October 15th, 2010 (#686)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt October 15th, 2010:
Econo-Eugenics and Rationalizing Tricks:
"Econo-Eugenicists Always Push their Way
To Reduce Population, Now a War on Grey,
With Elderly Consumers Sponging-up Health Care,
Leaving Young Producers with No Care There,
First They Went for Unborn, State Funded Abortion,
Now it is the Old, and Cost of Health Absorption,
Next it Will Be Unemployed, Challenged, Disabled,
Then Exit Booths Like Soylent Green Efficiently Enabled,
Yes, Post-Industrial Society, Devoid of Factories,
Killing Off Unemployed, Lower Class Menageries,
True Socialism in Excelsis, Scientifically Managed,
Weeding Useless Eaters, Saving Earth from Damage"
© Alan Watt October 15th, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - October 15th, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND –
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 15th of October, 2010. Now I always get the worst part over with first, and that is to advise newcomers to go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com, that's the main website, and bookmark all the other sites you'll see listed, in case the .com goes down, or if you find sticky downloads, because so many folk go into the .com at once, and sometimes that happens. You might find it easier on one of these alternate sites, which are listed there. These are the official sites. The only official sites by the way. And they all carry the same audios. They all carry a lot of transcripts in English for print up of a lot of the talks I've given over the years. And if you want transcripts for print up in other languages go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu. You'll see that listed on the .com site as well.
And remember that you are the audience that bring me to you, because, I don't ask for, and I certainly could go along with it, but I don't ask for money from advertisers. They generally approach you. And that's what sponsors most of the hosts. They get their cash that way to keep their family going and all the rest of it, which is okay. But I don't ask for that, so I've got a freer range to talk about different things, and if I'm asked a question I can give an honest answer about different things and so on, and the way to go with products, etc. So it's up to you, the audience to keep me going. And how you can do it is go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and while you're helping yourself to all the free talks I've given to give you the shortcuts to the histories, order the books and discs and so on that I have for sale, and hopefully that will help keep me going for a little bit longer. If not, I'll just be off somewhere else and I'll teach groups, and that will be that. So, you can buy from the U.S. to Canada, by using a personal check. You can use an international postal money order from the U.S. to Canada. Some people just send cash. And you can also use PayPal to order or to donate. If you want to order, just send the donation, followed by an email with your name, address, and the order, and I'll get it out to you as fast as I can. Same across the rest of the world, remember, you've got the addition of Western Union, which is kind of expensive, Money Gram is a bit cheaper, some people just send cash, and of course there's PayPal again, to order or to donate. That's all up to you. And that's those bases covered. A very important part, because really, as I say, I could be bringing in a lot of cash here, by bringing on the advertisers, who give you very good stories and so on. They know their stuff about money and the stock market and all the rest of it, and I'd become pretty wealthy, but again, it's really an hour's ad you'd be listening to. And I'm trying to go a different, alternate way with the general public. So, help me if you can. If not, as I say, it's no skin off my nose when I walk off and just give lectures.
