Feb. 15, 2010 (#514)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Feb. 15, 2010:

Madison Avenue Takes Talentless and Forlorn,
Transfusion of Cash - Voila! A Star is Born:

"Propaganda Machine Can Make You Go Far,
Madison Ave Takes Plain Joe, Makes Him a Star,
Take Mr. Al Gore, Various Claims, All Ludicrous,
Says He Invented the Internet, In Spare Time He's Studious?
This Multi-Millionaire Leftie Wouldn't Know the Truth,
Self-Evident from Lies Told in 'Inconvenient Spoof,'
All the Untruths Repeated Over Global Warming,
Is a 'Must-Be' Agenda and it's Up and Forming,
To Dominate Our Lives by Those With Nerve,
Who've Decided Their System is the One You'll Serve"
© Alan Watt Feb. 15, 2010


Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Feb. 15, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 15th 2010.  For the newcomers to the show, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site.  Scroll down the front page and bookmark all the other sites I have up there for future use because once in while I canít upload to the major sites for some strange reason.  It can take up to two weeks to get them going again.  So if you bookmark the other sites you can always get the latest shows and download them.  You can also try these other sites because if you find there is stickiness as you are downloading sometimes on the .com site itís because there are too many going into that one site at the same time and the other ones are perfectly good.  So try them once in a while.  The official sites are [listed above].  For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, they donít have computers and they play them on CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. 


I always say this is the tin can moment to see how many pennies are in it.  Itís up to you to keep me going.  Iím probably the only one out there who doesnít live on advertising income.  Generally you get paid by advertisers and I could do it certainly and Iíd bring them on as guests or mention them once in a while and you get paid each time you do it.  But this way Iíve got a freer hand.  The advertisements that you hear on the show are paid directly by the advertiser to RBN to pay for this air time.  It pays RBN for their broadcast and their satellite, equipment, bills and their staff.  So itís up to you to support me, keep me going at the same time and you can do so by getting the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale on the web site or your can donate to me.  [Ordering and donation options listed above.]  Itís important to keep me going because Iím probably the only one thatís gone this long trying it this way and itís not easy.  Itís not an income by any means and it certainly isnít the way that you support yourself and it certainly is not a business either.  As I say, my hands are free that way.  I can go into areas and talk about things that otherwise I could be restricted if I was backed by companies and so on. 


We live in a world where we see the scams today when they are exposed by people like myself and others who go through the latest scams and show you how they work.  I can also show you how famous people are created.  Itís no different than the creation of, out of thousands of say musicians, you can pick one little group and make them the top.  Itís done by professionals, not by the group.  Iíll talk about that when I come back from this break.


Hi folks.  This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about what we are living through today and how people are risen to astronomical heights of importance and people truly believe they are geniuses and they give their all TO them.  Itís really the same technique thatís used in the creation of a movie star or to raise, say, one of thousands of singers to the top. 


You create a mystique, a persona, and you give them incredible exposure.  The more you tell people out there that this person is the best thing since sliced bread, they will believe it, just by repetition and the fact that you say it.  The more people who say it in the right magazines and the right talk shows on TV, the more they believe it.  It is that simple, honestly.  When you think about how they have risen up people in the past for political agendas, itís no different than raising them up today to superstar status.  I was thinking of people like Al Gore. 


What credentials does Al Gore have?  And yet heís basically the kingpin for the inconvenient SPOOF thatís being taught all over the schools across the planet by mandates of government.  What exactly is he?  What does he have to his credit?  Itís just the creation of a star IMAGE as some kind of ultra-special specialist that gives him the God-like powers to speak, like God, and itís done; it is SO; so mote it be, as they say, and itís suddenly done.  All the papers parrot him, all the media parrot him and governments immediately put new laws into the school for education to make sure the children are brainwashed in a political agenda. 


