Nov. 9, 2009 (#447)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Nov. 9, 2009:

'World Government' the U.N. sigh -- 'In the Bag,' Big Bankers Cry:

"You'll Wonder Where Democracy Went
When They Bring in Global Government,
Actually a New World Soviet Led by NGOs,
Speaking 'for the People' as to Where it All Goes,
With 'Partnerships in Business' They Comprise New System,
Criticism will be Heresy and Heretic will be Victim,
CEOs of the Economy will Rule the World with Ease,
Ensuring NGOs, U.N. and Politics have Palms Slick with Grease,
Education and the Media will be Rewarded, Fast-Track,
For Brainwashing the Youth and for Muddying Each Fact,
The Sheeple Down Below, will Wallow in the Slag,
Forgetting Symbols of the Past, Tearfully Waving Global Flag"
© Alan Watt Nov. 9, 2009


Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Nov. 9, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on November 9th 2009.  I generally start the show off by advising newcomers to look into web site.  While on that front page, bookmark all the other sites I have up and listed there for future use because sometimes the big sites run out of bandwidth or whatever – even though it’s on automatic – and you can’t find me.  If you have them bookmarked, you can always get the latest downloads.  This is very important, there are a lot of bogus sites out there with MY name on them and if you fall for them, you’ll end up donating and buying t-shirts and all kinds of other things that I’ve got NOTHING to do with.  So the only authorized sites there are [listed above]. is the European site and has all the same audios as the rest but it has the addition of transcripts of a lot of the talks that I’ve given in the past for download and print up, written in the various languages of Europe. 


Remember that you are the people who bring me to you.  No one backs me here.  This is a 7 day a week scenario.  There are no breaks here.  There’s always a crisis, one after another, and it’s dealt with right here.  There’s no staff that I can call on to deal with things.  Therefore it’s up to you to keep me going.  I don’t sell products and all kinds of things that are going to save your life and so on.  I don’t bring on advertisers to terrify you with scary scenarios and offer you the solution… which they’ll sell to you.  To an extent that compromises what I’m actually trying to do. 


What I’m trying to do is just give you information of how the world really is.  How it really is.  I can’t really tell you what to do about it because to be honest with you, it’s such an old system – this con game called politics and the reality that is given to the public – it’s been very well put together.  It’s intergenerational.  Those who set up this form of democracy, as they like to call it, never intended that the public HAVE democracy.  They always knew where they were heading with the world government scenario, the kind of world they’d have and they favored the Sovietized, collectivist system in fact, to control the masses while there’s a small fascist elite above them living very, very well and owning all the resources of the world, the resources which we are all dependent on. 


Through science, they believed they would conquer… and they’ve done a darn good job of it, especially psychology and now they want to use narcosis on different people, big pharma.  Exactly what Huxley said would happen in the 30s.  He knew it because he was in on the big think tanks that help plan the future.  Those in power leave nothing to chance, NOTHING to chance.  They have think tanks going over EVERY part of the future, according to their plans, and possible reactions… what could go wrong, how would they deal with it, how would they stop it before it started, and all that kind of stuff.  That’s why they employ these big think tanks.  They don’t make mistakes.  Those who are in power want to maintain power for their own families and their own family genealogies to come.   That’s how it’s always been really.  With advanced science, they are so far ahead of the game now that it’s almost in the bag and they know it too.  Back with more after this break.


HI folks.  I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix.  It’s up to you to keep me going.  You can buy that which I have for sale on MY web sites, or donate to me.  You can do it through [options listed at top and bottom of transcript].  You have to keep me going.  Really, there are no breaks here.  There are no breaks at all.  Weekends don’t matter; it’s just another day to me.  There is always stuff going on to deal with.  You’ve got to make sure that the sites you go in to are listed on on the front page.  These are the ONLY legitimate sites I have.  Just today someone put up a fake Twitter site with my name on it.  This sort of stuff happens all the time.  I know who does it.  I know who does it and so do the cops.  So you’ve got to make sure you’re in a legitimate site.  There are a lot of dirty tricks that go on here ALL the time, all the time. 