Now, this New World Order, I've talked so much about it, because we've gone through World Order Changes before. There's always a New World Order, because, you see, even in the ancient times they helped to plan the future. Those who held tremendous power always make sure that they're going to be in charge of the future, for their own offspring, to make sure they can take over and rule with the same kind of power, maybe even more power, as time goes on. They don't sit back and say, well, we've got all the cash we need, we're going to enjoy ourselves, put our feet up, and then someone else tries to muscle in on them. That's not how it works. Even in ancient times the most powerful, wealthy people, and wealthy families, were doing what we call today geopolitics. And they had their travelers going all over the world as merchants and so on, collecting information, intelligence, and any up-and-coming small peoples, tribes, nations, that they thought could be a problem down the road, to them personally, they would fix it in such a way that some bigger country would take them out on their behalf. Never do it yourself. Get someone else to do it for you. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, we're back and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. And talking about New World Orders, as I've mentioned before, Hitler called his regime basically a New World Order, the Communists did the same with their revolution, and there's been previous revolutions too. Even the Napoleonic Wars and Napoleon was looking towards a New World, certainly a New European Order, but ultimately a World Order. So this is the idea that comes into the heads of powerful people. But really, those behind the scenes, who finance everything from ancient times to the present know the science of financing and the science of geopolitics, because they always made sure that they would survive, regardless of what nations would rise or fall. And they would also make sure that they would take nations down by gathering intelligence, keeping an eye on things. They were the most traveled peoples, the big money bags, because in ancient times they were also merchants, and they had their men all across the ancient world gathering data. And they'd come back and chat about who was rising, who was sinking, etc. Who might be a problem down the road. Who might rise up and block their trade routes towards some other country far beyond them. And so they would get wars stirred up by loaning money to kings, for armaments and so on. And then they also made deals in ancient times to get so many slaves. If they backed you, your army for instance, to go to war, they would demand so many slaves, along with the payment, with interest, and they used those slaves for their own gold mines. They've found the Phoenicians for instance had gold mines as far inland as the Ukraine, as far north as the Ukraine. And so, they've been at this for an awful long time, but they themselves never really went to war. They just made sure they backed all the sides in wars. And they could never lose, because whatever king won, they'd already backed them, and they would get the money back from the conquered people via the king who won. That's the sort of the way it works. Today they have lots of treaties in fact, so that the losers always end up paying, regardless. Somebody ends up paying. They never lose.
It's fascinating even to read the history of World War I and the Versailles Treaty that came out at the end of it, where the two Warburg Brothers, one who became head of I think the Federal Reserve in the U.S., he'd only been in the U.S. for about four years, just in time for WWI, got the job of course, and he lent the cash out for WWI to the American government. And then you had another, his brother actually, doing the banks for Germany. So here's two brothers literally negotiating all the cash they would get in from the conquered and the so-called victors. What a farce in history that is if people can't put that together, really. But that's their problem if they can't.
They'll put it down to coincidence theories because people like to believe in coincidence theories, like, my goodness, what's the chances of George Bush Sr meeting with the Bin Laden family in their joint meetings that they had for their corporation where they built these bombproof bunkers across the world for various kings and countries and so on, and they were meeting down in New York, down the street, where the towers went up, caused supposedly by the son of one of the families in the group. I mean, what's the chances of that happening in reality? You wouldn't even put that in a movie because no one would go for it, but this is the stuff we're told to believe. Meanwhile, this ex-president's son, who was then the President, is the President at that one time, when it's happening. It's impossible. It's just like the relations of them all, how they're all related, all the presidents to kings and queens and all this kind of stuff, and each other. What's the chances of that? How many? What's the population of the U.S. alone? How come everybody they pick is always related? But that's a coincidence again, eh? Coincidence theories. So, that's the rubbish we're given. We're given cartoon reality, because only in cartoons can you fit that kind of stuff in.
And it's the same too, as I say, getting back to the men with the power and the money who always seem to rule, and looking at the think tanks for the various military organizations for Britain, and the U.S. and the projections for the future, to 2030-2050. They say that the economies must be protected at all costs. Now, along with that, they mean the banking system, the same banks that have looted the planet and plundered the planet, raped the people, stole all their homes back off them, and got rewarded for it by the same governments, but the public, silly enough they still think they work for them. What's the chances of that happening too? Only in a cartoon, but we're living it, in this so-called reality.
And just as in ancient times too, they talked about peoples becoming too big for their boots, they also looked upon the different peoples as human herds. Even in ancient times, human herds of people. And they categorized them too in a eugenical fashion, according to their intellect and their size, their strengths, their weaknesses, mainly for labor purposes for instance and survivability, and threat level. They also could deprive people in ancient times of food, especially those who delivered the food, just like today, and cause famines and death to people who might be a threat down the road. Many ways to get rid of your enemies, you understand. There's many, many ways to do this.
