Dec. 27, 2010 (#734)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:


Poem Copyright Alan Watt Dec. 27, 2010:

For as Long as We Can Spread the Word,
The Pen is Mightier than the Sword:

"So Much Wrong with World, Some of it Rattles
On Your Nerves or Spirit, So Pick Your Battles,
Government Panics are On Cue, On Time,
Don't Follow the Rabble, the Nasty Sign,
They Go the Way Their Masters Expect
And Riot on Command by Those Who Direct,
Stay Calm, Avoiding Those Who Lead,
For Many are Paid to Start the Stampede,
So in Times to Come Don't Be Easily Led,
Be Guided by Instinct and Use Your Head"
© Alan Watt Dec. 27, 2010


Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Dec. 27, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
alternate sites:  ,   .us  ,   .ca

mirror site:
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:

Information for purchasing Alanís books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check Ė in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on December 27, 2010.  I always suggest, as always, that newcomers look into and help yourself to the hundreds of audios Iíve put up there over the years, where I give you shortcuts to the big picture, lots of information to tie things together, to show you basically that what you are living through in your life is a script.  The big events that happen on a worldwide scale are literally scripted long before you were born, and the social changes and all the rest of it are all part of it too, which you will experience throughout your life.  Itís not guesswork.  I give you the big players who helped to formulate this plan, and did their part in it, and published their books on it too. 


So help yourself to those and while you are at it too, remember, you are the audience that brings me to you.  I donít bring on advertisers to sell products.  The ads you hear on this show are paid by the advertisers to RBN for the broadcast time and for their equipment, staff and their bills too. So itís up to you to help me with mine and really, they do drop off, and it costs a lot to do what Iím doing.  This is not a job and itís bigger than a vocation.  Itís something that has to be done at this time of the changes.  Thatís why I came out in the first place years ago.  So help me with mine and you can do so by donating to me; youíll find how to do it on the web sites.  Remember, bookmark those other sites youíll see listed on that front page.  They all contain the audios.  They all contain transcripts in English of a lot of the talks, to download for print up.  If you want transcripts in other languages go into and youíll find them there.  So donate or purchase the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale.  [Order and donation options listed above.] 


These books are not written like some dry history books.  I donít bother with the dates, times, and places, of generals and all the rest of it.  I show the con tricks that are very, very ancient and have been used by those in the know for an awful long time to con the public and fool the public, because we are taught to think in a linear fashion instead of going all over the place and seeing things from many different angles.  Thatís why itís so easy to control all of us.  They can predict, literally, if they give us the computer data, which is just information to your mind, and using your logic, you will arrive at this conclusion which is the desired conclusion, and thatís how simple we are, really.  We have been kept that way, taught that way in school and so on.  So buy the books and disks.  Remember, donations too, just for the sake of donations, would really be welcome as well. 


On this show we talk about the big picture, really.  I donít tend to harp on about, oh, my God, what are they doing to us todayÖ because thatís endless.  Itís every day there is new stuff.  We are like rats in a cage, in a laboratory, just chattering about the guys in the white suits coming in in the morning, the white coats, and saying, what are they going to do today, are they going to nuke us, are they going to inject us, are they going to shock us?  You see, thatís how we are; we chatter about the stuff thatís put out for us to chatter about.  Itís time we rose out of this cage we are in and started to dictate to those who are ordering all this about in our lives.  They have no right to play with our heads and play with humanity in this fashion.  Itís disgusting!  This is not living.  When you are robbed of your ability to think for yourself, and it IS a war on the mind, then you have been robbed of everything.  This is what they call Ďbringing in world peaceÖí when you canít think for yourself.  I'll be back with more after this break.


Hi folks.  Weíre back and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix and I hope you all had a Merry Christmas, and Iím sure a few of you out there have a few sore heads still lingering from it too, because you got a bit too merry.  But as they say, you only live once, and sometimes some people donít even live that at all.  As I say, I hope you had a good Christmas and things turned out well for you. 


The agenda goes on.  We have watched this for years and years.  To be honest with you too, they are really on a roll now to speed everything up.  There is not much opposition really because you see, they are not going across any marks of democracy of any kind at all.  They are not following any guidelines of democracy.  We are in a post-democratic world, they claim, and they are now in the times of authoritarianism.  Thatís why they are rushing ahead with all these social changes and lies, blatant lies.  They call it Ďthe noble lieí actually.  They say we are too stupid to understand and go along with things for our own good; therefore they have to lie to us.  Thatís a standard rule they use.  That actually came out with the Project for a New American Century group as well, but they all use it. 


