich
That's how it goes
Everybody knows



Hi. Alan Watt back with Cutting Through the Matrix. I'm going through one of the main organizations that has been promoted by a parallel government. In fact they are part of the parallel government that Professor Carroll Quigley and later professors have occasionally mentioned. Margaret Thatcher mentioned it herself in her speeches when she toured the world. The title of her seminars or speeches were called The New World Order. They're allowed to say these things, but if the ordinary public says the New World Order they say you're crazy and that's just the way it is. However, Cecil Rhodes, if you read his will and read the writings of his society, you'll see that he based the order on the Jesuits. He used the Jesuit techniques. It would be a freemasonic order using the Jesuit techniques of psychopolitics. Psychopolitics is an interesting and vast subject where you look at the long-term range of what you want to do with countries; how you bring them together; how you dominate, take them over through conflict and war or treaty signing. The treaties come generally at the end of wars and then what you're left with you go on to build a bigger superpower and then go to war with the next countries to aren't part of it yet, until you have them all under your wing; and of course the general public would never figure this out. That's how the Jesuit society worked with their machinations, same techniques. Cecil Rhodes was quite open about using these techniques. Why change them when they work so well? Simply adopt them into your system.


It would be a freemasonic society (and they are freemasons) and they are chartered by the British Crown, meaning they're given royal approval with their royal charter to exist to bring this society into being. You'll find that when they joined the Lord Alfred Milner group the Round Table Society into the Cecil Rhodes Foundation, they merged the two and called themselves The Royal Institute for International Affairs. Every Commonwealth country, that's British Commonwealth country, has a member organization. They have one for Australia, an Institute for International Affairs, New Zealand Institute for International Affairs, Canadian et cetera. However, non-European or non-commonwealth countries were to be called The Council on Foreign Relations, the first one to be set-up in New York in the 1920’s in the Harold Pratt Building.  Pratt was a very, very wealthy family that helped fund this in the United States side on behalf of the big boys and the bankers who are behind it too.


Now people should check into the ecfr.eu website. That's the brand new website of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR.EU) for the statement of principles, policies and their spiel about themselves and how they use propaganda. You'll see it's very open there and they use the terms of New World Order and World Order et cetera right openly because they are the main advisers to the guys you actually elect into governments. They advise them. They tell them what to do.


I think Brian in New York is on the line. Are you there, Brian? Hello Brian.


Brian:  Hey, I had a question about Baphomet because he's always seated with one arm up and one arm down and whatever that symbolizes. I know there's far more to it. I was wondering if that Hawaiian hand signal with pinky and the thumb had any correlation with that?


Alan:  Actually you're not far wrong, because when the British came in and the powers came in to the Americas, if you read the history of freemasons, they did what they always did. They picked very powerful chiefs in various tribes and brought them into freemasonry. They also took some back to Britain in fact. Willie Bryant was the first American Indian they brought over. He was in charge of the five nations up in Canada and they brought him over to Britain, gave him an aristocratic wife to wed and he was now eligible to marry within the royal circles of Europe. He came back up to the Americas and he split up the tribes and had half of them fighting for the U.S. side during the War of Independence and half of them fighting for the British side, then his son Norton took over. They used the little apron. That's when they first started to use the apron in front. You'll see the Indians wearing that apron. That came from the lodge and of course, they gave them the sweat lodges and so on and all the rest of it, very Masonic, but they did the very same thing with the Hawaiian culture too. You're quite right.


Brian:  Can I ask another question?


Alan:  Yes.


Brian:  The letters G and M are very interesting. I started reading Peter Wright's "Spycatcher" and Marconi's nickname is GM and his father's nickname is GM and it's also genetically modified, grand master and all that. I was wondering what are the deeper meanings of the letter G and the letter M?


Alan:  G is also to generate. G always stands to generate, it's the phallic symbol, the erect phallic is to generate. You generate the spirit. You generate the power, the force, the vital force of life in the phallus through G, which is to generate. Later down the road you have Gnosis for the lower orders and you also have “to graft” – you're grafted onto the Tree of Life, you’ve become a scion, an S-C-I-O-N, pronounced Sion is no coincidence of course. You're grafted to the Tree of Life, meaning you're eligible again to marry within higher aristocratic circles for breeding purposes.


Brian:  Very interesting.


