Sept. 6, 2011 (#913)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:


Poem Copyright Alan Watt Sept. 6, 2011:

Terminal Taxation and No Save Haven:

"We Can Never Neglect the Major Foundations,
With Multiple Think-Tanks Advising All Nations,
Multilateral Governance Includes Those Think-Tanks,
Heads of Nations, The U.N. and All the Big Banks,
NGOs Replace the Public or Silent Majority,
Soviet Style as We Go into Planned Poverty,
The Police State was Formed Not to Fight Terror
But to Handle the Public with Force and Fervour,
For the Planned Crises, Financial, Food,
Energy, And Exchanging a Roof for a Hood,
Terminal Taxation, Redistribution of Wealth
To Offshore Corporations Glowing with Health,
Yes, the Banks and Foundations with Devolution,
Use Us then Implement Their Final Solution"
© Alan Watt Sept. 6, 2011


Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Sept. 6, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
alternate sites:  ,   .us  ,   .ca

mirror site:
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:

Information for purchasing Alanís books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check Ė in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 6th of September 2011.  For newcomers, I always get this off at the beginning of the broadcast and I tell you to go into Ė then I wonít pester you all the way through the broadcast.  So go into the site, help yourself to the audios which are there for free download.  Youíll find hundreds and hundreds of audios with different topics.  Itís really all combined together into this new world order idea, to show you how the world is always planned ahead by those who already control it, in all ages.  They have hundreds and sometime thousands of think tanks working on different parts of society.  And they use crisis.  They cause crisis.  They cause situations then they bring about the solutions.  The whole idea is to make us thing weíre just stumbling down through time and politicians are somehow getting us out of the muck that we fall into.  Nothing is further from the truth.  They actually plan the future. And for globalization you need lots of crisis to bring it all together.   And thatís the financial crisis, the ongoing wars that were planned a long time ago.  Youíll find that even the New American Century group, which were the neo-cons, basically just transferred onto the neo-libs, neo-dems Ė whatever you want to call them, itís all the same thing Ė to carry on the same wars.  On schedule in fact; theyíre right on cue with them.  Theyíve got a couple to go yet and then theyíll have the world in their hands.  And at the same time all of the taxpayers that are paying for these wars have to get soaked in the future; weíre already supposedly bankrupt, so bankrupt but the bankers can still give out millions of dollars in bonuses to each other.  Curious that, isnít it?  But itís all a plan to bring us into a world order, a new type of system of living, or existing, where youíll learn to go along with austerity, which basically means poverty. 


So help yourself to those audios.  Remember too, you are the audience who bring me to you.  I donít bring on the advertisers and make money that way, which is okay; thatís how most hosts have to make their money.  I rely upon you the listeners to buy the books and disks I have for sale at  [Order and donation options listed above.]  Itís all on the web site on how to do it and how to find the books and disks and so on.  Remember, straight donations are awfully welcome, because as I say, it takes quite a lot to do even what Iím doing here.  Itís an all-day job; itís a 7 day a week affair.  And itís not a business, believe you me.  If it was a business Iíd be off doing something else and making some money.  However, this is imperative to do at this time; thatís the only reason I came out in the first place.  Because I knew what was going on, many, many years ago, and I said in 2001 when the towers Ė the Jachin and Boaz Ė went down, I said, the hardest thing from now on will be to hold onto your sanity as we go through the changes, the forced changes for this new American century.  Because the century really started in 2001, not the year 2000 at all.  So weíre on our way of course.


Weíve watched the bombings of different countries continue.  Weíve watched them change their gun sights from one country to the next.  Most folk donít even notice, in fact they forget which one we were fighting last, or fighting now, and all that kind of stuff.  And thatís all intentional.  Like George Orwell said, who are we fighting today; is it East Asia, Eurasia or West Asia, who is it?  And of course, youíre supposed to always know who weíre fighting and why.  Because the boogeyman just jumps from one country to the next.  And we watch the big boys...  Actually, the banks own the big boys that are doing the bombing.  I hope you know that, that even GE, General Electric and all these big Military-Industrial boys are actually owned by the same banks, that we all bailed out supposedly, and theyíve got more cash than they know what to do with, because you see, the money that went with the housing crisis disappeared into money heaven, and somebodyís got the key.  Back with more after this break.


Hi folks, weíre back.  This is Cutting Through The Matrix and what I try and do on this broadcast is basically tie in what is dished out to us by this absurd thing called the media, which is owned of course by the same people who own everything else.  Anyway, I try and add on the parts that they omit from their stories, or tell you why itís really happening.  And thatís what you really have to understand, that nothing is just stumbling along through time, as I say.