Weíve seen the scams of global warming and everything else, to get carbon taxes in and there is much, much more to it of course, as to where they want to go with it.  Here is an article here for instance, from Britain, from a newspaper.  It saysÖ


The green hijack of the Met Office is crippling Britain

The Met Office's commitment to warmist orthodoxy means it drastically underestimates the chances of a big freeze, says Christopher Booker / By Christopher Booker / 26 Dec 2010


By far the biggest story of recent days, of course, has been the astonishing chaos inflicted, to a greater or lesser extent, on all of our lives by the fact that we are not only enjoying what is predicted to be the coldest December since records began in 1659, but also the harshest of three freezing winters in a row. We all know the disaster stories Ė thousands of motorists trapped for hours on paralysed motorways, days of misery at Heathrow, rail passengers marooned in unheated carriages for up to 17 hours. But central to all this Ė as the cry goes up: ďWhy wasnít Britain better prepared?Ē Ė has been the bizarre role of the Met Office.  (Alan:  The Met Office are the guys who parrot the East Anglia Universityís lies about global warming as they fudge their figures and put it into those strange computers, specially built to give them the answers they want.  Part of the problem is too, that Britain and other countries are in such a chaos, as they have been planning for this global warming, but itís been a great excuse too to save money on grits and all the machinery they need to clear the roads.  Thatís been another big part they are keeping away from because last year thousands died in Britain, for instance, because they could not afford the fuel, mainly pensioners, but not all pensioners either.  Of course the same will happen this year, as they go into this terrible, terrible mess.  They even had to pull out the army because they have done so many cutbacks, for austerity measures you understand, in equipping the roads guys and so on.  Plus, to be honest with you, itís such a corrupt system, right down to the local level; there is more money that goes into the pockets of certain people than ever end up as gravel on the road.)


We might start with the strange affair of the Quarmby Review. Shortly after Philip Hammond became Transport Secretary last May, he commissioned David Quarmby, a former head of the Strategic Rail Authority, to look into how we might avoid a repeat of last winterís disruption. In July and again in October, Mr Quarmby produced two reports on ďThe Resilience of Englandís Transport System in WinterĒ (A:  Sounds very British, eh, Ďresilience.í  I guess you just wave a flag and the snow melts.); and at the start of this month, after our first major snowfall, Mr Quarmby and two colleagues were asked to produce an ďauditĒ of their earlier findings.


The essence of their message was that they had consulted the Met Office (A:  As I said before, you will never get truth out of guys that are ostensibly weathermen who are now getting paid big bucks in grants to tell lies.  Theyíve got too much to lose, and go back to, you know, doing 2 or 3 part-time jobs instead.), which advised them that, despite two harsh winters in succession, these were ďrandom eventsĒ, the chances of which, after our long previous run of mild winters, were only 20 to one. Similarly, they were told in the summer, the odds against a third such winter were still only 20 to one. So it might not be wise to spend billions of pounds preparing for another ďrandom eventĒ, when its likelihood was so small. Following this logic, if the odds against a hard winter two years ago were only 20 to one, it might have been thought that the odds against a third such ďrandom eventĒ were not 20 to one but 20 x 20 x 20, or 8,000 to one.


What seems completely to have passed Mr Quarmby by, however, is the fact that in these past three years the Met Officeís forecasting record has become a national joke. (A:  And it is a national joke.)  Ever since it predicted a summer warmer and drier than average in 2007 Ė followed by some of the worst floods in living memory Ė its forecasts have been so unerringly wrong that even the chief adviser to our Transport Secretary might have noticed.


The Met Officeís forecasts of warmer-than-average summers and winters have been so consistently at 180 degrees to the truth that, earlier this year, it conceded that it was dropping seasonal forecasting. Hence, last week, the Met Office issued a categorical denial to the Global Warming Policy Foundation that it had made any forecast for this winter. Immediately, however, several blogs, led by Autonomous Mind, produced evidence from the Met Office website that in October it did indeed publish a forecast for December, January and February. This indicated that they would be significantly warmer than last year, and that there was only ďa very much smaller chance of average or below-average temperaturesĒ. So the Met Office has not only been caught out yet again getting it horribly wrong (always in the same direction), it was even prepared to deny it had said such a thing at all.  (A:  Why donít they fire them all?  eh?  Why donít they just fire all these liars?)


The real question, however, is why has the Met Office become so astonishingly bad at doing the job for which it is paid nearly £200 million a year (A:  AmazingÖ £200 million to tell the weatherÖ always wrong.) Ė in a way which has become so stupendously damaging to our country?