I remember Bill Cooper when he said that some people, his most ardent haters, he was always getting emails from them or doing dirty tricks and all the rest of it.  He’s quite right.  The ones that hate you the most can’t miss a show.  They’re really sick and they are obsessed, obsessed with you.  It’s a stalker mentality in fact.  Rather than just listen to somebody else, they just hate you; they’ve got a fixation.  Then, outside of that, you also have provocateurs that use others to do the dirty work so that they’ll get the legal consequences that come back on them.  That’s the sort of warfare that goes on all the time… all the time.


So don’t buy anything unless it’s on web site.  I don’t sell t-shirts.  There is a company down in the states that’s been selling t-shirts, have been for a couple of years now, saying they donate to me and they don’t.  So you’re paying for that and nothing arrives here.  Again, the cops are looking at them too, for fraud and misrepresentation.  These are the things that go on and it’s up to you to keep ME going.  Believe you me, I think there’s more money going elsewhere than arrives at this place here. 


The new world order is on a roll.  I’ve given lots of talks over the years about the agenda, NOT through guess work, not through crystal balls, but right from their own works, from their own agendas, their treaties, the memoirs of high-level bureaucrats and technocrats, as the call them.  Technocrats are never elected.  They are given more power than politicians.  Politicians are just fronts.  That’s why it shocks people who really believe in democracy when all the politicians seem to vote against the interests of the country regardless of the parties.  Politics is a front.  It’s there to take the tomatoes that you throw at them, and rotten cabbages.  That’s what politicians are for.  They are bought and paid for… and NOT by the public. 


Recently, we had Lord Monckton give a talk in the States but he also gave a talk in Australia on a radio show.  I’ll put the links up at the end of the show so you can listen to it yourself where he lays it out on the line. 


There’s another article in the Wall Street Journal. 


Has Anyone Read the Copenhagen Agreement?

U.N. plans for a new 'government' are scary.



We can only hope that world leaders will do nothing more than enjoy a pleasant bicycle ride around the charming streets of Copenhagen come December. For if they actually manage to wring out an agreement based on the current draft text of the Copenhagen climate-change treaty, the world is in for some nasty surprises. Draft text, you say? If you haven't heard about it, that's because none of our otherwise talkative political leaders have bothered to tell us what the drafters have already cobbled together for leaders to consider. And neither have the media. (Alan:  That tells us all we need to know.)


Enter Lord Christopher Monckton. The former adviser to Margaret Thatcher gave an address at Bethel University in St. Paul, Minnesota, earlier this month that made quite a splash. For the first time, the public heard about the 181 pages, dated Sept. 15, that comprise the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—a rough draft of what could be signed come December.  (A:  Then it goes on to talk about what it contains.  You can’t find it.  It’s under the NOTES from the General Secretary.  That’s how they hid it, under ‘notes.’  The UN has a page there on Treaties.  It’s up to you to have a look at it and search.)


So far there have been more than a million hits on the YouTube post of his address. It deserves millions more because Lord Monckton warns that the aim of the Copenhagen draft treaty is to set up a transnational "government" on a scale the world has never before seen.


The "scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention" that starts on page 18 contains the provision for a "government." (A:  He’s talking about WORLD government.)  The aim is to give a new as yet unnamed U.N. body the power to directly intervene in the financial, economic, tax and environmental affairs of all the nations that sign the Copenhagen treaty.  (A:  That is true.  I’ve said it for years.  When it comes to interdependence, which means that you will be totally dependent on the big boys for everything that you need to live… for heating, for food, and for where you live and all the rest of it.  INTERdependence means TOTAL dependence on THE SYSTEM.  But more so than that, they’ve got the carbon taxes – individual ones – and all of that tacked on.  I told you that would happen a year or two ago.)


The reason for the power grab is clear enough: Clause after complicated clause of the draft treaty requires developed countries to pay an "adaptation debt" to developing countries to supposedly support climate change mitigation. Clause 33 on page 39 says that "by 2020 the scale of financial flows to support adaptation in developing countries must be [at least $67 billion] or [in the range of $70 billion to $140 billion per year]."


And how will developed countries be slugged to provide for this financial flow to the developing world? The draft text sets out various alternatives, including option seven on page 135, which provides for "a [global] levy of 2 per cent on international financial market [monetary] transactions to Annex I Parties." Annex 1 countries are industrialized countries, which include among others the U.S., Australia, Britain and Canada.


