Feb. 7, 2021 (#1815)

"Cutting Through the Matrix" with Alan Watt

(Blurb, i.e. Educational Talk)

Elect's Power Electronic:

"Welcome to the Acclaimed Internet of Things,

From our Masters, Total Surveillance, Typical,

Unwrap the Package and See what it Brings,

Pandora's Wonders Mesmerizing, Semi-Mystical,


Changing Humans to Cyborg, so Incrementally,

Our Defenses are Down to This Stealth Attack,

So You Accept The Change Non-Judgmentally,

Then Adapt, Until There is No Going Back.


Humans-as-Products, Chipped, Quality Controlled,

Cradle-to-Grave Monitoring, Updated, Adjusted,

Flat Emotional Responses, Bought and Sold,

When There's No Own-Thought You May be Trusted.


Behavior Directed by a Computer Sardonic

Which Serves The Rulers Who Are All Unelected,

Home is a Cage, Elect's Power Electronic,

Where Years Will Pass, Time Undetected."

© Alan Watt Feb. 7, 2021

Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Feb. 7, 2021 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)


Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

 America:  Stripe, Cash, Cash App, personal checks, (Bitcoin for donations only)

Outside America:  Stripe, Cash, personal checks, (Bitcoin for donations only)

Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

PayPal no longer accepted for donations and orders

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries



cuttingthroughthematrix.com,   cuttingthroughthematrix.net,

cuttingthroughthematrix.us,   alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca






[emphasis added to articles with underscore and bold]





Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on February 7, 2021.  I hope you’re all hanging in, as always, [Alan chuckles.] and not just hanging around.  I guess we’re all hanging around, really, we’re all lockdown still as we go through the amazing retraining program that’s got so much hanging on it, the whole future hangs on the current developments to do with Covid, etc.  Planned long ago of course, before you heard the term Covid-19, judging from all the different tests that they had with Johns Hopkins University and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others too, all involved across the world with the same tests, IF this should ever happen what would we do? And we're certainly finding out, aren't we?


The first thing of course is wartime scenarios, emergency powers, because under emergency powers, that is war measures act, actually, and the first law by government when it comes to emergency is never tell the truth to the public. That's standard in all kinds of warfare. 


What's really surprising, I suppose, is that they're following war powers acts with the curfews of course in some places. Because Covid as you know is more virulent in the dark, you know, you don't see it coming, so it hits you faster, so you can't be out in the dark. Also, to do with crowd gatherings, no more than two or five or whatever the number happens to be. Right out of the book for war powers basically.  And again, crushing all dissent, any defeatist attitudes basically, is in other words, censorship of speech. 


It's the whole shebang we're going through right now, and we have been for a long time. Because they planned it, they talked about this at the events that they have, like Event 201 and Lockstep, etc. and all the lockdown stages up to about five, the different levels and how they would treat the general public. Eventually when you get up to the higher levels of it, they talked about completely de-platforming people or freezing any income that they had, to stop them from talking to the general population. It's important, you see, that there can only be one narrative coming from a singular source at the top that all the nations must follow.


Because this is global, obviously, global agenda.  Out of it too you have the World Economic Forum and the United Nations talking about a form of world government to cope with it all, you know. This doesn't surprise people who've been following this for years because it really is a repeat of many talks I've given years ago from their own sources of how they'd love to do this and do that, they would need different emergency powers etc. to bring all these things.


The same as 9/11.  Before 9/11 they had a whole list of countries they wanted to take out and reduce to the Stone Age, according to Kissinger and Brzezinski.  They had debates about it, and these are the terms they used by the way.  They said, it's better to demolish Iraq and other countries and destroy their infrastructure and ensure by financing different internal strife amongst different tribal groups or factions or religious groups, then they could have them fighting forever amongst themselves, so they could never stand together as a unified nation. That was the whole point of it.  Well, of that exercise, a lot more came out of it naturally.


Because you never go to war for, just to annihilate an enemy. Most wars are economic wars as you know. And even waging a war on some countries, economic war, because out of you get, again, emergency powers type acts are thrown out there and your own militaries, even if they’re invading other countries, need a lot of cash to make it all happen. And the money they take, dish out, is incredible, you know, the amounts of course, it's just incredible. 


And anyone who's ever followed the Halliburton exercise when Halliburton, this big, massive conglomerate went out to supply the troops with fresh drinking water initially and other things added on top of it.  Multibillion dollar industry.  They did an awfully good documentary about it years ago, if you can get a hold of it, because it shows you the cons that were going on. I mean, there were so many millionaires made by doing nothing except just signing occasional bits of paper.


The Federal Reserve of course was in on the act too by printing up cash, and you saw skid-loads of cash, freshly minted cash getting brought in and dropped off for the bunkers in Iraq where they had their bases. They even talked to some of the officers in charge of the bunker who said, yeah, the guys would come in with bags and we would just stuff them full of cash, no receipts or anything.  Just astonishing.  That's the reality.  So that's economic too, the ones who wage war naturally find it's awfully, awfully lucrative. Not the troops at the bottom, but the ones that jump on, jump in on the act of course.


It's the same with Covid as well. As you well know. I mean, there's so many millionaires and billionaires increasing their coffers massively when the governments are borrowing from goodness knows whom, right.  Trillions of dollars, just rubberstamp trillions of dollars, just digital currency really, numbers, that can't be verified because no one's overseeing it to see if it even exists in the first place. Great con, 'eh?  But regardless, if you accept to put them into the government coffers, then the taxpayers are guaranteed to try to pay this off, with the loan and the interest and everything else.


It's just astonishing. Really. We cannot… Well, it staggers the mind. The numbers are staggering. And economies, again, economic warfare, you can also shut down nations under economic warfare. You make them pay for everything, all the money that's getting borrowed you have to pay back, over many generations, 'eh.  Or, your great great great grandchildren, if you even have any, if you're still able to have them all after all this lot.  But the amount of money that's being made by people who are all behind this from the beginning, and in on the planning of it, it's just astronomical, really. Just like it was with Halliburton too.


It doesn't surprise me because we live in a completely fake reality. We're taught to be, as I said before, to stay naïve, you know. Your ability to really excel at school by using your own mind is completely stunted as soon as you walk into school at the age of five or whatever it is.  Then you're given an indoctrination to make sure that you stay naïve for the rest of your lives.  It's really something, isn't it? It's been perfected too, most folk really believe everything they've been taught.


I can remember, in school, I don't know what age, I think it was maybe six or seven, and there was a teacher talking about Robert the Bruce, you know. And all you know about Robert the Bruce is, you lost a few battles, you see.  They never told you at the time that he was really Norman, he wasn't Scottish. They were Norman families still, you know, they all came in with the Norman invasion, went through England and Scotland, and he was Robert the Brucee, you see.  I had to find out myself by going to the adult library, and they did have great libraries in the main towns where you could walk to.


So anyway, yet we were taught in school that he sat there, and he says, how am I going to become a king here and overthrow the armies of the South?  And he watched a spider.  This is the rubbish they taught you, he watched… And who was sitting watching him watching the spider, 'eh? He sat and watched a spider that's trying to get up the side of the cliff or the cave, and had to cross over, I don't know what it was crossing over for, to another point. But it was trying to swing across, and it kept falling and missing and all that. Had to keep swinging and eventually actually managed to swing across this little chasm and get stuck on the other side of it, you know. This is the tripe they taught you. This is what you went to school for, rubbish like that, you know.


It was years before they even touched on any Scottish history, apart from that, that kind of, the ancient history stuff.  Years. Because it was still very delicate to talk about what happened. There were still a lot of folk in the highland areas in Scotland of the clearances, that had not long finished. In fact, [Alan chuckles.] they were still exporting people out of Scotland in the 1940s and 50s and 60s and 70s. But the real clearances had left an incredible impression on the highland people, whoever was left. Because it was a genocide, as well as the deportation of masses of people, but a genocide as well.


And it was deliberate, you know. Don't think that in your own time you're seeing, kind of Hollywood movie style, deceptions and cunning and Machiavellian techniques being used. It was... It's... The techniques are ancient with humans.  Humans always want, or leaders always want to appear to be, they look at history in advance and say, how do I want to be perceived after I kill lots of people? So, they think up ways to do it.  Kind of like remaking Rockefeller after he had the militias shoot on the tents of the union leaders at the time and their families.  They remade him, he was remade by public relations experts and he suddenly became a philanthropist and a do-gooder, you see, you just misperceived his intentions when he was having you all machine-gunned, you know.


But that's what history has always been.  And in Scotland you had to find, again going into reference libraries, and they asked you, you know, why do you want to see these particular books? Like it was a, oh, a big thing, a big secret so you have to always lie to them and sound rather innocent. But you could find them at the time. They actually had statements in the 1700s after the last rebellion that Prince Charles had, and then after Culloden, they had lots of statements about people, what happened with the slaughtering, right through the Highlands, you know. You didn't have to be associated with any of the people who participated in it. Remember, it was a small fraction of people who actually took part in it all. But just being a Highlander was enough to get you slaughtered.  And your family. 


And they made... you know, the troops unfortunately in all areas take glee, a lot of them take glee in that. Some of them spoke out against it later on.  But others took glee in it, because you get a free hand to slaughter folk, and there's a sadistic enjoyment that some people get on that, you know, when you can see the terror in their eyes. You'll see it too in the Middle East when you saw the troops, you saw them smashing doors down and children, you know, everything getting, going loose so to speak, you know, in their clothing, as they wet themselves, etc. not knowing if they were going to live or die.  The same thing in Vietnam.


So, there's definitely something that takes a lot of them over. And all nations are the same, you know, these human conditions. And well studied too by the psychologists, that can exacerbate it, sometimes they exacerbate it to make sure that it is a big cull.  Never trust psychologists and behaviorists, they're always used for nefarious purposes. Even today with Covid too.  Big time.


But you find with the clearances in Scotland, as an example, that they had lots of statements from survivors who watch their families being deported in these old, old boats, old ships that were rounded up by the London governments, that were due for demolition, they were already sinking half of them and falling apart.  There were supposed to be a voyage, supposedly, over the Atlantic, and they watch the relatives sinking within sight of the coastline, it had just taken off, you know.  It's, again, it's the plausible deniability, well, we supplied the ship, we had no idea they were going to sink. You understand?


That's how things really happen in history. That's how really is. It's all lies. Humans are the most deceptive characters, especially leadership positions, and those around them, the coterie around them of experts that advised them, then the experts that tell us what to think on behalf of governments or royalty.  Nothing has changed much. Really. Except they've got better persuasive techniques today, because they study us. 


We've been so well studied over the last few centuries.  They can pretty well tell how, what works with, and with real time now too they can tell what's working on the public with the chit chat in real-time on the net and all their cell phone collection data, etc.  All the algorithms can tell real-time who's for this or against that or whatever it happens to be.  So, you have much better persuasive techniques. And they actually call it persuasive techniques now.  It's not, they don't call it brainwashing. No, that's too uncouth, you know.  Once we catch on to what things really mean, the terms, what they really mean, they change the name, the actual language of it. That's what professionals always do. 


The first thing you do in a profession is to create a language, for the insiders, for the in group, you see.  Be it medicine or whatever, you always change the language. Or psychology and psychiatry are really good for it because they had nothing much to start with, you see, except sex and Freud, that was it so, they built upon the rest of it from there.  But they had to create a whole language, a lexicon basically, of terminologies that only they...  It sounds awfully important, so that folk would cry, my goodness, they don't even know...  Manic depression, 'eh?  Manic depressive psychosis.  Hhhhhh!  And once they had enough talk shows mentioned the same term, they changed it to bipolar.  You know.  This is what they do when you catch on, when too many folk understand what they mean.


They don't like you understanding because then it's hard to get you to give them authority over you, that they want, when you can understand the terms that they are using. It's the same in medicine, they're exactly the same in medicine as well, once you catch on, just...  Right down to the terms about, to do with 'vaccine enhanced respiratory response' basically.  What they're talking about really, they've changed it about five times in the last eight months when the people start to catch on.  You know, the terminology that leads to the, to what's called the cytokine storm, that really dramatic terminology. But there's a whole bunch of other terms they use.


But they keep changing them because folk ARE catching on, you see, and they want to confuse you with it, rather than keep it straightforward. In other words, the vaccine enhanced response, and you're getting an over response by it because of the vaccine once you hit the wild virus, you see, in real life, then your system goes into overdrive and basically you'll drown, you'll drown in your own fluids in the lungs, as it really enlarges, you know, gets soaked up with extra blood and so on.  And so, they keep changing it. It's the same thing with all terminology, it's the same as science, you see.


But we never lived in a time, you see most folk haven't lived in a time of warfare.  Or if they have lived in warfare, they really always… You've always been… There's always been a war on the go across the planet, lots of wars actually. And you've lived in a war that's been going on since, what, about 1991.  Starting with Desert Storm and it never stopped. Then they policed it for a few years and then they went in to attack Iraq, and then Afghanistan and a whole bunch of other nations.


And that was on the list of the PNAC group from the 1990s. George Bush Junior and Rumsfeld and Cheney and the rest of them, that were in the PNAC group, were then in charge of government, so they got their wish, a Pearl Harbor event, and off it went. That kicked it off. That was also the Patriot Act and the antiterrorism bills and so on, all rammed through at the same time, where folk were stripped, not just in the US but across the world, stripped of their rights and freedoms under the guise of antiterrorism, fighting terrorism.  That was part one.


Of course, Covid is part two to complete it all.  Quite interesting. Because it's the same terminology that's being used.  Of course, the psychologists that work for governments, batteries of them, you know, and behaviorists all work together analyzing the data, etc., how do they get folk to comply with all the orders that are dished out there?  And have to even frighten the people, even right down to telling the journalists, the handouts they gave the journalists from the group that ran Britain, the SAGE group, subcontracted a department to another group of psychologists and behaviorists to find ways to make the folk comply.  Of course, this group came out and gave a handout to all the different journalists telling them in Britain, and elsewhere of course, because this is global, 'eh, to exaggerate the stories to intensify the anxiety amongst the public to get compliance.


So, they're terrorizing YOU by exaggerating stories, hm?  I've still got the articles here and I put them up months and months ago, last year. So, have lots of other people as well. But you’re really under wartime act where literally you're not allowed to say anything that's contrary to the mammoth, the monolith I should say, the monolithic system at the very top, you know. Because that's what it is, it's a pyramid and the cap of the pyramid dictates to all the sides below it.  There's four sides, remember.  Except for the underside too, you could take five in there. But you've got four sides and so all those bricks going down from the capstone have to all parrot what the capstone says.


And then at the bottom you have, you'll see it on the dollar bill and other paintings as well, especially from the 18th and 19th centuries but in the 18th a lot of them came out, they had the pyramids everywhere. But they also had what you see on the dollar bill, the weeds at the bottom. That's the general population. That's the wilderness, the people, where the ordinary folk are, that's the weeds growing that you see at the bottom there.  So, the ones who are above the rest of the public on the first level, all the way up, they have an idea of what they have to do. But as they go higher up the pyramid, they know the real reasons for things. The rest of them know not to ask, you know, and they're well rewarded for it.


So, all information has to be uniform in warfare. That's why you have a Department of Information, if you don't know that.  George Orwell worked for it in World War II in the BBC.  And why would you need a Department of Information running a wartime system when you think you're living in democracies?  Well, you can dream on and really still believe in it and keep voting.  And God help you because nobody else will if you keep voting.


But that's the system in which you live, you see. It's complete deception. And only now, remember, I've said it before, you get 50-year to 100-year lockdowns on information under wartime measures acts and so on. They actually classify information as secret, not to be told to the public.  And they have terms, some are 50 years, some are a hundred years. I've mentioned before, they only recently allowed the public to have the official sealed stuff about Lord Kitchener.  He was one of the guys, you sent him across the world in the old British Empire days to take care of problems. And he certainly did that.  But they couldn't tell the public how he did it, because it was butchery basically.  Every fifth man, line them up and kill them. That teaches all the rest of the people in the huts to behave themselves. 


Across the world, you see, that's why they have official secrets acts, you see.  That's how it really, really works. Folk have no idea of what's going on. They're given fairy stories in the meantime, which they quite happily debunk maybe 50 years later when everybody's either dead, of that generation, or no one cares anymore. 


But some people, yeah, it's sealed for 100 years.  The original NAFTA deal, North American Free Trade Agreement, it was put in, they had one version for the public, a very condensed minimalistic version. But the big one was put in archives, in bunkers actually and sealed for 50 years.    Why would they have to, did that have to be sealed for 50 years? It's because you've been sold out.  Completely. It's to be the end of the nation-state by the time the 50 years is up, 'eh.  It won't exist as a nation at all. That's part of it. 


Another part too, is you're going into a system that Caroll Quigley talked about quite openly in Tragedy and Hope and other writings too.  Remember, he was the official keeper of the archives for two or three years and he had access to all the records of the Council on Foreign Relations, the big monopoly system that runs every part of the system of the US, Canada and elsewhere. They have a branch for Australia, New Zealand and Japan, you know.  They brought China in long ago too.  They also have one for the European Union now as well. Of course, the British system is the Royal Institute of International Affairs.  And they created one for the European Institute for International Affairs.  Soros actually set it up [Alan chuckles.]  and it was in the newspapers quite a few years ago. But yeah, you can find it yet.


So yeah, you're taught to go and vote for puppets, front people, like Hancock in Britain, you know, that no one, I don't think anybody respects. That's my impression.  Nevermind Boris Johnson. A made-for-TV clown, you know. As I've said before, you really think his hair looks like that? It takes big money to make it look like that, professionally done and the whole thing.  Everything is a show, 'eh, everything you see is a show. A drama. And it's presented in that way too. Some are very professional presentations but most of them are, like you're ad hoc, good enough for the public.  Because they've got to look like they are spontaneous, which generally nothing much is these days.


But Britain definitely was the prototype for most countries in the Commonwealth of Nations to follow, like Canada and Australia, New Zealand. And India to an extent as well. India really took off and copied the British system pretty well, including Freemasonry which of course Peter Wright talked about too in Spy Catcher, how everybody in MI5 was a Freemason, etc. That was his own book, 'eh, it wasn't conspiracy theory, you know.  But that's how you played the game. And Freemasonry really, really was based on faith. True faith. The order you would get from a superior, you see, you didn't have to understand it, you had to obey it without reservations.  Just, no matter what you thought about the order, just obey it. So, you had to believe that they had a darn good reason for giving it to you. That's how the whole system was working, you know.  But in India it really took off, they adapted well into it, with the British system. It wasn't just cricket they copied.  It's like they have a tightlipped group of people, and they have different layers of them in the Indian government, and the military too of course.


That system you're seeing today is this instant obedience to higher authorities by all the lesser authorities. And it's a dangerous state of affairs when you have that on the go. It's bad enough when you have real war on the go, but they are completely intolerant in real war too through the Department of Information, you must only parrot the Department of Information. 


That's what we have now.  All information is checked and hyper checked by goodness knows how many layers now on the net alone.  They'll try and trick people up so quickly.  Or defame them, you know. If you can't… If you can show a person is wrong by facts, using facts, then they'll simply smear them.  They have lots of smear words too, Pavlovian style smear words to defame the person to shut up, you see.  Because no one likes being smeared with a nasty name. You've taught that it's applied to real monsters, you see, that's how you're trained in Pavlov, with these instant responses, these reflexive responses.  Oh, am I really? oh my goodness, I, what did I say?  You know.


But yeah, Department of Information, and George Orwell was part of it too and his job was, he said himself, was to convince people, all through the war, he had different shows, he had one to do with cooking, 'eh.  Because Britain was on starvation diet back home.  GREAT Britain, you know, the peasants didn't really… If you were wealthy you didn't lack anything, meat or anything else during the war. They've had books out since about it by a lot of the toffs themselves talking about it.  But for everybody else it was rationed, you know, maybe one egg, two eggs a week.  Per family sometimes.  That kind of thing.


So, they were rationed heavily, and punished if you tried to find extra food outside of the official sources, if you were caught.  So, Orwell, he would bring on different guests, and you've seen a resurgence of the exact same techniques with Covid.  For people who still get magazines or online magazines and so on, all these different recipes suddenly appearing, 'eh?  How no waste, 'eh?  How to make do with scraps, hm?  How to try avoiding getting infections from scraps that have been lying out for a little while, all these kinds of different things. 