This whole agenda with bringing us all into a state of poverty was planned many, many, many moons ago and written about in papers too, at world meetings, by mainly the non-governmental organizations which are part of this new parallel government system.  I was reading different articles today to do with the International Monetary Fund and the Council on Foreign Relations, all these big think tanks, and the Monetary Fund that works with The World Bank, who talked about the NGOs, how necessary they are.  Thereís thousands and thousands of them. You donít vote these people in and yet here they are lobbying governments and theyíve got a direct chain of command right to the top dog basically.  They get things done.  Because the guy whoís put in as the President or Prime Minister of any country is told to look out for them and do what theyíre told. So thatís really how the system works. 


Itís a parallel government and itís comprised of the bankers, the international money lenders.  Itís comprised of the foundations which they also own.  The foundations fund the thousands of NGOs.  Thereís a good book.  Itís called Foundations:  Their Power and Influence.  Itís a must-get book if you want to understand how theyíve been at this for a long, long time.  That came out after the Reece Commission back in the 1950s when the Congress decided to do an inquiry into the foundations and why they were funding what seemed to be all the far left groups, or communist groups in America.  Quigley talked upon that too, because he was the historian for the Council on Foreign Relations and he said that the CFR was often mistaken for the communist party because they had the same goals in mind.  Well, what does that tell you?  The CFR, remember, was established as part of the Royal Institute of International Affairs which was established on top of the international bankers who founded the whole darn thing. 


So hereís the international bankers funding what seems to be its opposition which is communism.  Itís because the bankers wanted a world government to come down the road.  They talked about it in the 1800s.  They wrote about it in the early 1900s, in their big society magazines and their books as well, which they published.  They knew about all the pitfalls and how theyíd have to shake off nationality, nationalism, to get them to do it.  And basically we live through a script.  Thatís what you find.  Youíre living through a script written long before you were born and weíre just going through the upheavals as they push each part of the script.  Itís amazing, with every crisis that they cause, with internationalism, and the Eurozone and the Euro currency, and forcing countries to amalgamate into a region with a new super parliament.  They cause more problems, and they use those problems to push even deeper into amalgamation. Itís just amazing how. 


Theyíre very clever at the top.  Thereís no doubt about it.  Theyíre good psychopaths because psychopaths study normal humans, you see. They study us to see how we tick.  And one of the first things they learned is how easily weíre all fooled.  Because you see, you as a normal person wouldnít do the kind of things that they do, therefore, if you donít do them then no one would do them. Thatís how you think.  And thatís how they get away with it. 


Now, we live in la-la land at the bottom.  All we get is the media to dish out the rubbish to us.  Remember what George Orwell talked about.  He talked about the outer party and the inner party.  So even the articles I read you from the Council on Foreign Relations, itís still from the outer party; itís meant for publication to the little people at the bottom, or the proles as Orwell called them, although most of the proles wonít bother reading this stuff, which they already know as well.  But itís better than having nothing at all.  The only other books you can get, really, are from bureaucrats and high-level functionaries within these organizations, who love to write their memoirs when they retire, or before they kick the bucket, generally.  Because theyíre psychopaths; theyíve got a tremendous ego and they want to be praised for their cunningness and prowess, and conning everybody.  They love to write about it to show you how geopolitics works and how we fooled the public at this time and this period and for that war, and then later on we fooled them in this war. They churn these kinds of books out but most of the folk donít read them unfortunately. 


But to get any truth at all at this level of reality, itís almost impossible.  Here you are getting sprayed like bugs, constantly since 1998, from the air.  And thereís thousands, probably, of videos up now on aerial spraying, of the chemicals which theyíve been dousing us with.  And of course, thereís all kinds of conspiracy theories come out of it, like oh maybe theyíre trying to help us by stopping the sunís rays coming out, and all that stuff, you know, prevent global warming and all that rubbish.  No.  The fact is you see, theyíre geoengineering the whole darn planet and theyíve been doing it for years.  Part of it of course, is aluminum oxide in the chem mix which comes down. And then Monsanto comes out with an aluminum-resistant plant basically because theyíve aluminized the surface soil, of almost the entire darn planet.  Why else do you think they would do that kind of thing?


So theyíre geoengineering the whole planet.  Eventually, just like the science fiction movies, youíll have scheduled weather.  Last year it was almost like scheduled weather.  Iíd have sun in the morning for about an hour and then it would overcast with the sprays, and then the sprays would cause complete overcast until it was all gray mush, then it would rain a bit and then it would clear up at 7pm for about 1 hour and then be sprayed and then covered again.  That happened day after day after day.  And folk are getting sick with it.  As I say, I used to stand and watch them all the time, still do occasionally, when I go out.  And youíll see them still spraying away with these long trails that go from horizon to horizon.  Then thereís the other type too, that spray halfway across and just stop; the thing doesnít fall out of the air, but it continues.  So itís not their propulsion mechanism; itís actually spraying thatís going on. However, thatís a different story. 