To be sure, countries that sign international treaties always cede powers to a U.N. body responsible for implementing treaty obligations. But the difference is that this treaty appears to have been subject to unusual attempts to conceal its convoluted contents. And apart from the difficulty of trying to decipher the U.N. verbiage, there are plenty of draft clauses described as "alternatives" and "options" that should raise the ire of free and democratic countries concerned about preserving their sovereignty.


Lord Monckton himself only became aware of the extraordinary powers to be vested in this new world government when a friend found an obscure U.N. Web site and searched through several layers of hyperlinks before discovering a document that isn't even called the draft "treaty." Instead, it's labelled a "Note by the Secretariat."  (A:  It even goes on to describe where you’ll find it.  A ‘note’ by the Secretariat, a note… 180 page note… that’s where they HID the damn thing.)


Interviewed by broadcaster Alan Jones on Sydney radio Monday, Lord Monckton said "this is the first time I've ever seen any transnational treaty referring to a new body to be set up under that treaty as a 'government.' (A:  Government, global government.) But it's the powers that are going to be given to this entirely unelected government that are so frightening." He added: "The sheer ambition of this new world government is enormous right from the start—that's even before it starts accreting powers to itself in the way that these entities inevitably always do."


So, it’s a done deal as we all know because there is no such thing as democracy.  It’s all coming together at the right time… at the right time.


On the CNBC network you’ll find


Dollar Will be "Utterly Destroyed": Strategist

Friday, 6 Nov 2009 /


The dollar will get "utterly destroyed" and become "virtually worthless", said Damon Vickers (A:  I wonder if that’s Lord Vickers son?), chief investment officer of Nine Points Capital Partners.  (A:  That’s one of the top, expensive ones.  You can’t even get into their site unless you can verify that you’re income is between $200,000 to $500,000 per year.)


"We don't have resources. Neither does a lot of Asia to be quite frank," Vickers said on CNBC's Asia Squawk Box. "Countries that have resources -- the Brazils, the Canadas, Australia -- their currencies are doing well."  (A:  Well, he hasn’t lived here.  Everything is getting hyper inflated.  They call it ‘quantitative easing.’)


Vickers noted that their stock markets have done the best year-to-date.


"They have stuff. They've got resources. They export real things. The United States exports 'promises' and 'pretty paper'," he added.


Due to the huge wage disparities between the United States and emerging markets like China, Vickers said that may resolve itself in some type of a global currency crisis.


"If the global currency crisis unfolds, then inevitably you get an alignment of a global world government. A new global currency and a new world order, so we may be moving towards that," he said.


Vickers added that this is the time where investors should be making money when the trend is developing.


"Oil looks higher, gold looks higher, currencies look weaker."


That’s one of these snobby, snooty investment companies, but you don’t really need them to tell you, do you?  Really, I’ve been talking about this for years.  It’s just now time to tell the public from the AUTHORIZED tellers, mainstream media.  No one really cares though, out there.  Most of the public, as you know, don’t really care.  Back with more after this break.


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix.  The matrix is the reality that’s been given to you at birth basically.  It’s not just for you; it was also for your parents and grandparents and great-great grandparents as well.  Every generation is given a version of it to suit those who rule… something that social scientists have been in to and studying for an awful long time.


It’s true.  Every system that exists is always there to serve a particular, powerful elite who benefit at the top, in the system that they create.  After a little while - a very short time - the people think it’s their system.  It doesn’t matter what kind of a system it is, they think it’s theirs and it’s all quite normal.  They’ll even go off and fight for it, when told.  That’s just they way it really, really is.  They know that people will adapt into the new system because it’s going to be presented in such a way that your life isn’t going to change that much.  They are born liars at the top… and we want to believe them.  [Alan laughing.]  That’s how easily it works. 


I’ve gone through how predictive programming works all the time, through all the movies you’ve watched and how they give you a human story to GRAB you - that’s the hook.  Really, it’s the messages that are contained within.  Look all the disaster movies that were put out in the 70s and 80s, even before that, as early as the 60s.  I think one was called No Blade of Grass.  Then it was followed up by Soylent Green.  Then later on you had different disaster movies and then you have the aftermath type of little bands of people killing each other for survival, Mel Gibson’s Road Warrior.  Then you had The Postman, Waterworld… all these scenarios were to get you thinking about climate change and catastrophe wrapped up in a human storyYou always identify with the hero… that’s how it sucks you in.  Very old technique, but it works very well because after you’ve forgotten all about them, the messages have been IMPLANTED in your mind to get you ready.  So you talk about ‘Oh, my God, there are going to be catastrophes coming if we don’t change everything.’  Somehow it will seem sensible to you, even though it’s really ridiculous. 