Alan:  If you take the letter M, the M is really again two – is comprised of two parts of a pyramid, put them together and you have a complete pyramid. You underline it. It's also the letter 3 if you rotate it, and if you put a line next to it or underneath the M, like McDonald's. That's why McDonald's has the M underlined, you have 13 and so it's very important. Then again you put the underlining attached to the M, turn it round again and you've got the letter B, because all masons used to say I BE. Now they say I AM and that's how that came about.


Brian:  Very interesting. Well take care, Alan.


Alan:  You too. Apart from General Motors of course, we have going back to The Council on Foreign Relations here on this particular topic, here’s the statement of principles from this organization. They call themselves the first premiere think tank now of Europe quite openly, an unelected body backed by the big foundations: the big Carnegie, Ford, Rockefeller, Rothschild's, Soros, all these big foundations; the very foundations that Albert Pike talked about creating, because foundations last for many generations. That's why they can take a mandate and take a century, two centuries or three centuries to develop and complete it. That's how it's done, quite simple.


The statement of principles says here:


             "We call on the governments of the European Union to develop a more coherent and vigorous foreign policy, informed by our shared values, dedicated to the pursuit of our common European interests…"


Alan:  Europe never had common interests, that's why they were always at war with each other. It really wasn’t the reason why they were at war, because the big bankers and the princes et cetera arrange these wars in advance to profit, cull off the population and keep things going. It's hard to keep controls over millions of people if there's no threats from outside, so they always had to arrange these wars down through the ages. Read the ancient Greeks. They were masters at this. They used to plan wars with the different islands and decide who was going to be the victor after three or four years and roughly how many they should kill off and how much money they'd profit, because they also ran the armament industry even in those days. Nothing really changes. Here they're talking about common European interests and sustained by European power.


They say:


             We endorse the following principles:


1.      When faced by the great powers of today and the rising giants of tomorrow, individual European countries regard the world as beyond their control. But if it speaks with one voice…"


Alan:  Now here you go, the one voice thing again. When I left Britain and everyone I knew was arguing with each other, there was no voice anywhere, even in the one country.


It says:


"…But if it speaks with one voice, the Europe Union can help shape the world order."


Alan:  Now they never defined what they were going towards, but it’s the Huxlian world order they're talking about.


             "2. It is only by acting together that European Union countries can effectively pursue their common interests…"


Alan:  Again, here's this common interest thing.


             "…from combating climate change…"


Alan:  There's the greening again. Green, green, green. Al Gore's green.


             "…to reducing poverty…"


Alan:  They've been trying to reduce poverty in Europe for about 1,000 years I think.


             "…from defending human rights and averting genocide to stopping the spread of deadly weapons and addressing the causes of violent extremism.


3.      The European Union's foreign policy should be backed up with all of Europe's economic…"


Alan:  Here they want all the taxing power. That's what that means.


             "…political, cultural and, as a last resort, military power."


Alan:  They are forming you see the European army. Out of the mess of all the countries, they’ll bring one super military power into being.


             "Our commitment to strong and effective multilateral institutions must be matched by a drive to increase European influence within them."


Alan:  Now what on earth is a European influence? Because there isn't one, you see. You have French and Ukraine and Polish and so on. You have all these different countries who are very proud of their histories and their heritage and their cultures.


"4.   Starting with the European Union's neighbours, the best way to secure peace and prosperity is to honour existing commitments to countries seeking membership and to encourage political reforms with more generous offers of economic opportunity and political cooperation.


5.      European transformative power can reach beyond its immediate neighbourhood. The European Union should leverage the world's largest single market and most generous aid budgets to promote the values we believe in…"


Alan:  I wonder what values they are. They don't say what they are.


             "…both in other parts of the world and in multilateral institutions. Europeans will benefit from having a stronger voice in the world…"


Alan:  Ha-ha-ha.


             "…and the world will benefit from a stronger European Union."


Alan:  Ho-ho-ho. That's the kind of dribble we're fed from the mainstream media, because these characters you see write for the big financial papers of the world. They're all big top reporters. They're members of The Council on Foreign Relations. I'll be back with more of this particular topic.



"Everybody Knows" by Leonard Cohen

Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
Everybody knows the war is over
Everybody knows the good guys lost
Everybody knows the fight was fixed
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich
That's how it goes
Everybody knows



Hi. Alan Watt back with Cutting Through the Matrix, going through this new ECFR.EU website, Council on Foreign Relations, the European branch – the new combined European branch which has come out in the open. On their welcome to the site, Mark Leonard, who's a main writer I think for "The Economist" and other main newspapers, has some words to say because he's also a member of this organization. He says:


             "The European Council on Foreign Relations is a first ever pan-European think tank."