Itís never been any different when you go into the past, down through history and they gave you famous players and raise them up to the top, the famous players that come out as top scientists, and they are BUILT UP by the media before they even appear to the public for the first time.  They are built up into genius status by repetition and claims.  So if they appear they are immediately treated like a God by the audience.  That truly is how simple it is.  We go into the Royal Society, for instance, in England, and the Masons admit this themselves in their own books and documentaries.  It was a Masonic institution; it still is.  Its core was to lead the world and guide the world by SCIENCES, what sciences should be available to the general population and to governments.  In other words, it came out of the old alchemists schools, as they call them, where alchemists were graded.  They always have the ones who are into real chemistry at the top, and exploration of science.  Then they have all the wanna-bes down below who are not IN on the true acts, who practice mixing eye of toads and newts and making funny smoke and casting spells.  Just like today, you have all the new agers trying to do the same thing through communication of oneness with each other and all that stuff and tapping in to the ALL, the universal consciousness and all that kind of stuff.  They are trying to do what the boys at the top are doing by plugging brains in to computers.  Itís the same thing, you see. 


The reality is that the high echelons of the Royal Society HAVE GUIDED THE WORLD, really, on what was to be made available because one thing in the real alchemists, not the phonies all down below, the real guys were a BROTHERHOOD and they knew their secrets of chemistry and all the rest of it.  Their discoveries were powerful.  They knew the weaponry they could create back then too.   Then knew that Kings, Queens and governments would come to THEM for the power that they could give to the governments and that hasnít changed today either.  We forget, itís not just that knowledge is power, it is particular kinds of knowledge that are very, very powerful indeed.  They also decided that it was time to go into their Age of Reason.  They gave us, again, the heroes for the Age of Reason and prior to that as well.  They built them up into superstar status, the idea being that they would eradicate the old religions and bring in their OWN religion basically, a form or secular humanism but once again, where the scientists now would get risen to the top AS the new priesthood. 


Well, itís quite astonishing since this political agenda, not the scientific cover that itís got, this political agenda of global warming has risen THOUSANDS of scientists up to superstar status with incredible salaries and grants, money thrown at them, and itís all a scam.  So they certainly are benefiting from it.  Luckily, enough scientists have refused to join the IPCC, the phony group at the United Nations OR they have joined it and left when they found out that they were not using science at all.  It was PURELY A POLITICAL AGENDA, once again, to control the direction of the world according to the beliefs of this particular political group.  Thatís how itís done.  As I say, Al Gore is a great example.  Itís the same in the past.  Youíll find that all the major players they give you, especially from Britain because Britain was set to lead the world, right, so you have to make sure that all the main inventors are obviously British.  When you go into the reports of what they were discovering back in the 1500s and 1600s from the Royal Society members, it was all coming from much older texts that they were copying directly from the Moslem countries. 


It is astonishing.  We donít even realize that right up into the beginnings of the 20th century all medicine practiced in the Western world had been taken from Medieval times from Moslems, ALL MEDICINE.  It was the same with all astronomy, ALL astronomy.  There is a very good series that was on TV recently.  It was about the written word and how language developed through writing.  It goes into the era where the Moslem nations were so into sending people across the whole planet to gather ALL knowledge.  Very rich and wealthy leaders in those countries literally spent years and years and years building incredible libraries up, with handwritten books by the people who went out to gather the information on EVERY branch of what we today call scienceÖ all kinds of medicines, all kinds of theories, all religions, astronomy, real sciences too, as well.  They were into dissecting the colors of the crystal, the light in other words, of the rainbow into its true colors, prisms; all the stuff that they were doing hundreds of years later with Isaac Newton and others. 


Again, itís amazing how you can squash a country or a people that you put down into a third world status often, which is wrong again because many of them are not at all, especially people like the Iranians.  You donít want to believe that they could have been way ahead.  It doesnít look good when they are way ahead of the up-and-coming superpowerÖ and they were way ahead HUNDREDS of years ago.  Pretty well all of the philosophers that we know today, all the writings were lost to the Western world and they all came through the Moslem countries in, again, the Age of Translations, as they called it.  They went out and they got copies of all the ancient philosophers; they kept them.  We got them back around the 10th century from the Moslems.  Whatís astonishing to me is the more you read, the more you realize that even the top astronomers who came out in Britain literally took the Arabic writings and translated them right into their own and claimed it as their own basically.  Amazing.  The proof is there, from the original writings of the Moslems.  Astonishing. 