We canít get the truth on anything.  You understand?  Weíre given chicken feed at the bottom.  They throw chicken feed at the bottom.  Thatís what youíve got.  Itís like a pack of corn flakes; thereís nothing but these crumbs at the bottom, these little things.  Thatís what they scatter to the public, and thatís good enough for most of us isnít it? because most folk go into trivia anyway.  We canít even get to the truth on David Kelly, who was supposed to go up to and give his account of Britainís Ė and Israelís as well, because he worked with Israel on behalf of Britain Ė on the chemical warfare industry with viruses and bacterium, fast-breeders for kills for warfare purposes, all that kind of stuff.  He was going up for the inquest some years back.  Then they brought in their own coroner from the government who says, oh he just killed himself.  And nothing made any sense to people ever afterwards.  Kelly even said heíd be killed before they let him testify in court.  So he was. 


Fight for inquest on David Kelly is going to court (Alan:  ...again, you see...) after doctor launches legal challenge / Miles Goslett / 3rd September 2011


(A:  This happened last year.  It happened a year before...)

The Government faces a legal challenge next week over its decision not to hold a coroner's inquest into the death of Dr David Kelly.


Attorney General Dominic Grieve ruled one out in June after conducting an investigation that concluded there was 'overwhelming evidence' the Whitehall weapons inspector committed suicide.  (A:  Thatís what they call them, weapons; theyíre talking about bacterial and viral warfare.)


Now a doctor who is suspicious of the official account of Dr Kelly's death has started proceedings for a judicial review of Mr Grieve's decision.  (A:  Theyíll never get that.  Theyíll pay a lot of cash and...)


After an appeal just a week ago, hundreds of Daily Mail readers have contributed £33,000 to a fund set up to help secure an inquest.  (A:  You have to PAY for an inquest, eh.)


You scroll down and it says the last inquest literally closed it under the British Official Secrets Act for 70 years.  They have nothing to hide but for 70 years you canít find out what happened.  You understand, thatís how everything which they do at the top is blanketed.  Anything they donít want you to know:  canít talk about that, thatís under lock and key for 70 years.  Whoís going to be alive in 70 yearsí time? to care? and in a completely different world? with its own problems?  Because the same bunch and their descendants will still be running the world.  But that just shows you, and all this stuff they talked about, how he killed himself with a pruning knife, no fingerprints on it, all that kind of stuff is true, as far as we know. But there you go.  You canít even get truth on that.  So donít ever take anything from the media as any kind of truth at all.  It might be a little bit of truth, it might be complete fiction.  They put a lot of fiction into the news to bend your mind and make you believe things, to get you to go along with political agendas.  Itís very hard to get any reality, except the memory of yourself, living through events and times and periods, thatís the only facts that you can have.  What YOU experience, what YOU know, what YOU remember, before they get their historians involved and give you the official results. 


I read too, that to become an American citizen now, when youíre sworn in you have to admit or give the official version as to who attacked the twin towers and started the whole thing off on 9/11.  You canít put in what you may think.  No.  You got to say what THEY want you to say or you wonít get your citizenship.  Now thereís free speech and free thought for you.  Remember, everything starts with free thought.  If they can shackle free thought thatís it, over, itís finished.  Itís bad enough when you already have laws where you canít talk about certain things, BY LAW, you know.  And itís not a matter if youíre right or wrong about anything; itís the fact that you said it.  Did you say this?  Yeah, I did.  Oh, thatís it, guilty; thatís it.  Just, did you say it or not?  Thatís the charge, basically, did you say it or not.  Yeah, I did.† And here you are thinking youíll get your day in court.   No, they wonít let you talk about why you said what you said.  So thatís your freedom in this new world order.  And of course thereís many reasons for that.


So anyway, we canít get it on David Kelly and weíll never get anything except the official version of 9/11, even though the New American Century group with Strauss and Perle and Wolfowitz and all the rest of them, talked about the need for Ďa new Pearl Harbor eventí, even Kissinger, to kick off this whole thing, or the public wouldnít go for it.  The first thing in war is you must get the public opinion on your side, so you lie.  So a casualty of war is the truth right off the bat.  And you never get the truth as they bring us down.  Now, theyíre bringing us down into this poverty, which is austerity.  And they use basically all the greenies to help push it too.  And theyíre telling us to eat insects like yesterdayís articles I talked about, insects are good for you, all that kind of stuff.  Theyíre even paying some celebrities to say they really enjoy eating insects, but I wonít even go into that today. But I will talk on what austerity and poverty really mean.  Back with more after this break.