Alan:  Pan-America, pan-Europe and all these ideas were pushed out at the very beginning when The Council on Foreign Relations was formed. They tried to get treaties passed linking the U.S. especially with various countries of Europe. They also wanted Pan-American treaties signed as well, but it didn't float at that time, so here they are 100-odd years later doing the same thing; because, why change their agenda? They've got all the time in the world with their big institutions and finances.


They say:


             "…the first pan-European think tank with a policy team in seven capitals London, Paris, Berlin, Rome, Sofia, Madrid, and Warsaw—it unites some of our continent's most distinguished researchers and analysts to promote Europe's role in the world.  The ECFR is based on a belief…"


Alan:  Here's a belief here, so it's a religion.


             "…is based on a belief that, in a world order defined by great powers and even larger problems, European countries can either band together and develop common responses, or risk losing influence over their fates."


Alan:  As if they ever really had any.


             "As Martti Ahtisaari, Joschka Fischer, Mabel van Oranje and I explain in today's Financial Times, the ECFR has been launched to fight against Europe's tendency to introversion…"


Alan:  That means nationalism in your own culture.


             "…and to inspire European governments to develop a more vigorous common foreign policy. The centerpiece of our launch is our Statement of Principles…"


Alan:  Now the reason I'm reading this in Canada and also to the U.S. is because we'll shortly get ours given to us by the American branch of The Council on Foreign Relations since we've already had them appear on television as a group, as an official body advising the governments in 2005 with an ex-vice prime minister of Canada, Manley, who was speaking on behalf of the fact that they had drafted up the American integration plans and presented them to the U.S. government and the Canadian government. They drafted them up. Who elected these guys? Nobody. They work for the big royal families of the planet. That's why I'm reading this one on Europe because it's shortly to be announced here.


             "…The centerpiece of our launch is our Statement of Principles which has been written and signed by fifty founding members.  It is a call on governments in European countries to adopt a more coherent and vigorous foreign policy in support of European values and interests backed by all of Europe’s power: political, cultural, economic and – when all else fails – military. We’re now encouraging all European citizens to endorse the Statement and thereby to become Associates of the ECFR. You can read the statement in full and sign up here."


Alan:  Now they want to get as many people joining all the little fools at the bottom that want to have their names added to something, to use the numbers racket to justify what they're up too. Remember that the Soviet Union was run by these types of groups, these non-governmental organizations, and they would also put up lists and present them to governments – lists of members, people who'd signed petitions who demanded laws get passed and all this kind of stuff, and the government was only too happy to do so because it was always in line with what the government wanted. This is the same con-game that's going on here because the heads of these organizations, the CFR, don't work for the ordinary people. They don't work for the little people at the bottom who want to become members and sign the petitions. They work for an agenda that was laid over 100 years ago and they want to bring this global system in: This new plantation. This new system where the elite intelligentsia will strut around the world and jet set around the world and keep the peasants in their place. We'll all be numbered and chipped and all the rest of it. That's what it's all about really. Nothing has changed because this came out of the feudal system.


Now they’re bringing invitations into the ECFR events and our Euro talks series: telephone them and yah-de-yah-de-yah and join them if you want to. You’ll be a little number on a petition somewhere. It has all the greening in it, which is going to control your lives, all the green plans. It has the new financial plans for the world all contained within it. These are the characters that Bertrand Russell and all the big boys belong to, the same organization, never changes its spots, just pretends it’s brand new all the time.


Their logo is interesting because it's a circle with a five-pointed star, almost like a ring that you're wear on a finger. They have the star with the fifth point pointing not quite downwards, not vertical, but at about a 45 degree angle, but almost down, which means basically war. That's what that stands for. Now I hear the music coming and I'll be back after the following messages.



"Everybody Knows" by Leonard Cohen

Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
Everybody knows the war is over
Everybody knows the good guys lost
Everybody knows the fight was fixed
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich
That's how it goes
Everybody knows



Hi. Alan Watt back with Cutting Through the Matrix. Just going through some of this new European Council on Foreign Policy, printed up for all to see. Of course, they won't tell you the real agenda. They can't really tell you the real history either, because these characters are all elitists. I have their books from the '30’s, '40’s and '50’s with their global agendas which they held and discussed annually in different countries, places generally where the average person couldn't reach. You know these wild exotic places that you just can't get a ticket to. It's too expensive and that's why they hold them in these places. Same with all the big global meetings with GATT and all the other names we've heard over the last 20 years.