We know that this eugenical society, this belief is all through science of today, it's all through the Darwinian belief system, and that's in all sciences, you must be a Darwinist to be a scientist today. They talk about the survival of the fittest, basically. The same idea that Adolf had, the Soviets had the same thing, they all came from the same philosophies of Marx. And Marx really teamed up with Darwin. He wanted to dedicate, I think his third or fourth publication of his book to Charles Darwin, because he said that Darwin validated all of his theories by his findings. So they all worked together. And as I say too, Nietzsche said the same thing. He said, well, he says, how would you behave in a world where there is no God? As opposed to the world where you've been brought up to believe, that everyone has been taught to believe that there is a God? How would you behave? Your whole world view, your perspective on everything would change. And then you go into what comes out of that, and it's a form of secular humanism, where, well, the only God that we have around is obviously Man, and then you get categories of Men, you're back into eugenics with geniuses and so on, and scientists, etc. And then you've got all the laboring class at the bottom, and that was all done in the 1800s, into the 1900s and the 20th Century, 21st Century, and here we are today.
This stuff is still getting pushed and we think nothing about the articles that come out now about, oh, overpopulation, overpopulation, even though I've gone through all the different books by the top eugenicists on this program, talking about this mantra they've had for the last fifty, sixty, seventy years of vastly reducing the population for a post-industrial world. They even knew it in fact at the height of the industrial era, that this would pass as they moved their big businesses elsewhere. And they'd have all this working class back home with nothing to do. Your leaders knew that when they signed the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs for the World Trade Organization, which enabled all their factories to get paid by your tax money to go offshore, and lift up, lock, stock, and barrel, and go to China. And they paid them to set up in China, for any losses incurred. And that went on for ten years, each corporation could keep claiming for ten years, according to any projected losses they would have during that ten year period, and the tax payers, back home, who were left without any work, would have to pay all those costs. And that ten years could be renewed for another ten years.
Now we're within the area of the sharing of the wealth, part of the plank of The Communist Manifesto, which the bankers dreamed up, of course, because Karl Marx was funded by them. And what are they going to do with all those people who have no jobs now? They don't like to keep pets around, so what do they tell you? Oh, we're going to run out of room. We're going to run out of sustenance. We're depleting this, depleting that, because they're all useless eaters. Now if they've got a big function for you, you're no longer a useless eater, but if they have no more function for you, you're a useless eater, and Lord Bertrand Russell, amongst many others have actually said that in their own books, the useless eaters, we must get rid of them.
Now all this stuff was discussed long before any of you here were born, at world think tanks and world meetings. When they created the League of Nations, at the end of World War I, they had a Department of Population for population control set up then. When they merged into the United Nations, that still remained in place. They don't employ hundreds of people in one part of the United Nations to sit on their hands and make up wish lists and do nothing about it. And what they decided to do with it is what they could never get the population to simply comply and voluntarily get sterilized. They'd have to find ways to do it for them. And they'd have to give a lot of propaganda to the public too, about too many people, the need to cut back on the wrong types of people who are breeding, and also to sterilize them in some way without them even knowing. And I've gone through many of the tactics that they talked about. Now, here's an article here, one of the many articles out there, and it says:
What is In the Flu Vaccine that Can Cause Infertility?
(Alan: And this is posted by Dr. Mercola, October the 15th. It says:)
GlaxoSmithKline's Fluarix swine flu vaccine, among others, contains Polysorbate 80, also known as Tween 80.
A study done in Slovakia on female rats found that when newborn rats were injected with the substance within a week of birth, they developed damage to the vagina and uterine lining, hormonal changes, ovarian deformities and infertility.
(A: All occurred. And then it says:)
The package insert for Fluarix mentions that the manufacturer cannot guarantee your fertility will be unharmed.
Why would they say that folks? Back with more on this, after this break.
Hi, folks, we're back and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. Reading an article about how swine flu vaccine contains Polysorbate 80, which is known to basically cause infertility. Anyway, it says here:
From the Organic Health article:
"Would you feel comfortable being injected with a vaccine that contains a substance that has been strongly linked to infertility?
Well, if you take the Fluarix swine flu vaccine manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline or any of the other swine flu vaccines that contain Polysorbate 80, that is exactly what you will be doing. If you are considering getting the swine flu vaccine, or any other vaccine for that matter, perhaps you should educate yourself about EXACTLY what is in these vaccines before you allow them to be injected into your body."
In related news, Australian health officials were aware of severe and unusual side effects with the flu vaccine three weeks before they made the data public, and now experts are demanding for a better national surveillance plan.
(A: Which probably means that they'll cover up all the more.)
