November 11th, 2010 (#705)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt November 11th, 2010:

Those Who Guide Fate End the Nation State:

"Van Rompuy Lenin, Gloating with Hate,
Proudly Announced End of the Nation-State,
Mission Accomplished, Pleasing his Masters
Who Own the E.U., Bringer of Disasters,
Suit and Tie Revolutionaries, Socialist Lovers,
Screwed Whole Peoples, Under the Covers
Of Pretences and Lies of "Just Free Trade",
As They Gobbled in Taxes what People Got Paid,
For Years These Commissars Worked Undetected,
Media Gave Cover so No-One Suspected,
Amalgamation was Always the Destination,
Leaders Signed "Closer Ties" Binding Each Nation,
He Who Caught On was Branded the Fool,
Suffering Haughty Sneers and Much Ridicule,
The World is a Stage, Politicos are Actors,
Plying Deception to Hide Any Truth Factors"
© Alan Watt November 11th, 2010

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - November 11th, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)


Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix, on November the 11th, 2010.  For newcomers to the show, and I get letters all the time, from people who have just listened in, so youngsters are always tuning into the show to find out what's happening.  You should look into, and you'll find hundreds of talks you can go over, at your leisure, where I try to give you shortcuts to the big picture of this crazy, bewildering system into which you were born.  It's not so crazy after all because it's really planned.  Your whole existence is planned, your future is planned, and the time you're born into, everything that happens in it is planned as well in the big scale, on the global scale.  Because, yeah we do have world planners.  We've had them for an awful long time, and they do make all the big changes across the world happen, on cue, when it's time to go into the next phase.  That's why you're having the wars in the Middle East, and a few other places.  The last few places to clean up, mop up, standardize into the World Global Democratic System, as they like to call it and stick in a world bank or a central bank system, under the world bank, and get them under the thumb, and then start taxing the blazes out of them to distribute the wealth across the world, so they tell us, anyway.  I wonder where it really all goes?  So, help yourself to the audios. 


And while you're at it too, remind yourself that you can buy the books and discs I have for sale, to keep me going, and that's all I ask, really, is just to trickle over, from show to show.  So, buy these books.  They're different from anything else you'll read.  It's not the usual 'who done it' sort of stuff, and his stories, which is history, it's to do with the techniques of controlling populations down through time until the present time.  And I do obviously give you the big foundations, which are all linked together today, across the world, pushing their global agenda. A very definite fixed agenda.  They know exactly where they're going, what kind of society they want, and it's step by step towards it, and the changing of all cultures into this big mush.  Out of it will come chaos, and out of that will come a New Order of things, their ideal, placid, society, where they have genetically modified everyone who would cause a problem, basically.  And that's what it's all really about.  It's been happening for a long time.  We're already affected by it.  And everyone has been kind of bio-engineered to some extent, through the chemicals, inoculations, and even the GMO food they've been feeding you.  So, that's the big, nasty story that you're living in.  Some people can't take that.  They prefer to live in a bubble, or they jump into the New Age, looking for some spiritual way to escape it all.  And there's always, there's lots of organizations you can join for whichever religion or branch of it you want to choose.  There's a big shopping mall out there, called religious shopping mall, and it's all supplied for you.  And you'll find similar people, of your own ilk in the particular one you choose.  And you can always change, remember, the fashion as you wish, and try something different, all supplied by the ones at the top, who understand how humans tick.


And remember, from the U.S. to Canada, you can buy the materials that I sell with a personal check, to Canada, or an international postal money order to Canada.  You can also use PayPal to order or donate.  Use the donation button, and send a separate email, with your name, your address and order, and I'll get it right out to you as fast as I can.  The same across the rest of the world.  Remember, you can use PayPal to order or donate, or both.  And you can also use Money Gram, which is cheaper than Western Union, and if you can really afford Western Union, then go ahead, and wire it across.  It's up to you.  Some people just send cash, and that's acceptable too, at the present.  And, who knows what the future will bring, because the big banks are making big, concerted moves together, and things are all to go cashless, eventually, within 4 years apparently, from all the news blurbs that have been out over the last two or three years.  That's about three or four years left, I suppose, before paper money and so on will be phased out all together.  Then they can really track you.  Back with more after these messages.