This Council on Foreign Relations is now advising governments which you elect. They're advising on foreign policy and war policies and they're also working with the United Nations, another unelected body of people. I hope people realize the UN is not elected by the peoples of the world. It was simply signed into an agreement by certain members of governments who signed away their national sovereignty back in '45 and '46. In other words, those people were actually traitors. They belonged to these secret societies. They were also involved in politics and they sold your countries out at the time. We’ve been under this for a long, long time. We've been born under it in fact and this agenda is simply a slow step-by-step agenda so that people can be herded into a particular path with a particular destination at the end of it.


Now to go on with this publication that's now up on the website the ECFR.EU. They say:


             "We will also be publishing new analyses of the situation in Afghanistan and recommendations on how European countries can mobilize more effectively at the United Nations in support of our values of protecting human rights."


Alan:  Ha-ha-ha. Tell that to the Rwandans, as the UN sat back and let them all be slaughtered.


             "We’re also partners in an exciting new departure in ‘deliberative democracy’:"


Alan:  Deliberative democracy, this is a new term for you. It means it's a new type of democracy where anything that happens will already be deliberated by people you'll never, ever hear of. In other words, it's an agenda.


             "Tomorrow's Europe, which will bring a representative sample of 400 European citizens together for a weekend of debate and discussion.  To find out more all this week of our launch I'm guest…"


Alan:  This writer, remember, writes for The Economist.


             "…I'm guest blogging at The Economist's Certain Ideas of Europe…"


Alan:  That's the name of the blog.


             "… Certain Ideas of Europe and I will be using the opportunity to focus on some of the key issues, for example on Monday on Europe's foreign policy dilemma in the new multi-polar world."


Alan:  I guess that's worse than bipolar. It must mean we're a basket case.


             "Our launch period culminates in a big event in Berlin on 9 November. The event will gather some 200 European policy makers…"


Alan:  There you go with these policy makers. Now who are these policy makers? We don't elect them. They're sometimes in government, sometimes out of government but always advising governments. They work for the big think tanks like the CFR themselves.


             "…200 European policy makers to discuss the EU’s relationships with Russia, China and its role in the Middle East. The German Foreign Minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, has agreed to be our keynote speaker."


Alan:  Here you have them all together, unelected and elected, all in bed together in a private and secretive organization with its own mandate.


Now it continues:


             "It's great to be up-and-running finally and I'm looking forward to the coming months in which we’ll be bringing a new voice and new ideas to strengthen Europe’s role in the world."


Alan:  Here you have a role for Europe just to inform the European peoples of all the different countries that comprise Europe you now have a particular role. Maybe one day they'll tell you what it is.


             "For those looking for the website in other languages than English, multilingual functionality will be coming very soon. Best wishes, Mark Leonard, Executive Director."


Alan:  Here's this character Mark Leonard, it's a lion of course, executive director who's also a member of this Council on Foreign Relations for Europe. That's the biggest organization you have on the planet. When they first set-up their long range strategy, when they merged the Cecil Rhodes Foundation with the Alfred Milner group, the Round Table Society, debating tables, and called themselves The Royal Institute for International Affairs, they set-up one for Europe to bring in long-term strategy, pre-war and post-war, all agreed at the beginning, because they knew they were going to bring wars in to make it all happen and make it come together. They set-up The Council on Foreign Relations for the U.S. and they set-up the Pacific Rim region as well. They had guys working in all countries in the Pacific areas for the last 70, 80 years. I'll be back with more of this in a moment.


Now we have Jim in Ohio on the line. Are you there, Jim? Hello.


Jim:  Hello. Hi Alan! It occurred to me that the Patriot movement and the 9/11 truth movements, why they're allowed to continue and not being suppressed as much on the internet is that I think it's part of the Hegelian dialectic in that they’re expecting that sort of response.  I'd like to know your thoughts on that and what the end result would be. If the truth coming out is the antithesis, what's the synthesis in that case?


Alan:  I'll tell you, in the Toronto Star about seven years ago there was a half page devoted to intelligence in the Americas with the CIA and the various groups they have in the Americas working at one time against communism. They said in there that in the 1950’s and '60’s the CIA set-up many patriot shortwave radio stations under the guise of Christian groups that would front for them by giving out counter-propaganda against the communist propaganda coming out from Russia and within the United States. And to be honest with you they've never really let go of a lot of these radio networks because they were tremendously helpful for the intelligence agencies. We know that, yes, they use the religion when the U.S. was a very religious country. There's a lot of power when you have millions of people signed on to churches and only a few main figureheads at the top. It's tremendously powerful to control millions of people through propaganda, but they didn't really let go. They have never let go of anything which works. They simply change the format.


