Dec. 27, 2011 (#989)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Dec. 27, 2011:
"We're Ruled, Directed by Authoritarianism,
At the Low End We're Victimized if We Quiz Them,
This is the Rule Advocated by Club of Rome,
First De-Industrialize the Nation You Call Home,
The Public Were to Be Gradually Trained
Into Compliant Acceptance, Terrorists Blamed,
The Longer it Goes On Adaptation is Easy,
Passive Acceptance to Things Which Should Make You Queasy"
© Alan Watt Dec. 27, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Dec. 27, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alanís books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE Ė AND Ė
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on December the 27th 2011. For newcomers, you should really help yourself this upcoming year too, and to get as much out of the site as possible, cuttingthroughthematrix.com, because we donít know whatís going to happen to the net the way things are going. Lots of laws have passed and a lot are pending so make use of the web site. Youíll find lots of information where I try and chronicle the history of the system weíre in and to show you that nothingís by pure chance, that nothing simply comes out in the big crisis form that is presented to the public and big changes that happen across the world. But rather, everythingís planned long in advance, many, many years in advance by those who control the world, and who control governments and whole trading blocs now as well. Theyíre globalists and they have the cash to prove it, and the power and connections.
So help yourself to the audios there; thereís hundreds and hundreds to choose from. Youíll get shortcuts hopefully to understanding this system which we call reality. Also remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. You can help me keep going by buying the books and disks Iíve got at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, because I donít bring on advertisers to sell you products, I donít have shares in product companies or anything like that. So all I have are the books and disks and you can buy them. [Order and donation options listed above.] And straight donations are awfully welcome. Youíll see how to do it at cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. All the sites listed on the .com site are the official web sites. They all carry the audios and transcripts in English. If you want transcripts in other languages go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and youíll find a variety offered there for print up; some people prefer reading, and I can understand why in these busy times, these noisy times too.
As I say, I try and chronicle the events to show you the connections between the past and the present, the big organizations that decided in the 1800s they wouldnít allow such a thing as democracy to take over and take their power away from them. They also believed that they had the natural right to rule, being the most wealthiest people on the planet and had held onto wealth through many generations. That was part of the induction; you had to have that in your history, or your rťsumť you might say, to belong to these clubs. And they believed too, in Darwinism. It really fostered and helped to really encourage their arrogant belief that they were so superior to everyone else, and so they were naturally the ones to rule the world, not just the average person. And democracy of course, they used democracy over and over again to fight their wars, and that really is their front. Oh, itís democracy weíre bringing to the savages, again, and enlightenment as we rape their natural resources. Anyway, I give you the history of it, the groups involved, the foundations that they put up as front organizations, worth trillions of dollars, which fund so many of their global projects, in a social setting mainly, so-called charities or non-governmental organizations. And they use them as full-time lobbyists at governments, all governments across the world Ė and itís a tax write-off for them too, with these foundational charitable fronts. But theyíre completely into politics and directing politics, and directing the course of the world. And of course, all the greening cash that gets thrown out for advertising too, generally comes from these big foundations which are owned, remember, by international money lenders basically. These are guys in families with a private bank who lend to whole nations, not just your corner bank at all. And youíll find out they have the plan that weíre going through today, taking over all, the whole of the world. And the ways of causing war, blaming an enemy, has been going on for well over 100 years; they even give the techniques in Carroll Quigleyís The Anglo-American Establishment. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, weíre back Cutting Through The Matrix. Iíve done articles, or read articles on the air before where the social services have gone after particular families and theyíre going after them in every country now. Everythingís global you see; itís all through the United Nations and various laws and treaties theyíve all signed, and they all act at the same time across the globe when these things become law. And Britain is such a mess now with children being stolen all the time by the services. And of course thereís always money involved, they get so much per child more from government for nabbing children. And it also creates an air of paranoia because they train the social workers to be paranoid of everybody out there, especially men. Dads now are terrified to be seen in public holding their little girlís hand anymore because you just never know, you just donít know. Thatís how paranoid everyone is. But when they come into a personís life they turn it upside down. They donít need proof or accusation of abuse, and they generally never let go, itís like they get their tentacles in there until they get what they want. And thereís much more to it than that, even the types of workers they pick for these so-called services.
Interesting too, Iíve always gone back to Lenin who said at the beginning of his little reign there, he said that basically services would spring up all over Britain which would be called Ďservicesí and then the public would get used to them being sort of authorities, and then they would increase and help this authority figure into their minds and eventually they would become completely authoritarian. And thatís all happened. The police services now are just militaries, and same thing with social services. A service is something you should be able to take or leave, like health service or anything else. But I spent the weekend too talking to a couple in Utah who had their child stolen recently, so itís the same across the world. This article Iím going to read here is about Britain. Lenin also, under the Marxian plan, believed in the destruction of the family unit. So it was one method to help that along, mind you. This is an article from Britain and it says...