It took over three months to clearly identify CSL's Fluvax vaccine as the likely culprit of an outbreak of convulsions (called febrile seizures) (A: That's when they get a high temperature and they go into seizures) among recently vaccinated infants.
Ultimately, at least 100 reports of febrile seizures were received, but the slow response and delays in official responses from state and federal governments were just not acceptable, the experts say and the public not only wants some answers, but a change in the way vaccine adverse events are reported.
So, they do want you sterile. We know that we're down 85%-87% of the sperm count of what we were back in 1950. And 1950 was the big push to start the polio vaccines, which contained all the cancer viruses, plus many other active simian viruses at the same time, which they haven't told us what they would do, but I'm sure they'll have their effects as well. So we have the cancer viruses, and no doubt too, something else added, which would also cause infertility, because most men today in the Western countries are basically pretty well infertile, even amongst the young guys. And I've given the articles on air here where even young men around 18 were picked every year at universities and even they have about 10% motile sperm. 10%, that means something that knows where it's going to find its target, the rest can't get there; they don't even know where to go. And once they hit about 25, there's hardly anything there at all. This is a big mystery, isn't it, for those who want to live in disbelief.
And along with that too comes:
'Green' burials require no coffins or chemicals
(A: From the Associated Press. This is one of these light-hearted things that they put out there, the way they put it forward, how it's ecofriendly and so on, about this chemicalization to turn you into a kind of green syrup. One article I read before said you could actually pour granny in your backyard's garden and grow something of value out of old granny, you know. That's how callous we're supposed to become, as we dehumanize society, further and further, until we're just a low, base animal, that they want us all to believe they are. Certainly lots behave like that today, because, they mimic all they see on their movies and television. Anyway, it says here that:)
Steve Sall moved forward on uneven, rocky terrain in his motorized wheelchair and came to a stop at the edge of a sweeping vista of ponderosa pines and bright pockets of yellow wildflowers.
Before being stricken three years ago with Lou Gehrig's disease, the 61-year-old Oregon resident who was an avid hiker would have backpacked this canyon. Instead, he was there to pick out his grave site.
Three months later, Sall was laid to rest in the forest.
He would be among the small but growing number of Americans choosing environmentally friendly burials. The so-called "green burials" are a departure from the norm in that they don't use concrete vaults, metal coffins or any chemicals.
The Green Burial Council, an industry group that sets standards, now counts more than 300 approved providers in 40 states, while only a dozen existed as recently as the beginning of 2008.
And a March 2010 survey commissioned by the International Cemetery, Cremation and Funeral Association found a quarter of those polled liked the concept of environmentally friendly burials.
(A: This is really an ad, you understand, this is a PR ad. I hope you understand that. It's probably paid for too, a handout. And then it says here that:)
"We think of this as a new idea, but this is really an ancient idea we're returning to," said Joe Sehee, executive director of the New Mexico-based council.
A burial in the wilderness was especially appealing to Sall after spending so much of his life (A: Blah, blah, blah, in the mountains and picking flowers, and yadda, yadda, ya. It says here that he:)
didn't like the idea of pumping gases into the atmosphere, said his son, David.
Sall began researching green burials on the Internet, eventually finding the website for the White Eagle Memorial Preserve, a natural burial grounds about 15 miles from the small town of Goldendale.
So, they're going into this green, greening of dying and all the rest of it too, because you see, the big boys want the top real estate. They actually want to plow up graveyards as well. So, even though you pay for them all in advance, that's another con trick as well, but they just want to dig them up and build something on it. Probably the chemical company that makes the stuff that turns you into green sludge, because they still use chemicals to do this kind of stuff, you see. So it's good business for the chemical agencies. The chemical agencies, too that probably kill you off with all the cancers in the food too, and processed stuff, you know. That's how it really works. Someone always makes a buck off death, you know. Always makes a buck off death.
And then the World Faces a Population Bomb, we'll get into that when we come back from this break. It's all about eugenics, folks.