That was all done in World War II and Orwell talked about it. He says, my job with these particular shows on diet and so on and food, was to convince housewives, he said, convince the housewives, people had housewives in those days and they generally did the cooking, he said, to start to use stuff and convince the housewives and all the people who listened to the program, convince them that the stuff he was telling them to eat was actually better for them than the real stuff. You know, the real stuff, you know, like porkchops and things.  So, his job was to lie to the people. That's what he said himself, he lied to the people, that was his job.  M-hm.  And tell them it was better for them than what they'd been eating before. Are you hearing the same things again perhaps, 'eh?


Wars have lots of things to accomplish.  More so to change the people in the nations involved, internally, that will stay that way after the wars.  Orwell also was in charge of the India, broadcast for India because Britain had, a lot of Indian troops were across the world too involved in the war fighting Japan. So, he was involved in broadcast to India and elsewhere in those areas. But yeah, convincing people that these things were better for you.  And you should be thankful for it, you see.


And if you see people at the end of World War II in Britain, they are emaciated a lot of them. The youngsters who grew up in it had terrible, teeth would fall out before they were 10 or 12 sometimes. They were very poor, very little calcium in them.  They had rickets lots of them.  Malnourishment of all kinds effects you, you know. And malnourishment, by the way, doesn't just affect that generation. It can affect two or three generations down the road. They were all stunted in growth.


Which is nothing new to Britain because Britain was famous for it. 'The poor man of Europe' during the industrial era, they had the sickest looking populace in the whole of Europe.  And they did. They were on starvation wages, the industrial revolution, the industrial era.  On a fixed system really.  It was just astonishing how well it was worked out how, no matter what you worked at, the working class, you couldn't get above a certain income. To keep you on a starvation level. 


Folk, this is the facts of it, folks.  Forget all these Ann of Green Gables type series on TV and, Papa can I have another pony, etc., you know.  Forget all that rubbish. The past really wasn't that great for most people. It doesn't mean they were miserably depressed all the time.  Because people in the worst conditions can have humor. That's one thing that developed in Britain was humor. In other countries too, when things were bad humor gets you through.  That wry humor, 'eh.  Because you have nothing much else.


But yeah, Department of Information is backed up by force.  Because when people in World War II spoke out before the war started, and in fact, they were all noted who they were.  It's a good documentary called Forgotten Men, I've mentioned it before, made by people in Britain to do with the effects of World War I. The mass slaughter, the culling of a whole generation.  And future leaders by the way, you know.  More happened World War I then meets the eye. There's many different tangents you can go off in to see what it actually accomplished, if you are an enemy looking at it, you know. Because you must always eliminate a ruling class to take over and put yourselves in there instead, you see, if you're taking over nation.  So, there's many interested parties.


But, Forgotten Men goes through some of the causes of the war and the effects of the war, and they were trying to warn people about another war, what would happen.  You know, literally about 20 years later, that's all. That's why they give you 20 years between major wars, you've got to get a new crop of young guys who is all kind of, it's old stuff, it's like ancient history, oh that war that daddy was in or granddad was in. So, they're ready to fill the uniforms, and the body bags as well for the next one. They're always used for things that have got nothing to do with reality.  Generally.


Now of course with so much information declassified about World War I, the real things behind it, all the myths of it, what happened, and the gaffs that were done with it too , have all been exposed for what they were. Lies and deceit. And massive profits for certain huge corporations too naturally. 


Other ones to like Peter Hitchens gives you the myth of World War II, with all the declassified stuff that's been coming out too. Outside of the movies there were no, not a single barge was made for the invasion from France to Britain by the Germans, things like that.  It's really astonishing.  And it's true enough too, you know, they have all these movies about the fighter aircraft, that's all you heard during World War II. Orwell had it in his book 1984, where you have this constant announcements on the radio, antenna systems, about our boys on the Malabar front, and our country has turned out two dozen more tanks this week, and 50,000 more fully automatic rifles, and dit, dit, dit.  Just statistics, statistics, statistics, statistics. 


We’re hearing the same thing about Covid.  So many millions of jabs will be given by May, and we've put out 10,000 today in this one little area here, and one half million this week, etc. It's the SAME TECHNIQUES, folks.  It doesn't have to be all true.  But it's the same techniques. To get you involved and believe you are involved. And don't forget, Klaus Schwab said it too, he said, it's more like a war scenario, he said, talking about the whole management of Covid, that's what you heard last year, they're treating it like a war. The war on Covid.  Oh.  You see, you had to get a war type scenario, just like 9/11 was a Pearl Harbor event, to get the people to knuckle down and buckle down and do what you're told and sacrifice. Well, there ya go.  Hm?


You got the same thing with the PCR tests, you know, and the swab tests and so on. We've administered so many thousands of swab tests on this day in this area or that, we found X amount of positives and so on. Statistics.  Statistics. Statistics.  All war scenario, 'eh.  To make it seem all the more real, you see.


You've got to remember too, during World War I and II, and there were nations in the planet where nothing was happening.  Life went on as usual. And for truly global war they got to get this thing involved, the same narrative across the planet. That's why you've got the WHO and other United Nations organizations all on board with it. Because they have, they are fronts as well. You've got to understand who set them up. The same group that came out of London, which is the Royal Institute of International Affairs, that came out of the Lord Alfred Milner group, that really ran what was the British Empire and the area called the British Empire in their days. They ran it. They ran the wars across Africa and different places too.  They appointed their own members to be lieutenant governors over those nations. Which they had; a governor had the power on behalf of royalty the same powers to exercise in nations.


Eventually they created the Royal Institute of International Affairs, private organization with a royal charter to exist.  That's your, everybody who's anybody is a member of that establishment in London and Britain.  They have the circuit roundtable societies as well, they run that as well, from the Cecil Rhodes Foundation that merged with them early on. You also have the Council on Foreign Relations that was well-known and still is well known in the States that was set up by the Pratt family, and Rockefeller of course who put himself in as president for a while eventually.  But you've got Harold Pratt and they had the Harold Pratt building I believe.  Anybody who is anybody in the States of any department of government or media is a member of it. Still to this day.  Then you got another specialized group that came out of it too, selected from it, and that's the Trilateral Commission, another private group.


But way back when they had the Lord Alfred Milner group, I don't know, the time of World War I, at the end of all that, they set up the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the same group set these up, the Bank for International Settlements. All private, they're all private you understand. Including the RIIA, it's private, a private club. And they set up the United Nations. First it was the League of Nations, they set that up, then the United Nations.


So, everything that's common usage today and we all know the words and meanings of them and the names of them, were all set up by the same group of people, to run the world.  And it came out of the people who ran the world at that time, who had no concept of human welfare at all. They were Empire builders and they had conquest on their mind across the planet. They wanted a world government system. 


When they tried to humanize themselves to the general public by giving more open talks, on radio and then television over the years, they humanized themselves by constantly talking about the need to help people, you see. So, they turned from a form of conquistadores to social workers.  We want to help people, you see, etc. etc. etc.  Just give us all the right to do so, and the right to lend money out and to demand money in payment back, or land, you know.  Because you have land for debt swaps, still going on by the way, even now, today, across different parts of Africa. I've got some articles on that, I might put them up tonight as well.


But their intention, naturally, just like Rockefeller remaking himself after machine gunning down the miners in their tents, was, they want to help, the philanthropist, really, you see.  They’re the Perry Masons of the world. They can't sleep, they keep thinking about their clients, the poor souls that they, who can't even pay them, you know, they want to help you, they can't sleep, what more can we do for you?  You know.


I don't think I've ever seen power, real power, that's benevolent. It goes with the territory, only the psychopaths seek power, you understand.  In every nation, it's all the same.   Any kind of legitimacy they create through law is, or time and law, generally that's what happens, is for their own benefit, for their own disguise, you know. Until it is normal. 


And it was normal, at one time people thought that royalty was normal, you know, what else was there? There was nothing else. Most folk had no concept of anything else, it's all they knew. Most folk had no education either to know that they tried different things in other parts of the world down through time.  All you knew was there's always been kings and queens, so it's normal, you see.


So, they never thought about people to get rights and change things. Then when they were given something to change things, through the Enlightenment and the gradual unfolding of systems and clubs that had formed, then gradually you had this push for revolution. A world revolutionary movement, of course there was one.  I mentioned before, different people were involved in it.  Either born into it, some of them like Thomas Paine, and that's what he admitted himself.  Or you had people like Benjamin Franklin in America. Then you had other ones in France of course, Rousseau, etc.  And many, many others.


Then you had the, eventually they formed into the encyclopedists as well, to give it their version of what they wanted people to be taught from then on.  And actually, that's grown ever since then until we're all taught the same things. It doesn't mean that they're true, of the reasons that we're given either.  But yeah, revolutionary movements are, definitely have been around. Then you have splinter groups off of them.  But there's always a core one there down through the centuries with high sounding principles, 'eh, but never believed in by those at the top like liberty, equality and fraternity. 


They have their fraternities, and you can be their, again, the brotherhood or sisterhood, etc.  Like even with Robert Burns in Scotland, he really fell for it all, naturally.  Because he was a tenant farmer. He rented his land. He rented the house he was in and tried to make a go of it. We're told, through history again, that it was bad land, it wasn't the greatest land at all to support a family on. Then you had his poetry, etc., which really wasn't bringing in much of an income in his own lifetime. But he also became a Mason and that's what really brought him up to some kind of prominence amongst those in literature. 


And he really fell for it, he fell for revolution. He was given a job as a taxman, you know, in the ports in Edinburgh, at the ports in Edinburgh.  Then they had ones in Glasgow too I think, but the ports in Edinburgh I should say anyway.  He confiscated some ships, I don't know if they were French or who, I think it must've been French at the time.  He bought with his own money his own wages, the canons, then, paid for them. That's a lot of cash even then if you think about it. I guess they're well-paid, these bureaucrats even then.  He paid for them to get shipped over to France, to help with the revolution. That's what lost him his job at the time.


But regardless, he like many people fell for it, the high-sounding philosophies, you know. Equality. And liberty, this strange thing called liberty. The greatest trick the elites always knew about liberty was to give them the appearance of it, make them believe it and they'll never figure out for a long time that they don't actually have it.  Oh, of course you've got rights and liberty, but there's little containment bits here to get a peaceable society working, you see, so you can't have everything you want, and you can't behave the way that you want all the time.  And all these little things, you know. 


Under wartime scenarios, which is fantastic, you can strip them off it so fast, if you want to anyway.  And they'll comply generally. Like Neil Ferguson said, you know, the geek supposedly, I don't know how he's a geek, I mean, he's never right.  But the guy who puts, feeds all the data into computers, so the God of the computer can tell him what to, what they want to hear, 'eh?  Like big figures about Covid.  Big, big, huge figures.  And the whole country's got to listen to an idiot like that, that collapses the economy and everything else.


He himself, Ferguson said that, that they were astonished.  He said, we watched the Chinese efficiently tell the people how to obey and do what they were told. He said, but we could never implement the same.  We sat at, he's talking about like Event 201 and so on, right.  But he said, we decided in advance these things would never work on the British public because of rights and freedoms and so on, individuality. He says, but we were pleasantly astonished how quickly they caved in and did what they were told. 


I'm paraphrasing that last bit but that's basically what he said. So, he admired the Chinese model. Like they all did. All totalitarians love that kind of system. Do what you're told. Isn’t that what Fauci said in a TV interview, eh? He was up on YouTube or somewhere.  He said the same thing. He said, the Americans will probably get problems with being told what to do, he says, but maybe it's the time, he says, to just do what you're told.  Maybe it's time.


So really, having rights and freedoms is an illusion, isn't it?  Because folk just give it up with the first sign of terror….  Hhhhhhhhhh, you're all going to die unless…  That's how it's done.  Over and over again down through history the same things are dished out there.  M-hm.  Over and over.  It doesn't take too much, and many have said it before down through time, that people give up all their freedoms immediately if you say that to them, oh if you don't do this, you're all going to die.  Most folk cave in right away, you know.  Hhhhhhhhhh, goodness me, 'eh.  Wow.


But again, wartime scenarios have a lot to accomplish. Like Quigley said, I've said it so many times, you can get more done in five years of war, meaning martial law systems, emergency powers 'eh, changing behavior of the population, than 50 years of peace using propaganda.  Hm?  And don't forget, all sides involved in the war are altered, culturally, by what they'll will adapt to and accept during the war. 


The populations were kept, as I say, to be very simple and very immature, really, so that people never look beyond the immediate what's happening.  They never stand back and say, what's the goals of this?  What is this supposed to achieve? Whose come out as the spokespeople to push it all? What do they have to gain from it all, etc.?  Then you find out that agendas have been sitting on the shelves for years, are getting rammed through under Covid. Well, that's no coincidence, folks, you know.  At all.


Remember, the great reset is for this whole century. This is the century, the 21st century, the century of change. The century of transition. This is the great reset that they talked about in academia all through the 20th century.  They kept saying that the great change, you know, the century of change will be the 21st century. And it is, isn't it?  They kicked it off with 9/11, antiterrorism, loss of freedoms, total surveillance, no privacy, no right to privacy and many other things came out of it, and then a permanent surveillance society.  And this is part two of it. This is the century of change. The great reset and all the rest of it.


The agenda for the 21st century is laid out it's basic plan for the whole century. It split up into sections. The next part is 2030, what must be accomplished by then.  Then the next part would be about 2045 or whatever.  It depends on if they're going to go with 10-year periods or 15-year periods.  This is how it's all set out.  I used to give talks about the 10-year plans and 15-year plans and 20-year plans at the UN and how they got it from the Soviet system.  That's how everything was planned out, they plan the whole century. Well, this part has to be done in so many years, and this other part has to be done in so many years, and cultural change in this area has to be done in so many years. That's how it is. Nothing has changed. It's one system here.


One system, folks, and your living through it but you're not aware of the why’s and the wherefores of what it's supposed to accomplish. Most folks still believe in hope, you know, I think that new term has come out, that hopium, you know, the hopium of the people.  Positive thinking to an extent. I used to give talks on the fact that all this positive thinking was done for a reason. It was to disarm most folk and train them not to look at the nasty things, which they should be prepared for, for their own survival.  That's common sense, isn't it?  Just basic things.  Like any wild animal should be aware of its environment and what's going on. That's a good start. 


But no, don't tell me about these things. Don't tell me what the UN wants to do. Don't tell me, because it's a downer, and I've been told to stay away from negative people. So, discussing important things is called negativity. Well, that's you being disarmed, when you believe it all.  Because it will be a bigger shock when the real things... 


And when you're talking about, you're not talking about things which are just speculative. You're reading from articles put out by the big world summits at the UN and the World Economic Forum and many other organizations, all clustered around them, they are all connected on this, on the same pathway.  And they publish this stuff. So, when you mention it, oh I don't want to hear that, you know, it's a downer.


Leave me with my TV and my dramas, and my happy, happy soaps, you know, comedy soaps, that type of thing… where I meet all my pals, the comedians, in the pub on the television, you see.  And therefore, they can have A reality.  They don't have ANY reality.  They give them a fictional/virtual reality, you know, they're all friends in the pub and all characters. Because in real life you're so isolated from everything else that's really happening, in this modern society, by design, that they're on their own, 'eh.  So, fiction becomes awfully important to them. More so.


And the elites who gave you this system know that. Don't forget that the real dominant minority doesn't have to worry about, they tell folk what to do and a massive managerial class gets it all done for them.  And in the managerial class you have a big scientific system set up of behaviorists and psychiatrists, neurologists, all working together for the greater good of dumbing down the masses.  [Alan laughing.] That's how it's done. Very effectively.  Until literally, as I've said before, people can tell you all about the so-called people, the stars, Who's Who, who’s divorced, who's getting married, who's getting… whatever, yada, ya.  All the fiction.  Because most of that's fiction too.  That they soak up. And that's their reality as they go through life. A short lifespan, 'eh, full of stuff like that.


And awful, with the music getting worse and worse all the time, until there is nothing. Remember, the whole idea of communism too, they had all these different programs out including the destruction of beauty for the West. That included paintings.  Until you ended up with Picasso, you know, where you didn't know where his eye, why is his eye on his chin? You know. Stuff like that.  And telling you, this is a work of genius for goodness sake, you know. Wow. Again, gaslighting all populations.  That's odd, I always thought that look awful, you know. Oh no, it's a genius, genius put that out there. 


Then music went down and down and down. Until there's no, there was no melody anymore. It had to be destroyed, you see. All things of beauty they said HAD to be destroyed.  Very effective, isn't it.  Until this this kind of nihilistic electronic music now just nneeehhhh-nnnn-nnnnnnnnnnneeeeeeeeehhhhhhhh-nnnnnnnneeeeeeeeenn-neeenn-nnneeeeeennnnnnnnnnnn.  It's like a kind of half-conscious whaling, like someone who's in a sleep somewhere.  But there's no melody to it. Nothing to remember, you see. 


Which is interesting in a sense.  You've got to understand what music, as an example, of what it inspires in people, can do it uniformly.  Certain pieces of music. Even pop and rock and so on, with the hook, you have a hook kind of chorus you jump in on.  And folk would jump in. They might not know the rest of the song but they're going, harrr, rah rah, harrrr, and then they jump in and they sing two lines or something, quite happily. All together. So, it's a form of bringing people together. So, there is a kind of unity, you see, and even that kind of song, no matter what the content of it is supposed to be about.


So again, once you destroy even that, then, you've conquered what used to be, what was regarded as culture.  Hchh, there's nothing much left, you see.  Culture or various, there's various shared things, shared values, shared likes/dislikes in culture, until everything is just destroyed.  Meaning, the culture’s destroyed. When the culture is destroyed, you're gone. YOU are destroyed.  Warfare, warfare, 'eh? 


And the dangerous thing about warfare is that in a global system, where for well over 100, maybe 200 years they have taught about superior types and inferior types of humans and so on. Eugenics. Then when you have a globalized system like that, they don't have to hide their malice and their malicious intent towards the general population. They simply implement it and do it.  That's what we're smelling today.


It wasn't so easy if there were still countries, they could point the finger too, that was watching them, as you're watching the other countries, they're watching you.  But when no one's doing, when it's a unified system there's nothing to compare yourself with anymore when you're all doing the same.  On the road to the same ruin, 'eh? 


You'll see some people who catch on to certain things, they get an intuition, an intuitive concept springs to mind, you know, once in a while. They're not sure what it is sometimes.  And if the press jumps on them too quickly to glorify them, they can burn for a while, then fail, you know. That happen to an extent with Marshall McLuhan who came out with works in the 1960s and 70s in Canada, you know. Again, he questioned perceptions on things.  And some quotes too put down to him, like, the medium is the message. That's how it turned out eventually, there's a whole story behind that because it was in French initially and then the media turned it into being massage.  [Alan chuckles.]   That's how they actually said it.  But it was the message.


So, the medium becomes the message. So, when you're watching television or listening to anything from the media, they are completely involved with themselves, and so the system, the media and the system of the media becomes the message. It's kind of like Hollywood going totally corrupt when you see them making movies about Hollywood, you know, actual fictional movies. Or musicals for instance, the big thing in the 30s and 40s was to get the bear legged woman, you see.  The cultural change.  They're all, you'll all make it as a dancer, you see, that was a big message back then.  Intentional too, as the envelope was getting pushed.  But again, completely self obsessed so they make movies about Hollywood. 


It's the same with the media. Until they give media stars, you know, and you get your Walter Cronkite's and your Dan Rather's. Rather than what? I always wondered. But anyway, you have these characters that are presented to you as authority figures, and people grew up with them and believing everything they said, everything they said as news would be the facts, you see.  That's the way it is today. 


They never question the fact that these people were just working for private corporations that were involved in a lot of other nefarious things across the world, including wars, and benefiting from it in some way or another. At least the folk who own the media would be. It never dawns on people they're being lied to and misled.  Like the embedded, remember the embedded journalists for Desert Storm, then into the Iraq war, you know. This endless war, this 30-year war, 'eh. 