Social Services Deliberate Destruction Of A Family Part 1
ukcolumn.org / December 12, 2011 / By J.S.
Their system works like this:
First Social Services get their set against you Ė under the heading of ďRISKĒ.
It may be next door neighbours, school, jealous/vindictive family, a previous error on your part, but one you have paid for and are now ďfreeĒ of. It doesnít matter; you are now on their radar. (Alan: Well, it doesnít matter folks; youíre definitely on the radar if it comes in.)
This paragraph really goes against everything I stand for and believe, because I think every child deserves all the love and fun a family can give. But the places where you should feel the most relaxed to showing your love and fun are now the most dangerous - school, playgroup, doctors, hospitals, your own home (neighbours (A: That will chat about whatever.)). The reality is that so many people have now been brainwashed into the ďpredatorĒ syndrome, that every male is a threat to every child, and every child thinks that every male is a threat to them. (A: And itís in advertising too. And itís in their school lectures.) In fact these sad people, so scared of ďsexĒ and so conditioned by the media of the dangers, that so-called friends become an absolute danger. (A: ...you canít trust anyone.) They feel so righteous and community minded ďdobbingĒ you in over their concerns about what they think is going on. They think that some casual observation and interpretation through their coloured perspective, gives them the right to make derogatory concern about the way you are behaving as a family. They have no understanding of the ďGestapoĒ which awaits the phone calls and the havoc that phone call reaps. (A: ...when they report you.)
And woe betide the recipients of SS attention, as the ramifications to your complete life, not only yours, but that of the children they purport to protect, is laid in desolate ruin. If they decide that you are a ďriskĒ to you children, your family is crucified. (A: Itís true enough; theyíll nail you to the wall, demonize you.)
So, you must stay out of their radar as best you can, and to do that you must hide your love and enthusiasm for your family out of the public view. (A: You know, you understand everything is Pavlovian training. And this is true, you canít just grab your child, your own child and give them a hug and put them down and have a laugh anymore. Youíre altering your own behavior because you know youíre getting watched all the time with all the cameras everywhere. And thatís intentional. Cameras everywhere is also meant TO alter your behavior; you canít be spontaneous about anything. And thatís why thereís so many cameras in a place like Britain.)
For some, that is not enough, because the SS have commenced a policy of removing children from parents who have criminal records, including drugs, and they delight in using their tactics against them, as they ďknowĒ the public will uphold their ďriskĒ assessment, even though based on lies!
They are effectively running an Inquisition, and instead of burning you at the stake, they burn your family instead.
The Kidnap (A: And then they kidnap your children.† And itís nothing but kidnapping, and they go through the techniques used there too.)
Then they mention the court system, which is a real ploy. Itís a closed court system and the parents canít say anything. The social workers go in and give their side of the thing and then the child disappears into... God knows, a foster home or wherever. But itís an awful situation and itís becoming more and more rampant. It is an agenda. Remember too, they pick families as well that are fairly bright often and well educated and have books lying around the house, about the topics we discuss for instance on this particular broadcast, and if they see that anywhere too, then youíre contaminated. Youíre contaminating your child with old-fashioned ideas, you see. That was a term they used from the Soviet Union, and thatís what they call you, youíre contaminated. They donít want you passing on things like morality and suchlike to your children, you see. So beware those people who come round your home; you canít trust anybody today. Either that or theyíre watching Oprah or something, theyíve just seen a show and their imaginationís running rampant so... you know. Be careful out there.
Now Monsanto is such an incredibly powerful institution on its own, that itís controlled courts across the whole planet. Whenever anybody gets a Monsanto seed on their land, it blows all over the place, birds actually poop it, you know, into your land too, Monsanto will come along and fine you multi-thousands of dollars and they say that youíve got their seed. It doesnít matter how it got there, youíve got their seed, thatís all the law cares about. And thereís one guy in Canada whoís been fighting this for well over 10 years and it says...
Finally... Solo Farmer Fights Monsanto and Wins
articles.mercola.com / Dr. Mercola | December 25 2011
Monsanto has long been trying to establish control over the seeds of the plants that produce food for the world.
They have already patented a number of genetically altered food crops, which can only be grown with proper license, and the seeds for which must be purchased anew each year. (A: They have the terminator gene so you canít save the seed. Itís a beautiful con, isnít it? Itís so beautiful, youíve got to go back for the seed every year, which keeps going up in price, and the chemicals to use with it.)
But genetically engineered crops cannot be contained.