So they created superstars again to lead the world saying we are the greatest; we are the people; we are the greatest.  Thatís how you build up a superpower by saying, yeah, we rule the world; we run it; we are the inventors of everything, you see.  Now itís the USís turn, same idea.  They give you people like Al Gore; build him into a superstar and what is this hack politician anyway?  What is he other than that?  Really?  Yet he is a GOD.  He is a literal God to children around the age of 8 or 9 years of age, who stand in awe of this guy that was Vice president. Thatís all you have to say is Ďvice presidentí and they stand in awe as this guy prattles on about the green agenda and how they are going to live in the future and how they will cut back on the lifestyles that their nasty, rotten parents had, another myth as well by the way.  Thatís how the children are brainwashed.  Everything is political today.  EVERYTHING is political. 


We watched the rise of the superstars.  Pachauri, another one at the IPCC for the United Nations.  What was he before he came into that position?  Here he is making all these POLITICAL statements.  Thatís what they are because they really want to decimate the planet so that the elite, the intelligentsia as they think of themselves, will survive.  Thatís as simple as that.  They also cannot stand the fact that you might be living in a fairly comfortable life and eating well and using up what they call THEIR RESOURCES.  In the Darwinian scale of things, the inferiors must die off soís that the superiors can go ahead and live.  And here you are, eating, chomping away with your French fries.  That just cannot be done, you know.  THATíS WHAT THEY MEAN BY UNSUSTAINABLE, as they jet across the world polluting all over the place and thatís okay.  Iíve even read articles about that; about his private limo and all the rest of it.  He canít even walk a mile to his work, from his £5 million house, one of them, as he writes his porno novels to pass the time. 


These are the characters that they raise up as heroes.  Itís just incredible.  When they are doing it today and you are living through it and you see how itís done and you KNOW it - and out there the listeners to this show certainly do know it - it was exactly the same in the past when they gave us the heroes and the top scientists and all the rest of it, and the Darwinís and long before themÖ POLITICAL reasons. 


I used to laugh when Benjamin Franklin, at the time when he was a Mason, and thatís in his own diaries.  He tells you when he was admitted to the different lodges and the English Rite and so on, and the York Rite and the blah, blah, blah, all the other Rites.  Eventually he was a Grand Master of the Nine Sisters Lodge in Paris.  He initiated Voltaire into them; thatís also in his own letters and writings in the Franklin Institute, so read it for yourself.  He wanted to go down - like all Masons at that time because they thought of themselves as scientists first and men of reason - as an inventor.  He made an awful stove that leached smoke.  They still sell them today or youíll find a few old ones.  But then they said, weíll make you, Benjamin, discoverer of the lightning conductor; youíll go down in history as thatÖ even though the Romans had it 2,000 years ago.  Back with more after this break.


Hi folks.  This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, dispelling the myths of the past and present.  Itís rather astonishing, as I say, how we create these giants in our minds, or the media does at least for us.  Big money certainly does it because you spend a lot of money promoting someone up to the top and creating the myth.  Weíve been given real sciences eventually from real scientists but what Iím saying is, when they create BIG, IMPORTANT people who end up immediately discussing politics and saying how the world should go, you know that there is something else going on.  Youíll always find the other scientists that generally did the real work were displaced and put to the bottom or suppressed and often they simply were eliminated and their work was taken by the political groups.  Thatís another fact of history and the same is true today.  Youíd be surprised how many of the Freemasons especially wanted to go down in history as scientists that brought something to the world. 