Hi folks, I'm back, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix.  As I say, it's a big system into which you're born.  Everyone is born into the same system.  It's slightly varied for different countries, of course, at least it was in the past.  Most countries are catching up, because they all watch the same television and movies, made in Hollywood.  Back in the '70s and even the late '60s, the Council on Foreign Relations said that eventually you'll have a trans-Atlantic culture, then a pan-American culture, really pan-L.A. basically, because Hollywood would create the culture for the world for the rest to follow.  And they're quite right.  It's already happened.  You'll see the same baggy pants and so on, and the way of dressing that you'll see in America, across even Africa and different places.  Everyone emulates what they see.  And that's all intentional, it's even mentioned in one of the articles I read a while back from an American military magazine, where they talked about ongoing wars, perpetual wars, and how they would put a degraded culture across the world because it really breaks them down.  It breaks down the societies.  It breaks down the resistance to integration of the global system.  And they did call it in the article degraded culture.  And that's what we have today.  We're conquered, actually.  When you've got degraded culture you're conquered.  You can't stand up for anything in moral relativity.  And that's what you've been taught for an awful long time. 


I've also gone through the history of the Economic Union, of Europe, that was to be the first amalgamation of a continent, basically, put out by Karl Marx in the 1800s, initially.  He talked about Trading Blocs.  There would be amalgamations where countries would be basically submerged into these systems, and they would lose their sovereignty altogether.  And the first one was to be the European Integration, and that's what's happened.  We've lived through it, many of us.  We've lived through the integration.  We've lived through all the lies and deceit as they said every country will keep its sovereignty, and it will be sort of a debating place, where they agree upon prices and imports and exports.  Nonsense.  It was meant to get a parliament up and going, which they set up in Brussels of course, and eventually, once they set it up and had it all running, they admitted to the public and actually released their documents that said in 1948, when they set it up, that the public were never to be told the true purpose of this economic union, because they wouldn't go for it.  They wouldn't give up their sovereignty.  So, they lied, lied, lied, lied, because that's the system you're really living in.  Big agendas for the world.  America was to follow suit, and Canada has signed agreements with the U.S., Mexico, and other ones, Chile was another one, to integrate the Americas.  And don't forget too, as far back as 1912, I think it was, a big building was set up in Washington DC, for the amalgamation of the Americas.  It's called the America House.  And they meant total integration of the Americas.  Massive, very expensive building, and you can look it up on the internet for yourself.


And we have all these big organizations, foundations, pushing, pushing, pushing for integration.  In fact, the Council on Foreign Relations came out in 2005 with the ex-vice prime minister of Canada, a Mr., I think it was Axworthy at the time, leading the CFR for the Americas, under their own banner of the CFR for the first time, on national television in Canada, saying they were signing the integration for the Americas, and it had to be so, and they had to eventually amalgamate and compete with Europe and then with China.  Well, wow.  Eh?  China.  Can you compete with China?  No, of course you can't.  That's a ridiculous idea.  That's not the intention, of course.  It's to bring you down into poverty, and share what they call your wealth to the rest of the world, which of course is the big corporations which they set up across the rest of the world, not to any peoples.  Anyway, this great tyranny, this New Soviet, that's what it is, because the CFR were the Big Boys too, were all behind the Soviet Union, under the Royal Institute of International Affairs, their British companion, who set up that and funded it via their bankers, that comprised the setting up of the Milner group and the Royal Institute of International Affairs.  All International Bankers and their sons.  They were the big players and agents, who traveled the world, amalgamating and amalgamating, and making sure the funding was getting to the right places for revolutions and money was getting to the right places too to keep Revolutions going, once they'd started.  And that's in the history of Tragedy and Hope, by the way, by the historian for the CFR, Carroll Quigley, for those who want to wade through it.  And you've got to also read the Anglo-American Establishment where he goes into this group.  He said, we're always blamed or thought of as being sort of Communist, he says, but the reason that is, is because they push the exact same system as Communism.  That's why you have a Sovietized European Union. 