And rather than being found guilty of contaminating farmers' property, Monsanto has successfully sued hundreds of farmers for patent infringement.
Many farmers have subsequently, quite literally, lost their farms. (A: That did happen to a lot in Canada.)
Percy Schmeiser of Saskatchewan, Canada, was also a victim of Monsanto's vile ways.
Schmeiser worked on farming and developing his own seeds for 50 years, and when his fields were contaminated, Monsanto threatened him, intimidated him, and tried to take his land away.
But Schmeiser refused to give in, and eventually beat them in court.
Percy's story is a classic case of David versus Goliath, and his victory is no doubt momentous.
It all began in 1998, at which time Schmeiser had grown canola on his farm for 40 years. Like any other traditional farmer, he used his own seeds, saved from the previous harvest. But, like hundreds of other North American farmers, Schmeiser ended up being sued by Monsanto for 'patent infringement.'
More than 320 hectares were found to be contaminated with Roundup Ready canola (A: Well, the main road went past his fields, you see, and you could see some of this stuff blowing out of trucks as they carried their Monsanto ones to other farms.) óthe biotech giant's patented canola, genetically engineered to tolerate otherwise lethal doses of glyphosate. The company sought damages totaling $400,000.
Most farmers end up settling, but Schmeiser was angry enough to fight back. In a 1999 interview, Schmeiser stated:
"I never put those plants on my land. The question is, where do Monsanto's rights end and mine begin?"
The case eventually went before the Federal Court of Canada. Schmeiser in turn accused Monsanto of:
ē Libel, by publicly accusing him of committing illegal acts
ē Improperly obtaining samples of his seed from a local seed plant
ē Callous disregard for the environment by introducing genetically modified crops without proper controls and containment
ē Contamination of his crops with unwanted GM plants
After 10 Years, Monsanto Agrees to Pay for Cleanup
After a decade-long battle, Schmeiser won when, in March 2008, Monsanto settled out of court, agreeing to pay for all cleanup costs. The agreement also specified that Schmeiser would not be under gag-order, and that Monsanto can be sued for recontamination.
And so it gives you some more of the story, but it also gives you the other part of the story where heís not quite happy yet with the laws that still protect Monsanto when it comes to patent infringement and so on. It comes under a whole different category because itís actually genetically modified and so therefore they donít put it in with the same category as contaminating a field, with some other kind of seed for instance. But he kept going and kept going. And they really, really threatened this guy, intimidated him like crazy. In fact, they got off with gangster tactics Iíd say, real gangster tactics and the Canadian government sat back, because they obviously wanted all the ordinary farmers off the land and out of the business. And even the judge that first tried this guy, said I donít care how it got on your land, if a bird pooped it on your land or the wind blew it, I donít care, youíve got it so youíre guilty, therefore I want so much of your cash, etc, etc, etc. So he appealed that and kept going; most folk would have definitely given in.
Now, things have also got so incredibly stupid, intentionally stupid Ė thereís nothing that happens by chance. Every young boy grows up watching the war movies; heís in a little world of fantasy himself. And today of course, thereís nothing but war movies because the government promotes them and the Pentagon supplies them with the scripts, at Hollywood, and they all work together, because they want to grow a fresh crop of soldiers. For when they grow up theyíll be ready to go in and get slaughtered for some other bankerís cause. But itís getting so farcical when they punish you for having a gun-shaped slice of pizza. Iíll get into that when I come back from this break.
Hi folks, weíre back Cutting Through The Matrix and just showing you how ridiculous it all is and how schizophrenic things are. When, as I say, every childís out there playing every night with their various video games and blowing people away in the video games and then theyíre watching movie after movie, all propaganda movies supplied by the Pentagon. As I say, they must grow up, you see, to be all for war and what they think is adventure, and be just like the G-men type and the big beefy guys that are out to kill, all the heroes. They see them as heroes, you know. Hereís a little boy at school.
D'ough! Boy, 10, punished for brandishing a gun-shaped slice of pizza
dailymail.co.uk / Daily Mail Reporter / 22nd December 2011
(A: And this is in Britain, which theyíre really against guns except for all the cops and their machine guns and things like that.)
A 10-year-old elementary student has been punished for waving around a slice of pizza which resembled the shape of a gun.
Nicholas Taylor will be eating lunch at the 'silent table' for the rest of the semester after being accused of threatening other students 'armed' with a pizza slice with bites taken out of it. (A: Well, thatís one of the worst crimes Iíve heard of, isnít it?)