The answer is that in the past 20 years, as can be seen from its website, the Met Office has been hijacked from its proper role to become wholly subservient to its obsession with global warming. (At one time it even changed its name to the Met Office ďfor Weather and Climate ChangeĒ.) This all began when its then-director John Houghton became one of the worldís most influential promoters of the warmist gospel. (A:  And it IS a gospel, as you all know.)  He, more than anyone else, was responsible for setting up the UNís Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and remained at the top of it for 13 years. (A:  So he was well paid for telling lies.)  It was he who, in 1990, launched the Met Officeís Hadley Centre for Climate Change, closely linked to the Climatic Research Unit in East Anglia (CRU) (A:  The other big liars.), at the centre of last yearís Climategate row, which showed how the little group of scientists at the heart of the IPCC had been prepared to bend their data and to suppress any dissent from warming orthodoxy. 


The reason why the Met Office gets its forecasts so hopelessly wrong is that they are based on those same computer models on which the IPCC itself relies to predict the worldís climate in 100 years time. (A:  They canít even get tomorrowís forecast right, eh.)  They are programmed on the assumption that, as CO2 rises, (A:  Öand itís an assumption, rightÖ) so temperatures must inexorably follow. For 17 years this seemed plausible, because the world did appear to be getting warmer. We all became familiar with those warmer winters and earlier springs, which the warmists were quick to exploit to promote their message (A:  Thatís because they forgot that they were all predicting in the 70s we were going to freeze to death, right.) Ė as when Dr David Viner of the CRU famously predicted to The Independent in 2000 that ďwithin a few years winter snowfall will be a very rare and exciting eventĒ. (Last week, that article from 10 years ago was the most viewed item on The Independentís website.)


But in 2007, the computer models got caught out, failing to predict a temporary plunge in global temperatures of 0.7C, more than the net warming of the 20th century. Much of the northern hemisphere suffered what was called in North America ďthe winter from hellĒ. Even though temperatures did rise again, in the winter of 2008/9 this happened again, only worse.


The Met Office simply went into denial. Its senior climate change official, Peter Stott, said in March 2009 that the trend towards milder winters was likely to continue. There would not be another winter like 1962/3 ďfor 1,000 years or moreĒ. Last winter was colder still. And now we have another even more savage ďrandom eventĒ, for which we are even less prepared. (The Taxpayersí Alliance revealed last week that councils have actually ordered less salt this winter than last.)  (A:  They are so corrupt though, these local councils and regional councils.)


The consequences of all this are profound. Those who rule over our lives have been carried off into a cloud-cuckoo-land for which no one was more responsible than the zealots at the Met Office, subordinating all it does to their dotty belief system. Significantly, its chairman, Robert Napier, is not a weatherman but a ďclimate activistĒ, previously head of WWF-UK, one of our leading warmist campaigning groups.  (A:  And so they are.  The same with the newspapers too; they have Ďclimate specialists.í Whatís a climate specialist?  Itís a failed journalist that scratches his living as a hurrah person for the group.)


At one end of this colossal diversion of national resources, permeating every level of government (A:  And it has permeated every level of government, this religion.), we have the hapless Mr Quarmby, who feels obliged to follow the Met Office and advise that the present freeze is a ďrandom eventĒ and calls for no special responses Ė with the results we see on every side. At the other, fixated by the same belief system, we have our Climate Change Secretary, Chris Huhne, (A:  Now, why do you have a climate change secretary?  Hmm?) hoping we can somehow keep our lights on and our economy running by spending hundreds of billions of pounds on thousands more windmills.


More than once in the past week, as our power stations have been thrashed way beyond normal peak power demand, the contribution of wind turbines has been so small that it has registered as 0 per cent. (See the website for the New Electricity Trading Arrangements: Google ďneta electricity summary pageĒ, and find the table of ďsource by fuel typeĒ.) At the heart of all this greenie make-believe that has our political class in its thrall has been the hijacking of the Met Office from its proper role. Itís no longer just a national joke: it is turning into a national catastrophe.


Ainít that the truth!  But itís the same in every country.  What they failed to mention here is that there is a social agenda at work to change the world.  Thatís how they got the European Union up and going.  They set up, supposedly, economic advisors across the countries and then once they started getting money going in to the EU Ė just for free trade you understand, they kept telling the people Ė they were setting up massive bureaucracies, because you see, free trade took care of all economy and if you run the economy, everything to do with economy makes your laws, you end up as a concerted, unified group under a new system.  I'll be back with more after this break.