Hi folks, weíre back Cutting Through The Matrix and trying to make sense of the global system because they do print bit and pieces, even on a lower level which most folk still canít read because itís too boring to wade through all their nonsense.  Hereís an article here for instance and itís from the Stanley Foundation. 


And remember that foundations are the parallel government.  They are fronts for the international bankers.  Thatís how they get off with their tax breaks, etc. They put them into these foundations, charitable foundations that run full-time think tanks.  Some of the foundations fund maybe 100 other foundations.  Itís all money laundering basically through the foundations to make sure that there are so many of them that it appears to the ordinary people that theyíre all real but most of them just launder cash to non-governmental organizations, who also get cash from your governments. But you can only get cash from your governments as a non-governmental organization if you sign on and you must say that you are for RADICAL change.  Thatís been in effect since the end of World War II or when they signed the charter in 1946 at the United Nations.  Do you understand, thereís a parallel government at work here, radical change?  That means the end of the family, all the stuff that, as Quigley said, the communists were blamed for.  The CFR were actually behind it.  The CFR isnít comprised of little guys at the bottom.  Itís comprised of guys who work in Goldman Sachs and different corporations, the corporations that run the world. 


Hereís an article here from 2010.  Now, you see, internationalism, globalism, we all to catch on to the phrases.  And we say, oh I donít like the sound of that, and once enough people say that then they change the terms a little bit.  And one of them is called Ďmultilateralismí, you see.  Just like Ďsustainable developmentí took the place of ĎAgenda 21.í  This is called...


Stanley Foundation: Policy Analysis Brief

Making Multilateralism Work:

How the G-20 Can Help the United Nations


Bruce Jones

Dr. Bruce Jones is Director and Senior Fellow of the New York University Center on International Cooperation and Senior Fellow at The Brookings Institution, (A:  Now, international cooperation isnít just going shaking hands, etc, and having a few, you know, beers.  Itís literally about bringing this whole international system, economically, militarily, socially together.  Itís a lot of areas to cover.) where he directs the Managing Global Insecurity project that produced the recent coedited volume, Power and Responsibility: Building International Order in an Era of Transnational Threats (Brookings Press, 2009). Dr. Jones previously served in several capacities at the United Nations (A:  The United Nations too, was set up by the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations according to Quigley himself, who again was the historian for this same group.), including as Senior Advisor in the Office of the Secretary-General during the 2004-05 UN reform effort and Deputy Research Director of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change leading into the push for reform.  (A:  Theyíre talking about world reform; thatís what multilateralism is, you understand. All the things, everything that you know is all in that term.  And then they go on to talk about the...)


The moves in 2008-09, (A:  Well yeah, there were moves, because you see, economic warfare is one of the first forms of war that you use.  Economic warfare... itís been done down through many, many centuries. Even when they wanted the peasants who were getting a bit restless to go back to looking for worms to eat, like weíll shortly be doing again of course, but they would simply withhold all the gold, bring it all back in again, and then thereís no cash to spend.  Economic warfare is a great way of making folk obey.  You can do it by inflation and many other means too, and just jack up the prices until your currency is worth very little for you at the bottom.) prompted by the global financial crisis, to convene the G-20 at the level of heads of state constituted the first major adaptation of global arrangements to better fit with the fact of the emerging powers. (A:  You understand, you donít vote in the G20!  They give you years of hearing the name and you see them going off and getting the red carpet treatment and eating out of gold goblets and stuffing their faces and we hear about the bills that we have to all pay for it all.  But the fact is, this is a new form of government, or goverNANCE as they like to call it, where youíve got all these heads of state, for nations, that have formed their little club, you see, because they were told to, by the bankers, who own them all, and then once we start to accept them as a sort of natural thing, like gravity thatís just there, then they come out with the real agenda.  It is a form, itís the embryo of world government, when these guys meet and correspond with each other.)


. . . to convene the G-20 at the level of heads of state constituted the first major adaptation of global arrangements (A:  I like the terminology; thatís how the polite people talk, you see... arrangements...) to better fit with the fact of the emerging powers.  (A:  Itís the same when one of the elite want someone bumped off; they just say well that personís being a nuisance and itís done, you see.)  Clearly it will not be the last. G-20 negotiations have already given a critical impetus to governance reforms at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and The World Bank.  (A:  See, they all work together, the G20, the IMF, The World Bank, because part of their function is to bring The World Bank to its proper height running the world and the IMF is a sort of in-between heavy that dishes the cash out under conditions and high interest rates and then punishes a country by stealing everything from them if they canít pay back their loans.)


Predictably, if somewhat ironically, the expansion of the G-8 (A:  ...the other group, which is a lesser group, but theyíre still part of it too.) to include a wider range of countries including from the ďGlobal SouthĒ drew angry cries of exclusion, illegitimacy, and preemption at the United Nations. Early G-20 decisions also provoked a new bout of tensions between the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) (A:  Itís quite interesting that George Orwell in his 1984 book called it INGSOC; INGSOC was English Socialism.  This is ECOSOC, you see.) and the international financial institutions.