Hi folks, we're back, Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about eugenics and depopulation and all that kind of stuff. The stuff that's been hyped up for such an awful long time. And I've read articles in the past where they've talked about the elderly having "a duty to die." A duty to die so that the young might live and live better with more of everything and all that kind of stuff. And they get more and more brazen about their ideas, and of course I'm sure they've got it in comedy. Every comedy you see has got an elderly person who's always senile. They're always senile, always infirm, and so on. And the youngsters have been taught too that anyone who's elderly is irrelevant anyway. You're a different species if you're elderly, where at one time, not that long ago, they had respect for the elderly because they had so much wisdom, and so much information they could impart to the young to give them advice on how to go through life and what pitfalls to avoid. That kind of thing. That's disappearing, of course, because even the aging today have lived a life of watching TV, and you don't learn an awful lot on Seinfeld. So anyway, this says here, and this is from the Foreign Policy Group. The Foreign Policy Group of course put their magazine out, and they are another private group, a foundation, etc. It says:
"The World Faces a Population Bomb."
Yes, but of old people. (A: Not elderly anymore now, it's old people.) Not so long ago, we were warned that rising global population would inevitably bring world famine. (A: And then he mentions:) As Paul Ehrlich wrote apocalyptically in his 1968 worldwide bestseller, The Population Bomb, (A: Which was a total bogus book actually, because you see, he was all part of the depopulation agenda at that time, and they hyped it right up to as high as it could be about the coming crisis and famine. And John Holdren, the science czar with Obama right now, helped to write that book (Ecoscience) with him. They both believe in compulsory sterilization of the unfit and all the other ones down below. I mean ex-factory workers. Stuff they don't need anymore. That kind of stuff.) "In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. (A: That's what they said.) At this late date, nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate." Obviously, Ehrlich's predicted holocaust, which assumed that the 1960s global baby boom would continue until the world faced mass famine, didn't happen. Instead, the global growth rate dropped from 2 percent in the mid-1960s to roughly half that today, with many countries no longer producing enough babies to avoid falling populations. Having too many people on the planet is no longer demographers' chief worry; now, having too few is.
(A: Actually they've said that. In the next century, it will be the other way around, having too few, but that's not enough for the die-hards that want to get us, you know, to kill more and more of us off. And it says:)
It's true that the world's population overall will increase by roughly one-third over the next 40 years, from 6.9 to 9.1 billion, according to the U.N. Population Division. (A: Who have always been wrong, by the way.) But this will be a very different kind of population growth than ever before -- driven not by birth rates, which have plummeted around the world, but primarily by an increase in the number of elderly people. (A: Too many elderly people.) Indeed, the global population of children under 5 is expected to fall by 49 million as of mid century, while the number of people over 60 will grow by 1.2 billion. How did the world grow so gray, so quickly?
(A: Worry, depressions, wars, and economic crashes is what made them gray so quickly. That's what caused it. Anyway, it says:)
One reason is that more people are living to advanced old age. (A: Which is really not true at all. There really isn't much of a difference across the so-called Western countries. Actually it's falling in Britain. They've got the highest young death rate than any other country in Europe, and they work longer before they get retirement. They generally die before they retire, which is great for government, because they can keep all that cash.) But just as significant is the enormous bulge of people born in the first few decades after World War II. Both the United States and Western Europe saw particularly dramatic increases in birth rates during the late 1940s and 1950s, as returning veterans made up for lost time. In the 1960s and 1970s, much of the developing world also experienced a baby boom, but for a different reason: striking declines in infant and child mortality. As these global baby boomers age, they will create a population explosion of seniors. Today in the West, we are seeing a sharp uptick in people turning 60; in another 20 years, we'll see an explosion in the numbers turning 80. Most of the rest of the world will follow the same course in the next few decades.
And then it gives you the grayest generation and so on. They're always giving you a crisis, on one end or the other, isn't it? They're just never happy. Mind you, in the United Nations definition of the perfect world citizen, it says a good citizen is a producer and consumer. And you see, once you're retired you're now a useless eater. You're a consumer, you're not productive in an economic system. That's how you're labeled, by the way. I'm not joking about that. You better find out what's really running the world, and you better look at all these charities and these institutions as they call themselves, and these foundations that you help to give your cash to. Or think twice before you're told to go out in the road with a billboard protesting something. Make sure you know the group that is asking you to protest, and what they're really protesting for. So, they're after the elderly now, too, and as I say, too, I've got in the archives section at Cutting Through the Matrix, you'll find that article that I read, where they've said that the elderly have a duty to die. Not to linger on and last a few years, but to die, to make room for the young and up-and-coming crew to have the good life, as they like to call it, you see.