Hi folks.  Weíre back and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix.  Just to follow on from that last article though, I was talking about how they got the EU parliament up and going.  They did it, again, through economics and giving money, before it was a parliament, to this commission; they called it a commission.  What they did with the cash was set up massive bureaucracies in every country that tied all their economic laws together.  If you tie up all your economic laws together you donít have a country anymore.  You have a new entity and thatís where the money from Cancun is going. 


Itís going into every country to set up a massive bureaucracy that will deal with all your economics because everything is to do with supposedly pollution and production and all the rest of it, and carbon output and ya-da, ya-da, ya.  Out of that will come, really, the big arm, if not THE big world government, it will be the big arm of the world government.  THATíS what the money is all for. They know itís a con.  They all know itís a con.  Iíve read the articles here from many of the big players admitting that itís a con.  Like Stewart in Canada who was in the federal government who said, it doesnít matter if the science of global warming is all bogus, she said, it will help to shape equality and put equality across the world.  This is what they mean by their little terms.  What they mean by equality doesnít mean what you think of.  These are little terms they use in the globalist socialist society. 


Now, Denmark hereÖ


Denmark Gives Away $7B USD, or 2% of GDP to Carbon Credit Traders

Submitted by Jack H Barnes on 12/24/2010 /


(A:  This is quite a good one actually, because the first ones in on the act are the con men.  It says hereÖ)


The Danish tax authority has been robbed blind by a carbon trading scandal that has rocked the market for carbon off sets: while the story saw some press a year ago, significantly higher losses have since been reported and the MSM has ignored the story. 

The Danish Auditor General is on the case now as the scope of the crime has become obvious, and grown exponentially since it was first reported.  Originally discussed as a quasi-small-time dollar scam, (A:  I remember it at the time.) the reality a year later is a lot larger: Europol is estimating a value on the case of 38 Billion Kroners and the values seem to keep going up.


Connie Hedegaard, then the Climate & Energy Minister for Denmark (A:  As I say, WHEN did we get these climate and energy ministers?  Itís a new religion.  Itís like having a high priest in your parliament isnít it? that waves a censer in front of you or something and reads palms, you know.)  is now the EU Climate Commissioner.  (A:  Thatís great.  You see how they make a career in this?)  While she was with the Danish government, she helped set up and manage a system where there were no background checks on the listings of permitted traders.  This removal of identification was done even though the EU requires at least passport.  This helped a group of fake, rogue traders set up a program that looted the Danish economy of up to 2% of its gross GDP in lost VAT taxes. 


Here's How:


The Denmark CO2 permit registry was setup with extremely lax rules and regulations, possibly intentionally.  (A:  Could very well be.)  In 2007, Ms. Hedegaard removed the requirement for identification and in a very short period of time traders figured out the loopholes and started to back up the proverbial truck.  How? To put it simply: you could round robin CO2 credits, booking the VAT as a bonus each time.


What is painfully obvious is that over 1,100 of the 1,256 (or about 88%) of the registered traders listed in their system were bogusly set up for fraudulent activity. The traders have since been delisted as the scope of the crime becomes obvious. 


The fake but registered traders used made up, unique addresses for their business: in one famous case, a trader was listed as trading out of a parking lot in London.  In another, the trader took the name of a dead Pakistani national. 


The fraud centered on the use of VAT as a mechanism to generate real non-taxed cash flow.  An international trader would buy VAT free credits from one nation, and then resell them to a VAT added customer in a second nation, pocketing as much as 25% of the cost of the trade as a personal commission.  The trader then kept the VAT difference in lieu sending in the VAT to the necessary tax system, effectively arbitraging the VAT system (See, e.g., Cap and Trade; Leaving Las Vegas, ďThe Hole Youíre InĒ).


This trade was coined a ďcarouselĒ as the traders would re-export the credits, claiming the VAT only to reimport the credits and reselling them again with a new VAT assigned.  They could wash, rinse and repeat booking up to a 25% VAT in the process each time. 


That will be happening in other countries too because the whole of Europe, you see, once they amalgamate you they always bring in a Value Added Tax.  In Canada they call it the General Sales Tax, brought in by Brian Mulroney; lyiní Brian they used to call him.  He said it was to help pay off the national debt; when he left he was honest and he says, not one penny went to pay off any national debt.  Apparently when they unify the Americas as well, they want a General Sales Tax but I donít know how they will get it into the States; itís maybe not time yet.  So VAT and GST is just the same kind of thing.  And itís causing mayhem even in Canada, the GST; try to post something and itís a different tax for each province you send it to.