Before, I mentioned one called Final Cut and Robin Williams was the main character in it.  It was about a time not far from now where at funerals and so on, there’s a character who acts like an editor and he takes a little chip implant from your brain and it’s recorded everything that you saw, everything you spoke about, everything that you did.  It’s recorded like a camera and like an audio in that little chip.  They put little bits together and play it back for the people who are grieving at the funeral.  He has access to ALL this data and obviously the government has it too.  They use it.


You can see with the use of technology and believe you me, technology is addictive.  They know that with all of the youth.  They knew that back in the 90s, that this technology would totally addict the young.  They don’t know any better.  Did you?  Did YOU know just how important privacy was when you were so young?  Did you ever think that ‘they were watching me?’  Of course they don’t believe they are being watched.  They haven’t done anything.  They haven’t lived long enough to have done anything to be worth watching… that’s what they think.  So they miss the point.  It’s not about what you do; it’s your whole personality that has to be monitored.  For a totalitarian world state everyone must be totally predictable.


Here’s an email I got that ties in with this science and what’s behind it and how they use all these free things out there – Facebook and all the rest of it – to do something that DARPA wanted done years ago. 


(Email from a Listener)

Subject: Lifelog, the Darpa military surveillance project, now being promoted through 'the market'


Hello Alan,


I've just been listening to your October 19 talk. By the end of the show, you read from a New Scientist article about a "new camera" that's supposed to log people's lives. And which people even get to wear around their necks, like with every other type of dog collar there is.


When I heard that, it sounded familiar to me, particularly the 'lifelog' expression.  (A:  That’s what they call it, Lifelog.)


See, Lifelog is the name of a DARPA project which was (is) included in the Total Information Awareness apparatus. Here is a quote from a DefenseTech article on this DARPA program:


"The embryonic LifeLog program would take every e-mail you’ve sent or received, every picture you’ve taken, every web page you’ve surfed, every phone call you’ve had, every TV show you’ve watched, every magazine you’ve read, and dump it into a giant database.


All of this — and more — would be combined with a GPS transmitter, to keep tabs on where you’re going; audio-visual sensors, to capture all that you see or say; and biomedical monitors, to keep track of your health."  (A:  I’ve got the link from DARPA when they first came out with that very term, Lifelog.)


In the meanwhile, the program was supposedly terminated. In fact it was, of course, partitioned and distributed among private contractors.  (A:  That’s how they are doing it all.  These big, private contractors, by the way, are just extensions of the NSA.  Real companies but NSA and the CIA set them up.  Most of the big boys are run by the CIA, in technology.)


And now here is one of its components. For fun, games and, of course, to help the disabled and the elderly.   (A:  That’s how they always put things.)


Isn't it funny (or scary, I should say) that these guys can pull this trick time and time again?  (A:  It’s for the elderly and disabled and they want to help people.)


That is, to create a military weaponized tool (in this case, for surveillance), and then sell it to the public on a piece-by-piece basis, via "the market", to supposedly help and entertain all of us.  (A:  And that’s how they do it.)


You can find the other components of the original LifeLog project spread around everywhere, in all sorts of systems: internet and other communications' surveillance, "smart meters", cell phone tracing, and now, even, personal health monitoring systems. 


I’ll be back with more after this break.


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an email that was sent by a listener who’s got a lot of good information in there to do with ‘Lifelog.’  Lifelog, something that DARPA dreamed up.  They thought, how can we get the public to take it?  After all, we know what DARPA’s all about.  So they simply farmed it out to their FRONT groups.  There are a lot of PRIVATE organizations out there, big ones too, real big companies and it’s all to get this stuff out into the public.  When you think you are buying it from a private company, your awareness kind of drops a little bit – your sensory awareness – and you’re not so careful as you should be.  It’s always sold to you as a wonderful thing… a wonderful thing.  It’s all do with monitoring YOUR life from birth to death really.  That’s what it’s about.  So’s you’ll give all your info up for free and they’ll know everything about you.  That’s how it works. 