With Franklin, heís the perfect example.  He wrote about it, that he was practicing with electricity with batteries.  Everybody in those days was doing it, at the top.  He also was given, supposedly he was the inventor of the lightning rod.  They had to give him something for a sign.  But as I say, the ancient Roman temples had these things on top of them too, with these copper wires coming down into the temples and you can read about them in the history books.  Sometimes in some of the temples, like the Temple of Jupiter, theyíd have the thing wired to the main God and if the lightning struck the temple, the lightning rod, the thing sort of glowed and sparked and it was quite the sight to see.  There is even a record where about 5 priests that were all touching the idol and touching each other, were electrocuted; that was quite the sacrifice, quite the show.  They enjoyed that.† This is how they recycle various sciences and give us stars who are risen to the top and then put onto political agendasÖ and nothing has changed.  Big bucks go into it. 


With Al Gore and so on, the myth-making machine went to extraordinary lengths to create him from a nobody into a somebody and make him some sort of top scientist.  Itís amazing how people have this fugue state where the propaganda takes over and they start to see him as a real scientist and so on and they forget this guy is a politician.  Thatís pretty well all he is, and not a very good one at that either.  But he is well connected and he was mentored by Armand Hammer.  He was a very interesting character who was able to not only be a multi millionaire, not only the very fact that his father renamed him Arm-and-Hammer, for the arm and hammer of the Soviet flag, the communist flag, which is also, by the way, the British Freemasonsí one; they actually have the arm and the hammer inside the compass.  Thatís what he had.  He was the next-door neighbor, he was given an apartment next to Lenin and then Stalin.  He crossed, all through the Cold War, back and forth with impunity from anybody, no CIA, no whatever.  BIG politics are behind the political agenda and the direction that the world is not destined to go, but planned to go by very, very, very rich people working in combination. 


Here is an article about the latest scandal from the IPCC at the United Nations.  Remember, everything at the United Nations, I donít care what department, they have a political agenda.  You should read your history on it.  This one is from the Telegraph. 


African crops yield another catastrophe for the IPCC

One more alarming claim in the IPCC's 2007 report is disintegrating under closer examination, says Christopher Booker

By Christopher Booker / 13 Feb 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk


Ever more question marks have been raised in recent weeks over the reputations of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and of its chairman, Dr Rajendra Pachauri. But the latest example to emerge is arguably the most bizarre and scandalous of all. It centres on a very specific scare story which was included in the IPCC's 2007 report, although it was completely at odds with the scientific evidence (Alan:  Like everything else that they do.)Ė including that produced by the British expert in charge of the relevant section of the report. Even more tellingly, however, this particular claim has repeatedly been championed by Dr Pachauri himself.


Only last week Dr Pachauri was specifically denying that the appearance of this claim in two IPCC reports, including one of which he was the editor, was an error. Yet it has now come to light that the IPCC, ignoring the evidence of its own experts, deliberately published the claim for propaganda purposes(A:  That means POLITICAL purposes, folks.)


One of the most widely quoted and most alarmist passages in the main 2007 report was a warning that, by 2020, global warming could reduce crop yields in some countries in Africa by 50 per cent. Dr Pachauri not only allowed this claim to be included in the short Synthesis Report, of which he was co-editor, but has publicly repeated it many times since.


The origin of this claim was a report written for a Canadian advocacy group (A:  Thatís a political greening group.) by Ali Agoumi, a Moroccan academic who draws part of his current income from advising on how to make applications for "carbon credits". (A:  Heís an opportunist.  You understand what an opportunist is?)  As his primary sources he cited reports for three North African governments. But none of these remotely supported what he wrote. The nearest any got to providing evidence for his claim was one for the Moroccan government, which said that in serious drought years, cereal yields might be reduced by 50 per cent. The report for the Algerian government, on the other hand, predicted that, on current projections, "agricultural production will more than double by 2020". Yet it was Agoumi's claim that climate change could cut yields by 50 per cent that was headlined in the IPCC's Working Group II report in 2007.  (A:  Back with more after this break.)


Hi folks.  This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article about the cons and the deception and the political agenda within the IPCC where theyíre still prattling on about false reports and claiming theyíre true, even though itís been admitted elsewhere they are packs of lies basically.  He was on about this particular report from the Telegraph. 