And here's something to augment what I've said, and this is this article that came out today from the chief, the head honcho, the big dictator, of the New Soviet of the EU, Mr. Rompuy, who was never elected.  I read the article two weeks ago, I think, where he came out in an outburst, replying to something, some accusations, and he said, yes, he was elected in secret, he said.  That was in the national papers.  That's how open this great democracy of the EU is.  It's a dictatorship.  Just like Lenin's dictatorship over the proletariat.  So, he says this:


Nation states are dead: (Alan: That should be a warning to everybody in America and Canada and everywhere else.  I don't think it will do much, mind you, because we're really already integrated.  We've signed five agreements so far for integration annually, since 2005.  They kept quiet about this one in Canada, this year.  It says here:)


The age of the nation state is over and the idea that countries can stand alone is an ‘illusion’ and a ‘lie’, the EU president believes.


(A:  So the age of the nation state is over.  That's the death knell for it.)


In one of the most open proclamations of the goal of a European superstate since the heyday of Jacques Delors, Herman Van Rompuy (A: Lenin. I added the last part there.) went on to denounce Eurosceptism as the greatest threat to peace. (A: Now, I'm not kidding you, when I say Leninism here, because, you see, it's run on the Socialistic principles of the Soviet.  You do what you're told.  You can't question them.  Their top boys all meet in secret.  We don't even know who they are.  It's not run like any parliament or democracy, or even republic that we know.  Except perhaps China, it's closer to China's system.  And he says here Euroscepticism is the greatest threat to peace.  That's exactly what Lenin would have said about counter-revolutionaries, those who were against it.  And we know what happened to them, don't we.  And I'm not kidding about that either, because it's getting to that stage, where these characters are going to be utterly ruthless.  They've already said it was Heresy to question the European Union, or what it does, even, and how it operates.  Anyway, it says that:)


Tory (A: conservative) backbenchers condemned the inflammatory comments in the speech made by Mr Van Rompuy to mark the 21st anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall.


They said it proved that David Cameron (A: That's this front man they've got in Britain right now that pretends he's conservative.) would have a battle on his hands if he is to prevent extra powers being handed to Brussels.


(A: They'll just take it.  They sign everything else they've been asked to sign.)


Last night 23 Conservative MPs, including former leadership contender David Davis, rebelled in the Commons by demanding a referendum if the Lisbon Treaty is amended – even if ministers argue the changes do not affect the UK. Their call was defeated.

Mr Van Rompuy’s speech in the German capital told his audience that ‘the time of the homogeneous nation state is over’.


(A: There you go.  Just like that.  That's it over.)


He added that the ‘danger’ of Euroscepticism was spreading beyond the confines of countries such as Britain and was becoming a stronger force across the whole continent.


We have together to fight the danger of a new Euroscepticism,’ he declared. ‘This is no longer the monopoly of a few countries.


(A: He means states, basically.  And they're trying to say this great thing is going to be how they survive.  Now, they're already been flattened with this man-made depression that exploded on cue, when somebody pushed the plunger, because that's how they do things in the real world.  Nothing happens by chance.  Believe you me.  Nothing happens by chance on a big scale.  And then they all have to bail each other out, supposedly.  And the bankers win, win, win.  And remember too, as I say, the Royal Institute of International Affairs was begun and controlled, still is, by bankers at the top.  International lenders, really.  That's what they do.  And they already have their department for the whole of the EU Parliament.  They become members of the European Institute for International Affairs, but still answerable to London.  I mean, talking about the City.  So:)


The Belgian equated Euroscepticism with fear, which eventually leads to war – echoing former French president Francois Mitterrand’s famous phrase that ‘nationalism is war’.


(A: Really, well what does he think internationalism is?  What was the Cold War about?  Internationalism.  And who was Mitterrand anyway to speak, because this was the guy who literally thought he was descended from one of the pharaohs, through his many reincarnations.  This is guy who had all that Masonic regalia on under the guards, with the arch, and their whole bit with their swords, in front of the new museum they made, that pyramid they made.  They made a big, big show of that.  But of course, very importantly, like Pierre Trudeau and others, he had a single red rose on his coffin, a sign of International Socialism, when he died.  Anyway:)


Today’s nationalism is often not a positive feeling of pride in one’s own identity, but a negative feeling of apprehension of the others.’