Not to mention too, that under the United Nations Agenda, now they've guaranteed under their charter that eventually the world is to have basically a standardized health care system, where everyone is guaranteed, listen to this, the minimal health care possible. If you wonder why you're dropping and you're getting cut back in the UK, and throughout Europe, and in the U.S., this new Socialized Health Care, because I've seen the report that the government got the Rand Corporation to do for them. And the Rand corporation took Britain as a role model, for slashing back on the cuts, giving bare treatment, minimalistic treatment, and that's what they're bringing into the U.S., and that stuff hasn't been published yet in the newspapers, but I've got it here. So all you idiots who think that Obama is bringing you wonderful health care, you better take a look around you, and around the rest of the world, because it's going to plummet like you would never believe. You would never believe. Again, most folk need the shock before they'll believe anything. That's the way it goes.
I'm putting up a link too. All these links I'll put up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the show. A link to the asymmetric warfare group, which is quite interesting. And it has counterinsurgency methodologies, and attack the network counterinsurgency methodologies. It's a battalion they call themselves, of I guess, cyber-warriors, etc, for the government. And they have their strategy plans outlined here, and you can certainly go through it and spend a long time looking at all their different techniques from soft attacks to hard attacks, meaning kill, and lethal attacks, etc, etc. And what they plan to do all about it, as they get up in power in the world.
Now, I love recycled news. Often recycled news is just an update of the same thing happening again. Generally recycled news is when there's a slow news period and everybody is doing it. I've even seen it in the Patriot Community, reading recycled news, but anyway, this is about the Congo. And I've been hearing about the Congo since I was a small boy, right up to the present time. There has never been peace in the Congo, mainly because the bigwigs won't tell you that the Congo is one of the richest areas for certain minerals, but highly rich in Uranium. Highly rich in Uranium. That's why they keep them at war all the time over there, killing each other off, so the big mining companies, the international boys can get in and loot the place for free, while they're all fighting each other. That's why it's been going on so long there. They never mention that, the uranium, in any of the articles, including this one. And this is from the Associated Press. Of course the press isn't there to tell you all this. The press gives you the story by always leaving half of the rest of it out, so you'll come to the desired but wrong conclusion. It says:
Congo Rapes: A Congolese woman walks down the main road of a village in which hundreds of women and children were raped earlier this year.
UN-backed Congolese troops have been accused of murdering and raping villagers and looting homes in the area in which rebel militias carried out mass rapes two months ago.
(A: They go back and forth just raping. The UN troops and these other Congolese troops. The UN it's amazing, the UN, wherever they've gone, they've set up prostitution rings. They've even imported females from different countries into countries like Britain, through incredibly well devised pipelines, and basically they're just sex slaves for pimps. Wherever they've gone, they've done this kind of stuff. There's so many reports, it's unbelievable, but then again, it's not really if you understand what militaries are really all about. And it says:)
Margot Wallstrom, the UN envoy on sexual violence in conflict, told the security council yesterday that UN peacekeepers had received reports of serious abuses by Congolese government soldiers.
In August, details emerged of the mass rape of more than 300 women, several men and children in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.
The UN – which had a base 20 miles from the scene of the attacks – admitted failing to protect the victims.
(A: It's just like Rwanda, you know the general who was stuck in Rwanda was from Canada. And the man eventually when he came home had a nervous breakdown, a complete collapse because, and he still couldn't figure out, he still doesn't to this day, figure out that the United Nations would not send them supporting troops. He couldn't figure out why. Because he doesn't know that the UN has another agenda altogether, to allow these mass culls to happen. And now he's on a private civilian board advising the UN, because he still can't get it through, he just can't get it through his head. But he was blaming himself initially in Rwanda. For what? Because they kept ignoring all of his calls over months and months saying they knew the attack was coming and a mass slaughter was coming? They were even presented with the attack orders, where they came from, who had armed these guys; it was a French group who armed them. All the data was in, but the UN said, no, no, leave them alone, just stay out of it, you know. So he had a nervous breakdown afterwards, and then they brought him back into the fold by putting him on an advisory committee, and he still will never get it through his head that there's another, they can't. They can't believe for all their life they've been working for something that has ulterior motives than the ones that's brainwashed into them. Anyway, back to the Congo. It says:)
It now faces further embarrassment because it provides logistical support to the Congolese army, (A: That's the UN Army.) which stands accused of compounding terror inflicted by the Rwandan-led FDLR rebels and the Congolese Mai-Mai militia.