In Britain the BBC did a documentary special on some of the patriot groups back in the 1970’s and also some of the supposed white supremacist groups. It's a one and a half to two hour documentary special and they showed you three main city offices or blocks where white supremacists groups were meeting under the guise of patriotism. They raided them and in one particular hall they caught over 200 people that were inside, many of them dressed in fact in their Natzi gear. It's so ridiculous really. The amazing thing was at the end of the night they had to let them all go except two men because they found that pretty well all the members were working for other sting operation groups. They have so many different law enforcement agency groups all working on these things that most of the people in that hall belonged to these particular groups. The two guys they actually arrested were just guys who walked in off the street to get a coffee free.


You've got to realize that most of what they give you for patriot – I don't say all of it, but most of it, a lot of it in the past certainly has been put out by the big sting operations. I know that Bo Gritz for instance who was on shortwave radio for quite a few years and who was always asking for members names by telling them they belong to the militia and they can get a free rifle if you wrote off to the government. You had to give you name and address for the rifle et cetera, it also told the government who you were and what you're ideas were. After 9/11, Bo Gritz had been off the shortwave radio for only two or three months after a fake suicide supposedly, and there he was on the Congressional steps on television being asked who he thought did the 9/11 job. He said "it's probably those paranoid black helicopter seeing, short-wave radio listening, patriot types that caused this to happen." These were his very words, so that man was a shill the whole time he was there. There's other shills out there as well and they've been doing the rounds for years, so you have to be very, very careful.


Now I do know too that in the long-term scenarios the Department of Defence for Britain and NATO (the U.S. is a NATO country), they foresee riots et cetera for the next 30 years as they bring down the standards of living and take away all the old rights that people thought they had. They expect most of them will happen in the Americas and they'll have to cause something within patriot groups to get the ball rolling to get something started so they can point to the general sheep and say, “look, there are crazy people living amongst you. We can't let it go on. We’ve got to keep you safe.”   I did notice that after the Oklahoma City bombing there was an immediate same video sequence they showed all over the world at the same time as soon as that building blew up, and it was of guys in mixed camel gear going through a forest and they said, "these are the paranoid patriot types."  That's what they kept showing after the Oklahoma City bombing. Every country had that clip at the same time, meaning they were given it to show because they wanted to blame militia types at that time and then use them as an example for bringing in marshal law.


You've got to remember that Bill Clinton tried to pass – this is before 9/11. Bill Clinton went and tried to pass through an omnibus crime bill, which was also an anti-terrorism bill, and it wouldn't wash at the time. It was that very weekend when it was turned down, up went the Oklahoma City Center, it blew up and it was passed on the Monday unanimously because that explosion happened and they wanted to blame the militias for causing it at that time. Therefore, if they can't get what they want they'll make the incident happen to cause it, because they must convince the majority of the sheeple you're not safe within your own country. There are crazy people living amongst you. We've got to take your rights away to protect you. The synthesis will be of course when certain groups spring up out of nowhere and start real problems, but, believe you me, it's all worked out in advance at the top. In fact the leaders at the top of the militias I'm sure will be in cahoots with the CIA and the Pentagon. Does that answer you?


Jim:  Yes. Thank you very much.


Alan:  Okay. Yes, we live in a dangerous world. We're always given our leaders. These think tanks will take a problem or something they want to bring into being in the future. They go over all possible reactions to that thing being introduced and they will actually train people in advance before they've even started the ball rolling. They'll train people to take over and be leaders maybe five, ten years down the road and then give them to you. The best way to give you a leader is to give him a build up in the press as being put in prison for standing up for someone's rights or their own or something. This is a standard ploy they even use in movies, these types of movies, just put them in prison. The people will automatically back them up. They won't question them any further and they become a hero and a leader. We've got to be very, very careful of people advocating violence. They want violence. There's no doubt about that, but they’ll want a specific time and no doubt it will happen when they want it and they've got it all planned out.


You can't take on organized military in communication with each other and the whole of the United Nations. You cannot take them on with disorganized bands of people, so we've got to head this off at the pass and find another way of coming at this and diverting it. We can't follow the traditional methods, they're too good at it and they've been at it for centuries. These are old formulas.