(A: So, you've got homophobic now, which means fear of homosexuals, which is kind of strange.  You're not in fear of them.  You're not allowed to dislike people.  And you're not allowed to dislike other peoples as well.  You don't even have to like your own people, if you have any.  But the fact is, they're calling everything phobic, you see.  So, today's nationalism is a kind of phobia, like xenophobia.  And it's like an illness.  No doubt they'll have a treatment for that one day, if they don't already.  Anyway:)


In a strong defense of the euro, he said the recession would have been far worse if France still had its franc and Germany still had its mark.


I don't know how he figures that one out, because really if countries are managing their own books, and they're not plummeting, why should they go into debt to bail out the rest, and then they all owe money to the World Bank.  And international bankers.  Back with more after this.


Hi folks, we're back, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix.  Just reading an article about the end of the nation state, according to Mr. Rompuy, who's the dictator of the new Soviet Europe, and that's what he says.  That's the guy who apparently has the power and all the rest of it, and what are they going to do about it?  What will anybody do about it?  What can they do about it?  Because they don't even know what's happening in the real world do they?  Most folk don't.  They don't know that most of these prime ministers all belong to the G20, G8, and all these things, the OECD, and to distribute the wealth across the planet.  They have no idea of all the clubs that these heads of state all belong to, as they go along with this CFR global agenda.  This Trilateral, CFR, Royal Institute of International Affairs, global agenda, that was laid down before any of us were born.  Any of us were born.  But here it goes, anyway.  And they never mention any of this stuff at election times.  It's always pension plans and healthcare and they lie anyway.  Now, it says here too, as Eurocrats waste millions from your taxes!


Millions of pounds of EU funds have been squandered on projects including a hydrotherapy centre for dogs and sending a troupe round Britain to perform the Smelly Foot Dance. 


(A: Isn't that rather good?  That's good culture for you.  See, they destroy the old cultures and they give you smelly feet instead.)


Taxpayers’ cash has also gone to a ‘hip-hop laboratory’ in Lyon, France, to address the ‘lack of co-operation in European hip-hop’.


(A: That's a very important thing, apparently, as folks are losing their homes across parts of Europe, and definitely in Britain.  Then it says:)


The details were revealed yesterday by the think-tank Open Europe, a day after auditors (A: Now listen to this.  A day after, this is the European auditors for this big Soviet here) refused to give the EU’s accounts a clean bill of health for the 16th year in a row.


(A: They don't tell you anything.  You know, they won't let you know what they're up to.  Top secrecy.  This is called a new and open transparent society, supposedly.  I think the white man speaks with forked tongue.)


They emerged a fortnight after David Cameron faced a battle with the EU Parliament over the size of its budget for 2011.


The Parliament wanted an increase of 6 per cent on this year’s £88billion (A: That's what it gives to the EU, from Britain)– but Mr Cameron seems to have persuaded other countries to join him in restricting it to 2.9 per cent.


(A: Which is nonsense, because Cameron is in on all of this.  Anyway:)


Open Europe produced a list of 50 examples of EU waste.


Top of the list was £350,000 for a dog fitness and rehabilitation centre in Hungary.


The EU’s Rural Development Fund paid out the huge sum for a project to ‘improve the lifestyle and living standards of dogs’ – which included the development of a hydrotherapy system for dogs. More than a year on, building has yet to start.


(A: But someone has pocketed the money of course, and is living on interest until it does start.)


Some £4.5million went on a fleet of limousines for European MPs (A: Naturally, it is.  Caesar and his bunch are always Caesar and his bunch.) in Strasbourg in 2009 alone. All chauffeurs at the company used must sign a confidentiality clause ‘guaranteeing absolute discretion’.


(A: So, don't tell where they've taken them, or the whores that they're bringing back, whatever description or type they happen to be.  Or the stuff they snort in the back seats.)


In Britain, golf courses, motorsport centres and hunting clubs have all benefited from thousands of pounds meant for farming subsidies.


(A: For smaller farms.  Well, that's them out.)