Wallstrom, who visited Congo last week, said she heard directly from villagers and UN peacekeepers in the area in which killings, rapes and lootings were recently carried out by government soldiers.
She urged the Congolese government to investigate the attacks and "swiftly hold any perpetrators to account".
"The possibility that the same communities that were brutalised by FDLR and Mai-Mai elements in July and August are now also suffering exactions at the hands of [government] troops is unimaginable and unacceptable," she said.
That's the kind of stuff really that happens when the UN is in there. If there's another reason for this going on, it will be, and believe you me, there's Uranium there, the big mining corporations are in there big time. And if there's a stable government there, they could demand big, big fees, massive fees for these guys to be in there and mining. But that's not the way when they end up having pell-mell civil wars and that going on. So they start the civil wars, and they arm the rebel troops. That's how they do it. They did the same thing in Sierra Leone quite a few years back. The big gold and silver and diamond guys in London were interviewed on a report, asking why they'd sent mercenaries in to start a war. And he said they couldn't get into certain areas to mine, so they got them all fighting each other, and they sent in the mercenary troops to get it all started. And then they just moved in behind the troops and started to set up their mines and got it all for free. And they interviewed the guy in the London diamond office, that talked about it. He was interviewed, a top CEO. And he literally laughed in astonishment when he was asked, did he see anything wrong with doing this kind of thing. Well, he says, this is standard, he says, they're sitting on all those diamonds and they're doing nothing with it. And he laughed, like how preposterous a question. And that's the egotists and psychopaths that you're dealing with. And all you ladies out there who love the big diamonds and so on, you go into the history of how much blood is spilled to get them and the ones who really profit off them, and where that money goes to for your little sparkling trinklets. It's disgusting what they do for diamonds. Disgusting.
Now, there's another article here, and it's from the 1960s, very interesting though.
from Unless Peace Comes
HOW TO WRECK THE ENVIRONMENT
(A: This guy wrote a book back in the '60s, '68 it was.)
HOW TO WRECK
by Gordon J. F. MacDonald U.S.A.
Professor MacDonald is associate director of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University of California, Los Angeles. His researches have embraced a remarkable diversity of natural phenomena and his professional interests are further extended by his participation in national science policy-making. He is a member of President Johnson’s Science Advisory Committee.
(A: Now he goes through all the dangers to environment to do mainly through warfare, like nuclear and so on. And then you scroll down, it goes into weather modification, because they were doing it big time back then, and they weren't doing just modification. They wanted also to use it for warfare purposes, and he touches on that as well. And of course he does the usual stuff too. It might help farming and so on and so on, and how they could load up the ice caps in certain mountainous areas with more and more ice which will melt and bring more water down to dry plains. All that kind of stuff. He also touches on climate modification and he talks about how this could be used too. And he goes through some of the history. He goes through what's happened in the past with climate alteration and its natural fluctuations going up to cool phases for a hundred years, two hundred years, and then warm phases and so on. Back and forth, back and forth, back and forth, which they've always known. It was standard knowledge even at primary school, which is junior school, at one time. He says:)
For example, in Europe the climate of the early period following the last Ice Age was continental, with hot summers and cold winters. In the sixth millennium B.C., there was a change to a warm humid climate with a mean temperature of 5ºF higher than at present (A: Than at present, hmm? For the global warmists out there.) and a heavy rainfall that caused considerable growth of peat. This period, known as a climatic optimum, was accentuated in Scandinavia by a land subsidence which permitted a greater influx of warm Atlantic water into the large Baltic Sea.