The youngster has also had to see the school resource officer to learn about gun safety. (A: Here he is playing with a pizza and he has to learn about gun safety. I mean, what do you tell him? You know, take a bite off the front part of it, the barrel, before you aim it at anybody.... I mean, what is this nonsense? This utter nonsense, isnít it? It truly is Orwellian nonsense. But itís all through the civil services and divisions and bureaucracies, all this strange brainwashing.)
His mother LeAnn described her son's punishment as 'absolutely ridiculous' saying that he was just playing around, according to Nashville's News 2 Investigates.
She claims he did not threaten to 'shoot' anyone with the pizza.
'The kid (A: ...child [Alan does not say Ďkid.í]) across the table from him said it looked like a gun so he picked it up and started shooting it in the air,' (A: Well how can you pick up a pizza and shoot it in the air? Do you see how they word it even there? You know. You canít do anything but squeeze out some of the, you know, extra cheese or something.) she told News 2 Investigates.
LeAnn said the first she heard about the incident after receiving a letter from the school, David Youree Elementary in Smyrna, Tennessee (A: Oh, itís actually in the States, this one. This is in the States, this is from a British paper though.), saying her son had threatened other students. (A: ...by pointing it I guess. You know.)
She said that she had been warned that if Nicholas eats his pizza into the shape of a gun again he will be suspended.
James Evans, spokesperson for the Rutherford County School District, said the pupil is being punished because 'students reported he was making some threatening hand gestures, that he was shooting other kids at the table.' according to the report. (A: It must have been a terrible pizza.)
He told News 2 Investigates, that when asked; 'The student didn't tell him the truth about it so he got silent lunch for six days.'
Evans called the punishment minor but said the message is clear.
'I realize some might say we are going overboard but the principal is just trying to use an abundance of caution and send the message that we don't play about guns and it's not something we joke around about,' he said.
LeAnn said her son is aware that he should not play with guns. (A: He hasnít. Heís been eating a pizza.)
'We don't have a gun in the house,' she said. 'He plays with light sabers. (A: So itís okay to cut folk up into pieces, you see.) He's a big Star Wars fan.' (A: See how schizophrenic the whole society is though? Isnít that amazing, you know... donít point that pizza at me. You know. Itís just utterly ridiculous, but thatís what we got nowadays, ridiculousness.)
Now, Canada, Iíve talked about the Bank of Canada before and how it was the only bank that was truly Canadian, or national, and during the Great Depression and how Canada didnít go through the depression with the same problems as everyone else because they didnít issue debt money; it was all debt-free money at the time. And it wasnít private, you see; it was run by the government itself. But of course the right boys got in, infiltration, and took it over and now itís the same as every other central banking system. So thereís a press conference recently released about, from...
Constitutional Lawyer Rocco Galati: Restore The Use Of The Bank Of Canada - Lawsuit Press Conference - youtube.com / Uploaded by canawareness on Dec 21, 2011
Iíll put that up for Canadians that might be interested. And it tells you about the lawsuit press conference, whatís going on, where theyíre taking it and so on. Weíll see what comes with that. And I mentioned before, the excellent video that was done called Oh Canada about the Bank of Canada, giving you the history of it, even talking to some ex-Prime Ministers who tried to explain, in a stammering and stuttering, halting, incoherent manner, why itís good to have a lot of debt, why itís really good for a nation to always have a lot of debt, you know. And youíll see him interview these characters.
Now I also talked to someone at the weekend who went to New York central and theyíve got screens up everywhere now. Itís just like Orwellian, all the science fiction movies, these big screens everywhere. So you canít miss them, it doesnít matter where youíre trying to look. And they played movies from Homeland Security on them, telling you itís all for your good and weíve got 200 agents amongst you right now watching, and some of them might be scrubbing the floors or cleaning the toilets or sitting next to you on the train eventually, but theyíre all ours, weíre watching, etc. Then it shows you a guy who looks like lost, like anybody is whoís lost at an airport, not an airport but the actual train station, and he says, this man, look at him for instance, he looks suspicious... you should report him. So whatever you do, it doesnít matter if youíve never been on a train before, donít look concerned because youíre utterly lost, because youíll get reported and dragged off by a bunch of goons before you know it. But this is how crazy everything is now. And this article here is about the...
TSA screenings aren't just for airports anymore
Roving security teams increasingly visit train stations, subways and other mass transit sites to deter terrorism. Critics say it's largely political theater.
latimes.com / Brian Bennett, Washington Bureau / December 20, 2011
(A: It goes on to talk about what theyíve been doing. It says...)