Criticisms of the G-20 from within the UN focus on its illegitimacy (defined in UN-centric terms). . . (A:  And Iíll continue with a little bit of this awful stuff when I come back from this break.)


Hi folks, weíre back Cutting Through The Matrix and I wonít read all of this very boring stuff because itís cryptic in certain places of course.  Itís meant to be cryptic; itís published for the public to see.  And most of them wonít read it anyway because itís like the Bible, after all the begattings you tend to fall asleep.  And then you see, oh theyíll be sand of the sea and all over the earth, and oh, globalism, eh.  Thatís what wakes you up; itís the little bits after youíve fallen asleep, you see.  If you can stay awake the whole time you catch little bits and pieces.  Thatís how things are deliberately written, you understand, because most of this stuff you could condense into about a quarter of what theyíve written here. 


What theyíre getting at basically is the G20 is a new form of global governance working hand-in-hand with the United Nations.  Thatís really what it is.  And they bewail the fact that they havenít quite matched up to all the goals theyíd hoped to bring the whole world to, by now, but if they work together even more closely they hope to rectify that pretty soon.  So youíve got to understand now, who voted the G20 in?  Nobody did, as I say; it just formed itself, right.  It starts with a couple of Prime Ministers talking together, next thing you know thereís a club formed, and now itís the G20, without the compass and square and the G in the middle, you know.  Regardless, thatís what youíve got, the G20 and the United Nations.  And it says here they hope too:


An important factor for the G-20/UN relationship, in particular, is the struggle to maintain UN legitimacy and effectiveness. . . (A:  Now, is the UN legitimate?  Well, again, you see, towards the end of World War II they already wanted to form this better League of Nations called the United Nations and they used World War II to do it.  And they got every head of state to sign on to the UN.  Every one signed away your sovereignty.  Every Prime Minister and President across the world that signed onto it gave away your sovereignty right there.  They signed onto all the treaties, binding treaties they said.  And so here is, ďmaintain UN legitimacyĒ. You see, it never had any input from the general public; well, they never do.  The proles donít count, like Orwell says, you know.  They were quite happy that the war was finished, when all this skullduggery was going on.  But this was actually done.  Your sovereignty was signed away and every government since then has been run by members of the Council on Foreign Relations that helped set up the United Nations.  Iíll put this up tonight at for those that can stay awake, like the Old Testament, and then find the little juicy bits and wake yourselves up again,)


And youíll see what they are really getting at, because no one has voted... No nation on earth has asked its people, how would you like to be in a global governance system?  What do you think about the G20; do you want to vote for it or not?  You never had that opportunity.  How about the United Nations?  Not that either. And yet every treaty that goes down the pike your President or Prime Minister signs it into law and youíre bound by it, right down to how you can build your house, where you can build your house, or if you canít build your house at all.  Itís all coming from the United Nations.  And again, this was put out by one of their many think tanks that work for them, the Brookings Institute and other ones and the Stanley Foundation, that generally are overlapping, these CEOs and directors overlapping within 2 or 3.  Thatís what they call their Ďcirclesí.  Going back to the days of Cecil Rhodes, their circles of influence, and then they overlap with other circles of influence, and thatís how this system, this parallel government works. 


As thatís happening weíre on target for austerity because you see, they want a post-consumerist society. And they told us that before they crashed the banks the last time.  So now youíll have to be a post-consumer society and maybe a hand-me-down society, if they allow you to sell or trade without a license.  Thatís been forbidden already because they wonít allow you to have your yard sales and stuff.  Anyway...  Right now itís getting bad, of course, as we well know, and thereís no sign on the horizon that itís supposed to get any better.  And I mean supposed to get any better.  This says...


More restaurants are targeting customers who use food stamps / Jonathan Ellis and Megan Luther / Sept 13, 2011


The number of businesses approved to accept food stamps grew by a third from 2005 to 2010, U.S. Department of Agriculture records show, as vendors from convenience and dollar discount stores to gas stations and pharmacies increasingly joined the growing entitlement program.


Now, restaurants, which typically have not participated in the program, are lobbying for a piece of the action.


(A:  Then it goes into the different companies that are going for it...) Louisville-based Yum! Brands, whose restaurants include Taco Bell, KFC, Long John Silver's and Pizza Hut, is trying to get restaurants more involved, federal lobbying records show.  (A:  So theyíre even lobbying the government for it.)


More retailers say yes to food stamps.  (A: well, because you see, thatís the only way itís going to go, until no oneís got any money and weíll all be on food stamps, maybe getting the occasional handout from China, I donít know.)