So yeah, you have been involved in war.  As I say. Because being over there you don't really see the effects of it so much. But you've been involved in it and you're paying for it all.  Not only that, you're getting masses of migrants coming out of it all too, naturally, seeking somewhere and getting directed to come into Europe and elsewhere by the way, with powerful organizations. Who also use it like a chessboard, or dominoes, you know, knocked down one, where do they go, go to the next place. They're guaranteed to end up causing other problems as they flood into Europe.  They can't support them right off the bat.  Which is a total war on the Europeans. Not from the migrants. The migrants get used.  I wouldn't stay in a country if it was constantly getting bombed either. Would you?  Of course, you wouldn't. 


But Marshall McLuhan, yeah, he talked about the different systems in which you live. He also talked about the fact that TV, we all know about TVs spying on people. When it came out with the ones, maybe 10 years ago in the States and elsewhere coming in from China, Samsung was it. Samsung company initially admitted to the people, you know, that TVs would be watching you and transmitting it off to whoever it went to. Watching you, just to see what you like and dislike, etc. they said, 'eh. 


But he got the people quickly acclimatized to having something like that watching them. Now you have Alexa of course and all the other gadgets that spy on the folk. But it's so convenient. You can tell it what to do and it does it.  McLuhan talked about these things even in the 60s and 70s. He said to another professor, he said that he wouldn't have a TV set on in his, if it was even a tearoom, he'd unplug them because he said that there were spy cameras inside them, then, inside the tubes looking out, you know.


But anyway, Marshall McLuhan, he had the little jingles he'd come out with to do with things. But he did mention about the music to an extent as well. He had, he clued in on a, maybe a superficial level I think to some of the, I don't think he knew all the people behind the cultural industry, what they really intended to do.  But he did realize something was going on.  He had a way of kind of condensing realities down into a single line sometimes.  He talked about pop music, and then rock music, early rock perhaps, as tribal chant he called it. Very appropriate really, tribal chant.  Because all across the world youngsters all had their variety according to their own culture and traditions of something similar, but in different languages, a little bit different here in there, but in a sense, it was true, it was like tribal chant. 


If you went into old, old societies in Africa you would hear them singing very old songs, and these were true tribal chants.  But you had the same thing, say, in Scotland at one time and Ireland with the bards who could sing the history of the tribe, you know, or the clan. And that was tribal chant to an extent as well. Because folk would catch on bits and pieces of it and they could kind of sing along with it.


So, you bring it into modern times and you develop it all for a modern society, because the whole idea is to create a uniform society across the world, that's obedient. You can't have differences if you want to control everybody, you see. You've got to make them all the sameness, the sameness of it all. Based initially on materialism to bind them all together, to the addiction of materialistic goods. Which are produced by monopolies, you know, because monopolies then have control over you for the goods that you want. Right down to your food by the way.  Anyway, you wind up with tribal chant.  So, it's very appropriate.  Some of them in the 60s and 70s were better than the music they were turning out for the youngsters to learn and sing, they were better jingles.  So much so many of them will stick in your head for the rest of your lives. Again, put together by professionals in marketing and psychology. So, McLuhan was quite correct and so on.


But he got into certain aspects of society and life, and he was carried along his own fame for a while, that it burned him out I think really, and I think he had a stroke eventually. He came out of the whole system of the limelight after the stroke.  And here's a guy who was touted as cutting through all the old-fashioned stuff, it was like he was avant-garde and he was a man of the, you know, common sense, and humanism, 'eh, and the sciences, the social sciences.  He went back to Catholicism, what he realized, that what he saw, put him back to Catholicism. 


I've always said, there's a consequence of knowing things, there's no doubt about it. A consequence, I said it too, even, and other folk have mentioned it. [Alan chuckles.]  If I say it folk will parrot right away. But I've mentioned before about knowledge itself. And wisdom. Remember wisdom, old sayings about wisdom, that there's a price to pay for it. Of course, there is.  Because the saying, ignorance is bliss, is true to a great extent. Because it might not make you aware of what's coming down the pike, but they would say to you perhaps, well if it's coming down the pike, it won't matter if I know it or not, I'll be affected by it when it happens.  And you can say, yeah, I guess that's true. But they're happy, in the meantime if they don't know it, they're quite happy, you see.  However, if you know about it, you might be able to avoid it.  Hm?  You might even be happier then. 


But by the same token, the old saying in various holy books, not just… You know, they all have the same basic tenets to do with philosophy of humans and families and peoples.  But the one in the Old Testament, I think it said that, with great wisdom comes great sorrow. You can't… Again, the opposites, right.  Because great wisdom, you got to realize, you can't have a utopia.  Because human nature is so varied. Human opinion is so diverse on different topics.  And you can't force everybody into the same mold, you cannot do it, people will rebel.  You see.


Some folk will love socialism, they DO love socialism.  It's all they know, some people, and they're quite happy to go through their lives being told what to do and advised by social workers and professionals who run and manage their lives for them, you know.  Others rebel against it. That's human nature.  But for control freaks, they've got to make you all the same if they can possibly do it, they're going to force you all to be the same, or else they'll punish you.  Or eradicate you. 


And that's what it comes down to, we're talking about it too so, is this uniformity and conformity of the public.  Because it never goes well, in what we know of it in the past. You have these big experiments, and they were called experiments, like the American experiment.  That was the US experiment, for the Revolutionary war, and can mankind control himself and manage his own affairs or does he have to be forced to comply and go along with certain things? So free will, hm, can you be trusted to use your free will wisely, with little government looking overlooking the whole system, right? 


That's what they claim it was about. Again, it's a nice myth as well because there's a lot more to it than that.  Jefferson and another one, they made comments about it, about free will and so on and freedom itself.  The idea that they could have minimalistic government running the affairs of people, and they would stick to the basic systems of imports and import duties running the country.  That was initially what they were going to do, import duties, trading duties, taxes would finance the running of government. And government shouldn't get too big. They even talked about they didn't want standing armies, and Jefferson talked about that. Although Jefferson was also partly behind getting around that whole thing by creating the Marines, you know. Which is just an army attached to the Navy really.  But they, that was an experiment.


The second one was conformity of collectivism.  That was the Soviet experiment, the Bolshevik, you know, that, or came out of the Bolshevik one, the Soviet system.  Rule by councils, so there'd be councils and for all different departments of society including trade councils, not unions but councils, all appointed by the Politburo.  Councils for everything that would run your lives, from birth to death.  You wouldn't have to make decisions, but you have to definitely obey them, you see, to exist within the systems. You'd be a collective, and you'd have to go with what was called the collective opinion.  Even though the appointees, the leaders of the Soviet, would obviously go the way that the Politburo directed them to go.  But it always sounded like, we the people have decided, you know. So that was the other, the second experiment.


Of course, what happened was for a while in the West they gave the appearance of free will, especially in the States. That's why people were flooding into the States, and Canada to an extent as well. I mean, Canada at one time, that needed a lot of people for business and for the huge natural resources in timber and mining and all that, they had to get lots of people coming into the country. So, they gave them more of an American type of system, initially, and rights that they didn't have, say, in Britain or other parts of Europe, you could have them inside Canada for a while. So that's how they draw you in.


Eventually of course as they bring in the, they merge the two systems together, collectivism and individualism, they bring it together like they said in the Reese commission, you know, Norman Dodd and the Reese Commission where they said they would blend the Soviet system with the West.  That's what you've got today.


But obviously, you're getting further and further into collectivism by the use of warfare techniques.  You have a war on Covid and so you're in total national emergency, international emergency and you go into conformity. Right down to the Soviet system of police state where they're actually paying, they're actually advising children now to turn on their, to clipe on their parents, they call it clipe, to clipe on their parents, you know.  I've got some articles about that all ready. 


And these kinds of semi-, they're not officials, you've got security guard companies being employed by governments like Canada working in airports now, and literally taking people off planes and take them into these quarantine and different places, where they're not allowed to even meet the relatives. It's like prison camps, that's what they're saying.  I haven't read too much about it, but literally what we do know is they’re not allowed to even get in contact with the relatives on the outside.  This is… This is not freedom; this is not a free society when you get this happening.


And collectivism, totalitarianism always ends up the same way.  In massive disasters. As far as the population are concerned.  When you start forbidding folk to contact people, where you can take people off planes and put them up somewhere in different hotels and so on, and they can't move out, they're surrounded by police outside, but there are security guards inside, private security guards, you know, like private Stasi, you know, and they can't even contact the relatives to say this is what happened and this is where I am or whatever…


You're looking at echoes coming down from time, from the Soviet system and the Gulag system. I hope you understand what I'm saying here.  Run the same way. Because that's what happened in the Soviet bloc countries.  Folk disappeared at night, grabbed out of their rooms, homes.  Alexander Solzhenitsyn talked about it.  It was also used to terrorize the streets, the people, the word spread fast, did you see what happened last night to the so-and-so family? You know.  They would often turn out the people, the tenants of these buildings to witness it. That further terrorized them, and they'd say, well I guess they must've done something wrong. That's what they always say, must've done something wrong, surely. Yep.


So yeah, you are in this mix, this blend of the Soviet system merged with the West. Absolutely you are. Like they said they would at the government inquiry in the US, the Reese Commission and Norman Dodd was the guy who talked about it. I think his YouTube videos might still be up there somewhere where he talked about it. Where he talked to the heads of the biggest foundations, these charitable foundations like, didn't have the Bill Gates back then but you had other ones, which are still there of course, Rockefeller and Ford and Carnegie, etc., etc., a myriad of them, that run thousands of nongovernmental organizations. How can you have democracy when you've got all, thousands and thousands of well-paid, well-funded and directed NGOs, nongovernmental organizations literally working to undermine this and undermine that and change this and change that. All planned outside of government, outside of the public's knowledge. 


You've never been in a democracy.


You haven't.


You've never had a democracy.


All the big changes that have been that you adapt to throughout your entire life were all planned for you to fall in and copy and just go along with it. By private agencies and organizations. On behalf of multibillionaire's, the rich men of the world.  


Remember folks, go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  You can find out how to send a few bucks.  I'm still under lockdown here but I've got some books to get off as shortly as I can.  But send me a few bucks to tick along because it costs money to keep my sites all going.  And I use antique equipment here, believe you me, but I do what I can. I knew this day would come long ago, long, long ago, many years ago.  But yeah, if you help me just tick a long here, because we're going through this together. 


No one's backing me, no organization backs me.  I wasn't put out there as a front to begin with. Because most of them actually really are.  [Alan chuckles.] How do you control nations? You make sure you put out the leaders for them to follow.  I've gone through some of the techniques used by unconventional warfare from Department of Defense manuals and so on.  What you've seen used for way over 30 years with color revolutions, and with your own governments, and actually longer than that with using conventional means, they always go into nations, your nations send in operatives into other nations, sets them up financially.


At one time they used to set up newspapers for them, like Lawrence, if you're Lawrence of Arabia, that's what he and many others came out of University were given their intelligence indoctrinations systems by the military, and financed, and taught languages too at University for the countries they were designed to go into. They would set up newspapers and start changing public opinion in countries which they eventually would overthrow. They were the soft power of the day.  He talks about it, Lawrence talked about that in his own books.  So, it's as old as can be.


With the Internet of course we put in lots of, maybe thousands of operatives across the Middle East.  Disguised as little bloggers, 'eh.  But well-financed and well educated, and well supplied with information to make sure folk grab it. Oh, they're pretty good in what they put out, you know.  And they'll give you a different flavor of character for whatever personality you have, there's one out there for you. 


That's what they were doing in the States for years and years and years. Even before the Internet came along, they gave the you the leaders. And the CIA supplied them.  Well, the CIA never stopped supplying them, folks.  Why would an all-seeing eye, I've always said this, set up operations, even using shortwave years ago...? I gave these talks when I was on shortwave [Alan chuckles.] about the shortwave.  I said, you know, this is the history of what was called Patriot Radio at that time. 


They had some good articles. One was from the Toronto Star, it was a good half page I think, going into the history of it at one point.  It was set up to combat communism and communistic radio coming off the Eastern Bloc countries. At that time, they would use mainly, not always but mainly Christian pastors to lambaste and hammer back at communism.  And then put out all, a different alternative information or facts if you like, to the communists.


Well, why...  The CIA never gives up avenues of communication. And really, when I came out, I knew, I knew I could, I'd watched it long enough to know what was going on, the score and the whole thing.  And I had to, as they say, you walk between the raindrops.  You know who's who. You don't… You can only use what's already there, you know, but you're very careful, you know, because you know everything’s set up. Of course, it is. 


But with bloggers it's more so because it's like the 77th Brigade in Britain. It's not just in Britain, they have operatives across the planet, in Egypt, everywhere.  They train these bloggers and they financed them, and they set them up and make sure they've got our personality, a personality that folk will go for.  Oh, I like so-and-so.  Like rat poison, they've got to have 95% corn but it's the 5% of counterintelligence information or dis-info they put across that you run with, you see. And that sinks you.


I've watched folk get de-platformed for years following people, who end up, the people who they follow have their own platforms and just keep going.  Literally avalanches of them go over the edge parroting the same stuff, and they don't have their own platforms to come back with. 


Hhhhhhh.  I can't think for people. You know, you really can't.


I've watched them remake themselves, the ones who lead you, over and over as they gaslight you, and oh, I was never doing that, you know. Then they remake themselves again as the new champion for the new cause, whatever it happens to be.  And folk never catch on.  N-n. 


That's a sad thing too, and I said this would happen with the Internet a long time ago. You'd be so swamped, so swamped with voices, and that's where you are, an overload of data.  Just like Rockefellers when they literally did massive surveys across the US back in the 1930s to find out how many newspapers and magazines they'd have to control to make sure they standardized all kinds of opinions into their opinions, from themselves, for the whole country. At that time, it was over 30.  All the lesser newspapers and magazines would simply take information from the main ones and copy it. So that would be enough to influence the whole nations opinions.  They even put ones out just for bureaucrats and civil servants, you know, magazines and so on. You've got the equivalents today on the Internet for them. Quite interesting to read those ones too.  So, standardizing opinion is very, very important.


But also, with counterintelligence, the idea, don't forget, counterintelligence doesn't come out and just lie, lie, lie. Counterintelligence, they are the most believable ones because they have, they check to see what the latest chatter is amongst the people, they copy it, they even turn books out about it, like faster than you can go back and forth to the toilet sometimes.  Book after book. And folk never catch on. [Alan chuckles.] It's all taken from other people's talks and so on, then they add their 5% twist on that, the poison, right.  That makes everything ludicrous, the 5%.  So, the folk whose material is grabbed to legitimize the person who is counterintelligence, gets labeled with the same brush, oh you believe in so-and-so, so you're crazy so-and-so.  Counterintelligence.  And there's lots of that out there today.


There's lots of [Alan laughing.] they call them echo chambers. Now, the government has lots of agencies using echo chambers, they create a lot a lot of them.  They try and get maybe about a thousand people all saying the same things, these are echo chambers. From the same source, you see. But also, and the ones you're following, you often find will occasionally let it slip that they also set up and run hundreds of bloggers. You starting to get little bells going off in your head maybe when you think about it? 


That's what we're living in. Amazing systems of control.  Then outside of that you have the deluge of easy blogging where everybody's getting in on the act.  And you have an overload, like they said in the intelligence agencies some years back, eventually you'll get overload of data until most data becomes meaningless.  And we're pretty well there actually.    


We really are.  You have your, some sites that let multiple people upload on, you know. Just look at the pictures, it's like a zoo. It's like the old tabloids with faces all grotesque or trying to look funny or whatever it is. But it's like looking at a circus, you know. So, we're pretty well there.  Aren't we?


So, you have to stick to, if you’re legitimate, are the basic facts.  Where does all this come from, what we are going through today? What is its intentions? Where's the sources of facts from themselves, from the sources?  Hchh.  And are they achieving their goals? Where is it supposed to go?  Hm?  And by seeing where it's supposed to go, you'll see where any weak links in the chain of command at the top come from, where they are. There's always weak links, you know. And you can definitely see from the very well executed, prepared, set up for January 6 at the Capitol building, it was all prepared way in advance by counterintelligence.  I think the FBI admitted it had something to do with it too. They definitely had informants working for them.  At least you could say informants, I guess, they don't say assets or agents, 'eh?  [Alan laughing.]   You never get the full truth on anything from government, especially intelligence agencies. 


But definitely yeah, it was set up. Because the next part of the plan, as I say, 9/11 was for the loss of rights and freedoms and privacy. Perpetual. And this is the next part. Antiterrorism, everybody's a suspected terrorist. Especially certain... certain... just ethnic groups for goodness sake. Imagine.  You understand where this is going?


This does not bode well.  It's shades of what you can get ramped up and ramped up by totalitarian regimes of the past, we see it happening now too. All the different instruments are there to make it all happen.


Perhaps the main target group is the one that could do something about it, to stop it or slow it or whatever it happens to be. Or divert it off. Maybe that's why they're so heavily, heavily accused of all the worlds ills, 'eh?  There's way more going on than they'll ever tell you.


I've always said to people, don't be followers. And don't be blindly led by people that you've seen so many examples in the past in your own countries, of your own intelligence agency setting up stings for people for goodness sake.  Within a week of 9/11 happening, when the top people at GCHQ in Britain advised against the agenda then, they already knew what they were going to do.  It was to set up sting operations to try to draw out potential, like pre-crime right, potential terrorists in Britain.


And he said, this is not good. He says, we can't have this. He said, this is going to encourage folk to become, youngsters to try to become, because you're going to put out fake people for them to follow, and that would radicalize the youth in order to catch the youth. You understand? Well, that's been going on in every country since.  The fact intelligence, top people, TOP intelligence officers in Britain knew that, and when it's disregarded it means there's a bigger agenda at play.


Of course, it was always meant to be widened into domestic terrorism.  Always. Now you're seeing a world government type system like George Bush Senior said, and Junior by the way, 10 years apart, a new world order coming into view.  [Alan chuckles.]  A more equal one. Just like the WEF, you know, chairman Schwab talked about, redistribute wealth, your wealth we’ll redistribute it, you know. That's what he meant to say, YOUR wealth.  He won't do it with his own.  Another private club, the WEF, 'eh.  Yep.


So yeah, you're living through amazing times.  You'll never get, you'll never, if you want evidence of these nefarious techniques used upon society from the past to the present, right as you're living through it, you've got the greatest proof, that most folk haven’t had even in the past.  They didn't have the ability to get quick communication and to see various exposés of... EVIL manifesting itself... using timeworn techniques, you know.  Right down to blaming the people. Oh, there's terrorists amongst you, you're a terrorist if you don't take the shot. We're hearing that already. I said this would happen a year ago, this is the sort of terminology they'd eventually start using.


You see, this is the elite’s revolution.  This is maybe part three or part four of THEIR revolution.  It's an ongoing stage by stage set up. It's not an outside revolution, this is their revolution.  A continuation of it. In stages, hm.


And what do you always have in revolution? What is their biggest enemy? Like the Soviets did, what did they immediately turn the people against? Look out for 'subversive counter terrorists', they're counterrevolutionaries. They're terrorists. They're enemies of the state. Enemies of the people. That's what the courts in the Soviet Union called themselves, they were the courts of the people, when they tried folk, they'd call it, they were enemies of the people, you see. That's what you're getting, the same terminology that's been used over and over again. 


Enemies of the people. The ones who don't want this particular shot, this new, brand-new experimental vaccine, mRNA vaccine, experimental. You ARE part of stage three trials when you take it. And if you're a bit cautious, I don't really want that, I'll wait and see what happens, you know, you're an enemy of the people, an enemy of the state. You're dangerous to the people. That's… You're watching the psychological units in operation, the behavioral insights teams, etc. all working overtime now to demonize people who are using caution. That's what they do in wartime scenarios.  M-hm.


You've got to remember too that all of these things that are happening today were planned years ago. And not just individual plans, it's a continuum of agendas all, a cluster of agendas all tied together basically, to do with eugenics, the idea of scientism would rule the world on behalf, there's still an employee so on behalf of the dominant minority, the minority who owned everything financially.


Remember what Rockefeller said?  A few times actually.  One of his main disclosures in front of the press, the US press, and the world press, he says, we could never have made it without your compliance in keeping our topics quiet from the public.  I was ad-libbing there but that's what he said. It's after one big meeting. I can't remember if it was Bilderberg or which one it was. But he thanked them, for years they'd kept silent and not told the public what was really going on. 