Three federal air marshals in bulletproof vests and two officers trained to spot suspicious behavior watched closely as Seiko, a German shepherd, nosed Vetter's trousers for chemical traces of a bomb. Radiation detectors carried by the marshals scanned the 57-year-old lawyer for concealed nuclear materials. (A: ...ahhh. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks, Iím back; weíre Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about how far things go into the world of Alice and Wonderland, when you create a government agency. All bureaucracies and agencies spread like cancers immediately; thatís the first thing they always do. And they want more money, it makes them feel more powerful, more necessary you see; if theyíre kept fairly small thereís always a chance theyíll be scrapped at some budget cut. So they have to spread you see, and seem awfully important. Anyway it says here... and itís a handout obviously, itís a pro-security handout to the newspapers.
The Transportation Security Administration isn't just in airports anymore. TSA teams are increasingly conducting searches and screenings at train stations, subways, ferry terminals and other mass transit locations around the country.
"We are not the Airport Security Administration," said Ray Dineen, the air marshal in charge of the TSA office in Charlotte. "We take that transportation part seriously."
The TSA's 25 "viper" teams (A: They like all this military stuff. They watch all these movies too, eh, and now theyíve got the uniforms and outfits and flak jackets and all the gizmos and gadgets. VIPER team... You know, they actually pay marketers big, big bucks Ė itís okay because itís your cash theyíre spending Ė to come up with these names, you know. And itís for...) ó for Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response (A: Thatís what they got to fit in with VIPER, so they sound awfully good, you know. They didnít go for Ďadderí because theyíve got a very low IQ and theyíve got problems with sums. Anyway...) ó have run more than 9,300 unannounced checkpoints and other search operations in the last year. Department of Homeland Security officials have asked Congress for funding to add 12 more teams next year. (A: More and more cash, eh. Just incredible.)
According to budget documents, the department spent $110 million in fiscal 2011 for "surface transportation security," including the TSA's viper program, and is asking for an additional $24 million next year. That compares with more than $5 billion for aviation security. (A: Theyíre probably asking for submarines next as well.)
TSA officials say they have no proof that the roving viper teams have foiled any terrorist plots or thwarted any major threat to public safety. But they argue that the random nature of the searches and the presence of armed officers serve as a deterrent and bolster public confidence. (A: So they terrify the public and they call it Ďbolstering public confidence.í)
"We have to keep them (A: ...you know, THEM...) [terrorists] on edge," said Frank Cilluffo, director of the Homeland Security Policy Institute at George Washington University in Washington. "We're not going to have a permanent presence everywhere."
Well they would if they had all the cash for it. So it goes into the old stuff, again, the usual stuff of ďOsama bin Laden's compound in PakistanĒ and all that, and more stories and why they must be there, about who gets blown up across the world, and that the US will have more attacks in the future. And they will too, they will actually have real attacks. And itís hard to tell the difference anymore. But they might get real attacks because folk are getting awfully ticked off at their countries being run over by foreign armies and you know, men with fat suits on, fat men with fat suits I should say, and podgy fingers, are grabbing all the resources and their cash.
Now, Anonymous of course, youíve heard of Anonymous that do the occasional hacking. But they plan for violent revolution, plans for violent revolution, I should say. In other words, they put a handbook or something out Ė Iíll put that up tonight Ė to tell you maybe how to protect yourself if all hell breaks loose. And itís always good to know this stuff because everyone tries to keep alive during times of riots or anything else thatís going on. It could be rioting brought on by government, who knows. It could be government plainclothes guys doing the rioting, you wonít know. But it doesnít matter. What you want to know is how to survive it. Iíll put this link up anyway. Iím sure even this kind of knowledge would have been good in previous wars too, when your countryís invaded as well. If you want to live, that is. Or you just want to wait for government to tell you what to do, or kill you... by mistake.
'Anonymous' plans for 'violent revolution' - wnd.com / December 26, 2011 / Aaron Klein
Antidepressants... Big pharma is incredible with all the pills that they churn out. And when they find out that something is unsafe, or even lethal, they often just move a few molecules into a different pattern, the same molecules, and they call it a different name; theyíre allowed to do that, and resell the thing. And even thalidomide is back on the market, I donít know if people have known that, for quite a few years. The thing that brought out children, it genetically modified them alright, until they had no arms, practically; they had hands sticking out of where their arms should be, at their shoulders, and tiny, tiny legs or no legs at all. It was a horrific thing to see the offspring of these mothers who took the stuff during pregnancy. And so they came out with it a few years ago and itís back to the old thing that they actually announced it for; actually it might help you with urine problems or bladder problems, but mainly for... it MAY, it MAY Ė this is the beauty of pharma, isnít it? Ė it may help prevent breast cancer. So they gave it another name, moved a molecule over and there you go. They never give up.
Antidepressant, Talk Therapy Fail to Beat Placebo
foxnews.com / December 22, 2011 / Reuters
(A: A placebo of course is a fake; generally itís something made of flour or something.)