You see, thatís post-industrial, post-technological.  Actually weíre almost a post-service economy.  And this is whatís left for you.  All you have to do now is to supply young fools, called your sons, to go off to war and fight the last few wars to bring democracy for these global bankers, across the world.  And you get a central bank in place, make sure theyíre all inoculated to make them dumb, stupid and not living very long because theyíll come down with cancers, and then you can all just die off.  Thatís basically the agenda.  Itís basically the agenda. 


Now, while all this is going on they just canít get enough vaccines in you.  I read today that they actually want to give you boosters, eventually every year.  I read that article about two or three years ago from the United Nations World Health Organization.  And of course, these things are not for what you think they are.  Very little in this world is what you think it is, even the stuff you eat that you call food.  Anyway...


Narcolepsy link to swine flu vaccine established - victims to get compensation - HELSINGIN SANOMAT INTERNATIONAL


Victims of the surge in cases of narcolepsy after the vaccination campaign against the H1N1 or swine flu virus nearly two years ago (A:  The virus that wasnít there.) will be entitled to compensation.


The compensation will be primarily the responsibility of the Finnish Pharmaceutical Insurance Pool. Decisions on compensation are to be made in the coming weeks.  (A:  ...etc, etc, and that was for Helsinki; thatís where this was published.)


The other countries have ignored it because we are so used to having doctors con us.  Theyíll tell you theyíre dying of something else and we just accept it.  For the Western world, weíre just too dumbed down Iím afraid to even stand up and be indignant anymore.  Weíre too dumbed down and fairly content with trivia to be bothered to stand up for our own.  And again too, we donít really like children; we abort more than we give live births to.  So we canít even use them as an excuse, and future generations and all that stuff.


Another article I talked about too, and just touched on, was the...


All Party Parliamentary Group for World Governance


 (A:  This is an official body, one of many actually.)

The All-Party Parliamentary Group for World Governance (APPGWG) is a cross-party group with currently 163 members drawn from both Houses of the British Parliament, the European Parliament  (A:  And thatís a lot of countries in the European Parliament.), and the Welsh Assembly. It promotes discussions and awareness about global governance issues and the role of Parliamentarians in reforming the UN and other global institutions to make them more democratic, accountable and transparent.


Established in 1947  (A: see, right after they signed the charter for the United Nations.) by the then newly elected Member of Parliament Henry Usborne, the APPGWG is one of the oldest groups in the British Parliament. Its members established the One World Trust  (A:  ...again, another foundation.), a registered charity, in 1951.  (A:  And they will in turn pay for hundreds of non-governmental organization groups, full time, like with pensions and all.  Not bad working in the charity business, eh?)


Every year, the APPGWG and the One World Trust co-host a number of meetings for parliamentarians and the public featuring experts on global governance issues and related parliamentary processes. In addition, the Group holds an annual AGM to elect its officers and review the year's progress. At its AGM on the 8th of July 2008, the Group had 73 members in the House of Commons  (A:  And thatís from both parties by the way.), 61 members in the House of Lords members, 15 from the Welsh Assembly, and 15 from the European Parliament. This diverse membership gives the group a unique perspective on the problems raised by the need to reform global decision-making.  (A:  And that ties in with the last article, you see, completely.  They all dovetail together when you get each article from the different groups, because they all work with each other, you understand; theyíve all got the same bosses.  And yes, there are bosses at the top, that you never hear of.)


And I was reading an article the other day there, again, it was from Quigley.  He was talking about, in the early 60s and 70s, the thousands and thousands of farms that disappeared in the US, every year, because of government legislation primarily, and interference.  Now itís even worse with Monsanto and the rest of them putting farms under by saying that youíve got their seed on your land there, that has actually grown, and every court in the land will fine you.  Theyíre all on board together; itís a must-be.  Thousands went under in the 60s and 70s, sometimes 20,000 farms in a year!... were going under.  Now, these are the small farms, not these big massive agricultural businesses that are left.  And that was all intentional, putting the small guys out, because everything is monopolization, you understand.  And this article here, itís a continuation of it because itís the EPA, the Environmental Protection Agency, now, they told you youíre going to be vegetarian and all that.


EPA  Declares Hay  (A:  Hay, right, is...) a Pollutant in Effort to Antagonize Small and Mid-Sized U.S. Cattle Feeders  

(A:  See, theyíve said youíre going to be vegetarian in the future and they mean it.) / September 1, 2011


Billings, Mont. Ė During his presentation on the status of the nationís new country-of-origin labeling (COOL) law, and on behalf of the R-CALF USA COOL Committee, R-CALF USA member and Kansas cattle feeder Mike Callicrate was asked a non-COOL question that set convention goers on their heels during the 12th Annual R-CALF USA Convention held August 26-27 in Rapid City, S.D.  