Open Europe director Mats Persson said: ‘The EU’s budget is irrational, overly complex and hopelessly out of date. Huge amounts of money are wasted on projects which do nothing to help the EU economy to get back on track. There should be no talk whatsoever of budget increases until the problems with waste and mismanagement are stamped out.


Well, what about abolishing the darn thing.  It truly is a Secret Society at the top of that Parliament there.  It really is.  That won't happen of course, because this was planned a long, long time ago.  And guys who literally will work on something in secret and lie to every country, year after year, that it's just an economic agreement for trade, and then you end up losing your sovereignty, under a super parliament, exactly what Karl Marx said.  You know, they aren't going to sit around and discuss changes of plans at this stage of the game.  They're not going to do it.  You're under an authoritarian society, now, remember the Club of Rome said, democracy had to go, and they're the main advisors to all these groups that run everything in the world.  They said democracy just takes too long to get anything done, to get the great work done, because there's so many competing parties and conflicting, and arguments and so on, and all this kind of stuff happening, so they have to bring in authoritarianism instead to get the big thing rushing ahead.  That's what you're living under now, and folk who have been under it since 2001, at least, hopefully you've all noticed it.  Most really haven't.  We think the world just evolves accidentally, accidental view of history, and things just happen, willy nilly, and there's nothing you can do about it. 


Now, while that's happening, at the same time this is happening, and Van Rompuy-Lenin there is, you know, giving them the great dictatorship of the proletariat, or the eurotariat, I guess they call it, then this is happening with the G20, and it's good news though, it's good news, it's called the Great Leap Forward.  That was the term they used.  Where have we heard the Great Leap Forward before?  Does anybody know?  Do you know where that comes from?  The Great Leap Forward?


G20 ushers in "great leap forward" on development


(A: They mean across the world, eh.)


A new global development strategy to be unveiled at this week's G20 summit marks a "great leap forward," the head of the OECD said on Thursday.


You notice, they don't even tell you what the OECD is.  This is how they put things across.  It's like the CFR advised the president to do so and so.  You think it's some official thing.  This is a private organization, just like the United Nations, by the way.  And just like the Council on Foreign Relations is a private organization that runs the world.  I'll read this article for you and spell it out and explain it to you, when I come back from this break.


Hi folks, I'm back, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix.  Just reading this Great Leap Forward spiel to do with the G20.  Again, all your prime ministers and your presidents, they all attend this G20 to decide to take your tax money and spread it across their big corporations across the world, and they call it foreign aid and stuff like that.  I like the way they write it in these handouts, this is a handout obviously by one of the PR companies for the OECD.  And the OECD is the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.  It was set up about 1948 or something to do this very job of globalizing the world by using the tax money from the Western countries mainly, and to pump it into what they claim is the poor countries.  In other words, what it's going to do is decide which countries they're going to bring up to first world status for a while, as they bring down the first world countries to maybe second or maybe one and a half status.  Because that's what's happening now, if no one has noticed.  It says here:


The Group of 20 major economies plans to endorse the "Seoul Development Consensus for Shared Growth," (A: Right.  Now, you better understand that these are legal statements they make.  It's like a declaration.  They'll often say the declaration of so-and-so.  That's an official, legal definition of something, and it is a declaration.  If there's no comeback or opposition to it, it goes ahead as a legal document.  So they have consensus documents, declaration documents, and everything else.  Anyway, it says:) which includes an emphasis on infrastructure investment as a means to attain sustainable growth in poorer countries.


"This is really going to change the way in which we address development," Angel Gurria, secretary-general of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, told reporters.


(A: Do you understand how they all have these same terms as the U.N., secretary-general?  Have you ever wondered why?  You see, it's all one big organization with specific functions, each department specializing.)


He said the adoption of a multi-year action plan would be a "a very big deliverable"  (A: Hey?  A very big deliverable, I guess.)  from the two-day G20 summit, which starts on Thursday.


The blueprint identifies nine areas where action is needed to ease development bottlenecks, including skills training, increased access to finance, expanded investment and improvements to the physical fabric of developing countries.