What made this even odder, however, was that the group's co-chairman was a British agricultural expert, Dr Martin Parry, whose consultancy group, Martin Parry Associates, had been paid £75,000 by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) for two reports which had come to totally different conclusions. Specifically designed to inform the IPCC's 2007 report, these predicted that by 2020 any changes were likely to be insignificant. (A:  That was the report that Pachauri was handed and yet he lied and went the opposite way with it.)  The worst case they could come up with was that by 2080 climate change might decrease crop yields by "up to 30 per cent".  (A:  Thatís like if some oddball thing happened that wasnít predicted.)


British taxpayers poured out money for the section of the IPCC report for which Dr Parry was responsible. Defra paid £2.5 million through the Met Office, plus £330,000 for Dr Parry's salary as co-chairman, and a further £75,000 to his consultancy for two more reports on the impact of global warming on world food supplies. Yet when it came to the impact on Africa, all this peer-reviewed work Ė including further expert reports by Britain's Dr Mike Hulme and Dutch and German teams Ė was ignored in favour of a prediction from one Moroccan activist at odds with his own cited sources.  (A:  In other words, a guy who lied through his teeth, which I read at the beginning of this particular article.)


Fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud.  Iím just wondering if the myth-making machine that created the IPCC and the UN, these holy men at the top, these guys who literally are all out, they sacrifice their lives to help the world, you know.  I wonder if that myth will overcome this data here.  Weíll find out wonít we?


The Mail on Sunday had this about the same thing.


The professorís amazing climate change retreat

13th February 2010 / Mail Online


Untold billions of pounds have been spent on turning the world green and also on financing the dubious trade in carbon credits.


Countless gallons of aviation fuel have been consumed carrying experts, lobbyists and politicians to apocalyptic conferences on global warming.


Every government on Earth has changed its policy, hundreds of academic institutions, entire school curricula and the priorities of broadcasters and newspapers all over the world have been altered Ė all to serve the new doctrine that man is overheating the planet and must undertake heroic and costly changes to save the world from drowning as the icecaps melt.


You might have thought that all this was based upon well-founded, highly competent research and that those involved had good reason for their blazing, hot-eyed certainty and their fierce intolerance of dissent.


But, thanks to the row over leaked emails from the Climatic Research Unit, we now learn that this bodyís director, Phil Jones, works in a disorganised fashion amid chaos and mess.


(A:  Then he goes through the different things about how his record keeping is; itís just absolute mayhem.  He doesnít need it because he makes things up as he goes.  But here is Jones, after all those leaked emails came out where heís telling people to destroy evidence of global cooling and all the rest of it.  It saysÖ)


Even more strikingly, he (A:  Jones) also sounds much less ebullient about the basic theory (A:  of global warming.), admitting that there is little difference between global warming rates in the Nineties and in two previous periods since 1860 and accepting that from 1995 to now there has been no statistically significant warming(A:  Isnít that a complete turnaround?  Weíve all to change our lives for these utter liars that have been caught out.)


He also leaves open the possibility, long resisted by climate change activists, that the ĎMedieval Warm Periodí from 800 to 1300 AD, and thought by many experts to be warmer than the present period, could have encompassed the entire globe.  (A:  Well, I tell you, isnít that an about-face, eh?)


This is an amazing retreat, since if it was both global and warmer, the green movementís argument that our current position is Ďunprecedentedí would collapse. 


And it better collapse because if you understand the hell they have planned for you, this political agenda, youíd make sure it collapsed right now.  Youíd make sure that all this INDOCTRINATION at school was thrown out the window as well.  You would make sure that ALL these green journalists, and this is true.  There is a whole section, a NEW category of journalism.  Every newspaper has a green journalist; thatís his specialty.    Heís a POLITICAL journalist; this is how he is activated to promote the propaganda.  They have to get thrown out.   They have to get thrown out.  You cannot have people who are biased, and media, putting out these reports as if they were absolutely true and factual, these GOSPELS that they have, these new gospels, when they have a political agenda.  You cannot have truth, it doesnít happen when you have a political agenda.  Amazing.  So this is the Mail Online and Iíll put these links up on my site at the end of the show, if XplorNet graces me with enough speed to put it up there even tough Iíve been paying for high speed and they take the money.  Iíll put up all the links on my site for your perusal. 