Now, in Canada too, most folk donít know it, there are exemptions from vaccinations.  Itís the same sort of exemptions youíd use in the military, if you get called up for the military.  It saysÖ


Exemptions from vaccinations Ė Vaccination Risk Awareness Network



Vaccinations are NOT mandatory in Canada. ďUnlike some countries, immunization is not mandatory in Canada; it cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution.  (A:  Itís not really called a constitution, but anywayÖ  Thatís the music coming in, but Iíll read these off because youíve got to know what they are to get your children exempt.  I'll be back with more after this break.)


Hi folks.  Weíre back and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about vaccinations and exemptions.  A lot of folk have been writing to me about them, in the States and elsewhere and Canada too.  Iím putting a link up tonight to a site which gives you some data on what to do and so on, for Canada.  It says hereÖ


Three provinces require proof of immunization for school entrance: Ontario and New Brunswick for diphtheria, tetanus, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella immunization; Manitoba for measles. But, exceptions are permitted on medical or religious grounds and reasons of conscience (A:  Thatís the same as the military isnít it? in war time when youíre drafted.); legislation and regulations must not be interpreted to imply compulsory immunization.Ē (Immunization in Canada; May, 1997; Vol 23S4 and Canadian National Report on Immunization; 1996).  (A:  Iíll put up these links as well.)


This means that nobody in Canada can be forced to receive a vaccination. In some cases, nursery schools, daycares, and other schools which are privately owned and operated can demand vaccination for enrollment. But publically-funded schools and daycares cannot.


Furthermore, Canadian Medical Law clearly states that healthcare recipients must be informed of all significant risks posed by any invasive medical procedure that carries a risk of injury or death. Vaccination is such a procedure; every Canadian must have received and understood all the information that is pertinent to the vaccination(s) to which they consent.  (A:  How many of them bother toÖ how many doctors tell you? or nurses?  They donít even know themselves.)


Legal Exemptions & Forms Note that in Ontario, exemption forms must be notarized by one of: a notary public, a lawyer, or a commissioner of oath (the latter is usually accessible at any municipal building).  (A:  And itís a lot cheaper too.  Iíve got a bunch of links for you to look up for your own information on more and more and more of this.)


Canadian National Report on Immunization, 1996 / Volume: 23S4 - May 1997


In the States too, it happens.  You have these exemptions; most folk donít know it.  Iíve had some amazing correspondence from people, on their correspondence to the authorities that want them to be immunized, and when they say religious grounds, they come back at you and ask you if your belief system is in keeping with your minister, your priest or your rabbi.  In other words, they are trying to find out if you are just an oddball that wonít go along and they are trying to play religion and theology with you, your knowledge in theology and so on. But you can simply keep them running in circles for a while and waste their time until they give up.  You are allowed.  Itís your body!  If you are not in charge of your own body then you donít have the right, youíre a slaveÖ understand?  Youíre a slave; someone else owns you.  When governments can say you must do thisÖ And an injection IS an INVASIVEÖ it still comes under invasive surgery.  Something is being stuck into your body; it doesnít have to be a scalpel.  And something else pumped into it, all that foreign matter, you know, from aborted fetuses and bits of chickens and pigs and all the rest of it all mushed together, which they call a science.  But itís up to you if you want to get these or not. 


In Britain in fact, they have just announced that almost 70% of people last year in Britain got the flu shot, including the swine flu added into it.  Itís got the same amount of folk with flu this year as last year.  Of course their excuse for that is, well, if everyone got it, 100% you see, there would be no flu at all, which is rubbish because it tells you on the package:  it canít be guaranteed to stop you getting the flu.


There is Clint from Ontario on the line.  Are you there Clint?


Clint:  Hi Alan, thanks for taking my call again.  Quickly, Iíll just talk about the vaccine form here, since you are on the subject.  I have one of those myself, a while ago.  What it is, itís a Statement of Conscience and Religious Belief affidavit.  Itís from the Immunization of School Pupils Act of Ontario from 1990.  I got this form.  Itís from the Ministry of Long-Term Health Care.  Again, like you said, you have to get it notarized from a notary public, which I have done so for myself and my son.  These vaccines are more than likely going to be made mandatory.But I have a couple of quick questions I just want to ask you and then Iíll hang up and let you speak.  It has things to do with the past weekend here, Christmas.  I want to ask you about Saturnalia, which Iím sure you might be able to tell us about.  Where do you think Prince William, Prince Willy was over the weekend?  As you know he was away from his family; they said he was on some flight mission or something but Iím sure there is more to it than that. Would that be involved with Saturnalia or was he involved in some sort of ritual on that day?  And there is the new species that were found in Siberia, in that cave; Iíd like to hear your take on those if you can.  As I got you on the phone Iíd like to wish you a Happy New Year before the day comes.