(A: These are the guys remember, that helped bring you the World Trade Organization, into being, which brought in GATT, which made sure that all your factories and your work would end up in China.  I hope you realize that.  This is the same bunch.  All the guys that you think you elect as prime ministers and presidents.  So it says:)


"The great leap forward here is that this is no longer a question of aid. It's a question of development," Gurria said.


Gurria applauded summit host South Korea for driving the new agenda, which says there is no one formula for development success.


(A: Really?  Except just keep taxing and taxing the West until there's nothing left to tax.  And it says:)


The G20 plans to set up a high-level panel to recommend ways to mobilize financing for infrastructure in developing countries.


(A: And here's the World Bank in there.  This too, this other big private company, set up again by the same boys who set up the CFR, and the Royal Institute for International Affairs, for a World Society.)


World Bank President Robert Zoellick estimates the financing at (A: This is all they'll need by the way, from all of you lot that's listening out there, all they'll need:) $900 billion a year. (A: That's all they want, this one group.  Never mind all the other billions they want for their other projects.  They only want $900 billion dollars a year from all of you out there.  It says:) Actual investment is about half of that, Zoellick said in Singapore on Wednesday.


(A: And then of course they always bring out the other NGOs, which they all own by the way.  The foundations own the NGOs who come out playing the opposition, or demanding that they keep their promises.  So, right after it's got the same thing.  And it says:)


The Overseas Development Institute, a British think tank, (A: So here's a private think tank again, right, who works for the World Bank.) said the G20's emphasis on trade, investment and growth was the right one for long-term development. It described the G20's agenda as going beyond aid, not replacing aid.


(A: So this the kind of rubbish they hand out for the general cattle down at the bottom there, right.)


Other non-governmental agencies reacted more cautiously.


(A: Here's your NGOs.)


"Rich countries must not use the economic crisis or the G20's focus on growth to wriggle out of their commitments to the world's poorest at a time when they need help more than ever," said Takumo Yamada with Oxfam, a British (A: Private) aid agency.


That works with all these guys.  So they always bring them out to say commitments.  Well who?  What commitments?  Did any person that you know sign a commitment to help the Third Word, across the world?  Anybody at all?  Hmm? That's why you vote these idiots in, because you're giving them the right to vote at these international agreements, on them; you're giving them consent to do it on your behalf.  I hope you realize that.  Anyway, that's the reality of the world, all rushing ahead.  If you'll notice too, there's very little news about presidents and prime ministers right now because you're getting trained into a new system gradually.  They're keeping the Big Boys out of the limelight, and all you'll get is reports like this one, where they happen to be attending and stuff like that.  Because the days of throwing the rotten tomatoes at them is going to be over.  You're now under authoritarianism and petty bureaucrats in non-governmental organizations, and the foundations will be dishing out your news to you.  Just like the New Soviet.  Soviet was rule by councils.  These were all councils, you understand.  You don't vote them in.


Now, there's Clint from Ontario, if you're still hanging on the line there.  Are you there, Clint?


Clint: Yes, I am, Alan.


Alan: Yes, go ahead.


Clint: Thanks for taking my call.  I have some questions for you, and I think you'd be the guy to answer them.  It has something to do with the banks, but there's a freeman movement going on, and I'm sure you know about it.  And they preach that all our names are in capital letters on our birth certificates and that means that we're a corporation.  Now, can you say anything to that at all? 


Alan: Well, technically, it's true.  You'll notice that every government's letter addressed to you is all in block capitals.  And even at school, I can remember getting taught that whenever it came to examinations and stuff they'd tell you to write your name in block capitals, without telling you why.  I realized afterwards, we're blockheads.  Technically it is legalities.  The thing is though, I don't care what you join, if these guys want you, they'll get you. 


Clint: No, I understand that.