Don't ever expect the authorized media to be there for the people. It's never going to happen. It never has happened in the past.  And it never will for the future. They are owned by those at the very top, the one who own the banks. I'm not talking about bank managers.  I'm talking about the ones who own the chains of banks and central banks. They are owned, folks, and the bankers to the world, etc., they are all owned.   They also have the money invested in all the control levers such as media of all kinds, etc.  And the Internet and Silicon Valley with all of its algorithms. The NSA and the countless other [Alan chuckles.] the myriad of other levels of agencies all tapped into the same spy organizational systems, that are watching all of us.


That all came out from 9/11, you know. And since 9/11 and the war on terror, which is a war OF terror. We're definitely in a war OF terror today and then governments have declared war upon the people using hype and fear and terror tactics to make them comply into an agenda, to stampede along as they are guided as to where to be directed to next, and next and next and next and next. That's what you do when you get stampeded.  All techniques.


So yeah, don't ever think the media is ever going to be there for you. Right. Brzezinski said that, he says, the people will shortly expect the media to do their reasoning for them. He meant their thinking too and their reasoning, right. And folk really do think, oh if there's anything worth knowing they'll tell us. Like they've got a duty to tell us? Where's that written in stone? You know?  Uuh, how you're trained to be naïve, it's just astonishing.


You can't even get a proper weather forecast from them. In Canada here, I mean, I've got about a foot and a half of snow in the last day and a half. But the media said it would be maybe 4 cm, you know.  [Alan laughing.]  This is how they play the statistics game. So, they can always bring it up next, at the end of spring, this is the warmest, the warmest winter we've had for a hundred years. This is what they do every year of course these days. So, they downplay the cold temperatures, and they exaggerate the warm ones. We truly are living in a Fantasia, 'eh, a planned directed Fantasia. And we are constantly gaslighted NOT to perceive what we see and what we experience, but what we are told to experience. 


I mentioned it before, the countless studies that are done on the public. Sometimes with hidden cameras by psychology departments, universities and so on that are given permission to do this, by THE authorities, you know, the authorities. If you try to do that kind of spying, you'd be peeping Tom or something, they'll lock you up. But it's okay when they got to glean information on how to control us. Because they decide how our behavior really works in different situations.


But I mentioned before how they've constantly examined people after, say, bank robberies or major incidents that have happened in streets and so on. You'll often find that they have conflicting stories, individually, when they're first separated, right.  That's why they try to separate them initially and get each person's viewpoint of what they saw.  But if you allow them to stay together a dominant personality within will say, no, this is how it happened, this is what...  They'll start to gradually one by one jump over to that person's side and go with their perception. This is well understood.  That's how it works.


So, we're constantly being gaslighted by the main media not to see what we are seeing. Including the demonstrations last year, 'eh, the demonstrations in the States, with fires burning in the background. Whole cities, whole streets were decimated actually, burned out like some Third World country the next day when you saw them. But you saw the clips that they put up from TV onto YouTube or whatever, you could actually see the reporters standing there saying there's nothing much happening, it's fairly peaceful. And there's the fires behind them all burning, you hear the windows busting with the heat and poof, poof. 


Really gaslighted to your face. That was obviously, they're telling you there that that was their agenda from before the riots started, this is how you all report them. ALL you guys, you know. Yep. No one made them report it like that, but they certainly knew what the formula was supposed to be, 'eh.  Total gaslighting.


Right down to the beautifully staged people waiting to go into the government building on January 6. And the police obviously compliant, expecting it. All laid out in advance, 'eh, so that photographers could have a field day and say, oh, these are absolute rioters, there's all these white folk here.   That's what they targeted the next day, white folk, you know.  What do you mean? All the white folk in the world were not there, folks. And most of them that were there were not inside that building.


But that doesn't matter. It's Wag the Dog, it must be true, it's on TV, there's what they showed you. You know? All staged. Including who would get in first, it was all staged. They've even had the FBI come out and admit that one of the leaders of one of the groups there, who was involved, you know, in setting up the scenario, he wasn't there, they actually stopped him from going there because he was one of theirs. Was a top informer for them, at the very least, 'eh?  Maybe an agent provocateur, who knows. So, there's nothing you can trust these days. Especially on television.


It must be true, it's on TV. Wag the Dog should be taught in school as a classic way of deceiving people. It's well done, you know.  It's a comedy too, you know. But it's well done. It's more real than anything. That's how it is done. That's how the folk perceive, it was on television, it must be true.


It's all perception management, you see. You can higher gangs of people to riot if you want to. That's old stuff in the States and elsewhere. The States have hired folk across other countries, it's under soft power of revolutionaries, you know.  Numbers to fill the numbers game for demonstrations in other countries, in Iran and elsewhere.  That's how it's done. It's what you're seeing done in your own country and you can't fathom it out.  But the big boys don't go after them. And they don't get arrested.  If they do, they're turned lose and the charges are dropped. That tells you all you need to know.


But the ones who fell for it at the capital building on 6 January, they went to follow the darn thing, saps all, what a shame. Absolute shame. Because it was a set up. It was made-for-TV, literally made for television, you know. It was to discredit all the other folk that were there just grieving basically about losing what they saw as a nation, you know. It wasn't just to do with who got elected. It was to do with the lockdowns, the destruction of the economy, destruction of everything and their values and so on. That they've been watching for a whole year.  [Alan chuckles.]  That's part of the reason they were there. Of course, it was. 


And helped along by other forces, obviously helped along, if not led there by other forces. I won't name them but that's how it works. And folk will still follow the ones who lead them, 'eh?  What a shame.


That's interesting too, watching, again, people who lead them, at least encouraged them, maybe even financed them, that whole demonstration there or meeting or whatever you want to call it, or protest, remake themselves immediately by the professionals behind them, you know. Everything's produced and managed and folk don't realize it.  They remake their images and so on.


Other folk who I think were hoping that Trump is real, even in religious organizations, immediately turned tail as soon as the first utterance came out, oh you must be mad after all, talking about Trump. Because that came up from the papers that very night of 6 January. And they started to think, oh my God they're going to go after, they're going to purge all the folk that were right wing. So, they immediately turned tail and turned their whole jackets inside out, that's not really us, we're different.  That was something to watch that.


The fear in people, 'eh?  Hhhh.  What a world when you're living in fear all the time, and lots of folk are.  And that's what authorities want, living in fear. Now there's no lack of evidence as I've said before, there is NO lack of evidence from the elites’ point of view to do with too many of you, with all the documentaries that came out and books galore that came out from the sources, like the better families Bureau of America, the Rockefeller groups and so on, to do with eugenics 'eh, better breeding, 'eh. 


Of course, the racial hygiene that Germany had, where they did go around the hospitals with hygienic people who eradicated the unfit, as they called them. You know, the nonessential types, the people who had hereditary deformities or whatever it was. Or mental illnesses of one kind or another.  Lots of people get congenital defects from birth really, lots of children would get, would be perfect or look fine too, but if the cord went around the neck in the womb they could be deprived of vital oxygen at a crucial point at birth and so on, and just for a minute or two that's all it takes to cause damage. So, all these kinds of things.


Anyway, they were wiped out by, again, the practical folk. Because science took over in Germany, you see.  And scientists rule. Now, you can't argue with science. And Hitler did congratulate the West for their research into eugenics. That's where he copied it all from, from the Cold Spring Harbor group in the States.  When they brought in cattle breeders from the cattle breeders Association of America to see if they could use the same techniques in breeding better people.  [Alan chuckles.]    


They did the same thing, started sterilizing the unfit.  You see, the people who were poor and end up on welfare obviously were mentally ill because that's why they're poor, they are unfit. That came from Britain by the way, the poorhouses. When you read the articles that were written at the time from books and magazines, at the time, 19th century Britain going into the 20th century, the class system was so rancid, they really talked quite openly about the fact, well the poor folk are obviously mentally unwell, you know, that's why they're poor.  So, they should really be eradicated. Or at the very least sterilized.  M-hm.  It is very, probably, you know, hereditary, you know.  That's what they said.  N-n-n.


That hasn't changed, folks. And as science went into ascendancy it's more solidified today than ever before.  We've had the eugenicist come out over the last few years, professors in this university and that university, one in Australia comes on every so often, people should just Live to 60-odd years and die, and leave space and not consume so much so the next generation can get work and take over.  And you're getting convinced to die. These are persuaders, these are professional persuaders, people. 


They're even turning professional persuaders lose on you to try to convince you to take the vaccination.  Now, you wouldn't need professional persuaders if you can just come out with the straight facts, all sides of it, of facts, you know, see how far you get.  If you had the guts and the okay to go ahead and actually tell people ALL facts and all side effects, all possible bad effects, you know, bleeding to death perhaps even, you know.  Yep. 


But no, no, no.  Perfectly safe.  Folk who die have nothing to do with vaccinations.  All from the manufacturer's point of view, 'eh? 


I remember doing the articles on Monsanto years ago, had all the patents you see on modifying the vegetables, the genes in the vegetables and adding things and taking things away and all that. People were complaining too about the side effects of not just that but also the pesticides that went along, like the Roundup Ready went along with using Monsanto's products, you know, and the side effects that folk were claiming were coming from the pesticides as well. They were getting sued, and getting off with it too, were getting actually charged, you know, by the Monsanto and getting put, you know, having to pay fines, hefty fines.  Some independent local laboratories wanted to investigate the pesticides and the actual seeds and that for themselves. They were forbidden by Monsanto to do it because they had the patent rights, that no one could publish anything about their products except themselves. 


That was law; so no one, even for the health of the public, was allowed to investigate and test the stuff in laboratories, for years.  It's no different from the vaccine companies. They give the handouts. They tell all the governments what to say, you know. Got nothing to do with the vaccine.  Without even checking [Alan chuckles.] to see if it had anything to do with it. Immediately the person dies after the vaccination, 'eh, they can tell you within 20 minutes that it had nothing to do with the vaccine. Nope.  Really?  Hm.  And that's good enough for us, 'eh? 


This is your freedom. This is the system that you go, like idiots and go and vote for again.


So, let's get back to 9/11 that was to usher in the terrorism, anti-terrorism, you see. And no privacy.  In America especially they had it written, at least it's written into law what their natural rights were, which was self-evident, they put it into writing at least, have been stripped away. And this is part two of it, where you're all terrorists. Even if you have a thought about something, you might be a terrorist.  Did you have the right kind of thinking? They're actually, this is what they're coming down to with the Ministries of Truth, 'eh, out of George Orwell, the Ministry of Truth. Then they'll get out and they'll send you to the Ministry of Love, where they torture you to see what you've been saying.


Don't forget too, 1984 in the book and in the movie version, there's different movies made on it but the one with Richard Burton, it was really well done. Where Winston goes to see Burton who was, he was one of the officers of that class of the ones who rule, the inner party.  He eventually finds out, after he's caught and sent off to be tortured, and Burton comes to torture him. He says, oh no...  Because Winston believed that there was a rebellion Army basically, an army of rebels who would overthrow this nasty totalitarian system. And Winston said, well you gave me the book, the manual for revolution. And Burton said, well, I wrote it. He says, well not all of it, I wrote some of it.  So even the ones that you follow to rebel against are given to you, and their philosophy is given to you, to draw you out and use you and catch you all.  Ding-ding-ding-ding-ding. That's how it works.


People have to really want freedom, you know. Really want it. Most folk don't, I think. Most folk really have become accustomed to this form of socialism, this cotton wool from birth to death, you know. In a world where even boys are kind of emasculated, they're not allowed to be boys anymore. I see China, by the way, is putting money towards programs to making boys into men, they actually say that, to make them into real men.  While the West is trying to really effeminize them in a sense, at least neuter them.  Has been for a long time.


Where boys, I can remember when they stopped boys from climbing trees and things, you know, the things you could do. Yeah, I remember you fall once in a while, but you get over it, it didn't bother you. That's what young boys used to do; you'd be very active.  You'd want to build things, DO things. Go fast on your bikes or whatever it happened to be.  Yeah, and you'd have your little crashes and spills, but you get over it. That's just what you do, you know.


But now, with the Internet too, and the games they play, they just sit on their bum all day, they sit on their rear end all the time playing their games.  Which are addictive, meant to be addictive. So, they're never testing their own bodies or their strength of their abilities to run or do anything or climb or anything. It's all done virtually in some game somewhere, so they don't know. 


That's the first thing you do in the military.  In the military a lot of people, it does matter what country you go into in the military, you go through a brutalization process to make you standardized. That's the first thing they do.  At least they used to. You’re screamed at a lot, you know. And you comply. You must eventually jump immediately and do what you're told. To stop you from thinking for yourself, that's the idea, just obey, obey, obey. But eventually too you'll find recruits turn into more confident young guys as they learn to climb and do things they never thought they could do themselves. 


So, they're getting confidence in things which they didn't know they could do, you see.  Some of them used to come out of the forces and they would be helped getting start up businesses on the go. They did have the confidence to do things. Again, because they had learned confidence, really that's what it is, confidence, when they're in the military, you know. All countries do the same thing.  But regardless of what you've been taught you gain the confidence, you'll have it regardless and then you can apply it to different fields, you see. With some optimism. And knowing you can do it. So, there's some pluses from that too. Again, it's a tribal thing, the military, and young guys tend to excel in the tribe. It doesn't matter what ethnic background they come from.


That's what Desmond Morris talked about years ago, was Tribe and Super Tribe I think it was called. He put a book out on it, about America as it attempts, again experimentation, the great experiment, to see if they could combine all the different ethnic groups into a super army, a super tribe he called it. And be able to put their ethnic differences behind them, hopefully, and eventually forget, you know. If America was to continue to be the leader, or the policeman of the world as they like to call it, which really meant they were plundering the planet for a few big corporations.  It hasn't changed, 'eh.


I should also mention too that the people go into the military, especially in the States, are despised by the left-wing, and Hollywood. But not just them, the left-wing that are also the millionaires and billionaires, despised by them. I mentioned it before how articles were out when Bill and Hillary Clinton were in and they talked about it, how they despise the military, but they would use them and despise them, you know. These are the words they used, by the way, in the media at the time.  And you always see in Hollywood what they call the rednecks, in the military, and how they debase them in their movies and in their comedies, they debase them all the time. Incredible.  Absolutely incredible.


It's almost like the movie Deliverance as well, everybody they meet outside the big city is a hick, crazy person.  Yep.  Very telling. An inbred, you know.  And even the comedies like, it was Mars Attacks, was it? A comedy that you couldn't, I couldn't chuckle at, at all, you know. Because there were some other things behind, there was a lot of messages hidden into it. Very much so.  It was mockery of a system, and the people in it too. 


There's a scene in Mars Attacks where they have to get the troops out to fight these alien invaders, you see.  As I say, it's done supposedly as a comedy.  But then they show you a trailer camp of house trailers, and there's this family, a mum and dad and the son, and they're stripping weapons. So, this is your redneck, this is Hollywood's idea of the redneck, you know.  Like gun crazy, living, they're trailer trash as they like to call it, right. Nothing wrong with trailers, believe you me, but this is what they call them, and they're stripping guns and stuff.


But again, their son goes off and they see him go off to the war.  Then the son when it comes to actually going out and fighting aliens, he runs forward, his magazine falls out of the rifle… and he gets zapped and he disappears, like he's an idiot, you see.  Talk about debasement. They hate, they hate what they are…  But who fills most of the uniforms, 'eh?  They get sent off to fight these wars that are for profit for big corporations. The same corporations that despise the military.  [Alan chuckles.] They always say it's mainly from the south of the US.  And it's a shame, it's a shame they'll keep doing it, you know, keep doing it over and over.  Always suffering. Always left with big bills to pay for these wars. They get nothing out of it personally, if they survive it.  And big corporations use them and abuse them and throw them away like toilet paper.  N-n-n.


Now, here's an article here called…


The New Domestic War on Terror is Coming

greenwald.substack.com / 19 Jan 2021 / Glenn Greenwald


(Alan:  You see, they start off with the war, again, war on terror, and the stripping of privacy and 9/11, right, and now this is the next stage of the same thing.  Now that they've got all the massive fields of almost cities built up that do nothing but collect all the data, it's just like spy cities since 9/11 all set up. It says…)


No speculation is needed. Those who wield power are demanding it. The only question is how much opposition they will encounter.


The last two weeks have ushered in a wave of new domestic police powers and rhetoric in the name of fighting “terrorism” that are carbon copies of many of the worst excesses of the first War on Terror that began nearly twenty years ago. (A:  It’s actually very similar to what happened in Russia when it was taken over.)  This trend shows no sign of receding as we move farther from the January 6 Capitol riot. The opposite is true: it is intensifying.


We have witnessed an orgy of censorship from Silicon Valley monopolies with calls for far more aggressive speech policing, (A:  And that's what they call it, speech policing.  We're back to Orwell again hey, the Ministry of Love, Truth, we've got Ministries of Truth now who decide what truth is, 'eh.  So, speech policing…)   a visibly militarized Washington, D.C. featuring a non-ironically named “Green Zone,” vows from the incoming president and his key allies for a new anti-domestic terrorism bill, (A:  So really, it's a domestic terrorism bill.) and frequent accusations of “sedition,” “treason,” and “terrorism” against members of Congress and citizens. This is all driven by a radical expansion of the meaning of “incitement to violence.” It is accompanied by viral-on-social-media pleas that one work with the FBI to turn in one’s fellow citizens (See Something, Say Something!) and demands for a new system of domestic surveillance.


Underlying all of this are immediate insinuations that anyone questioning any of this must, by virtue of these doubts, harbor sympathy for the Terrorists and their neo-Nazi, white supremacist ideology. Liberals have spent so many years now in a tight alliance with neocons and the CIA (A:  …and isn’t that the truth, ‘eh.  It’s all one group now.) that they are making the 2002 version of John Ashcroft look like the President of the (old-school) ACLU.


The U.S. Department of Homeland Security website, touting a trademarked phrase licensed to it in 2010 by the City of New York, urging citizens to report “suspicious activity” to the FBI and other security state agencies.


The more honest proponents of this new domestic War on Terror are explicitly admitting that they want to model it on the first one. A New York Times reporter noted on Monday that a “former intelligence official on PBS NewsHour” (A: That’s the Public Broadcasting System, NewsHour…)  said “that the US should think about a ‘9/11 Commission’ for domestic extremism and consider applying some of the lessons from the fight against Al Qaeda here at home.” More amazingly, Gen. Stanley McChrystal — for years head of Joint Special Operations Command in Iraq and the commander of the war in Afghanistan — explicitly compared that war to this new one, speaking to Yahoo News:


I did see a similar dynamic in the evolution of al-Qaida in Iraq, where a whole generation of angry Arab youth with very poor prospects followed a powerful leader who promised to take them back in time to a better place, and he led them to embrace an ideology that justified their violence. This is now happening in America…. I think we’re much further along in this radicalization process, and facing a much deeper problem as a country, than most Americans realize.”


(A:  What they don’t mention here too, it’s interesting, it’s a whole history of Al Qaeda, what it is.  Al Qaeda was set up by the West with its war in Afghanistan against the Russians when the Russians were running Afghanistan. That’s what it was, they don’t mention that here.  It’s a pity.  Al Qaeda, really, was the term they used for almost like a meeting place, like a cyber thing, like in a radio thing, Al Qaeda, and they would tune in and talk to each other at the time. That was the meaning of it back then. Then it became more solidified as the West hired mercenaries to use against other nations in the Middle East and so on and Asia.)


Anyone who, despite all this, still harbors lingering doubts that the Capitol riot is and will be the neoliberal 9/11, and that a new War on Terror is being implemented in its name, need only watch the two short video clips below, which will clear their doubts for good. It is like being catapulted by an unholy time machine back to Paul Wolfowitz’s 2002 messaging lab.