Alan:  Same to you. 


Clint:  Okay, Alan. Thanks.  Have a good night.


Alan:  I donít know about the new species they have found; I havenít looked into that.  But I do know that the Royalty, they do have the special times for upping them into the higher lodges, as they call them.  Youíve got to understand too, the Duke of Kent traditionally is the head of the Grand Lodge of England, and he is the Queenís cousin.  They like to get their boys in to it. There is also one particular realm of Masonry where youíre jacked up there according to the age that you hit as well.  Remember too, they are sussed out; everyone is sussed out to get into the higher knowledge because you can get someone who is not terribly bright, like Prince Charles, and who might let something slip out of the bag, you couldnít quite trust him, so he wouldnít get too far.  He got to the 40th degree on his 40th birthday and that was celebrated in front of a crowd in England.  I remember watching it on television and then he put his arm, of course, in the square and then held it out to the public, and they were all Lords with their robes on and they all applauded like crazy, then he drunk his wine.  Something will be happening with the rest of them too. 


There is no doubt about it, when you see the inaugurations they have there for Royalty, when you see the Queen sitting on a raised dais and these guys standing round her, itís reminiscent of the ancient times of Nimrod.† In fact even the ermine cloak they wear, with the red in it too Ė by the way, thatís where Santa comes from, in reality; it wasnít Coca Cola at all.  Look at the Lords from the 1800s; they wore the Santa Claus suits, and now itís just a robe they wear, red, but around the fur collar itís ermine.  Itís black and white and youíll see that in the same etchings of the depictions of Nimrod in ancient times.  No one has ever explained to me why we have sort of ancient systems going all the way back to Nimrod, practiced in Westminster Abbey or elsewhere, or wherever they happen to go into to have their inaugurations.  So something will be happening, Iíve no doubt, this winter. They do love the rebirth; this is the rebirth time.  This is the time when the sun hangs on the cross for 3 days before it starts rising again.  This is their big, big party time.  Itís the same time of year, too, they used to go into groves in ancient times.  Iíve no doubt that more of that will be going on as well.  But we will never get the whole truth; thatís why they keep all this stuff secretive. 


The brighter ones in the Royal family will get upstairs, even Prince Phillip isnít too bright.  Heís got a habit of nipping at the bottle and he comes out with crazy statements like the British people are far lazier than the Germans, and this is from a Prussian speaking who was kicked out of Greece, by the people of Greece.  They didnít want him ruling over them there either.  Heís had an awfully cushy life on it, but he canít be trusted so he wonít get terribly high on the totem pole, neither will Charles.  So they are looking for fresh blood to get up there, into the higher realms of reality and understanding.


There is also Charles from Toronto.  Are you there Charles?


Charles:  Good evening, Alan.  How are you?


Alan:  Not too bad. 


Charles:  Great.  You often say that people comment that you are too dark or you donít come across with the upside.  I appreciate your particular form of what I call Ďreality therapyí because we donít get it from too many places.  But my question to you tonight is this: Are there issues that you will not go into because you feel they are too dark for the public to hear, or areas that you feel may be personally dangerous if you start speaking about them?  I know Catherine Austin Fitts, who does a lot of good work, says there is a certain way that she has to speak about things without bringing moreÖ a dangerÖ you know, repercussions upon herself, at least thatís how I interpret it.  She has been asked to go into greater depth but she hasnít dealt with that issue.  So I am curious to hear what you may have to say.


Alan:  There is no doubt at all, even to get the public up to the stage Iíve managed to expose today to them, took a preparative phase.  Youíve got to prepare them in their minds, from where they have been, with the regular conspiracies and all the rest of it, into the harsher realities without breaking them all together.  In other words, you want to lead them up without putting them off and show them how bleak it really is.  Because if you want to understand an enemy, you must understand all of the enemy and not just the parts that donít seem so dangerous.  That took a lot of time and preparation on their minds to get them step by step ready for the harsh reality of living in a controlled society, where every little escape hatch that you thought was out there for you literally has been welded shut.  Thatís not a pleasant thing to impart to people at all.  Of course youíll take a lot of hammering too.  People will say, oh, youíre a downer, you are notÖ Well, I said years ago on a show, 10 or 11 years ago, I will never be a cheerleader for the public.† You understand?  I wonít tell them the bad news and say, but donít worry it will all be fine in the end.  As far as the public is concerned, they have to come to the decisions one by one.  I donít think there has ever been an age in history where the majority of the public have ever acted in unison for any cause whatsoever.  To be honest with you, I really donít.  It was the same during the American Revolution, only 3% did anything about it, the rest of them were bystanders, a few of them may have helped contribute some cash and stuff, but most of them stood by and let things happen, watch their farms get burned down and their women raped and all the rest of it.  It takes a minority of people with the information to go forward with it and be a nuisance to the governments.  There is nothing else you can do right now except be a nuisance to the government, who knowÖ Do you understand, there is an old saying, it says, pick your battles. 