Now we have Gary in Tennessee there. Are you there, Gary?


Gary:  Hello. I'm 65 years old and I sit here and kind of watch it. It's kind of like a journey on an ant hill. You've got the worker ants and you have the guard ants and they have those attending the queen and they have the queen ants. It appears to me like a pyramid structure that they're building. What I don't understand is how they think they are going to, depending on how they build the pyramid, how they think that maybe a dozen people are going to control the whole world, because there's something about the human being that has a soul, a spirit and a love of freedom and they try to control that. I think what will happen is that the masses will just rise up and eliminate the whole damn bunch of them.


Alan:  They have discussed all of these particular things in think tanks too, even 50 years ago, so if you can't make the public through persuasion go along with a totalitarian system, then what you do is you alter the people. You physically alter the people and that's what the race towards the genetic engineering has been all about.


Gary:  That was the other question I was going to bring up is that they're going to have to keep us sedated or they're going to have to alter the genes or they're going to have to do something like that because – I don't know. They've got an awful big guy they're working against and that's called God, and I don't think they're going to win.


Alan:  Well, the thing is, God helps those who help themselves. You will have to admit that a lot of people have already succumbed to the propaganda alone, the incredible indoctrination they've had towards nothing but pleasure, pleasure, pleasure and avoid pain by all costs. They're already chipping youngsters for nightclubs now. They're putting chips in their arms right now, making them very trendy, giving it snob appeal. You get silver, platinum, gold and all that kind of stuff. Eventually, if you can make society unpleasant enough you can convince them to take a chip which will take away all their worries; and that will be promoted. Hang on and I'll be back after the following messages.



"Everybody Knows" by Leonard Cohen

Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
Everybody knows the war is over
Everybody knows the good guys lost
Everybody knows the fight was fixed
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich
That's how it goes
Everybody knows



Hi. Alan Watt back with Cutting Through the Matrix and the last few minutes to go. Do we still have the caller on the line?


Gary:  I'm still here.


Alan:  Yes. I'd like to just mention it's an interesting topic because in ancient times they used to say that the fate of God was tied up with the fate of man, meaning that man was given free will. Of course, all holy books across the planet always have a scenario, a time ending where people make choices, the final ultimate choices that end an age and bring in a different period or a new thing, a new being even. Many say that we're at that time right now. You're right with the whole picture with the ant hill or the beehive. It's very similar. An ant is only a wingless bee, you understand. The ants even in the occult are used as those who come in after the bees have done all the work and the ants will clear out all the honey. These are all symbols that they use in the mystery religion that uses nature in a perfect way to describe their agenda. The worker bees are very similar. We have the queen at the top of course and then we have the little drones, the priests around her, and they make the royal jelly; and depending on the food they give you, that's a very important point, you will either be part of the upper priesthood or else you'll be a worker bee. The food itself alters what happens to the bee.


They've done the same with modifying our food as well, they’re using the same scenario by altering all the foods that we are allowed to eat and this was done in secrecy. The Canadian government for instance agreed to let Monsanto and other big organizations, they signed secret agreements with them to test modified food on the public of Canada without the consent or knowledge of the public of Canada for ten years. It wasn't until it broke out of Britain, that particular part of the news, that we found out we were the guinea pigs.  I'll tell you the people are being dumbed down incredibly and part of it I'm sure is the types of foods we're eating. You don't bring in scientists and pay them millions of dollars each per year to make a bigger potato. What they've done with all these very careful genetic selections and recombining of genes from different species even into vegetables et cetera is to produce certain enzymes and perhaps even toxins that will affect the human body. That’s something they had discussed in the days of Aldous Huxley and now it's actually here. We’re under war right now; and to have a sentient people who can fight back and be aware of what's happening to them, you need a healthy population. We're not healthy anymore, as I'm sure you've noticed.


Gary:  I’m quite sure that mankind is going to undergo and is undergoing some terrible times, but I just can't help but – I have to hang on to the belief myself that there's that little spark of goodness in people that is going to rise to the top eventually and prevail eventually.


Alan:  Yes. That's our survival mechanism. We can do it in times of trouble on crisis levels. We help each other. We've got to become human again and bring that out and find out what is important to humanity. Is it each other or the items that we buy and slave to buy? That's where it's coming down to the crunch.


Anyway, for me, that's good night, and Hamish my dog, up here in Ontario, Canada, and may your god or yours gods go with you.



(Transcribed by Linda)