Itís so interesting too, how everything is politics.  Everything is politics and we donít really get it.  We donít understand, really, whatís going on with us as we get taxed to death and put under.  Iím looking for a particular article here and itís from The Economist.  Very interesting article because this guy, this is in the green.view column; this is the journalist whose job it is to push his religion under the pretense he is a journalist.   


Conflict conservation

Biodiversity down the barrel of a gun

Feb 8th 2010 / From Economist.com


THERE was a time when conservation meant keeping people away from nature. Americaís system of national parks, a model for similar set-ups around the world, was based on the idea of limiting human presence to passing visits, rather than permanent habitation.


In recent years this way of doing things has come under suspicion. To fence off large areas of parkland is often impractical and can also be immoral. (A:  Here is what he goes through now, how conservation areas are now created.  Itís through perpetual war.  War is good he says, really.  We need perpetual war because in between the strips like North Korea, South Korea, places like that, nature thrives in these no-go zones.  And it also kills off the human population, these wars, and it helps nature and animals and the birdies and stuff like that.  So this pretended journalist is actually a fanatic with a cause, getting paid as a journalist for his green page and is promoting perpetual war for human depopulation and to allow the animals and the fungi and the ferns and so on to grow.  Quite something.  He goes through the different instances in the world today where this is happening because of conflict and war.  Quite something.  So his last paragraph saysÖ)


Military conflict and the preparations that surround it are not, in themselves, good for the environment: far from it. Animals big enough to be eaten, or with body parts that can be sold for a profit, are well advised to stay out of war zones. It is depopulation that matters. (A:  Heís talking about PEOPLE here, by the way.)  Armed conflict and its knock-on effects simply happen to be one of the few forces on the planet that can cause quick and thorough depopulation. (A:  Wars, get wars going.)  These areas struggle to survive when peace arrives. (A:  Heís talking about the animals now.)  The nasty truth is that the likelihood of random and violent death is the cheapest form of conservation yet invented.


Itís time we got all these so-called green journalists out in the trash heap because THEY MEAN IT.  These are the worst fanatics and you can imagine if they get ahead with this green agenda.  If you think the Soviet system or the Nazi system was bad, YOU AINíT SEEN NOTHING YET.  You ainít seen nothing yet. 


Politics, politics, everything is politics.  The BBC.  This is not new to me because Iíve known how the scriptwriters, especially in Canada, so openly propagandize.  They copied stuff right from the Soviet system.  You canít watch any entertainment without getting your Ďconsciousness raisedí in certain areas, you understand, about this and Ďsensitivityí and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.  Itís so bad in Canada but itís always been that way.  The BBC is a bit more subtle, at least it used to be, but theyíve gotten pretty coarse about it now.  The US do the better ones; they give you movies you get INVOLVED in and you lose yourself and then you get brainwashed really good at the end.  The BBC, it says hereÖ


BBC scriptwriters tried to use Doctor Who (A:  A series.) to bring down Margaret Thatcher

By Tom Kelly / 15th February 2010 / Mail Online


She battled the Argentine army abroad and the unions at home. But Margaret Thatcher never knew she was also under attack from outer space.


Left-wing scriptwriters hired by the BBC during the 1980s tried to inspire a 'Tardis revolution' by using Doctor Who as propaganda to undermine the Tory prime minister.


In one serial they caricatured her as a vicious and egotistical alien ruler who banned outward displays of unhappiness among her downtrodden people and used a secret police to oppress dissidents.


Former actors and writers on the show admitted yesterday that there was also thinly veiled support for the miners' strike and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.