Neither antidepressants nor "talk therapy" were able to outperform inactive placebo pills in a new clinical trial on depression treatment -- though there were hints that the effects varied based on people's sex and race (A: I guess they mean Ďgenderí and race.), researchers report.
The findings, published in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, add to evidence that people receiving "real" depression treatment in studies -- from antidepressants to St. John's wort -- often do no better than people given a placebo.
A recent review found that a minority of antidepressant users even fared worse than placebo users.
In this latest study, researchers randomly assigned 156 depression patients to either take the antidepressant sertraline (Zoloft and other brands) daily for 16 weeks; undergo a form of psychotherapy called supportive-expressive therapy (twice a week for four weeks, then weekly for 12 weeks); or be in a placebo group given inactive pills.
After 16 weeks, there were no overall differences in how the three groups fared.
Of antidepressant patients, 31 percent were treatment "responders".... (A: That said it was okay. In other words, they felt better on the placebo and so on and so on.)
So they know this stuff of course, but it wonít do because they wonít manage it. Theyíll just put more and more ads on television and bring on people who say their lives have been changed by the latest wonder drug; and theyíll get money for it from the pharma and theyíll go on the big talk shows on television and tell you all about it, the virtues and wonders of being stoned out of your head.
Now Britain, it used to be called Great Britain at one time, and during the 60s it went pretty well all communist, completely, under what was called the Labour Party at the time. And it never recovered of course. And then Iíve read the articles by Tony Blairís chief, or his second in command actually who admitted that they were trying to destroy Britain forever, especially the culture, so it could never reemerge, by mass immigration and other techniques as well. But as they all go down the tubes, they all have to pay, we all have to pay actually through the World Trade Organization, through the United Nations treaties, to bring up the countries that are now up-and-coming, emerging nations they call them, emerging nations. In other words, they got all these deals given to them: we fund their economies into existence, we build the factories for them through our cash. And so you canít lose. They canít lose. Itís all by treaty. And no matter how broke you are at home youíve got pay for these treaties, you see.
Brazil Overtakes Britain as Sixth Largest Economy
myfoxny.com / 26 Dec 2011
(A: Well Britain, it canít even heat its people in the wintertime anymore.)
(AFP) - Brazil has overtaken Britain as the world's sixth largest economy, a London-based research group said Monday.
In its latest World Economic League Table, the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) said Asian countries were moving up while European countries were slipping down. (A: Well that was put out by the United Nations many years ago, thatís what their agenda would be, bring down the first world countries and bring up to a certain standard the third world countries. So thereís nothing new in it.)
Brazil's population of about 200 million is more than three times that of Britain. (A: And have you seen the size of the two countries compared though?)
The Brazilian economy grew 7.5 percent in 2010, but the government has cut its growth projections to 3.5 percent for this year after the economy slowed in the third quarter.
The CEBR also predicted that the British economy would overtake France -- ranked fifth this year -- by 2016 and it said India, the world's 10th biggest economy (A: Weíre funding that too.) in 2011, would move up to fifth place by 2020. (A: So itís all planned. Youíre living through a script, as I say. The whole future of the world is scripted and planned and so on because all these projections here tally with projections that came out from the United Nations at least 20 years ago, maybe more in fact.)
And talking about Britain as they go down the tubes, and thereís hardly any healthcare service left, and you get maybe 25-50,000 dying every year. Thatís the government statistics; the local statistics are much, much higher Ė about 150,000 die of the cold in the winter. These are people living in homes, you know, elderly people, because they canít afford the fuel. But thatís okay, theyíre worthless now. Once youíre old youíre worthless. Isnít it true? They should just dispose of us, liquefy us in that green sludge and then pour us into the garden. And like that article said, you can pour granny into the garden and grow tomatoes or carrots or something.
Cancer patients 'relying on charity handouts' for fuel
bbc.co.uk / 26 December 2011
Cancer patients are relying more on charity handouts as they struggle to pay rising fuel bills, figures reveal.
Macmillan Cancer Support said it had paid out £2,548,563 to 12,669 cancer patients during 2011, up from £1.4m to 7,369 patients five years ago.
The charity wants a government-commissioned independent review of fuel poverty (A: You canít afford the fuel for your home.) to prioritise cancer patients. (A: See, thatís really when you know what governments think of you, is when they treat people like this. This is how they really, really think of you.)
Macmillan's campaign manager, Laura Keely, said it was "shocking" cancer sufferers needed such help.
She said: "To feel too scared to put the heating on because of soaring energy bills is an unacceptable reality for thousands of vulnerable cancer patients who feel the cold more and spend long periods of time at home.
"When the charity was established 100 years ago, founder Douglas Macmillan helped cancer patients by handing out sacks of coal to keep them warm.