ďHas the Environmental Protection Agency declared hay a pollutant?Ē an audience member asked.  Callicrate responded affirmatively and explained that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently initiated a formal enforcement action against his Kansas feedlot for, among other things, failure to store his hay in a pollution containment zone.  (A:  A pollution containment zone for your hay...) ďNow that EPA has declared hay a pollutant, every farmer and rancher that stores hay, or that leaves a broken hay bale in the field is potentially violating EPA rules and subject to an EPA enforcement action,Ē Callicrate said. ďHow far are we going to let this agency go before we stand up and do something about it?Ē    (A:  Well, how far are you going to go with it?  You understand, theyíve been doing this stuff for years because thereís a big agenda afoot.  And of course it sounds crazy, but itís crazy like a fox; it knows exactly what itís doing and why itís doing it.)


Callicrate is permitted to handle 12,000 cattle at a time in his feedlot, which is considered a small to mid-sized feedlot in an industry now dominated by mega-feedlots such as those owned by the worldís largest beef packer Ė JBS-Brazil (A:  ... a monopoly.) Ė with a one-time capacity of over 900,000 cattle; or the other mega-feedlot that also feeds hundreds of thousands of cattle at a time and is owned by the nationís second-largest beef packer - Cargill; or the other handful of mega feedlots with capacities of hundreds of thousands of cattle such as those owned by Cactus Feeders, Inc. and Friona Industries. 


In comments submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice, R-CALF USA estimated the above named mega-feedlots feed 18 percent of the nationís fed cattle each year while one-fourth of the nationís cattle are fed in feedlots with a one time capacity of 50,000 head or more. The largest of feedlots are getting larger and Callicrateís feedlot is among the group of small to mid-sized feedlots that are being pressured to exit the industry (A:  ...exit the industry...) so beef packers and corporate feedlot owners can increase their respective capacities. Data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) show that 45 feedlots with one-time capacities of between 1,000 or more cattle but less than 16,000 cattle have exited the industry from 2008 to 2010.   (A:  Thatís 45 feed lots that have gone under in that time because of the pressure of government working hand-in-glove with the big monopolists.  So shortly youíll have no hay at all.  And the next thing itíll just go on from that to that to that, etc, etc.  Quite nice isnít it?  Quite something the way that they treat you.  Itís quite something indeed.)


And weíve seen them coming down on the Amish groups and Mennonites for selling raw milk, even to people who joined the club basically.  That was the way around things; you join a club and itís private and then of course you can get your milk.  Well, weíve seen the raids last week, and when they come in theyíre not after drug enforcement or anything.  No, theyíre after milk, eh.  You understand, itís either too late to do something... and it certainly will be if you donít do something fast.  Because you see, this is an agenda to put everybody... Eventually youíll have to get on your knees Ė and Iím not kidding about this Ė when they ration food, because thatís what they want to do.  And they will not lose cash when they ration food because youíll pay 100 times more than youíre paying now for it, and youíll get less.  Just like theyíre doing the same with your electricity, all your energy; and remember, food is classified by these guys as energy.  It is energy for your body, and all life.  And your electricity is going up and up and up and theyíre talking about, again, in the future, all they have to do is give you 20% of what youíre getting right now, youíll have your rolling brownouts, and youíll pay 100 times more for it; so theyíre not losing out at the top.  Thatís what austerity means.  Austerity...  All your spending cash that you had at the end of the month that you wanted to buy something with, no, no, youíll be paying that for bare essentials... just to survive.  Thatís what they mean by this. 


So anyway, you have no right to privacy in contracts...




When the FDA answered FTCLDF (Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund) in the interstate shipment of raw milk suit, they stated four fully repugnant things. That you have no right to, nor does your child have a right to any particular food, you have no right to bodily or physical health, that you have no right to contract, and that they are ďrationallyĒ fulfilling their public health mission. (A:  Thatís how they rationalize it to you when they come in and steal all your stuff.)  It appears that they forgot to include that you have no right to privacy or free association along with no right of contract. With the recent actions against Rawesome, sting operations against Amish farmers, and the absolute destruction of Morningland Dairy, one can only surmise that the FDA, who pulls the strings on state level equivalent agencies, forgot to specifically deny the right to freedom of association guaranteed us under the First Amendment along with many others.


As many people have been covering these continual affronts to our very right to consume food that we want to consume, I donít feel as compelled to conduct a full review every time I find myself in the position of covering a new travesty of decency. Maybe thatís laziness in the eyes of some, but the truth is we are against the wall in this country with the most basic of human rights, and itís too late to be nice about it any longer.   (A:  Iíll repeat that last bit for the hard of thinking.) . . . and itís too late to be nice about it any longer. If people are still unaware that food is a controlled substance (A:  Think about that again...) food is a controlled substance(A:  Youíd better believe it is!), they are not likely to read this article anyway. Unfortunately, we have another assault that needs to be brought to the attention of those paying attention.