The first video, flagged by Tom Elliott, is from Monday morning’s Morning Joe program on MSNBC (the show that arguably did more to help Donald Trump become the GOP nominee than any other). It features Jeremy Bash — one of the seemingly countless employees of TV news networks who previously worked in Obama’s CIA and Pentagon — demanding that, in response to the Capitol riot, “we reset our entire intelligence approach,” including “look[ing] at greater surveillance of them,” adding: “the FBI is going to have to run confidential sources.” See if you detect any differences between what CIA operatives and neocons were saying in 2002 when demanding the Patriot Act and greater FBI and NSA surveillance and what this CIA-official-turned-NBC-News-analyst is saying here:


The second video features the amazing declaration from former Facebook security official Alex Stamos, talking to the very concerned CNN host Brian Stelter, about the need for social media companies to use the same tactics against U.S. citizens that they used to remove ISIS from the internet (A:  That’s what I’m saying, they’re using the same tactics, by the same teams in cyber warfare, operatives.) — “in collaboration with law enforcement” — and that those tactics should be directly aimed at what he calls extremist “conservative influencers.”


(A:  …conservative influencers. So, let’s use the military, ‘eh?  [Alan chuckles.]  Cyber warfare, which they’re already using about the Covid.)


“Press freedoms are being abused by these actors,” the former Facebook executive proclaimed. Stamos noted how generous he and his comrades have been up until now: “We have given a lot of leeway — both in the traditional media and in social media — to people with a very broad range of views.” But no more. Now is the time to “get us all back in the same consensual reality.”


In a moment of unintended candor, Stamos noted the real problem: “there are people on YouTube, for example, that have a larger audience than people on daytime CNN” (A: [Alan chuckles.]  I wonder why?)  — and it’s time for CNN and other mainstream outlets to seize the monopoly on information dissemination to which they are divinely entitled by taking away the platforms of those whom people actually want to watch and listen to:


(A:  So, it's true enough, it's monopoly, it's back to the monopolization for the mainstream, who literally were falling apart for years, no one was looking into them because we know it's all disinformation, and they've been getting government subsidies for years and years. Well, now they want the right for all, ALL data, to give out all data.  This article goes on and on and on about it. He says…)


(If still not convinced, and if you can endure it, you can also watch MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski (A:  I guess that’s the daughter of Zbigniew Brzezinski, ‘eh.)  literally screaming that one needed remedy to the Capitol riot is that the Biden administration must “shutdown” Facebook. (A: [Alan chuckles.]) Shutdown Facebook).


Calls for a War on Terror sequel — a domestic version complete with surveillance and censorship — are not confined to ratings-deprived cable hosts and ghouls from the security state. The Wall Street Journal reports that “Mr. Biden has said he plans to make a priority of passing a law against domestic terrorism, and he has been urged to create a White House post overseeing the fight against ideologically inspired violent extremists and increasing funding to combat them.”


(A:  And it will go right down to just speaking, you see. They want to censor all speech; I hope you understand.  Which you cannot have democracy and censoring speech. You can’t have it. It doesn’t work. You either have totalitarianism, you know, and tyranny, or you have democracy.  And in a democracy, you’ve got to tolerate all kinds of speech.)


Why would such new terrorism laws be needed in a country that already imprisons more of its citizens than any other country in the world as the result of a very aggressive set of criminal laws? What acts should be criminalized by new “domestic terrorism” laws that are not already deemed criminal? They never say, almost certainly because — just as was true of the first set of new War on Terror laws — their real aim is to criminalize that which should not be criminalized: speech, association, protests, opposition to the new ruling coalition.


This article is quite lengthy actually, but I'll put it up for those that want to read it for themselves.  I've only read maybe a third of it, maybe less.  But it's on the money. It's put out by someone who's had his share of it too, that was Glenn Greenwald. So, he knows, he's not some amateur journalist here telling you what's coming down the pike and what IS happening in real time now. This is not something from the future. Remember, all these laws too are immediately expanded as soon as you put it on the books to include all kinds of things, or even, what were you thinking when you said that? You know? I'm not kidding you.  This is where it's all supposed to go. Thought crime.  Thought crime. Own-think. Have your own-think. Was that your opinion or did you get it from someone else?  This article here ties in with it too.  When you see everything working together, 'eh, under different names and different departments, it's all the same. It's one organization. This is from the Rutherford Institute and it says…


In the Shadow of that Hideous Strength:

The UN’s Proposed Alliance with Big Data to Know Where You are and What You’re Doing

rutherford.org / 1 Aug 2016


(A:  This is from 2016.  Oh, that's old news. Well, no. It's just as relevant today. There is no such thing as old news, folks.)


The age of crony capitalism, married to scientific research, with the sword of the state blazing the way. Enter That Hideous Strength, and C.S. Lewis’s scathing, yet prophetic portrayal of a science unhinged from objective truth, and sold-out in the pursuit of power.


(A:  Who are we hearing today, Covid, science is the ultimate God and truth, 'eh, you can't argue with science, 'eh?)


Despair of objective truth had been increasingly insinuated into the scientists; indifference to it, and a concentration upon mere power, had been the result . . . Dreams of the far future destiny of man were dragging up from its shallow and unquiet grave the old dream of Man as God” (That Hideous Strength, p. 203).


Lewis’s not-so science fiction work haunted me this last April, when I served as an NGO Representative to the UN’s Commission on Population and Development. The Theme for 2016 was “enhancing the demographic evidence base.” In other words, the commission was concerned about data. Accurate data. Data you can sink your teeth into, and track population movements, contraceptive usage, and a country’s overall amount of harmful alcohol consumption. The UN wants to know everything about everybody. They seek a level of omniscience unprecedented in world history, all as a crucial part of their grandiose, audacious, Sustainable Development Goals for 2030.


But convincing someone to sell their freedom, requires big promises. How about SDG goal #1 “end poverty in all its forms everywhere” for a starter? 


The UN’s Commission on Population and Development is one of ten commissions in the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) (A:  It all smacks of George Orwell’s 1984, you know EUROSOC and so on. So, this is it here, it’s ECOSOC here.), ranging anywhere from the Forum on Forests (UNFF) to the Status of Women (UNCSW). Through starched, dry, and benignly titled commissions, the UN elite seeks to control the economic and social development of the world.


The fundamental philosophy undergirding ECOSOC is collectivism, relying heavily upon top-down, central planning, by self-interested bureaucrats (each with a pet issue to peddle). But the stubborn thorn of all central planning has always been limited knowledge. The UN is now making a concerted effort to overcome that hurdle by making use of Big Data. As if to only make matters worse, the economic elite and the cosmopolitan bureaucrats finally may have enough information to make sub-par, sovereignty ceding, harmful decisions; and thereby forever proving Hayek right: 


(A:  Hayek wrote The Road to Serfdom.)


[Central] planning owes its present strength largely to the fact that, while planning is in the main still an ambition, it unites almost all the single-minded idealists, all the men and women who have devoted their lives to a single task. The hopes they place in planning, however, are the result not of a comprehensive view of society but rather of a very limited view and often the results of a great exaggeration of the importance of the ends they place foremost . . .  it would make the very men who are most anxious to plan society the most dangerous if they are allowed to do so -- and the most intolerant of the planning of others. (The Road to Serfdom, p. 55).




According to a 2015 report, Ban Ki-Moon, the Secretary-General of the UN, boasted that “the MDGs [Millennium Development Goals] (A:  Which ended up being in Agenda 21 by the way, got blended in with them.) helped to lift more than one billion people out of extreme poverty.” The claim failed to reference probably the most important factors in the reduction of global poverty: the growth and privatization of both China and India over the last several decades. (A:  Nothing to do with the UN, you see.) As an economist commented, “three-quarters of the gains made in reducing extreme poverty are attributable to economic growth in China and India, not to any particular effort by the United Nations.”


Along with goals of ending poverty and ending hunger, the (A:  Sustainable Development Goals.) SDG’s seek to “ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights,” which many countries interpret as abortion on demand -- a sustained effort, especially by developed countries, to control and limit world population. Not to forget combatting climate change, increasing the use of renewable energy, and the picturesque Goal 16: “Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.” It sounds so nice -- or does it?


An integral component for the UN’s SDG aspirations, are their ability to measure progress. And this requires data. Massive amounts of it. This includes traditional sources, such as censuses, surveys, civil registration, but also Big Data.


A UN report (A:  The links are all here by the way in this article from the UN.) listed current projects to exploit Big Data and gather information. Including, mobile positioning data for “tourism” tracking, mobile phone data for commuting patterns, tweet analysis, and smart meters for analyzing the structure and size of households, among countless others.


ECOSOC released its 2015, (A:  The link is here too.) Report of the Global Working Group on Big Data for Official Statistics. “The potential of big data sources resides in the timely — and sometimes real-time — availability of large amounts of data, which are usually generated at minimal cost.”


You know, the point of all of this too, is the fact the UN, naturally, naturally since it's a front for those [Alan chuckles.] who own the world, is talking about your ID 2020 they call it. A big program for ID 2020, for IDing everybody across the whole planet. ID 2020, an ID that will be on all the phones to start with, you see.  At least on the phones, and maybe on paper too for those that don't have the phones yet. But everybody will have to have their ID 2020. Your tracked and traced ID basically. 


So yeah, the UN is a big, big part of it naturally. Because after all, it was set up to be a front for those who own the world, to bring in the system of the world that they want the world to be. As opposed to what it was and is at the moment. We are far closer to their goals now actually.  Most folk don't realize what you're really living through, when you're living through it.


This article falls in line with the last couple, and it’s from John Whitehead and he talks about, again, what’s happening with terrorism and domestic terrorism and so on. It’s called…


Enemies of the Deep State: The Government’s War on Domestic Terrorism Is a Trap

rutherford.org / 26 Jan 2021


We are moving fast down that slippery slope to an authoritarian society in which the only opinions, ideas and speech expressed are the ones permitted by the government and its corporate cohorts.


In the wake of the Jan. 6 riots at the Capitol, “domestic terrorism” has become the new poster child for expanding the government’s powers at the expense of civil liberties.


Of course, “domestic terrorist” is just the latest bull’s eye phrase, to be used interchangeably with “anti-government,” “extremist” and “terrorist,” to describe anyone who might fall somewhere on a very broad spectrum of viewpoints that could be considered “dangerous.”


Watch and see, we are all about to become enemies of the state.


In a déjà vu mirroring of the legislative fall-out from 9/11, and the ensuing build-up of the security state, there is a growing demand in certain sectors for the government to be given expanded powers to root out “domestic” terrorism, the Constitution be damned.


If this is a test of Joe Biden’s worthiness to head up the American police state, he seems ready.


As part of his inaugural address, President Biden pledged to confront and defeat “a rise of political extremism, white supremacy, domestic terrorism.” Biden has also asked the Director of National Intelligence to work with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security in carrying out a “comprehensive threat assessment” of domestic terrorism. And then to keep the parallels going, there is the proposed Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2021, introduced after the Jan. 6 riots, which aims to equip the government with “the tools to identify, monitor and thwart” those who could become radicalized to violence.


Don’t blink or you’ll miss the sleight of hand.


This is the tricky part of the Deep State’s con game that keeps you focused on the shell game in front of you while your wallet is being picked clean by ruffians in your midst.


It follows the same pattern as every other convenient “crisis” used by the government as an excuse to expand its powers at the citizenry’s expense and at the expense of our freedoms.


As investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald warns:


“The last two weeks have ushered in a wave of new domestic police powers and rhetoric in the name of fighting ‘terrorism’ that are carbon copies of many of the worst excesses of the first War on Terror that began nearly twenty years ago. This New War on Terror—one that is domestic in name from the start and carries the explicit purpose of fighting ‘extremists’ and ‘domestic terrorists’ among American citizens on U.S. soil—presents the whole slew of historically familiar dangers when governments, exploiting media-generated fear and dangers, arm themselves with the power to control information, debate, opinion, activism and protests.”


Greenwald is referring to the USA Patriot Act, passed almost 20 years ago, which paved the way for the eradication of every vital safeguard against government overreach, corruption and abuse.


Free speech, the right to protest, the right to challenge government wrongdoing, due process, a presumption of innocence, the right to self-defense, accountability and transparency in government, privacy, press, sovereignty, assembly, bodily integrity, representative government: all of these and more have become casualties in the government’s war on the American people, a war that has grown more pronounced since Sept. 11, 2001.


Some members of Congress get it.


In a letter opposing expansion of national security powers, a handful congressional representatives urged their colleagues not to repeat the mistakes of the past:


“While many may find comfort in increased national security powers in the wake of this attack, we must emphasize that we have been here before, and we have seen where that road leads. Our history is littered with examples of initiatives sold as being necessary to fight extremism that quickly devolve into tools used for the mass violation of the human and civil rights of the American people… To expand the government’s national security powers once again at the expense of the human and civil rights of the American people would only serve to further undermine our democracy, not protect it.”


Cue the Emergency State, the government’s Machiavellian version of crisis management that justifies all manner of government tyranny in the so-called name of national security.


This is the power grab hiding in plain sight, obscured by the political machinations of the self-righteous elite. This is how the government continues to exploit crises and use them as opportunities for power grabs under the guise of national security. Indeed, this is exactly how the government added red flag gun laws, precrime surveillance, fusion centers, threat assessments, mental health assessments, involuntary confinement to its arsenal of weaponized powers.


The objective is not to make America safe again. That has never been the government’s aim.


Greenwald explains:


“Why would such new terrorism laws be needed in a country that already imprisons more of its citizens than any other country in the world as the result of a very aggressive set of criminal laws? What acts should be criminalized by new ‘domestic terrorism’ laws that are not already deemed criminal? They never say, almost certainly because—just as was true of the first set of new War on Terror laws—their real aim is to criminalize that which should not be criminalized: speech, association, protests, opposition to the new ruling coalition.”


So, you see, the issue is not whether Donald Trump or Roger Stone or MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell deserve to be banned from Twitter, even if they’re believed to be spouting misinformation, hateful ideas, or fomenting discontent.


Rather, we should be asking whether any corporation or government agency or entity representing a fusion of the two should have the power to muzzle, silence, censor, regulate, control and altogether eradicate so-called “dangerous” or “extremist” ideas.


This unilateral power to muzzle free speech represents a far greater danger than any so-called right- or left-wing extremist might pose.


The ramifications are so far-reaching as to render almost every American an extremist in word, deed, thought or by association.


Yet where many go wrong is in assuming that you have to be doing something illegal or challenging the government’s authority in order to be flagged as a suspicious character, labeled an enemy of the state and locked up like a dangerous criminal.


Eventually, all you will really need to do is use certain trigger words, surf the internet, communicate using a cell phone, drive a car, stay at a hotel, purchase materials at a hardware store, take flying or boating lessons, appear suspicious, question government authority, or generally live in the United States.


The groundwork has already been laid.


The trap is set.


All that is needed is the right bait.


With the help of automated eyes and ears, a growing arsenal of high-tech software, hardware and techniques, government propaganda urging Americans to turn into spies and snitches, as well as social media and behavior sensing software (A:  They actually have that out, behavior sensing software.  The links for that by the way are here, for the articles.), government agents have been busily spinning a sticky spider-web of threat assessments, behavioral sensing warnings, flagged “words,” and “suspicious” activity reports aimed at snaring potential enemies of the state.


It’s the American police state’s take on the dystopian terrors foreshadowed by George Orwell, Aldous Huxley and Phillip K. Dick all rolled up into one oppressive pre-crime and pre-thought crime package.


What’s more, the technocrats who run the surveillance state don’t even have to break a sweat while monitoring what you say, what you read, what you write, where you go, how much you spend, whom you support, and with whom you communicate. Computers by way of AI (artificial intelligence) now do the tedious work of trolling social media, the internet, text messages and phone calls for potentially anti-government remarks, all of which is carefully recorded, documented, and stored to be used against you someday at a time and place of the government’s choosing.


(A:  All the links are here for these articles by the way, that it’s mentioning here.)


For instance, police in major American cities have been using predictive policing technology that allows them to identify individuals—or groups of individuals—most likely to commit a crime in a given community. Those individuals are then put on notice that their movements and activities will be closely monitored and any criminal activity (by them or their associates) will result in harsh penalties.


In other words, the burden of proof is reversed: you are guilty before you are given any chance to prove you are innocent.


(A:  So, they’ve changed around what used to be, innocent until proven guilty, and now you’re guilty until proven innocent.)


Dig beneath the surface of this kind of surveillance/police state, however, and you will find that the real purpose of pre-crime is not safety but control.


Red flag gun laws merely push us that much closer towards a suspect society where everyone is potentially guilty of some crime or another and must be preemptively rendered harmless.


This is the same government that has a growing list—shared with fusion centers and law enforcement agencies—of ideologies, behaviors, affiliations and other characteristics that could flag someone as suspicious and result in their being labeled potential enemies of the state.


For instance, if you believe in and exercise your rights under the Constitution (namely, your right to speak freely, worship freely, associate with like-minded individuals who share your political views, criticize the government, own a weapon, demand a warrant before being questioned or searched, or any other activity viewed as potentially anti-government (A:  It’s true enough, the Constitution is really looked upon as being antigovernment today, isn’t it.), racist, bigoted, anarchic or sovereign), you could be at the top of the government’s terrorism watch list.


(A:  I’ve got links to these articles too by the way, including the government’s list and so on from the New York Times.)


Moreover, as a New York Times editorial warns, you may be an anti-government extremist (a.k.a. domestic terrorist) in the eyes of the police if you are afraid that the government is plotting to confiscate your firearms, if you believe the economy is about to collapse (A:  That’s another one too, you see, which, of course you’re wondering how it’s still ticking along there, ‘eh, since it really is pretty well shut down altogether.)  and the government will soon declare martial law (A:  …which they pretty well have, that’s what the Emergency Powers Act is that they’re using right now.), or if you display an unusual number of political and/or ideological bumper stickers on your car.


According to one FBI latest report, you might also be classified as a domestic terrorism threat if you espouse conspiracy theories, especially if you “attempt to explain events or circumstances as the result of a group of actors working in secret to benefit themselves at the expense of others” and are “usually at odds with official or prevailing explanations of events.”


(A:  The links are all here by the way, in this article to other articles from authorities.)


Additionally, according to Michael C. McGarrity, the FBI’s assistant director of the counterterrorism division, the bureau now “classifies domestic terrorism threats into four main categories: racially motivated violent extremism, anti-government/anti-authority extremism, animal rights/environmental extremism, and abortion extremism.”


(A: [Alan chuckles.] It’s amazing really when you look at what governments doing ‘eh.  [Alan chuckles.] They can declare war, and have you fight, that’s not a conspiracy of course, that’s no extremist you know, sending you off to war. And then close your whole nation down, stop all the economy and tell you to stay in your home. That’s not extremist either, is it?  [Alan chuckles.]   But they’re going after YOU for complaining about it.  [Alan laughing.]  This is something out of Monty Python.)


In other words, if you dare to subscribe to any views that are contrary to the government’s, you may well be suspected of being a domestic terrorist and treated accordingly.


Again, where many Americans go wrong is in naively assuming that you have to be doing something illegal or harmful in order to be flagged and targeted (A:  And that’s the truth most folk don’t realize.) for some form of intervention or detention.


In fact, U.S. police agencies have been working to identify and manage potential extremist “threats,” violent or otherwise, before they can become actual threats for some time now.


In much the same way that the USA Patriot Act was used as a front to advance the surveillance state, allowing the government to establish a far-reaching domestic spying program that turned every American citizen into a criminal suspect, the government’s anti-extremism program renders otherwise lawful, nonviolent activities as potentially extremist.


In fact, all you need to do these days to end up on a government watch list or be subjected to heightened scrutiny is use certain trigger words (like cloud, pork and pirates), (A:  Which is, by the way, true.  [Alan chuckles.]  They actually have ones which will flag you, and some of them are rather, you’d never think of it in fact.) surf the internet, communicate using a cell phone, limp or stutter, drive a car, (A:  The links are here to these by the way from official sites and so on from government.) stay at a hotel, attend a political rally, express yourself on social media, appear mentally ill, serve in the military, disagree with a law enforcement official, call in sick to work, purchase materials at a hardware store, take flying or boating lessons, appear suspicious, appear confused or nervous, fidget or whistle or smell bad, be seen in public waving a toy gun or anything remotely resembling a gun (such as a water nozzle or a remote control or a walking cane), stare at a police officer, question government authority, or appear to be pro-gun or pro-freedom.


Be warned: once you get on such a government watch list—whether it’s a terrorist watch list, a mental health watch list, a dissident watch list, or a red flag gun watch list—there’s no clear-cut way to get off, whether or not you should actually be on there.