And weíre right back to that right now. Only itís oil now; you must use oil, you know, the authorized oil. Canít burn, youíre not allowed to burn firewood now and stuff like that. If they catch you, oh, thatís carbon, ooooh. So you got a nice green land there you see, with dead people; but the greenies will be awfully happy about that. And so will the United Nations because they said, you know, a good global citizen is both a producer and a consumer; thatís the definition of it. And when youíre elderly youíre consuming but youíre not producing. And this is all through movies on and so on, old folk, youíll always notice, are senile. Have you noticed that theyíre always senile? Theyíre always senile, and they always joke about them. Thatís to get YOU to do the same, as you dehumanize a section of your own people. And one day it will be your turn to be laughed at as well. Ah, Iím freezing to death... Iím sorry sir, but you see youíre not really worth keeping alive. And thatís as simple as that. Eugenics isnít it? And economics.
American congressmen are calling on Twitter to block Taliban propagandists from the micro-blogging site. - telegraph.co.uk / 25 Dec 2011
Thatís so that they can get the American propagandists on instead I suppose. Anyway, theyíre using it all, so thereís fairness for you. And in England too, theyíve brought into a school there a head teacher, principal, who did really improve the school by all her ideas, like teaching them something called education, real education, you know.
Head forced from school for IMPROVING students education - youtube.com / Dec 26, 2011
Iíll put this link up; itís to a video and youíll hear what happened to this woman, as they had to get rid of her because she was teaching the children and she wasnít falling down into some desperate measures that all the schools end up falling down into. She was keeping them above and floating. But itís not good enough you see; youíre not supposed to educate children. You donít want that.† All you want are soldiers, people who grow up to be soldiers because youíll still be fighting, about up to the year 2025, 2050 even, because they have other plans after theyíve finished off Libya and Syria. Read the CFRís report; itís long term, long range. So you want pretty well stupid people, you see, who donít really know what theyíre fighting for, or care, as long as they get to wear the same outfits that the little cartoon characters in their video games wore. Theyíre the winners, you see. Children see that very easily. Winners and losers, I want to be one of the winners. You see. So Iíll put this link up to let you have a little peak at it.
And another article too on the same thing about...
Energy prices creating Ďheat or eatí decision
moneyfacts.co.uk / 12/23/2011
(A: Thatís another article on the same problem. And it shows you how really bad it is.)
One in five Britons (22%) said they will either eat less or buy more microwaved or cheaper food this Christmas so they can pay their heating bills, while nearly a third (30%) will buy fewer presents to keep their homes warm.
So they canít afford presents for their... See, they used to have grandchildren and things at one time, you know, the old folks and stuff; thatís how they were, that strange generation. And you donít have even families anymore. But well, what can you say?
And in France...
French Nov jobless total hits 12-year high
cnbc.com / 26 Dec 2011
PARIS, Dec 26 (Reuters) - The number of jobless people in France hit a 12-year high in November in the latest sign the French job market is deteriorating ahead of the April-May presidential election.
So all of Europe is going down and down, theyíre all up to their eyes in debt; actually theyíre past their eyes in debt. Because they were all bailing each other out by borrowing money from private bankers, to try and bail out some countries. It didnít work. Oh, the bankers loved they were getting them all into it; now the bankers will own them for about 200-300 years to come with all this compound interest, stuff they keep tacking onto everything. Must be great to be untouchable at the top, eh? Untouchable.
And now in Britain too, now that theyíre ruled from Brussels, this super-parliament, this soviet parliament in Brussels, it says...
Now Brussels clobbers British holidaymakers with a green tax on flights: Family of four forced to pay £80 more to fly to America
dailymail.co.uk / Ray Massey / 22nd December 2011
Well itís carbon, you know, itís energy taxes. Yep. I wonder if these guys, you know, all the Rockefellers, theyíve never seen the TSA because they go into special airports where theyíve got their own jets and everything and nobody dares pat them down, believe you me, and they can go wherever they want. I doubt if they even take a passport with them or anything like that.
And then there was a cop, a cop who says...
'Iím a cop, I can do whatever I want' (A: He was yelling when he was drunk...) off-duty policeman shouts before 'executing guy in bar' over a game of darts
By Daily Mail Reporter / dailymail.co.uk / 25th December 2011
Over a dart game, and then he pulls out a gun and shot a guy and killed him. He executed him and it was caught on video. Iíll put that up tonight as well to show you how crazy they all are out there and this is the type who are going to serve and protect, their global masters I guess; thatís who they must mean because it certainly isnít the public. But yeah, a darts match and an argument broke out and the guy says, ďIím a cop, I can do whatever I want,Ē and pulled his gun out and shot a guy, executed him. Yep. Thereís temper for you, eh? What kind of drugs are they on? What kind of drugs are they on? They got all kinds of drugs for the cops now.