Morninglandís cheese plant has now been shut down for just over one year. Theyíve been to court and have filed an appeal on the judgeís order to destroy their wealth, and were taken to court again on June 13th and found guilty on one of three Contempt of Court charges brought against them for not rolling over and dying when the Milk Board suggested they should. They had to post bond again to keep their cheese from the hands of the destroyers until the legal wrangling is complete. Now the Attorney General says they must give up the names, addresses and phone numbers of individuals who are members in their private association. Denise Dixon says she will go to jail before that happens(A:  This is not the Middle Ages!  Do you understand, the same techniques that were used in the Middle Ages are done today, by the descendants of those who ruled the Middle Ages.  And Iím not kidding about that.  The businesses, transnational shipping, merchandizing, banks.  Back with more after this.)


Hi folks, weíre back Cutting Through The Matrix and just to finish off that before I take the caller, this says...


The Dixons even applied for a tax id number as Morningland Dairy, not Morningland of the Ozarks LLC.


But that doesnít matter. Trying to make an independent living is now illegal.  (A:  And thatís the name of the game.)


Monsanto Investigator in Illinois Laughs  They Are Doing 'Rural Cleansing'  / 11 January 2009 / Linn Cohen-Cole


Alan:  Now, thereís Tom from Wisconsin on the line there. Are you there Tom?


Tom:  Yeah, I am here, Alan.  And I just wanted to get your take on this organization, a sort of loosely knit, called The Peopleís Awareness Coalition.  One of the things that most people donít understand about the federal government is that it is basically a private law orientation. And since the Civil War in America all the States have been operating as subsidiaries of the federal government through US citizenship.  And I donít know what your awareness is of this but I just wanted to get your opinion on it. And I also wanted to state really quickly too, that you were talking about previously many times about how the English language has been created by basically Freemasons, or a collection of people with Freemasonic principles, to create hidden meanings within the words.  And I think itís really important that we all understand, and most of us do that listen to your broadcast, that words have meanings and that through this private law, through contracts, we actually give away all of our rights.  So all of these things that you talk about with government, governance, thatís really all done through contract.  And Iíll take your comments off the air.


Alan:  Youíre quite right.  It is.  And also, your consent is by your acquiescence and silence.  Silence is consent.  And thatís how folk are.  And then once one generation just accepts it and says nothing, they donít even think through it, the next generation are born into it and they think itís normal.  Creating a language is not a new thing; itís been done many times in ancient history, in ancient times.  When they introduced whatís now the English language through the King James Bible, actually, that was part of it, and Shakespeare too, who brought in about 160,000 words into it, that did away with the old languages that were talked.  There were so many different dialects of Old Saxon language talked around England for instance; thatís all gone.  So they definitely helped to introduce a newer one through the creation of English during the times of Shakespeare.  And itís interesting too, theyíve said, and Iíve read the articles even years ago from governments and so on and business reports, that English would be the international language of business for the future.  Well, it is now.  Everyone across the planet in business will talk English to you, so itís already been achieved.


So you wonder how far back they planned that, when you think that John Dee talked about a world with free trade and part of joining free trade was to copy the British institution, which they now call democracy but they didnít call it back then, democracy.  And so you had to adopt the British system for free trade entrance, and if you didnít join it theyíd either make war on you or theyíd simply cut off all trade going into your country and make it impossible for you to get trade from anyone else.  Thatís pretty well a stipulation of how the free trade negotiations are now.  And itís for the Ďfree flow of labor and goods across all national boundaries.í  Thatís why youíve seen such mass immigration.  And this was decided a long time ago, at the League of Nations and they just copied the same charter and added to it for the United Nations.  Weíre living through a long-term script, as I say.  Also the US was updated with the Treaty of Paris again and they brought another little constitution out for them.  Itís a corporation anyway; everythingís corporations, which are ideas.  Government is an idea.  And you only give it authority by the fact that you give it authority, and vote for it. 


From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada Ė and remember, please donate and buy the books to keep me going Ė itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. 



Topics of show covered in following links:


Yet Another Legal Challenge into Dr. David Kelly's Death

Making Multilateralism Work

Restaurants Woo Customers who have Food Stamps

Narcolepsy Linked to Swine Flu Vaccine

All-Party Parliamentary Group for World Governance

Enviro. Protection Agency Declares "Hay is a Pollutant"

No Right to Privacy in Food Contracts

Rural Cleansing of Farmers by Gov-Monopoly Fascist System


Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:


"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3


"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)


Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)


Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)


"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"