The revelations appear to confirm claims that the 1980s BBC opposed Mrs Thatcher's government, with the then Tory chairman Norman Tebbit claiming it was in the hands of a 'Marxist mafia'. (A:  Well, he was absolutely true on that; it was.  You know whatís amazing to me, the BBC, which is run by the government and funded by the tax payers through the government and is owned by the government, the CBC in Canada and the other British Commonwealth countries that all have their versions, same base, owned by the government, are all staffed by Marxists.  There is nothing new in that.  One of the communists who defected from the Soviet Union, a KGB guy, went to work with the CBC and he said the he met more communists, true communists, in the CBC working there, than he ever did in the Soviet Union.  Back to this articleÖ)


Sylvester McCoy, the actor who played the Doctor from 1987 to 1989, said: 'Our feeling was that Margaret Thatcher was far more terrifying than any monster the Doctor had encountered. 


This is nothing new though.  Iíve got articles here where the writers who put together a lot of stuff for Walt Disney slipped so much in it, in the songs too.  They actually had Marxist meanings and were meant to hit people subliminally as well.   They admit about the time it took to get just the right word for a particular line; it might take them weeks to decide on the proper word for IMPACT.  Thatís quite something.


You cannot get entertainment today where there is no propaganda.  That Avatar movie is something else.  Itís training the children to plug in.  The whole idea is you plug in to the net and get lost in this new Peter Pan Disneyland where everything is wonderful, you are all one with the planet, the plants are connected with you and you use this sort of tail youíve got to hook yourself into them.  Well, thatís like plugging in; the same with The Matrix movie isnít it.  Everything is propaganda.  everything was ONE and Mother Nature ruled.  Mother Nature ruled, keeping the balance, you know the Cabalistic balance of everything.  A fairly land, absolute fairly land of fantasy.  You know something?  The worse they make it is this world to survive, with all the things that are coming down, the more youngsters will want to escape into this fake reality.  Not just youngsters, by the way; apparently adults are hooked with the virtual reality world as well, some of them.   EVERYTHING in that movie, EVERYTHING was the new agey, conservation propaganda to a tee.  Quite something. 


The world they are bringing in and they discussed this an awful, awful long time ago, even before they called themselves the Royal Institute of International Affairs and we can go back further to the Milner Group, the Cecil Rhodes Society and again, you had the Royal Society there too with its umbrella organizations going back for hundreds of years.  They planned the sort of future world that they envisaged should come in and they could make it happen, these very powerful and rich people.  Eventually they wanted a world where everyone in that world would be run like a beehive, in what they called Ďa perfect social orderí.  This was articulated by HG Wells, the heads of the Royal Institute of International Affairs.  Itís been said again recently at some of their meetings.  They are bringing in a world of SERVICE where youíll all be born, if they need you to be born, to serve themIt will be a world of service to the world society, to the state, the world state. 


If you donít like that, youíre anti-social; the same technique they used in China.  You cannot have individuality and free choice in these totalitarian systems.  And the greatest thing is, they can camouflage it so well that the people donít even see it for a totalitarian system.  Itís that incredible, the psychology they can use?  This article here is about how they are going to tax you literally, a pre-death tax now.  Britain, Canada, and the Commonwealth countries are the most highly taxed countries on the planet.  In Canada itís a general sales tax and various other hidden taxes galore on everything that you purchase.  In all the European countries, itís a Value Added Tax that started off only, supposedly, for things you donít need, like binoculars.  Eventually it spread onto everything.  Well, thatís going up by the way, to 20% now on every purchase.  You can tack on 20% on EVERY purchase.  This article is about ANOTHER TAX they are going to hit you with.  Well, one day you might need health care as you are dying, so we are going to make you pay £20,000 in advance for that care.  Howís that?  How is that?


Council chiefs back 'death tax'

By Nick Triggle / Health reporter, BBC News / 11 Feb 2010


Pressure is growing on the government to clarify its position over the so-called "death tax" after social care chiefs and charities backed the levy.  (A:  What do charities have to do with this?  Well, this is their living, by the way, then they call themselves a charity.)