That’s why they first came out with the term ‘personal’ computer.  Rather than say ‘computer’ or ‘network watched by government agencies computer’, no, they’ve got ‘personal’ computer.  Your PERSONAL computer.  Well, you buy your ‘personal’ computer so it must be okay.  ‘I bought it; it’s mine.’  Where, in reality, it’s the same as the television.  I said they should really give them out free because they NEED these for propaganda.  With the computer, they need it to bring in their wonderful new world order where everyone is monitored… and all the other gadgets that link into it.  They should give it to us all for free.  But it works; make us buy it and then, ‘oh, that’s mine; that’s obviously mine, I’ve got privacy.’  So I’ll put this up on my site too, this letter with the links in it - minus the sender’s name - and you can look it up for yourself.  This shows you how they actually do these dirty little tricks on the public and put them through private, apparently private companies.  They’re all funded by the big boys and the governments themselves. 


We’re racing into this whole new world order now.  It’s in the open.  Most of the public don’t mind.  They don’t mind.  They won’t know HOW they’ve come to the conclusion that eventually will rest somewhere in their grey matter.  It’s taken years of little bits of downloads – bits and bytes over the years – of indoctrination and drama, movies, fiction, news bits and bytes, and even novels.  They actually hire in countries, the countries that have cultural teams, countries that have departments of culture, like Canada.  They HIRE writers to write about the greening stuff, all the children’s books… are put out by these people with grants from the government.  It’s been that way for an awful long time. 


Here’s an article about Charles Darwin.  I’ve talked about how all the big totalitarianists since Darwin’s day have used his supposed theories – and they weren’t his – to do the nasty things that they did, including the boys who run the world today… bringing the population down and getting all the wrong types off the world. 


Charles Darwin and the children of the evolution

From The Sunday Times November 8, 2009  /  Monday November 2, 2009


The naturalist outraged the church, prompting a bitter debate that still sets creationists against evolutionists. Now a sinister link has emerged between his work and the recent spate of high-school killings by crazed, nihilistic teenagers.  (A:  It’s interesting, this.)


You wouldn’t know from the celebrations of Charles Darwin’s life this year (A:  It’s been all over television, this sort of dramatic, fictional form.) that the amiable Victorian gent portrayed in those TV drama-docs pottering around the garden of his home in Kent has been fingered as a racist, an apologist for genocide, and the inspiration of a string of psychopathic killers.  (A:  I should put in, The Optimum Population Trust and all the other big ones, like Sir Crispin Tickell, Prince Charles’s buddy, who’s got a department on the British government now saying we’ve got to bring down the population drastically, especially all the wrong kinds, meaning the working classes.)


The Darwin double anniversary (2009 marks both the bicentenary of his birth and 150 years since the first publication of On the Origin of Species) has featured much vanilla hoopla: the Royal Mail issued commemorative stamps; Damien Hirst designed the dust jacket…(A: Bla-bla-bla, about all the different things they did.)


With hardly a mention that his name has been associated with some of the most infamous crimes of modern history, it is as if there has been an unspoken agreement to accentuate the positive. (A:  Well, there IS an agreements and it’s spoken about by some places called clubs.  ‘I’m off to my club,’ …in London, you see, club.)  Certainly, the milquetoast Darwin played by Paul Bettany in the recent film Creation provided little hint that there might be a dark side to the great man’s bequest to posterity. The film focuses on Darwin’s inner conflicts in the years leading up to the publication of On the Origin of Species. The scientist is reluctant to make his ideas public, not because he has foreseen dire social consequences, but chiefly because he fears that the theory of evolution will upset his wife and the Church of England.  (A:  Which is all bogus because that was the intention of it.)


In America, where Darwin’s writings on morality and race have come under particularly intense critical scrutiny because of the enduring creationist debate, he has been accused of fostering moral nihilism and scientific racism, and even of promoting an ethic that found its ultimate expression in the Holocaust. Most startling of all, a connection has now been drawn between Darwin’s theories and a rash of school shootings. In April, 1,000 people gathered at sunset in Littleton, Colorado, to commemorate the victims of the Columbine high school massacre, 10 years on. Darrell Scott, whose daughter Rachel was the first of the 13 children to be murdered, and whose son Craig narrowly escaped being shot, cannot understand why so little attention has been paid to the motivation of the killers, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, and their interest in Charles Darwin’s ideas. (A:  You can also tie that in with the murders of I think it was Harvard back in the 20s or 30s by a couple of the richest students on the planet, to do with Kuhn, Loeb and Company.  I think it was Leopold Loeb; they’ve actually put movies out about them.  They believed in Charles Darwin.  They even believed that, from their professor who also taught Darwinism, that the ultra rich, the elite ruling class, had the right to commit murder, but not the people below them.  They had a PRIVILEGE to commit murder.  By the way, they did it.)   “Harris wore a ‘Natural Selection’ T-shirt (A:  The killer, right.) on the day of the killings. They made remarks on video about helping out the process of natural selection by eliminating the weak. (A:  This is these killers.)  They also professed that they had evolved to a higher level than their classmates. I was amazed at the frequent references to evolution, and that the press completely ignored that aspect of the tapes.”