You will be tracked wherever you go.


You will be flagged as a potential threat and dealt with accordingly.


This is pre-crime on an ideological scale, and it’s been a long time coming.


(A:  It’s all been here years ago.  I remember when they did the movie Minority Report, and I think it was Philip K Dick too did that one from one of his novels. But it did, yeah, it was to show you they are working on pre-crime and stopping, they treat you as guilty before the crime actually happened and they’d arrest you before it happened.  Because they just knew it was going to happen, you know, or a good idea it was going to happen, on a certain percentage basis of so much percentage possibility of probability.  And they are actually working on it. I remember when it came out in the movie and folk talked about it and it came out in the media and they discussed it too. Then they’d go into, do you realize the FBI is actually working on programs like this right now, etc. etc.  And all countries of course are doing the same thing at the same time, ‘eh, in this day and age.)


To that, add tens of thousands of armed, surveillance drones and balloons that are beginning to blanket American skies, facial recognition technology that will identify and track you wherever you go and whatever you do.


(A:  I don’t know if you’ve seen the ones from China, they had some almost like ads put out by China, they like to boast. They showed you these glasses that the police wear at railway stations and airports and places, but they can use them in the streets. And everybody walking by, you had a little box would come up with the number, their name and the whole thing and who they were, in the glasses, ‘eh.  This is, again, this is getting to be old stuff already. And whatever they have of course we’ve already got in the West as well. And they’re using it.)


  And then to complete the picture, toss in the real-time crime centers being deployed in cities across the country, which will be attempting to “predict” crimes and identify so-called criminals before they happen based on widespread surveillance, complex mathematical algorithms and prognostication programs.


Hopefully you’re starting to understand how easy we’ve made it for the government to identify, label, target, defuse and detain anyone it views as a potential threat for a variety of reasons that run the gamut from mental illness to having a military background to challenging its authority to just being on the government’s list of persona non grata.


There’s always a price to pay for standing up to the powers-that-be.


(A:  He mentions his book…)


Yet as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People you don’t even have to be a dissident to get flagged by the government for surveillance, censorship and detention.


All you really need to be is a citizen of the American police state.


But yeah, it's sums up pretty well what's happening, had been happening for years.  Nothing happens by chance, by itself at the time. These, all these different things that are suddenly pushed, put into effect, have been on the drafting boards for years and years, I always say they just take them off shelves and blow the dust off them and implement them when it's time. And that's really how the system works. 


Remember too again, go back into, because folk forget very quickly, and I do myself at times, to send a few bucks my way @cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  You can certainly use PayPal or send cash even or personal checks. And any other ways you can find to do it let me know. That will help me go on. Because as I say, I'm not backed by, you'd be surprised, I can't even go into what I do know about other people over the years.  And even the nasty things that happen, you know, from other people. There’re definitely agents out there, I know it, it's not, I'm not suspecting, I know it.  And the dirty tricks that they play on others to try to get them off the air. It's quite astonishing, some of them.


So, you've got to be very careful. I mean, it's up to yourselves who you listen to. I won't say who to listen to and who not to. But it's up to yourselves.  But if you've been bitten a few times you should start to learn from experiences and stop following people blindly, even if you like them.


And by the way, be very careful, you know, they put out all kinds out there. As I said before, we have all kinds of personalities amongst us and we have all kinds of likes and dislikes. They know exactly, I said this before too, it's the same as women if you're a guy, they know exactly through all your surfing and, I did these talks years ago before I even had the computer myself. I said, they already know everything about you, your personality profile. They'll know exactly your dream woman, what she'll look like, facial features, the color of her hair, everything about them, the personality type, all from what you've viewed, watched, what you've surfed or what you've read and all the rest of it.  That's how they do it, you know.


So, they know exactly, for whatever you're really into and what you like, they've got someone ready for you already.  Ready-made, you know. It's like walking into the world's biggest tailoring shop, whatever size/shape you are they've got a suit made for you already, it's there for you to walk right into, just for you. 


And that's how the whole movement is for the truth movements, call it what you want. They literally have them, they have lots of people sprinkled in there amongst all the regular ones, there are genuine ones but lots of fake ones too. That are well-funded. They'll appear as ordinary folk.  They'll be trained to be likable, presentable.  And the women will go for certain ones. The guys will go for others. This is how it's all done.  So be very, very careful.  You'll know by the cons that they push. If they're pushing, promoting the same kind of things that got a lot of folk in trouble already, you should be very wary, at the very least, 'eh.  And if it's happened a couple of times, then it's, you know, fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. 


And you really can't help people because they'll start to like people even though they're getting used or fooled or set up. And they will get used and set up again. As I say, the Internet now is a minefield. It really is a minefield.  It's way too, so many people, way too many folks just talking. You know, that's fine, talking.  But the problem is too, it ends up like a huge circus with all kinds of shouting and screaming, laughing. It truly is like clowns and jugglers and acrobats.  That's what you end up getting for alternate news, 'eh.  Everybody wants to be a performer rather than just go on and talk. They want to be a performer of some kind.  And it's probably saturated now too.


I remember I read, as I said earlier in the talk that I spoke years ago about, from the government websites where they talked about eventually information warfare that we’d have information overload. Just data overload. And data is data, it doesn't mean it's true false or anything, just data. It could be gibberish, it doesn't matter. But there would be an overload with it until it would just bog folks’ minds down eventually until they'd have to tune out to keep their sanity.  We're almost there already of course. We know that too.


So be careful of what you listen to and what you're wasting your time with and whoever's using you, you know. When you hear the same people, even if there's 50 of them all parroting the same messaging you can pretty well realize they get it from the same source. That's what they call their echo chambers.  And some of the bigger ones finance hundreds, or sometimes dozens, sometimes hundreds of other bloggers out there to parrot the same stuff as they're parroting. You wouldn't believe what's going on. 


You understand, what they're doing now with the articles I just read, about going the next step for total control, is just that.  We've already been under pretty well total control, and under massive surveillance. Even before 9/11, hm.  Governments have never spared any amount of your own tax money to spy on you. It's awfully important to know what's going on. Even before the Internet they had thousands of their own agents scattered through London as an example, I remember reading the article years ago on the air at the time.  There was about 5000 of them across London. They had them across other countries that used to belong to the British Empire as well. Thousands of them.  They would go into bars and coffee stores and even live in streets and listen to the gossip and the chat. That's how they get the feedback of what folk were thinking, what they were talking about, what they're complaining about, what they're worried about.  What they were going to do to try and combat government interference in their lives, or higher taxes, or whatever.


Nothing takes government by surprise, folks. That's why.  It's information gathering.  Jacques Ellul talked about it in the 1950s.  Across the whole of Europe, they had what they called Cardex systems and these were, you'll see these rotary type systems, 'eh, with the cards in them.  But they had massive, they had buildings with this stuff.  Every country including Britain had them.


They had the data on every citizen that they could possibly, whatever they could collect from school...  You don't realize in school even teachers’ reports were all being collected on the different individual children. Any little test that they did, they gave them little IQ tests, were all collected and put in the Cardex the system.  Troubles that the children had been involved, truancy, things like that, anything at all that was displayed was all noted personality wise and so on and put in their Cardex system. Then when they left school their employment records, their marriage records. Even their affairs records were, all the intimate stuff that can be gleaned from folk living in your communities and your streets was passed along, folks.  The 1950s onwards. 


That's why government never loses control. Nothing really takes it by surprise. And most of government showed, the politicians are not the bosses. No. They are there to take the tomatoes that are thrown at them, until you're fed up and you get another group that you vote in, and then you start with them again going around in circles.  That's what politicians are there for. They know they are serving a higher power, you know, higher than the general population, put it that way. 


Again, you had the same things coming from big players in the past, who were more motivated in years gone by because of their... superiority level, you know, and their attitudes as well, of writing in their own books what they thought of the general populations. They were rather… Charles Galton Darwin is a great one to read, The Next Million Years.  I've mentioned it so many times.  I never get fed up reading it in fact. Because it reminds you, you've got to remind yourself once in a while, we haven't progressed, we haven't, they haven't got nicer to us.  The Masters, you know, they are the same ones then as they are today.  And they have more means to implement agendas that Charles Galton Darwin talked about.


I mean, the rest of the people again to him were inferior. But his own class, his own type were superior. They are the wild men.  Well, even middle-class are irrelevant to him.  He's talking about the ones who plan and direct and work with the teams that plan and direct the future.  All of it. Economic. Fashion. Culture. Everything. Legal, etc. That's how they do it.  And they're wild, they are not inhibited by cultural norms, which they have forced upon you in fact. And that's what they say, we steer the ship, we steer the planet Earth therefore we cannot be inhibited, we are wild men, wild to make great leaps of decision-making, unconventional decision-making, unrestricted by morals or anything else. That means if they wanted a mass cull, they would JUST do it. Do you understand what they're talking about? The Next Million Years.  M-hm-hm.  And they have no illusions of democracy.  They're quite open about it.


So anyway, I've gone over those articles before and those books before. I should maybe do them in the future again, some more books.  To give anybody who's really interested in understanding the real reality of the system in which you're living. Even though you've studied it, and even though you think you understand it, people are still shocked when they actually see it implemented.  You can actually see the effects of pressure that's been applied to those that front for the elites, I mean the political parties that manage us and so on, on behalf of those who are above them, and the pressure they are under. You'll see the absolute venom coming out of these politicians now.


Venom... when they cannot be obeyed immediately, in this system of, really, authoritarian control.  You know?  They just can't get the immediate compliance by those who should be obedient to them, and you'll see them getting really furious about it. This is a very dangerous time when you see people with, showing fury, in positions of power over the people. Because these are the same characters in history who've ordered more drastic things to be done to the publics in some countries in the past, and you're seeing the start of it here now.


As they demonize, I've mentioned before about genocide, how they demonize a segment of society, that's the first step.  You make them subhuman in the eyes of everybody else.  You keep repeating it.  Repetition, repetition.  Then you cut the demonized group from having the ability to convey their thoughts to anybody else through any other kind of media. It's now the Internet naturally but in the past, they've used it with print or anything else.  So, you isolate them and isolate them and then you get rid of them.


That's what's happened now, that's what happened in the Soviets system.  As we know.  That was the real opening salvo of the scientific systems, supposedly, scientific to be used with the new form of controlling the public and directing the affairs of humans in the nation.  And what a horror show that was.  But you see the same faces then, resolute, y'know, working together determined to get their way.  You're looking at murder, that's what you're looking at, potential murder... from the eyes of those people. 


There's no doubt about it. Look at the old photographs of Trotsky when he was in charge of the red Army at one point. And look at the massacres and slaughters they did.  Yep.  These guys weren't out to debate anything with anybody. They wanted immediate obedience and compliance. And even for those often complied they'd slaughter them just to show, just to make a lesson out of them for others to be terrified, as a reign of terror.


Dangerous, dangerous when you see these things coming from government officials.


I always say, when it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's generally a duck, you know.  Forget the title, oh, we're Democratic or you're a Republic. Forget the titles, folks, and look at what you're seeing. 


It's the same thing down through history.  I'm using the US as an example.  Every country was on board with the same agenda when 9/11 happened. How come?  They were all, all the Western countries were on board with the same agenda, stripping all their people of rights, and privacy rights and so on.  That took preplanning, you understand.  Just like the whole Covid exercise took massive preplanning over years to get ready for it all, and the right folk put in place at the right time, before it all happens.  That's so telling as well.  Otherwise, you get differences of opinion in those in authority across the world in the same equivalent positions. But you don't, they are all uniform, y'know.


And getting back to sending a few bucks, remember take notes of my official websites @cuttingthroughthematrix.com in case anyone goes down and hopefully you can still get them on one of my other official sites. 


Now, this article hear is from the New York Times. It's interesting because we've already read official studies put out by virologists and epidemiologists talking about vaccine reactions at times, how it can cause massive autoimmune responses in the body, where the body starts creating, part of your immune system will attack its own cells in certain parts of the body.  Rheumatoid arthritis is a classic example of that. 


It's interesting too that since the vaccinations started you've already had people coming down with certain symptoms that they, to do with autoimmune, the body actually attacking...  That one doctor, that obstetrician in the States who after getting the vaccine, maybe two weeks later, even before the two weeks was up, he was admitted to hospital. He got very, very sick. His wife said that his platelet count when he was admitted was at zero for blood clotting and he eventually hemorrhaged to death and had had a massive stroke that finished him off.  But before that he was perfectly healthy.  So, your own immune system can definitely…


And by the way, all, anything negative about the vaccine is going to get hammered. Because remember, this is a war, using full Emergency War Powers Act to go after anybody who says anything that's not been authorized by the establishment.  And you can't, you CAN'T mention, really, that vaccines cause any problems, according to all the authorities, they are perfectly safe. Even though they admit you're in a phase 3 trial when you get it, because they didn't do a phase 3 trial on animals, etc. So, they just know in advance with crystal balls that it's perfectly safe, you see.  And anything that counters that, like folk dying, have got nothing to do with the vaccine. It's just a coincidence. That's what they're telling us in different, article after article.


There's an article here got me thinking too because now that you're seeing the effects of certain physical maladies occurring after vaccination, never mind anaphylactic shock and the immediate effects, you know, for some people anyway, you're getting the other ones with massive temperature rises and so on that go on for weeks and can end up really badly.  What they're trying to say now that this is because of the Covid, these symptoms.


How the Coronavirus Turns the Body Against Itself

nytimes.com / 28 Jan 2021


The coronavirus can warp the body’s defenses in many ways — disarming the body’s early warning systems, for example, or causing immune cells to misfire. (A:  To misfire, ‘eh?)  But a spate of new studies suggests another insidious consequence: The infection can trigger the production of antibodies that mistakenly attack the patient’s own tissues instead of the virus.


(A:  So, this is a new study, with a new idea, I guess.  [Alan chuckles.]  But the folk weren't seemingly coming down with that before, as I say, last year. But they're coming down with it now, so it could be a cover for what's happening after you get you know what.  Hm?  Obviously. That's what I would say it would be.  It's obviously a cover for it. Why are they bringing this report out now? But it says…)


The latest report, published online this week, suggests that so-called autoantibodies can persist months after the infection has resolved, perhaps causing irreparable harm. If other studies confirm the finding, it may explain some of the lingering symptoms in people who have recovered from Covid-19.


(A:  Now, here’s what they’re saying…  I don’t know if you ever saw the movie a comedy called Joe Versus the Volcano.  Quite a good comedy actually, kind of fantasy comedy. Where a guy in a humdrum boring job, so depressed and all the rest of it, has a doctor visit on Monday, or he was told to visit this doctor.  He visits the doctor and the doctor says to him, oh, you’ve got brain fog, you know. What’s that? He says oh, it’s terrible syndrome, you know, and it’s a fatal thing, you know, brain fog, a new disease, ‘eh, brand-new.)


(A:  He doesn’t know the doctor actually is a personal doctor for big businessman who wants something from an island, a very rare mineral, rare metal/mineral I guess from an island.  The natives of the island demand a sacrifice who jumps in the Volcano, and that’s how they would, in that way the island wouldn’t submerge into this sea if they got another sacrifice. In return, this businessman could get the metal. So, the businessman had set up this bored guy, this very bored young fella to be a victim, a willing victim. Well, you’re going to die anyway, you know, you’ve got brain fog, and he got his own doctor to tell him he had the brain fog.)


(A:  Well, here’s, I’ve never heard of that before because it was a comedy for goodness sake, and here they are using that very term.)


The syndrome, sometimes referred to as long Covid, can include dementia, “brain fog” and joint pain.


I wonder if you have to have a desire to jump into volcanoes, you know?  But this is what I’m saying, a lot of the stuff that’s going to come out from you know what, you know, the stuff that’s going on now, will be causing these very symptoms. And your immune system is liable to attack a good part of your body. That’s what happened to me back in the 90s, I got a whole bunch of booster shots and boom, down with massive arthritis, massive spinal problems, massive everything. And my lungs were full, you know, absolutely totally congested, and the eosinophil levels way up.  N-n-n.  Then you get on the Cortisone to try to bring the effects down, you know, stop the immune system working. Lots of antibiotics, that burned a hole in my stomach. Like permanent. That was the circular route that went on, many had gone on before me.  And since me too. But that's what did it. And your immune system starts attacking your own joints.


Another one too is to do with…


Distinct Autoimmune Antibody Signatures Between Hospitalized Acute COVID-19 Patients, SARS-CoV-2 Convalescent Individuals, and Unexposed Pre-Pandemic Controls - medrxiv.org / 21 Jan 2021


…where they compare the levels of different immunoglobulin and so on and antibodies between four different groups and they give you the results on the bottom.  For those who are really serious in finding out, and don't mind spending part of their lives, whatever's left of your lives these days [Alan chuckles.] since you're all locked down at homes, or most of you are anyway. 


And you get lots of articles too, like...


19-year-old hospitalized in ICU days after receiving second Pfizer vaccine

jpost.com / 1 Feb 2021


It has still not been confirmed with certainty that the inflammation was developed as a side-effect

(A:  Because you have to say that of course.) to the vaccination.


(A:  You also had myocarditis cases.)


However, a number of COVID-19-related myocarditis cases have been reported.


It definitely seems a lot of problems with the heart, no doubt about it.  Another guy was a doctor, recently, a young guy, 39 I think, and he ended up with myocarditis too apparently supposedly after a shot. There’s lots of this happening. But it’s nothing to do with the vaccination, ‘eh.


39-year-old nurse aide dies ‘within 48 hours’ of receiving mandated COVID-19 shot - lifesitenews.com / 27 Jan 2021


I’ll put these links up for anybody that wants to read them. Since you’re literally, humph, getting hammered for saying….  You’re going to find under war powers act your government is at war, with you, and any opinion that’s counter to their mandates. So, thinking you’ve got truth or fact doesn’t matter, at all, to the government agencies now. Remember too, in the pandemic exercises as they went through their different levels and stages of the exercises, they said that eventually they’ll go after folk who just won’t stop speaking out about it. And they really mean it, folks.


This is a script you’re living through, like a wartime script, all planned in their exercises, and bingo, you’re living through it now. And just like some dystopic movie you are actually in it.  And you’re watching them go after people now for not just having opinions, they’re going after professionals. Shortly they’ll be getting locked up quickly. Not just people coming in from airports getting grabbed, and taken off by private security companies like G4S, ‘eh, that the government is employing.  But you’ll get extraordinary rendition.  Just like they did with terrorists of course, they’ll classify you as a terrorist. Enemy of the state, hm?  Dangerous times indeed. 


And don’t think you’ll EVER, once rights have gone you NEVER get them back, folks. That happened from 9/11 onwards, all the rights that you’ve lost and lost and lost.  You never get them back.  It doesn’t happen.  It’s like income tax, in Britain it was a temporary war tax.   I think in the US they called it the victory tax.  Once they start it, you never go back to normal.  [Alan chuckles.]  It’s the same with any rights you’ve fought for, they take it away instantly, but they never give it back to you again.  I mean, you had to fight to get them in the first place, you know. 


Another one too, is to do with outbreaks and this is The Sun newspaper in Britain.


Nine care home residents dead and 69 infected in mass Covid outbreak six days after getting vaccine - thesun.co.uk / 2 Feb 2021


Well, they're finding this after the vaccine. Remember, it was supposed to create the spikes, the protein spikes, in your own cells, so lots of folk are testing positive after they get the shots.  I'll put this one up too.  And...


7 die at Spanish care home after getting Pfizer Covid-19 jab as ALL residents test positive for virus, second doses still to come - rt.com / 1 Feb 2021


Congressman tests positive for COVID-19 after receiving second dose of vaccine - cbsnews.com / 31 Jan 2021


(A:  ...in the States.  Interesting too, because I’ve got articles here where they'll say, well people have been immune from Covid after getting the first shot.  It's all public relations exercises by PR companies, remember.  Hm?   So...)


Congressman Stephen Lynch, a Democrat from Massachusetts, tested positive for COVID-19 on Friday after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine earlier this month. Lynch is one of several members of Congress who have tested positive for the virus in recent weeks.


"I am fortunate to currently be asymptomatic, and I have immediately begun to self-quarantine."