It means you also pick your battlefield.  Not just the battle but the battlefield, and the timing and so on for it.  The governmentÖ Yeah, the government up until now has always been the one in charge of picking the battlefields.  Always.  If people want to demonstrate in public they must get a license; they must put the date down.  A yea or nay is given to them if they can or they cannot.  You can get fined for going down the road with a placard, for instance, without a license.  We donít have freedom as such.  We allow the governments themselves, with their incredible lying to the public, as they guide us along like sheep Ė they are good shepherds and we are the sheep you see Ė they are guiding us into a world of what they call austerity.  Thatís another nice term for bringing you down to a poverty level.  Thatís from food, medicineÖ thatís all the way down.  Thatís the world they are bringing in for you.  And they do know, they do know, as they have been doing away with the farmers in Canada here for 50 years, they have been putting them under.  They do know that they are brining in a food shortage, eventually, too, and it will be on their terms and they will announce itís a crisis when they are ready for it.  They have, again, picked the battlefield for it.  The public themselves have been so fragmented at the bottom, there are lot of fake ones out there at the bottom too, all fighting for the same communist ideology that the big boys want them to fight for because it ties in with this new system.  But the public have never picked their own battlefield or stood up with any unanimity against anything the government plans to bring down. They will bring in famine, eventually.  Iím not kidding about this.  Itís not nay-saying.  Itís not being a nasty fortune teller.  Iíve read their articles.  Iíve read the CFR's articles.  I put the links up to the Council on Foreign Relationsí own web site where for 15 or 16 years they have had hundreds of their own people working on the coming food shortage. 


Charles:  Sure.   Itís all out there, you just have to be willing to look at it and a lot of people actively resist.  Itís not that people donít know.  Itís the people actively donít want to know.


Alan:  Yes.


Charles:  And thatís the issue.  So finding that 3% or that 5% of people who have the capacity, for whatever reason, to acknowledge it is the large part of the battle.  But there is no topic thatís too, too far out there, or too dangerous?  Like for instance, if you were to talk about it, that would bring their censure in on you much quicker.  I know they give you problems with your downloads and so on, but there is nothing where you thought it might just shut you down right away? 


Alan:  Oh, there are a few things.


Charles:  I assumed there would be.  I assumed, because you erudition is so broad there has got to be a few things.


Alan:  Oh, absolutely.  And you literally canít talk about them.  Itíd be so easy to be stirred up into being a leader for instance, and saying the wrong thing; immediately Iíd be off.  That would be it.  Of course you canít talk about a lot of the big players and organizations either, that you do know about, that are not talked about much, or at all, because once again, certain things are under official secrets acts and you are not supposed to have found any of this stuff out.  There are definitely things which would shut you down immediately.


Charles:  Thank you for your work and I ask everybody to continue to contribute to you because you are a very valuable resource to us all. 


Alan:  Thanks for calling, and thanks for that too because yeah, I really do need financial help.  I really do.  It costs a lot of cash to do what Iím doing here.  Iím getting fed up with shaking the tin cup to be honest with you, and keeping the advertisers off.  And itís been a hard, hard slog bringing people up, without putting them off, but step by step until more of them are able to understand on a higher level than they have ever understood before.  I have.  When I started with the Patriot Movement, as they called it at that time, I was so fed up listening to them navel-gazing and stuck looking at their bellybuttons.  They didnít realize the big pincer movement on the whole planet working together, worldwide to bring in a world system.  I did manage to change all of that, on the shows with Rollye James and so on, and discuss it for the first time. 