And Iíve got this, it says ďTSA screenings aren't just for airports anymoreĒ. Thereís more to it; Iíll put that up as well. And a last article is about how pepper-spraying children, and tazering them, in school and out of school, is now normalized.
Madness: Even School Children Are Being Pepper-Sprayed and Shocked with Tasers Ė
alternet.org / Rania Khalek / December 21, 2011
Itís the normal thing to do, for compliance. Thatís what you do for compliance; the big bully will do the same thing too, theyíll twist your neck until you give in. Well the new normal is to tazer and pepper-spray children, for compliance. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, Iím back Cutting Through The Matrix and Iíve got a caller on the line. Thereís Jane from Ontario. Is she still there?
Jane: Yes, I am. Yeah, when you were talking about the children being taken from their parents it made me think of a former Georgia Senator Nancy Schaefer. She became involved helping parents whose children had been seized by child protection agencies. And later she began exposing corruption surrounding that issue and exposing child trafficking that was going on. And in 2010 she and her husband were found dead in what many people believe was a staged murder/suicide.† So it looks like that was a way of keeping her quiet about the issue.
Alan: Well, thereís no doubt about it; thereís certain people that put orders in for children, you know. They order... you know, you put in an order, I want this. And itís big bucks, big, big business, and the social worker and aid companies get big money too for every child they kidnap. And itís good business for the courts and the lawyers love it; the more business they get the better. But yeah, itís a dangerous business as well because youíre dealing at the top with the gangster mentality of the super-rich, super-elite, and the pervs that are out there.
Jane: Yeah. And like the perverts who are, like the child molesters who are like homeless, or at the bottom end of society, they get, you know, put in jail for what they do. But the wealthy ones, you know, and the influential ones get away with it. Like the thing that happened... well even in the White House, there were tours of the White House where they were taking young children, and I donít know, something to do with White House tours, and it was something to do with, you know, child prostitution and whatnot. And that was totally covered up. Like it was related to the Franklin Missouri...
Alan: Thatís right, the Franklin cover-up. Thatís right.† These things come up every so often, but youíre dealing with very high profile people. Mind you, theyíre trying to do away will all the laws so that they can have what they want. Rather than call it pedophilia, they want to call it intergenerational sex and make it sound better, but itís the same thing. And thereís big, important, very wealthy folk up there who are pushing for this. Itís all through the movies too by the way.
Jane: Yes. And it used to be really, really subtle. Like thereíd be things like someone, and a child suddenly becoming an adult through some magic, and some of them were really kind of enjoyable movies to watch you know. But when you think about it, you know, like they would end up falling in love with someone, as an adult, but then theyíd... I donít know. Itís sort of going towards that direction I think in very, very mild, mild way.
Alan: Itís controlled. Itís controlled, first from the censor bureaus. The censor bureaus are there to control, and keep the pulse on the public, to see if youíre degenerate enough now as the public to accept this stuff. And when they think that you are, they push the envelope to the next step. I can remember when they did it back in 2001, they said theyíd have more intergenerational portrayals in movies and bingo, right off the bat there was one with a well-known star, a female star in the tub with a young boy, who at one time through a different life was her husband; this is how they put it across. So yeah, theyíll pull you in with it; theyíll sucker you in with a story Ė if you watch it at all; I donít watch any of this stuff because I know what theyíre up to Ė and then youíre actually accepting this relationship in a fictional form. And the next step is to bring it into reality. Itís to normalize it in your mind, and we adapt so darn quickly. Whatever you put in your mind can help you or it can kill you or it can kill others. And remember, the mind has no firewall. It has no firewall. Itís a very important thing to take care of. Thanks for calling.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Social Services and the Deliberate Destruction of the
Canada--Farmer Eventually Beats Monsanto in Court
The Farce of the Agenda Goes On---Boy in Deep Trouble for Brandishing Gun-Shaped Pizza
The Use of The Bank of Canada Lawsuit Press Conference
TSA Expand into All Means of Transport
Anonymous gives Tips on Surviving Bloody Internal Strife
Experiment on Anti-Depressants--Placebo Won
Brazil Overtakes Britain as Sixth Largest Economy
Cancer Patients Relying on Charity Handouts
Congress calls on Twitter to Block Taliban
Educate the Children?--There'll be None of That
UK--Heat or Eat
French Jobless at 12yr. High
Travel and Carbon Taxes
Off Duty Cop Guns Down Man in Bar over Darts Game
Normalizing the Tasering of Schoolchildren
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"