Much of the evidence remains sealed under a court order issued to minimise the risk of copycat killings, but from those documents that are in the public domain, it is clear that Eric Harris fantasised about putting everyone into a violent computer game that only the fittest could survive. (A:  Don’t you think that’s what it’s all about in the first place, computer games?  You didn’t know that did you?)  And, like Darwin himself, he noted how vaccination might be interfering with nature’s weeding process. (A:  You know, weeding out the weak.)  In his rantings Harris said he wished there were no vaccines, or even warning labels on dangerous goods, “and let natural selection take its course. All the fat, ugly, retarded, crippled dumbass, stupid f***heads in the world would die? Maybe then the human race can actually be proud of itself”.


As the attorney for the families of six of the students killed at Columbine, the Denver lawyer Barry Arrington has come across more in a similar vein. “I read through every single page of Eric Harris’s journals; I listened to all of the audio tapes and watched the videotapes. It became evident to me that Harris consciously saw his actions as logically arising from what he had learnt about evolution. Darwinism served as his personal intellectual rationale for what he did. There cannot be the slightest doubt that Harris was a worshipper of Darwin and saw himself as acting on Darwinian principles.”  (A:  I should say too that anyone who is really into Darwin, truly believes in it, is capable of all this stuff too.  These are the guys at the bottom.  Can you imagine the Crispin Tickell boys at the top of the Optimum Population Trust and all the other big trusts up there working for the foundations and telling government they’ve got to bring down the population?  They have the POWER to do it on a larger scale.  You’d better really take this stuff seriously because they are doing it.  By they way, they’ve been using injections not to save you, but to bring you down.  They’ve even discussed that.  I’ve given you the quotes from Lord Bertrand Russell and others.  He said, “We shall use the needle.”  …they’ll put stuff in the food, stuff in the water.)


In 2007, detectives following up a tip-off about a planned school shooting in Pennsylvania discovered that their suspect often logged on to a social networking site called Natural Selection’s Army and a number of related chatrooms that were later tagged by the media as the “cyber school for killers”. These sites were quickly shut down by their service providers, but today “Natural Selection” is the name of a popular computer game in which competing teams attempt to annihilate one another — a sign that Darwin’s term is still associated by many teenagers with sudden and extreme violence.


“Natural Selection” T-shirts have proved a popular line through web-based outlets, and it seems that the Columbine killers have spawned a gruesome personality cult — there is even a computer game in which players adopt the roles of Harris and Klebold, which features original CCTV footage of the killings.


Among those reported to have frequented the original Natural Selection’s Army website was an 18-year-old Finnish student, Pekka-Eric Auvinen. On November 7, 2007, in Tuusula, Finland, Auvinen forced his head teacher to kneel down in front of him before he shot her with his pistol. He slaughtered a further seven victims before turning the gun on himself. Some of the Jokela high school students afterwards described the way Auvinen prowled through the building pointing his gun at people’s heads. Sometimes he would squeeze the trigger and kill them; sometimes, after looking long and hard through the sights, he would suddenly turn away and let his terrified target go free. One witness said he seemed to be choosing his victims at random, but in fact he was making a very deliberate selection. He was trying to weed out the “unfit”.