(A:  So, he’s self quarantining after getting the shots.) 


Shots can be dangerous to older folk, 'eh, and yet the chances of getting ill with the Covid are very rare. 



(A:  This is, now here’s what they do with the debunking any other opinion…)

No, a Wexford doctor's death was not related to the Covid-19 vaccine

thejournal.ie / 26 Jan 2021


A number of posts on Facebook have said that Dr Keshav Sharma died on 11 January after receiving the Covid-19 vaccine, insinuating that the two events were linked.


(A:  Well, of course, it couldn’t be linked.)


Although it is understood Dr Sharma had received his first dose of the vaccine, his death was unrelated to this.


There have so far been no reports of deaths where a Covid-19 vaccine is believed to have been a contributory factor, either in Ireland or anywhere across the European Union.  (A:  This is in Ireland.)


One social media post shared more than 300 times claimed that the doctor was “found dead after Covid vaccine” and linked his death on 11 January with his vaccination a number of days before.


This is misleading and an inaccurate outline of the situation.


The Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) (A:  …authority, right.  These are the ones who regulate and are actually buying the vaccines, ‘eh.  [Alan chuckles.])   the regulatory body for medicines in Ireland, confirmed there have been no reports of deaths (A:  You can trust them, ‘eh?  [Alan laughing.]) for which there were concerns about the Covid-19 vaccine.


“The HPRA has not received a report of a fatality for which there is concern that a Covid-19 vaccine had a contributory role,” the HPRA told TheJournal.ie.


“The HPRA published its first safety update in respect of Covid-19 vaccines which provided an overview of reports of suspected side effects received in the period up to 18 January.


So, they have no problems with safety at all, even though it’s experimental, right. Even though once you get the vaccine, they actually have you put down, your name, number, age and the whole lot, probably your insurance number too, but they definitely have you down with the batch number and the date you got the shot. And they want updates on you.  Because you’re part of the third stage of the experiment now. It’s an experimental vaccine so they can’t say, they can’t say with any absolute certainty that they are perfectly safe if they haven’t done the third, you are part of the third stage now.  [Alan chuckles.] 


Ah, it’s quite something. Amazing times we live through, isn’t it?   It really is, it’s so dystopic this whole thing, you know. And then the article, another article…


Doctor Kershav Sharma (Co Wexford, Ireland) Found Dead After Covid Vaccine - theirishsentinel.com / 21 Jan 2021


But this article here says only he’s 39 years old. It doesn’t mention anything about the vaccine, getting the vaccination at all in this other article. It’s strange how they even missed that. Or is it, ‘eh?   And…


Covid: France restricts AstraZeneca vaccine to under-65s

bbc.com / 3 Feb 2021


It is the latest recommendation from an EU member state approving the jab with such restrictions, citing insufficient data on its efficacy for older people.


(A:  Well, they've had too many folk with bad effects after it, that was part of the reason. This is from the BBC by the way.)


What did French officials say?


The health regulator said there was still not enough data about the effectiveness of the AstraZeneca vaccine for patients over 65 years of age.


(A:  But it's because they've had bad effects, reports of bad effects from a lot of people.)


European Affairs Minister Clément Beaune told French radio on Monday that the British were "taking a lot of risks in this vaccination campaign" by spacing delays between two injections.


(A:  Some of them, remember, were saying just to use the one, get more, get one out, that's better than nothing. Then they were saying they shouldn't mix different makes together. Remember that? A week or two ago? Then you had Fauci coming out contradicting both of them.  [Alan laughing.]  I love how the scientists are all on board, 'eh, with their different opinions.  It says…)


What have other EU countries decided about AstraZeneca?


Last week Germany's vaccine commission said it could not recommend the use of the jab in people aged over 65.


They refuse to say why, even though other articles from other newspapers have mentioned why. But there you go.  And again, the BBC again…  


Covid vaccines extremely safe, finds UK regulator

bbc.com / 5 Feb 2021


Covid vaccines being given to millions of people in the UK (A:  There ya go, they’re extremely safe…) are extremely safe, with mild expected side-effects, says the country's drugs regulator.


Some 22,820 suspected reactions were reported. (A:  Suspected, ‘eh?)  Almost all were mild, such as a sore arm or flu-like illness.


(A:  Meanwhile I’ve got the lists here, the official ones, [Alan laughing.] with folk getting resuscitated and all the rest of it too.  This is horrible what they’re doing here, trying to pretend it’s all quite, quite harmless, ‘eh.  When they’ve had, they’ve got people standing by with all kinds of jabs to try to bring you back again if you pass out and your blood pressure plummets.  And then at the bottom they contradict themselves…)


Severe allergic reactions to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine can happen…


(A:  Well, that’s impossible, I read the other articles that says, no, they’re perfectly safe. So here it says at the bottom…)


Severe allergic reactions to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine can happen but are very rare - between one and two cases per 100,000 doses administered, experts estimate. The MHRA received 101 allergy-related reports.


Doctors already say people with a history of significant allergic reactions to ingredients in the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine should not receive it. 


So, there ya go.  So, you made your mind up, in the same story as they tell you they're perfectly safe, yada, yada, ya. And…


Booster shots to keep Covid mutations…


This it to be permanent, you understand, more and more shots and boosters.  And that Dr. Bell said, Professor Bell, I don't remember what his name was, in Britain. He was in charge of some of the vaccine there.  He is also on the SAGE group in Britain as well. And the GAVI group. But he did say that, last year he said, I expect this will be a regular shot every year like the flu. So…


Booster shots to keep Covid mutations under control says expert

standard.co.uk / 2 Feb 2021


(A:  Even though they're constantly mutating, which is probably pointless. Viruses are the great robbers; they call it robbers. Like magpies as well is another way they describe them. Because a virus comes into your body from someone else's, and it will leave behind in your body, parts of RNA from other people's bodies. It will grab some of yours and mutate it a little bit and then it will move on to the next person and leave some of yours in theirs. This is how it works.)


(A:  So, you really can't have a standard thing against it, it will constantly mutate anyway, you know.  Like a common cold, 'eh.  Or even the flu.  The flu is similar too. Even within the major strains you have many, many variations of it. And this is one you're seeing now with the Covid, it's just a variation under a particular strain.  So…)


Dr Susan Hopkins said UK health experts are currently looking at what further protection might be needed against coronavirus variants among people who have already been fully vaccinated. 


(A:  M-hm.  Oh, dear, dear.  So, there you go.)


…said the South Africa variant has more mutations than earlier strains.  (A:  There ya go.)


It will guarantee business, ‘eh, big business, when government starts using your tax money to buy stuff from designated sellers, ‘eh?  [Alan chuckles.]  Great business. How many businesses can guarantee sales every year by the government mandating it? If you make spades or shovels, or hammers and chisels, they could mandate you must buy theirs, ‘eh? Government mandates it.  You can’t fail then, can you?


Covid door-to-door tests rolled out in Bristol (A:  England.) and Liverpool as new mutations detected, Hancock says (A:  There ya go.)

thesun.co.uk / 2 Feb 2021


(A: [Alan chuckles.]  So, they're giving numbers to the mutations and all that.)


And in Liverpool they have found 32 cases of the original strain bearing the E484K mutation.


It comes as door-to-door tests started in eight postcodes today after 11 cases of the South African variant were found in people with no travel links to the country.


I guess it's spontaneous, 'eh? Yep.  So anyway, yeah, door-to-door. I mean, they tried that last year too, door-to-door and folk told them all to get lost. They wanted to draw blood, by the way. It wasn't just nasal swabs, they wanted to draw blood and all the rest of it and get...  Oh, come on, this is intrusive stuff.  And...


Covid 19 News 

Keep INDOORS and use stockpiled food to stop mutant coronavirus variant spread, postcodes told - thesun.co.uk / 8 Feb 2021


Mr. Hancock warned the residents of numerous UK postcodes that they shouldn't even be going to the shop to get food. 


So that's Mr. Hancock again.  I guess you just starve to death then, 'eh?  You starve to death and they'll test you and find out that you had Covid, because that's what they'll put you down as.   


Single dose of Oxford vaccine prevents hospitalization with Covid for 12 weeks, trial finds - telegraph.co.uk / 2 Feb 2021


...trial finds.  You're an experiment.  That's why they're coming out with the studies now.  M-hm.  And again, Fauci in his articles are talking about, just go ahead and give them the second vaccination, don't wait. There you go.


Vaccine Passports and Health Passes: Is Showing Your “Papers” the “New Normal?” - theorganicprepper.com / 15 Dec 2020


Well of course that's exactly where it's supposed to go.  Totalitarian regimes always restrict travel.  And this isn't going to be just for traveling abroad. That's how they'll put it across initially, but eventually it will be your own local area, your communitarian little area. I gave these talks years ago from the United Nations meetings that they had talking about the future and your community and you'll be a communitarian, but of the collectivist society.  And you won't need to travel much except with public transport, for short trips. Because you know, it's bad for the environment, all that transport. It will be no private vehicles anyway they said in the agenda for the 21st century, Agenda 21, essential vehicles only.


So, they're going to have to, like in all systems, and the Soviet system, papers for traveling outside your own area, even into the next area. Well, that's all done with apps on your phone. They boasted about that last year from China, they tried it all out, you know, they were the test bed for it all. It's all to come here now, 'eh.


As I've said before, they can't...  The WHO said before, a few years ago, they couldn't force people to take vaccines but they could force you to comply with the demands to take it.  You see?  Oh, you could go and get food if you take the vaccine first, you see. Etc., you see.  I mean, it's so easy, much easier if you just take the vaccine you wouldn't have to have folk deliver to your home and stuff the food. No.  Yada, ya.  You might be able to go and meet people, maybe. Maybe, we can't promise you will be... if you take it. Because they can't tell you, it's not going to stop you being a carrier or catching the virus, they said, with the vaccine.  You know. 




In the Shadow of that Hideous Strength:

The UN’s Proposed Alliance with Big Data to Know Where You are and What You’re Doing

rutherford.org / 1 Aug 2016


I mentioned that before, that’s a good one.  A good article because that’s where we are with it all.  Big data.  ID2020 as they called it.  Which is now being implemented. They had it on the back burner for years now but it’s definitely there today. Now, Los Angeles…  I mean, I’ve mentioned Monty Python quite a few times, because we’re living in the absurd.


Los Angeles County bans restaurants from turning on TVs

kusi.com / 29 Jan 2021


LOS ANGELES (KUSI) – After a two-month shutdown due to surging COVID-19 cases, (A:  Not illnesses but cases.) patio dining returned to Los Angeles County Friday but with a new restriction forcing restaurants to turn off or remove all televisions from customer seating areas — a clear effort to prevent gatherings of sports fans.


The county’s revised Health Officer Order also reinstates previous restrictions on outdoor dining, requiring servers to wear masks and face shields, limiting restaurants to 50% of patio capacity, limiting tables to no more than six people and requiring tables to be at least eight feet apart.


(A: [Alan laughing.]  You should roll up one pant leg as well, 'eh? Maybe on a Friday, but not on a Thursday.  Yep.  Or maybe on a Thursday in the afternoon but not in the morning. You see.  That's how much sense all this is. It's just nonsense.  So yeah, they don't want you gathering and watching sports, for goodness sake, you know. No. Tragic, you know, they say…)


 “It will be tragic if the Super Bowl becomes a super-spreader of coronavirus.”


(A: Wooow.  Woow, ‘eh?  Woah.  [Alan laughing.])


And again, John Whitehead's commentary I've mentioned already...


The Deep State’s Stealthy, Subversive, Silent Coup to Ensure Nothing Changes - rutherford.org / 19 Jan 2021


Because that's what you're living through, is a continuation, folks, of the same system.  It doesn't matter who pretends to be in power as the head of it, because they're not the head of it. 


Implanted “Vaccine Package” ID: Germany’s Parliament Has Ratified GAVI’s Digital “Agenda ID2020”

globalresearch.ca / 3 Feb 2021


This is a centralized general electronic data collection of every citizen to which every government agency, police – and possibly also the private sector would have access.


It covers all that is known about an individual citizen, now up to 200 points of information and possibly more as time goes on, from your bank account to your shopping habits, health records (vaccination records, of course), your political inclinations, and probably even your dating habits and other entries into your private sphere.


Agenda ID2020 was designed by (A:  …naturally…)  Bill Gates,


(A:  …you know, another part of the Spector group, ‘eh, James Bond.  [Alan chuckles.])


 as part of the “vaccination package”. It is backed by the Rockefeller Foundation,


(A:  It’s the same characters. You truly are living, the true characters in James Bond exists. We’re seeing the characters just, right out of the James Bond books.  And the same organizations they belong to, we’re seeing it. Rockefeller, Bill Gates…)


  Accenture, the WEF and GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, now simply called the Vaccine Alliance), (A:  With Schwab and all the rest of it, ‘eh.  All part of the vaccine alliance.)


 also a Gates creation (2001), with HQ in Geneva, Switzerland.


The public part being WHO, plus a number of developing countries;


M-m-m.  There ya go.


The New Domestic War on Terror is Coming - greenwald.substack.com / 19 Jan 2021 / Glenn Greenwald


I mentioned that already. And oh, the Scottish church.   [ Alan chuckles.]  Poor Scotland. I mean, I’ve always said Scotland, you know, the patron saint of Scotland is St. Andrew, what you used to say is, the patron saint of lost causes. Because that’s all the Scots ever fought for was lost causes. Even after they lost their country they fought for another country and won all their battles for them.  Because they got nothing out of it themselves at all. Except maybe a few paychecks and that was it. But the patron saint of lost causes indeed. When you see the tragedy of government in Scotland, and the betrayals in Scotland, within their own ranks of people by the way, you know. That was always their problem, was betrayals and people bought and paid for, century after century, you know. So anyway, this says…


27 church leaders sue Scottish gov’t for criminalizing in-person worship

christianpost.com / 31 Jan 2021

(A:  They've got to destroy your religion of course. Because you can have no other gods before them, for the ones that are managing the system now, right.)


More than two dozen church leaders in Scotland have joined legal proceedings against the Scottish government, demanding a judicial review of tighter pandemic lockdown measures that have closed churches for in-person services and “criminalize[ed] public worship.”


N-n.  At one time they had power, you know. Why do you think this is all happening now, when everything is so weak in what used to be really strong churches? It's been long gone actually, from my lifetime, for strengthening community. It's all breaking apart, and TV taking over and giving you a different culture, etc.  But at one time too the churches weren't just churches. They had, they were community halls and so on. They had big events for your communities, and the children went and had parties and different things all year round, different things on the go. So, it was a central hub for the people. But that went out long ago, you know. 


Then they started building not church halls but town halls for the people and so on, and community events were held there.  Then the churches started to die off gradually. World War I definitely destroyed a lot of it. World War II finished it off for most folk. They couldn't understand why the state used the churches, which they certainly did, to help promote the ongoing war. Rather than just rebelling against going off into war. So, the churches were compromised completely, and the people just lost all faith in its because of their compromised positions, backing the state, you know. 


The Church of England was a big backer of the wars, World War I and II. Scotland wasn't far behind it with its churches too.  They were already fragmented in Scotland big time.  Because in Protestantism you have schism after schism until they're all different little, tiny differences between different sects, some of them into the absurdities in fact of differences. And they lost their strength.


The Catholic Church again suffered from World War I and II because of the massive loss of life, and they couldn't understand why a deity would let things happen.  They never understand regarding deities, deity gives you free will. Otherwise, you'd be a robot, you know. You make your own choices, really.  But it's true enough, when any church starts to back the state, they're going to lose a following.


Now, there's also this article to do with the history of the biotech group that have, they seem to have the main patenting, I guess, on mRNA vaccines.  But this one here is from Canada and it's Global Research organization.


What’s Not Being Said About the Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine. “Human Guinea Pigs”?

globalresearch.ca / 6 Feb 2021


First published on December 25, 2020.


Bill Gates is actively financing and promoting new untested vaccines supposed to keep us at least somewhat safe from a ‘ghastly” death from the novel coronavirus and supposedly allow us to resume somewhat “normal” lives.


(A:  Well, no one said we can go back to normal. In fact, Fauci was adamant last year about that, that we'd never go back to normal. You see, it's a big agenda, and regardless of Covid, Covid is kind of like the front for it all.)


The financial world went ballistic (A:  …and so on…) on November 9 when the pharma giant Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, announced in a company press release that it had developed a vaccine for Covid19 that was “90%” effective.


The controversial US head of NIAID, Tony Fauci (right) rushed to greet the news and the EU announced it had purchased 300 million doses of the costly new vaccine. If you believe financial markets, the pandemic is all but past history.


However, it seems Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, doesn’t share the confidence of his own claims. On the day his company issued its press release on the proposed vaccine trials, he sold 62% of his stock in Pfizer, making millions profit in the deal. He made the sell order in a special option in August so it would not appear as “insider selling”…


(A:  And he goes into some of the history of the drugs and the corporations.)


Pfizer, famous for its Viagra and other drugs, has partnered with a small Mainz, Germany company, BioNTech, which has developed the radical mRNA technique used to produce the new corona vaccine. BioNTech was only founded in 2008. BioNTech signed an agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in September 2019, just before announcement in Wuhan China of the Novel Coronavirus and (A: [Alan chuckles.]  Just a coincidence, ‘eh?) just before BioNTech made its stock market debut. The agreement involved cooperation on developing new mRNA techniques to treat cancer and HIV. (A:  Hm.)  Curiously that press release, “The Gates Foundation sees BioNTech potential to ‘dramatically reduce global HIV and tuberculosis’” 05. September 2019 has now been deleted.  (A:  Hm.)


BioNTech also has an agreement with one of the largest drug producers in China, Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (“Fosun Pharma”) to develop a version of its mRNA vaccine for novel coronavirus for the Chinese market.


(A:  They’re also working with BioNTech, again, the same group again, BioNTech, BioNTech, BioNTech, you know.  So, it says…)


This means that the same German biotech company is behind the covid vaccines being rushed out in China as well as the USA and EU. The vaccine is being rushed through to eventual approval in an alarmingly short time.


(A:  It talks about it being explicitly experimental, hm.)


“Explicitly experimental”


Dr. Michael Yeadon replied in a recent public social media comment to a colleague in the UK; “All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been… in development for more than a few months.” Yeadon then went on to declare,


“If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for…whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information.”


(A:  And it goes on about…)

Human guinea pigs?


And I think I mentioned already, maybe not, that…


Pubs and restaurants could reopen in April – with no alcohol

telegraph.co.uk / 6 Feb 2021


Pubs and restaurants could reopen as soon as April if they agree not to sell alcohol (A:  In Britain I think it is. So, they could open in April, or they could soon. Everything is ‘could’ or ‘possible’, you know, if your master says so.) under options being discussed to allow the widespread relaxation of coronavirus restrictions after Easter.   


(A:  This is from the Telegraph new site.)


The Telegraph can disclose that a temporary "booze ban" is being considered as part of the Government's roadmap for lifting lockdown.


(A:  Why don't they just ban the TVs and the booze and then they can just sit and stare at each other maybe, you know.  M-hm.)


It is understood the move is being discussed to allay concerns from Prof Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer, and others about the effect of drinking on social distancing.


Under the three-stage plan for lifting restrictions, some outdoor socialising is expected to be allowed in March and schools are set to return.


It is hoped that hospitality can then reopen in April and that all of the most vulnerable will be vaccinated by May.


(A:  They're already backing off from the elderly because of, well, just… you know why.)


With almost 11 million people now vaccinated and deaths, hospitalisations and infections all falling, the Government is under increasing pressure to explain how and when the restrictions will start to be lifted. 


But isn't it amazing, I mean maybe it was, I think it was in Australia there was a song, it was about a pub with no beer, you know? That was the name of the song, a pub with no beer.  So, there's no beer and no TVs now, 'eh? 


By the way, you think that you're not under emergency powers act, 'eh?  Which is War Powers act, it's the same thing, they call it the emergency powers act.  I was looking into RTE News that's in Ireland, and current affairs. I just looked up wiki, you know, to see what the history on the company was. They're like the BBC you might say, their own version for Irish news basically. So, everything that's anything at all will get put through the radio and television over there.


RTÉ News



 ...is the national news service provided by Irish public broadcaster Raidió Teilifís Éireann. Its services include local, national, European and international news, (A:  …and so on.)