The climatic optimum was peculiar. While on the whole there was a very gradual decrease of rainfall, the decrease was interrupted by long droughts during which the surface peat dried. This fluctuation occurred several times, the main dry periods being from 2000 to 1900, 1200 to 1000 and 700 to 500 B.C. The last, a dry heat wave lasting approximately 200 years, was the best developed.
Lots of hockey sticks all up and down. All down the way, you see. Back with more after these messages. Amazing how they can eradicate this from history, eh?
Hi folks, I'm back. We're Cutting Through the Matrix. And we've got Clint from Ontario. We'll take Clint. Are you there Clint?
Clint: Hello, Alan, how are you?
Alan: Not so bad.
Clint: Thanks for taking my call. I actually, just to get back on the vaccine, the Polysorbate 80, I have here in front of me, which I got last year when the H1N1 came out, is the consumer information about the vaccine, the non-medical ingredients. And it is nicely tucked away on pg. 22.
Alan: Oh, that's nice.
Clint: And here it says that the Thimerosal was in it, of course we know that as Mercury. Also it says other important ingredients were Squalene, Vitamin E, Polysorbate 80, which you touched on, egg proteins, Formaldehyde, Sodium Gilcholate, I think it's pronounced and Sucrose. Now, I don't know about anybody else, but with Formaldehyde also, I'm pretty sure they just put that in you when you're dead, not alive.
Alan: They certainly do use that when you're dead, yeah.
Clint: Yeah, exactly. So why would they put that into your immune system while you're alive is beyond me. It's quite appalling. Now this vaccine is probably going to come out again. I don't know if they're going to hide it through just the regular flu vaccine or not, but I have a 1-800 hotline number here for Ontario, if you mind, could I mention it.
Clint: Okay, it's for people if they want to call, it's 1-800-476-9708. And you can call them and ask them why all this is in there and what not, and you can hear the explanation they give. Now a quick story. Last year, when I had this, I printed off a few hundred copies, and I went to where they were giving this vaccine in my town. And the lineup was like literally around the building. People were just lining up in droves to get this, because of the fear that they were putting out. And Alan, within five minutes of me getting into the back of the lineup and handing out this information, I was surrounded by the finest police force that is in my town, and they told me that if I did not leave I would be arrested for disturbing the peace.
Alan: (Chuckle) Disturbing the peace.
Clint: Yes, exactly. Now, if it wasn't for a couple of gentlemen near the end of the line, when I started voicing my opinion about freedom of speech, I honestly believe that I would have been pulled away in the back of that car. And if it wasn't for those two gentlemen, who had families as well, who asked me for the information, the officers literally turned around and walked away. And I continued on to my car and I left, because I didn't want the problem. But that's what we're dealing with, you know.
Alan: I know, it's disgusting how, I mean, just going into Sudbury today I saw two opposing groups, pro-life and pro-choice, on opposite sides of the road there, and of course, there's never a cop to be seen when they're pushing for the state-funded abortion. You know, if they want to do it themselves, that's up to them, but why should everybody pay for their decisions, right? If it's their choice, if it's their choice to get pregnant, obviously, they were somehow involved in the procedure, then why should you pay for what they want, instead of the government stepping in? The government wants the right to abort. You see, you cannot give power to the government. And that's something else they don't like to think about. There's always another reason for something. But you're right, in this year's flu shot, they've snuck in the swine flu as well, so it's a triple shot, really in one, of this year's flu shot.
Clint: I definitely plan on getting out there again if it happens. And what people need to realize here too, especially here in Canada now, is that the officers in our police forces, they're not peace officers anymore, they're policy enforcers, and people need to realize that, and I'm sure many people who know this can see it. Cops want confrontation, and if they're not going to get it, then they'll move on. And they're just there to enforce the policy now.
Alan: That's right. They are.
Clint: Right, exactly. Thank you, Alan.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Clint: Bye, bye.
Alan: And for Dan in Kentucky, I'll get to him maybe next week, hopefully you'll phone again, Dan. From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it's Good Night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
show covered in following links:
Flu Vaccine and Infertility
Green Burials, Eco-Friendly and Good for the Chemical Industry
Population Bomb--of "Old People"
Asymmetric Warfare Group
UN-Backed Troops |Raping and Murdering in Congo--Again
How to Wreck the Environment--by Science and Covert Weather Warfare
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"