Before he embarked on his shooting spree, Auvinen posted a lengthy apologia on the internet. Styling himself a “social Darwinist” (A:  Just like Crispin Tickell, SIR Crispin Tickell, and all these top boys that have the power.  And I should say Mr. Rockefeller who goes on about it too and Sir Charles Galton Darwin who wrote The Next Million Years, the descendant of Charles Darwin who said the very same thing, they’ve got to kill off the unfit or they’ll outbreed the fit, like himself.  Read the book yourself.), he said that natural selection appeared not to be working any more — had maybe even gone into reverse. He had noticed that “stupid, weak-minded people reproduce faster than intelligent, strong-minded ones”. The gene pool was sure to deteriorate if society continued to guarantee the survival of the second-rate. (A:  So he’d actually READ Charles Galton Darwin’s The Next Million Years because that’s what he was on about.)  He had pondered what to do about this problem. He understood that life was just a meaningless coincidence, the outcome of a long series of random mutations, so there might not be much point in doing anything at all. But eventually he had decided he would do his bit by becoming a natural selector, aping the pitiless indifference of nature.


Auvinen left a special plea for his motivation to be taken seriously and for the world not merely to write him off as a psychopath, or to blame cult movies, computer games, television or heavy metal music, before concluding: “No mercy for the scum of the Earth! Humanity is overrated. It’s time to put natural selection and survival of the fittest back on track.”    (A:  If he’d just written to the United Nations, he would have found out they have been covertly doing it for years.  Look at the cancer rates and all the rest of it.  He didn’t know.)


Of course, it is not unusual for homicidal maniacs to cite great writers when seeking to justify their crimes. The Chicago spree-killers Leopold and Loeb (A:  Kuhn Loeb family.  Kuhn Loeb is the big boys with Schiff.  I think Mr. Gore’s daughter married one of the Schiffs, in fact, that were set over here by Rothschild to set up a bank, a central bank and all the rest of it.  So their children here, Leopold and Loeb.) (the models for Hitchcock’s 1948 film, Rope) claimed Friedrich Nietzsche as their muse, as did the Moors murderer Ian Brady. Other deranged misfits have nominated Albert Camus, Jean Genet and André Gide. But it may take a keener intellect than was possessed by Harris, Klebold or Auvinen to negotiate such a reading list. The basics of evolution are much more accessible and are taught in every high school, so it should not be surprising that Darwin seems to be emerging as the inspiration for the more dim-witted schoolboy sociopath.  (A:  I’ll add, for all those who belong to the big foundations, the very rich, schoolboy sociopaths at the top… who have the POWER to implement on a much larger scale.)


I’ve got a link here too to the National Expositor.  Very good.  It’s about the same topics as well.  I’ve gone through the Rockefeller funded genetics program.  These great philanthropists… the philanthropists that Weishaupt talked about.  He said, we shall create all these foundations which will really run the countries.  That’s what they do.  It’s called the parallel government.  Mr. Rockefeller still travels the world at 94 parroting the same old stuff about killing off most of the unfit and all that stuff, the people that shouldn’t be out there.  They’ve been sterilizing people across the planet through different foundations, including the Gates Foundation.  I read the article about a month ago where the United Nations has sterilized I don’t know how many women it was in Chili - it was multi-thousands of them - without their permission and they’d outright lied to them too. 


Native Americans Secretly Sterilized Under Bush Sr. Program

Michael Sullivan DeFine on 23 June, 2008  /


(A:  Well, it’s continued.  So it’s not a party thing.  There are no parties in reality.)


In 1970, George Bush Sr. started and ran a program that sterilized Native American women without their knowledge and against their will.


A History of Governmentally Coerced Sterilization:


The Plight of the Native American Woman 


I.                    Introduction


The purpose of this article is to trace the historical influence of governmentally funded sterilization from the beginning of the eugenics movement in the 19th century (A:  That was all coupled with Darwinism, of course.) to see how this effects Native American women today. This topic will investigate the social prejudices and rationalizations for sterilization of the "less-talented" members of society advocated by the most influential social and biological scientists in American history.


These "science"-based eugenic influences break through the lines of science into the world of politics, promulgating anti-humanistic views of poor women of color in the form of legislation fraught with bigotry and baseless generalizations. This political view flows through the judicial system, as courts apply eugenic philosophies in determining who should be sterilized and for what reasons. (A:  Then it goes through the story of how they’ve been doing it to American Indians ALL ALONG.  But it’s not just the women, the guys too.  That’s why they put them in these awful, awful reservations in the worst places.  They were sure to bring down their numbers with disease and all that.  There’s still at it.  Back with more after this break.)


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just connecting a few dots tonight to show you how the world really is.  After this you can go back to sleep or surf the net and be happy, doing the happy stuff that people do.  But some won’t.  Some will understand what’s happening here. 