(A:  They've got it in the Irish language as well and so on.  But they've got, not just in Ireland, they've got stations across different parts of the world now, I think. But just reading through it, the boring stuff that I read through, you know, it gives you some of the history, started in 1926.)


On 1 January 1926, 2RN, Ireland's first radio station, began broadcasting. Its first advertised news bulletin was put out on 24 May 1926.


(A:  Then it goes on about the second world war...)


During the Second World War, referred to in Ireland as The Emergency, (A:  That's what they call the second world war, ‘the emergency’...) Media censorship of radio broadcasts (under the provisions of the Emergency Powers Act 1939) (A:  That's what we've got in right now, right.  It's war emergency, Emergency Powers Act 1939.) affected news bulletins. Before any news bulletin (A:  ...listen...)



Before any news bulletin was broadcast, (A:  Hm...) the script of the bulletin was read over the phone to Head of the Government Information Bureau, Frank Gallagher. Censorship under the Act was lifted on 11 May 1945.


So, they had to phone what they were going to broadcast to, literally, the head of the Government Information Bureau. You understand, you all think you've been free? Really?  When were you free? When [Alan chuckles.] were you free?  [Alan chuckles.]  Aah, quite amazing.  Now they'll go after you for just... anything contrary at all about Covid, you know, or your own observations, or some expert's observations, and it's all taboo, it can't be allowed unless it's rubberstamped by the Ministry of Information. The Ministry of Truth as George Orwell would say, you see.


It's all here, isn't it?  We're living through it all. And the farce is now reality. But it's dangerous. Just like the dystopian comedies you would get too, a kind of Monty Python type idea like Brazil, you're liable to suffer extreme consequences for opening your mouth. [Alan laughing.]   Because you're not authorized to say anything or think anything. You see, thinking can be dangerous these days, 'eh, under tyrannies. 


You'd better start believing, and you've seen this, you've read about it before, if you read at all. Most folk maybe haven't these days but some of the older ones still have read about the old systems in the Soviet Union.  Hm?  That's where Hitler got his ideas from, because he worked with them initially, with the Soviet system initially, you know, for years. Don't forget, Hitler started off as a socialist, national socialist, and found out how they managed to deal with dissidents in the Soviet system.  Hm.  And they had the Young Communist League and he created the young Hitler league eventually, you see, he copied the systems.


But you're living through it now, 'eh. Censorship departments.  Maybe a knock on the door, what are you thinking? Why are you telling people what you're thinking? You know.  Your thinking hasn't been authorized by the state. You've got bad-think and wrong-think, and own-think.  [Alan chuckles.]   


As I'm saying this, this kind of thing is happening, you know. And it's going to get a lot worse. A lot worse, folks. 


Because this agenda for the whole 21st century, to be completed all through the century step-by-step, stage by stage, has to be done, the Masters have decided it, you know, and the Masters always get what they want.  Because as far as they're concerned, they own the world, they own the system.


I've heard small bankers, like international ones, who travel, who for big branches they go across the world for their branches internationally. I remember one telling me, he says, you know, the ordinary folk would be nothing without us bankers, nothing. We make their businesses work, you know.  The arrogance was just, would knock you off your, whatever you're standing on or sitting on.  That's how they talk. And that's the lower echelons.  That's the folk who are not up there.  They're maybe in a managerial class but that's about all. They're not waay up there for the big, big, big banks way above them, the central banking systems, the big private ones.  M-m-m.


They see the world as theirs, you understand, and you’re in it, you are in their system.  M-hm. 


It's like that movie about the CIA's startup, The Good Shepherd I think it was. Quite good movie actually. Slow in some parts, but you get the gist of it all, of how the systems work, and the darker arts as they say of the MI5, MI6 being taught to this beginning group, 'eh, of  the CIA that came out of the OSS.  There’re some good little statements in it, when the new head of the CIA goes to make some deals with the Mafia. And the CIA has always been in bed with every possible criminal organization. They use them, 'eh.  Even for drugs and things like that. 


But they go there, and they talk to the head of a Mafia family. They are chatting away, and the Mafia guy initially says, well you know, he says, we've got this and that, we've got our own families, we've got, you know, we've got big families and we've got our own culture, talking about the Mafia and Italian background.  And he says, what do you guys have? Meaning the white American guy. And the American guy says, he says, we, you know, we are the country.  I'm kind of paraphrasing, we are the country.  He says, we run everything. He says, we own everything.  He says, you, you, you're just the tourists. 


But they're showing you the arrogance of those who get up the ladder, and you are into systems who are quietly controlling behind the scenes so much of your existence and you don't know it. But they themselves are only doing it, if you're a worker for them, like the head of the CIA, you're a worker for them, you're not the boss. The dominant minority are way above that. That's how the system really, really works.  But the arrogance is incredible. Truly.




Cardinal Müller decries the Great Reset

lifesitenews.com / 5 Feb 2021


(A:  He talks about big capitalism merging with China. Of course, it's merging, because the West created modern China. But anyway, it says…)


The cardinal warned that the goal of this newly merging force – the collaboration between big capitalist entities with China – is ‘absolute control of thought, speech and action.’


Well, yes, he’s right. China didn’t just start itself up, folks. We gave them all of the factories through the free-trade agreements and made China the most favored nation trading status, to give them all the breaks in taxation things. And we funded the factories to move over there and set up.  I-yi-yi, I tell you.  M-hm.


UK 'planning vaccine passport' to allow Brits to travel abroad for holidays

thesun.co.uk / 5 Feb 2021


(A:  Vaccine passport to allow Brits who’ve had the jab to go on summer holidays planned by government.

And this is from I think The Sun again.  Yep.)


THE UK is developing a "vaccine passport" system as Greece prepares to let in tourists who have had the Covid jab.


(A:  So, you can show if you’ve got proof of inoculation as a condition of entry. And they got their article from the Times as well. The links are here on this one.)  


It comes despite (A:  …politicians, they call them ministers for politicians.) ministers repeatedly insisting that vaccine passports are not part of their plans.


(A:  Well, they’re…. when will you expect truth? Why do you keep expecting truth from politicians? You see, you don’t believe in miracles, but you keep expecting one day they’re going to tell you the truth.  On anything?  [Alan chuckles.]) 


Tourism makes up a fifth of the country's economy which has been battered by the deadly pandemic.


So, there ya go, there’s your passports there. And to get anywhere at all, and eventually it will be inside your own country, you know that too, don’t you? Because I read the articles years ago from the WHO of their wonderful plans, and if they can only get them to pass, that you need passports inside your own country.  To even go into grocery stores, eventually.   


We don’t force you to take jabs, we just coerce you into and make it impossible for you to live without them, you see. That’s how they, that’s how they really do it, isn’t it?


Aren't you getting… Don't get fed up getting treated like a child your entire life!?


And then when you're trying to become an adult, they threaten you.


And then you go and vote for them. 


What's wrong with you?


So that's the system we're living in, or existing in, folks, and it's not going to get better. It will get a lot worse. Because the World Economic Forum has told us that everything is riding on this agenda. They had tried to get it all through with the climate change.  Oh, you're all going to, you're killing off the planet, you're going to, you're the enemy of nature, you're the enemy of the world. Oh, my goodness. The Club of Rome, man is the enemy, because of droughts and famines and so on, it says, that will fit the bill, that man is the enemy. So, by using that as an excuse they'd regulate you into the, you know, into the poor house basically.


And it wasn't, it's not fast enough. We weren't listening to them and we were ignoring them and bingo, well, Covid breaks out. After they said that at the meeting of 2019, that folk weren't listening to them, you know, at the climate summit, they have to do something more drastic.  And just like 9/11, where the PNAC group said, well, we need a Pearl Harbor event. Well, bingo, you get your Pearl Harbor/Covid event for this one, just the same. And the whole plan gets dusted off and rushed into action. 


Sad but true. That's how it really is, you know. Isn't it?  We're living through it and folk don't recognize what they're living through.


Now here's another one too, which I really didn't believe it at first. I had to wonder.  Because I've read articles over the years to do with the Soviet system. Orwell showed it too in 1984.  Where the children were taught and raised in school to snitch on their parents, with spies, you see.  We saw it working in the Soviet Union. That's where Orwell got the idea from. Also, the Nazi party encouraged children, the Hitler Youth to snitch on their parents if they heard them saying anything unpatriotic or whatever or criticizing the system. 


We always thought, you know, that's incredible, no wonder we went to war against, you know, yada, yada, ya.  That's what you're taught, that's what you're supposed to think, oh, we went to war to fight against that terrible kind of system.


Spy Kids: New intelligence law allows CHILDREN to work as secret agents for local councils,

(A:  This is Britain. This is from The Daily Mail.)

anti-fraud bodies and even the gambling watchdog - and even shop their own parents

dailymail.co.uk / 7 Jan 2021


Police and security services among those who will be allowed to use under-18s.


But many other public bodies are also on the list of those with permission.


They include local councils, Gambling Commission and Food Standards Agency.


Scores of Government bodies, the armed forces and even the gambling regulator will legally be allowed to use child spies - including against their parents.


(A:  Hhhah.  That’s amazing.)


But guidance for the Covert Intelligence Bill, (A:   That’s what they’re calling it, CIB.) currently going through the Lords (A:  The House of Lords.), outlines other public bodies who will be allowed to employ them as undercover agents.


The document, which has been published online, (A:  I think I’ve got the link for it here too, mind you, it should be included in here.  Yeah.)  prohibits those under 16 from being used to inform on their parents or guardians.


But it permits the use of older teenagers to be used against their own family under special circumstances.


'In other cases, authorisations should not be granted unless the special provisions, contained within the Juveniles Order are satisfied,' it notes.


'A CHIS aged 16 or 17 years old should only be deployed to gather evidence against their parents or any person who has parental responsibility for them where careful consideration has been given to whether the authorisation is justified in light of that fact.


(A:  This is just astonishing, ‘eh?  M-hm.  I tell ya.  M-hm.  [Alan laughing.] and so immediately they changed the, this is the technology used. So…)


Anne Longfield, the children's commissioner (A:  So, you've got a Commissioner for Children.), called for the use of child spies to be banned.


(A:  They’ve been using child spies for years in Britain, by the way, for other reasons. Even getting them to go into stores and ask for smokes and things, and then they charge the shopkeepers. They’ve done documentaries on it over the years. And some make their living, some of these children make a living on it, you know, that’s how they get their cash coming in. Anyway, she says…)  


'I remain to be convinced that there is ever an appropriate situation in which a child should be used as a CHIS,' she told the Telegraph.


'This practice is not in the best interests of the child.'


(A:  You see how she spins it as she’s trying to condemn it. What about society, the interests of society?  Hm?)


As well as police, MI5, MI6 (London headquarters pictured) and the National Crime Agency, the list of agencies includes the Gambling Commission, county and district councils, the Environment Agency and the Food Standards Agency.         


(A:  Right, they can all use it as well.)


The bill has already drawn heavy criticism as it passes through Parliament. (A:  And folk are complaining about it.) 


(A:  Here’s another one…)

…which aims to protect undercover operatives from prosecution if they are forced to break the law on operations. 


So anyway, that's the system we’re living through, isn't it? And under any other times and in any other time in history we say it for what it is. It's tyranny.  And these are dystopian governments. Obviously. Dystopian times.  And authoritarian systems which are not democratic by any means at all.  Being rushed through, all these different kinds of laws and ridiculous agendas, which at any other time in any other country would've been massively condemned. And yet your own countries are using them internally. 


So those setups things, to set up their own parents. Or neighboring parents for instance, neighboring folks. What you think of so-and-so?  Well, I think so-and-so… And they'll get reported.  That's it.


This is complete tyranny, folks.


And you VOTE for these governments?


I can't believe… What's wrong with you?


What's wrong with you?  N-n.


And they never learned from history, do they?  Folks never learn, you know. That's what I'm saying, never fight across the seas for something. Never do that. Never ever do that. They used to say that the only thing to fight for is a little bit of dirt you sit on. That's about the only part you have some control over, at least to grow your own vegetables and support yourself. But don't go over and fight in other nations for vague whatever, oh, the evil Empire, or the evil Satan or whatever they want to call the latest target. 


Because you're being used. For a system that has no, that will turn around and do what they're doing to you now. What's wrong with you? Wake up.  And wisen up. 


Because hhhch, you don't get many chances, you know, retakes at this. You get the one chance at everything, really, generally.  And you have to make decisions as you go along.  But can't you see what you're living through and how BAD it's going?  This is just the START of this.


Look at Mr. Schwab and his great agenda here for the great reset, 'eh.  Making things better and all the rest of it, 'eh.  Bring back better. This is a complete sustainability agenda, post... post consumerism, folks.  They've had it with you buying things and keeping yourself happy by buying things. Even though they made sure that all you could buy was junk that wasn't made to last at all, that's why you had to keep buying stuff.  But it's always your fault, not theirs. Oh no.


Psychopaths will always make excuses to project onto you what they are doing themselves. It must always be your fault for what they want to do. Because whatever they want to do is going to be pretty nasty for you. There's no doubt at all about that.


And to shut down the world's economies, where they say that if you get Covid you've got [Alan chuckles.] 0.04 of 1% chance [Alan chuckles.] of becoming ill with it or sick or dying. Now you'll notice too, they already have lots of good treatment in the hospitals, you know, good antivirals and so on.  So that even the folk that were dying before, last year, because they were sticking them on those stupid ventilators down their tracheas, they're not doing it so much now, and folk are recovering much better.


But literally 99% of the people don't even know they've had it, and don't have symptoms pretty well.


So yeah, this is a big agenda, using Covid obviously for the great reset.  Build back better. BBB, 'eh?  [Alan chuckles.]  And reimagining society.  Reimagining commerce.  Reimagining education.  All from the same head of the Hydra you might say, the main head of the whole Hydra, the capstone itself.  When they all parrot the same things it's all coming from a central command.


And once again, you've got to, you're going to have to come through and have a small, just a few people who are committed to help each other out. Because times are going to get bad.  Really bad. And you have to help each other to help you out with basic necessities and things that must be done occasionally here and there. Help, basic help.  During terrible times. 


Because government is not going to do, make you happy, believe you me. They are not there to make you happy, no matter what they say. Or to help you in bad times. 


People now are terrified of their governments. I think it was Jefferson talked about the systems and he mentioned that government, when government was afraid of its people you had some security and safety. But when the people were afraid of their governments the system would fall apart eventually, or be made to do something because you can't, you're under a tyranny, you see.


When older folk especially are terrified, or to even go, like happened in Canada a few months, a couple months ago or whatever it was.  Where the couple, the woman had a problem and she had to get medication for it, she had a prescription, went to the pharmacy and the cops basically arrested them. She said they sat pondering going out at all. She couldn't wear a mask; it was part of her problem that she was getting the prescription for. It didn't matter, you see. But she said that she and her husband were worried about having to leave home because of what might happen to them by the police. And it did happen to them.


So, people ARE living in fear of their own governmental agencies. That shouldn't be, folks.


These are the things that we used to accuse tyrannies of. Tyrannies were always across the sea somewhere. Now they are all here.  And you can't go on for long like that. Because tyrannies don't stop being ruthless, they get worse unfortunately as time goes on.


Because psychopaths start to get used to very quickly you obeying them [Alan chuckles.] and they, then they become very impatient when they have to use more persuasion to get you to go along. Then they stop persuading you and just order you.  Like Fauci.  [Alan chuckles.]   


What a system, 'eh?  What a system. But the whole system is geared towards massive change, and what Quigley talked about, war, getting more done in five years of war. He was talking about massive changes, social changes. That's what you're in right now, using a war type scenario.


The great reset isn't just finances. It's the entire structure of society and living, right down to the personal life or if you should even exist in the first place. I remember giving the talks where I said that eventually you won't get born unless they need you for something. That's where they want to take it down the road, you know, you have to have a purpose to serve them, the great state. 


So, help each other out, don't forget that. And try to patch up any differences you have with the few folk you may have fallen out with even. Because these are tough times and you have to put things behind you. And don't start yelling too, families and falling out with families about this, you'll need the family's, if you have families at all. And yeah, you will definitely need each other, believe you me.


So, remember, send a few bucks my way @cuttingthroughthematrix.com, list all my official sites and send a few bucks, PayPal, Cash or personal check will be fine as well.  As I say, hopefully shortly I'll be able to post a few books off and get that done. So, have patience because the whole world is, you know, being forced into this right now.  So, it's about patience, all around.  And don't fall out with each other, right.


So for myself, Alan Watt from Ontario, Canada, it's good night and may your God or gods go with you.


Topics of show covered in following links:


In the Shadow of that Hideous Strength: The UN’s Proposed Alliance with Big Data to Know Where You are and What You’re Doing

rutherford.org / 1 Aug 2016


Enemies of the Deep State: The Government’s War on Domestic Terrorism Is a Trap

rutherford.org / 26 Jan 2021


The Deep State’s Stealthy, Subversive, Silent Coup to Ensure Nothing Changes

rutherford.org / 19 Jan 2021


The New Domestic War on Terror is Coming

greenwald.substack.com / 19 Jan 2021


How the Coronavirus Turns the Body Against Itself

nytimes.com / 28 Jan 2021


Distinct Autoimmune Antibody Signatures Between Hospitalized Acute COVID-19 Patients, SARS-CoV-2 Convalescent Individuals, and Unexposed Pre-Pandemic Controls



19-year-old hospitalized in ICU days after receiving second Pfizer vaccine

jpost.com / 1 Feb 2021


39-year-old nurse aide dies ‘within 48 hours’ of receiving mandated COVID-19 shot

lifesitenews.com / 27 Jan 2021


Nine care home residents dead and 69 infected in mass Covid outbreak six days after getting vaccine

thesun.co.uk / 2 Feb 2021


7 die at Spanish care home after getting Pfizer Covid-19 jab as ALL residents test positive for virus, second doses still to come

rt.com / 1 Feb 2021


Congressman tests positive for COVID-19 after receiving second dose of vaccine

cbsnews.com / 31 Jan 2021


Debunked: No, a Wexford doctor's death was not related to the Covid-19 vaccine

thejournal.ie / 26 Jan 2021


Doctor Kershav Sharma (Co Wexford, Ireland) Found Dead After Covid Vaccine

theirishsentinel.com / 21 Jan 2021


Covid: France restricts AstraZeneca vaccine to under-65s

bbc.com / 3 Feb 2021


Covid vaccines extremely safe, finds UK regulator

bbc.com / 5 Feb 2021


Covid door-to-door tests rolled out in Bristol and Liverpool as new mutations detected, Hancock says

thesun.co.uk / 2 Feb 2021


Keep INDOORS and use stockpiled food to stop mutant coronavirus variant spread, postcodes told

thesun.co.uk / 8 Feb 2021


Booster shots to keep covid mutations under control says expert

standard.co.uk / 2 Feb 2021


Single dose of Oxford vaccine prevents hospitalisation with Covid for 12 weeks, trial finds

telegraph.co.uk / 2 Feb 2021


Vaccine Passports and Health Passes: Is Showing Your “Papers” the “New Normal?”

theorganicprepper.com / 15 Dec 2020


Los Angeles County bans restaurants from turning on TVs

kusi.com / 29 Jan 2021


Implanted “Vaccine Package” ID: Germany’s Parliament Has Ratified GAVI’s Digital “Agenda ID2020”

globalresearch.ca / 3 Feb 2021


27 church leaders sue Scottish gov’t for criminalizing in-person worship

christianpost.com / 31 Jan 2021


What’s Not Being Said About the Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine. “Human Guinea Pigs”?

globalresearch.ca / 6 Feb 2021


Pubs and restaurants could reopen in April – with no alcohol

telegraph.co.uk / 6 Feb 2021


Cardinal Müller decries the Great Reset

lifesitenews.com / 5 Feb 2021


UK 'planning vaccine passport' to allow Brits to travel abroad for holidays

thesun.co.uk / 5 Feb 2021


Spy Kids: New intelligence law allows CHILDREN to work as secret agents for local councils, anti-fraud bodies and even the gambling watchdog - and even shop their own parents

dailymail.co.uk / 7 Jan 2021




Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:


"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3


"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)


Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)


Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)


"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"