Ministers in England are considering introducing a compulsory fee, possibly up to £20,000, to pay for social care.  (A:  They already pay for social care; thatís what the National Health system was created FOR.  Itís been funded to the hilt, but youíre supposed to forget that of course.)


The government said it would be making an announcement soon.


John Jackson, from ADASS, (A:  It should be called S-A-D, SADASS.) which represents social service chiefs working for councils, said extra funding was "much needed".  (A:  But theyíre not going to make it a voluntary scheme either.  Itís going to become compulsory.  Back with more after this break.)


Hi folks.  This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix.  This article that Iím reading from the BBC is about a new tax they want to bring in where youíre going to have to pay in advance for care you might get when youíre dying, even though the National Health Service is robbing people blind to provide all these cares already. 


The problem - they donít mention it here - is with the government expanding its wars along with the US across the world and buying all these drones too from the US, theyíve got to take the money from the needy to get all the weaponry and stuff.  Itís a lot of dough for these big bangs they put up there, to get the latest gizmos.  They got to cut back from the usual places so theyíre just going to keep taxing the people for more and more and more and giving them less service.  Here are people who have lost their homes, probably millions and millions - because of the last crash and the same con as they were using in the US with all these pyramid schemes for mortgages - and taxed to the gunnels, lack of jobs, overrun withÖ the immigrants are complaining there are too many immigrants.  They canít get work; there are too many immigrants.  Itís getting flooded and thatís Labourís policy to eradiate what was the British culture.  Thatís what the article I read from Tony Blair and his best buddies said that in the paper last week.  I quoted it a few times and itís on the web site from the mainstream.  But here they are hitting them with another one, £20,000 in case you one day have to get treatment as you are dying, even though you are already paying for it, your whole life long, with your taxes into the National Health Service.  Quite something, eh?  Quite something. 


From the CBC Canada; I love the new normals.  I call them Ďnew normalsí when everything is one way, like 1 in sort of 150,000 children might show the signs of autism.  Thatís how it was right up until the 60s and then bang, it started going up like a rocket until itís like 1 in 4 whoís got autism and thatís the new normal now.  Weíre not supposed to equate the inoculations and stuff with it of course; thatís just not allowedÖ even though they darn well know it.  The CBC has an article here on the new asthma.  Remember about 2 years ago - I think I read it on the air here; itís in my archives section Ė how allergies had gone up 60-odd percent, 65% in the last 5 yearsÖ  a new normal.  No money was put into finding out whyÖ because they know what causes it.  Itís in your food too, by the way.  Thatís what causes it.  It changed with GMO food.  They are well aware of what causes it. 


1 in 3 chance of developing asthma: study

By CBC News / February 15, 2010


One in three people can expect to be diagnosed with asthma in their lifetimes, Ontario research suggests.  (A:  I like how they Ďsuggestí things.)


Asthma is more likely to develop in childhood, but can also occur in adults (A:  Which is a brand new thing.), with a 33 per cent risk over a lifetime, Ontario research suggests.


Researchers followed the medical histories of more than nine million Ontarians for 16 years, between April 1991 and March 2007. A study of the data found the lifetime risk of developing asthma was 33.9 per cent.


What Iím telling you here is that this is a NEW NORMAL.  They are spraying the bejesus out of us every day in the sky and have been steadily, steadily since 1998.  Before that it was occasionally as they were testing stuff, but STEADILY though from 1998.  Big spraying in Ontario because as the jet stream comes up here, they spray at one end, Michigan, and they spray it where I am up here in Sudbury and itís carried all the way down to New York state, BIG COVERAGE AREA.  Thatís why we have the asthma now, by the wayÖ and they know this too.


From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.




Topics of show covered in following links:


More Fraud from UN IPCC

Top Climategate Scientist Now Admits No Global Warming for 15 Years

More on Prof. Jones's U-Turn

Human Depopulation by Constant War for Nature Conservation Advocated

BBC used Fictional Entertainment Smear Margaret Thatcher

Pre-Death Tax to be Announced

Ontario-Expect 1 in 3 people to Develop Asthma



Transcribed by Diana