Itís been a hard, hard slog and you tear you hair out, believe you me, at times, wondering how to put something across to the public without demolishing them.  You donít want to demolish their spirit; they are already getting enough of that with the coming austerity and all the rubbish thatís getting foisted on them.  Eventually, remember, Agenda 21, there will be NO cars on the road that are privately owned.  And meanwhile, you are going to pay, literally, for every bit of food you eat, for carbon taxesÖ oh, it took so much carbon to produce that, you know, and artificial manure and so on, fertilizer, until every item that you buy will be tacked on with carbon taxes to this massive global government.  And we MUSTNíT forget that is the REAL intentions behind the carbon taxes and the so-called global warming, is to get massive funding from the public to set up massive bureaucracies across the world, tied together dealing with all economy.  That is effectively a world government.  Thatís how they did it with the European Union, the same technique.


Charles:  They want one world culture too, right, where we all think the same way, right?


Alan:  All think the same way.  Itís the never ending story; itís not just once we are all thinking the same way, they literally do plan, they do plan to breed special types of categories of workers and people, exactly the same as was in Brave New World.  They literally have discussed this, at the top, and again, that will be the last thing they want to tell you.  It will go under genetic enhancement.  They are already using that; they are using the term Ďgenetic enhancement,í for women to choose what they think are going to be specially ordered children.  I even know some people who have ordered them, and had it done.  I'll be back with more after this break.


Hi folks.  Iím back and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix.  Iím going to put links up tonight on...


The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America


Itís a short video I think and itís based on Charlotte Iserbytís book [The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America].  Itís a short one but even the book itself is worth reading, how it was deliberately put into effect, a new system of dumbing down the children, who feel great about themselves but they canít spell or think and they have no critical reasoning ability. Thatís how you get a society thatís going to be happy and egosyntonic and narcissistic and be quite happy regardless of whatís happening around them.  Thatís why theyíve got them today.  Iíll put that one up too. 


Iíll also put up this one here.  Years ago I wrote a poem about the greatest capitalists were the communists, because I knew the agenda, the Reece Commission and Normal Dodd and so on, when they said theyíd join the two systems together, and itís happened.  Itís happened.  It was always planned that way. The two must come together, under the dialectic process.  And you need an enemy so they created the Soviet system and the Chinese system. 


Fresh humiliation for eurozone as China says it will bail out debt-ridden nations

By Daily Mail Reporter / / 23rd December 2010


Pledge: Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao offered to buy Greek bonds in October and the country has also agreed to buy out Portuguese debt.  (A:  Now, itís still a communist, technically a communist country; actually itís more fascist.  But all systems by nature are fascist.  To even have a business in China you must go to the Politburo and join them and you pay your way up there, obviously from all your profit.  You have to pay an awful lot back to the politburo.  And the government technically still owns the biggest plants in the country.)


China has said it is willing to bail out debt-ridden countries in the euro zone using its $2.7trillion overseas investment fund.


In a fresh humiliation for Europe, Foreign Ministry spokesman Jiang Yu said it was one of the most important areas for China's foreign exchange investments.


The country has already approached struggling European countries with financial aid, including offering to buy Greece's debt in October and promising to buy $4billion of Portuguese government debt.


'To have any discernible effect China will have to buy a lot more than 5billion euros if they expect to have any impact on the negative sentiment surrounding Europe,' said Michael Hewson, currency analyst at CMC Markets. 


Do you realize how farcical the whole thing is? with the communist/capitalist stuff?  It always was, you knowÖ  It always wasÖ utterly farcical.  FarcicalÖ because the US, the whole debt is owned by China.  Why would you let supposedly, supposedly Ė if it were true, right, your worst enemy, that actually is an antithesis to your system Ė own all of your debt?  Hmm?  Itís such a joke!  But this is what they give us for news, isnít it?  An utter joke!  China did not come up by its bootstraps because it suddenly had a lust for material goods.  It was brought up by the World Trade Organization pumping your bucks in and then the GATT Treaty that allowed all your plants to move over to China, and your tax money that funded them moving over there and setting up the big factories; now everything is made in China.  Again too, that was also the old soviet ideal; youíd have one plant literally making shoes, one planet making something else, and that is the system you are coming in to.  And eventually you will have ONE outlet for all of your food. The United Nations has already said that from their Department of Agriculture.  They will dish it out to you, and you will reduce your population because you will be rationed, you see, and itís up to you how you bring your population down.  That was also said at the UN. 


From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. 



Topics of show covered in following links:


The Green Hijacking of the Met Office

Carbon Credit Fraud doing Well in Denmark

Exemptions From Vaccines-Canada

Immunization in Canada

Dumbing Down of America Video

"Communist" China to Bail out "Capitalist West"



Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:


"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3


"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (EspaŮol) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (PortuguÍs)


Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)


Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)


"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"