Director of Planned Parenthood at 40 Days for Life Birthplace Resigns after Watching Abortion Ultrasound

Planned Parenthood seeks restraining order  /  By Kathleen Gilbert  /  Monday November 2, 2009



BRYAN, Texas, November 2, 2009 ( - The director of the Texas Planned Parenthood abortion mill where the 40 Days for Life campaign began has resigned, saying she experienced a conversion after watching an ultrasound video of a child being killed by abortion.


"I just thought I can't do this anymore, and it was just like a flash that hit me and I thought that's it," said Abby Johnson in an interview with local news network KBTX 3. 


Johnson had been affiliated with Bryan's Planned Parenthood facility for eight years, and worked as its director for two.  She said she began to feel uncomfortable with Planned Parenthood's business philosophy after the organization, suffering from the economic downturn, told her to try to bring more abortions in the door.  (A:  Planned Parenthood eh?)  "The money wasn't in family planning, the money wasn't in prevention, the money was in abortion and so I had a problem with that," said Johnson. 


But the turning point for Johnson was reportedly when she witnessed an actual ultrasound image of an abortion being performed on an unborn child.  (A:  And that was the end for her.)


Go into the beginnings of this.  Margaret Sanger, you have to look into her history, again, a eugenicist, a Darwinist, and all the rest of it.  She believed in the survival of the fittest.  She was an admirer of the communist system.  She was a great admirer or Adolf Hitler too.  She truly was an utter racist of the top, the first quality, you might say, of racism.  She wrote her own books.  She wrote that children were weeds.  She said, ‘You have to weed them out,’ you know, killing… weed them out.  That’s the great champion of the feminists, Margaret Sanger.  At least there are some people who actually go along with it, see the light, and get rather disgusted eventually. 


You see, what’s interesting too is most of these things are worked by bureaucracies above.  They say that’s how the communist system could pick up their targets.  Bureaucrats would just pick numbers and have them eradicated… like eradicating them from their White Paper.  AT the bottom, real people really kill people.  The same with Adolf Hitler.  When you’re just a number and bureaucrats deal with it, it’s completely impersonal; it’s just numbers and figures; you’re not names… and they are eliminated.  It isn’t until you are up close and doing something like that, that YOU personally have a choice to make.  That’s what makes it so efficient today, bureaucracies.  Bureaucracies. 


It’s just going on and on and on.  I’m sorry about the callers.  There’s a caller that’s been waiting for ages.  I can’t really take him; but if he calls in tomorrow, I’ll try and grab him. 


This last article is from the Washington Times.


Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams

November 3, 2009

 Valerie Richardson  /


(A:  See, there is BUSINESS in everything.  These evil characters at the top, business, economy… eh?  Business.  Profit.)


A San Francisco cosmetics company has ignited an outcry among pro-lifers for including an unexpected ingredient in its anti-aging creams: skin-cell proteins from an aborted fetus.


Children of God for Life, a watchdog group that monitors the use of fetal material in medical products, called last week for a boycott of all treatments manufactured by Neocutis Inc., which acknowledges that the key ingredient in its product line was developed from an aborted boy.


These are sacrifices for your beauty.  You always get something back for your sacrifice.  That’s what sacrifices are for. 


From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.




Topics of show covered in following links:


"Is the Copenhagen treaty about creating a world government?" [Lord Monckton Interview in Australia].

"Has Anyone Read the Copenhagen Agreement? - U.N. plans for a new 'government' are scary" by Janet Albrechtsen ( - Oct. 28, 2009.

"Dollar Will be "Utterly Destroyed": Strategist" ( - Nov. 6, 2009.

"Lifelog, the Darpa military surveillance project, now being promoted through 'the market' " (Email from a Listener).


"Charles Darwin and the children of the evolution" [Charles Darwin--Inspiration to Murderers and Elitism] by Dennis Sewell, The Times - Nov. 8, 2009.
(Article at original link was removed. Link is to excerpt in transcript text.)

"Native Americans Secretly Sterilized Under Bush Sr. Program" by Michael Sullivan DeFine, National Expositor - June 23, 2008.

"Director of Planned Parenthood at 40 Days for Life Birthplace Resigns after Watching Abortion Ultrasound" by Kathleen Gilbert ( - Nov. 2, 2009.

"Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams" by Valerie Richardson ( - Nov. 3, 2009.



Transcribed by Diana