Alan: I've seen so many folk join these groups over many years.  Other ones went before them.  There's been lots, a whole succession of them, and the guys often go on tour, and they give big speeches, make a lot of money, and then they either get put in prison or they die away, or one of their followers gets put in prison, and that's the end of it.  Really, you cannot become a lawyer to fight the law.  Do you understand?  It would take you years and years to understand all the nitty-gritty stuff.  And even then, if they want you inside and out of the way, they'll get you inside.  On the laws, there's always two outcomes for any particular type of case.  There's always, for the same scenario, the exact same scenario, regardless of what it is, so say for a particular crime, if they want you inside, they go and say, okay, a precedent was set by so-and-so, in the year so-and-so, so-and-so vs. so-and-so, and the verdict was guilty.  If they want to let you go, they'll go and find someone that they let off with it as a precedent setting case, and they let you go.  If you've got the right credentials, qualifications, and you know how to wink and stand, and that's how it's really done.  That's how they operate in court.


Clint: I think there's no way of getting away from it.  But when I was looking into that, I noticed that on my birth certificate, from Ontario here, on the outside of the border, on the bottom in very fine print it says Canadian Bank Note.  Now, I found that really disturbing that a bank note would be on my birth certificate. 


Alan: Not really, because you see, your birth certificate is the first part of identification for the social insurance number.  The social insurance system was brought in to pay off bank debts, apparently.  That's why they first brought in the income tax.  Supposedly it was a temporary war tax, and they kept it on in all the British Commonwealth Countries.  And that's why.  You're collateral for all the debt.


Clint: I was just going to say that.  So that, we're tied into the bank, somehow, then. 


Alan: Absolutely.


Clint: Yeah, okay.  Now, another thing is, now, with the King James Version Bible, the New and Old Testament, when I was a kid, here in Ontario, we would have to recite the Lord's Prayer every morning.  And it would go on, it would say, "Our father which art in heaven, hallowed be thy name.  Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.  Give us this day our daily bread."  And then in school, we would say, "forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those that trespass against us."  Now, in the King James Version here, it says, "and forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors."


Alan: That's right.


Clint: Now, is that more or less saying that like to take on debt, it's illegal in what would be God's eyes?


Alan: It has a different meaning in Hebrew, old Hebrew, because every so many years the Hebrews had to forgo the debt, but only of their own people.  Every seven years, I think, every seven years they have to forgive every debt that was outstanding from those who owed them money.  So that was tucked in there in that, in a sense, too.  But yeah, you're quite right.  You'll see two different versions of that particular phrase, right there.


Clint: And it's funny, that, because we were indoctrinated more or less to say trespasses, and to leave the debt out.  Because when I looked in the dictionary, 'trespass' more or less means 'sin'; so forgive us our sin.


Alan: That's right, so people sin against people.  That makes more sense, really.


Clint: Yeah.  So, I thought that was funny.  Anyways, thanks for clearing that up.  And I just want to say, I finished your book there, and I highly recommend it to all your listeners who don't have it.  And they should literally get it and read it, because you really break things down really good.


Alan: It wakes you up. It does wake you up to what you see every day.  And it doesn't really click with us until you start thinking about it.  It's all out there. 


Clint: And anybody who's on this path to Truth and wanting to know, you really help it out quite a bit.  Now, one thing, are you writing another book at all, or are you in the midst of doing?


Alan: Oh, I tell you, I'm in such crisis here, just running through and running through.  I've got stuff started and not finished, but, I'm not kidding, there's always a crisis per day here, either with computers or something else cropping up, or getting wood in, or whatever it is.  And it's just one thing after another.  I really need staff.  That's what I need, it's the only way to do it, and go further.  And if I do that, I'll have to take on advertising, and that would be the way of it.  Otherwise, it's killing you.


Clint: Yeah.  Well, hopefully you can maybe somehow get one together, you know, because it would be really good.  You have a lot of information to give us, so.


Alan: I know.  It's such a frustration to know what you want to do.  It's all in your head.  If you had the time, and two or three weeks to spare, you could probably churn out three books, quite easy.  And you just don't even have that time.  And I'm not kidding.  Even at weekends.  You just don't have it.


Clint: Maybe you should find a local kid in your town there, who's a whiz on the computer to type some up for you, quick and get it printed up.


Alan: It's even the time to dictate it.  That's even what I need, is the time to dictate it, that's all. 


Clint: That's it.  That's it.  Okay, Alan, thank you for taking my call.


Alan: Thanks for calling.


You'll find that everything is changed and of course there's been so many variations of the New Testament, especially, in the last fifty or even longer years, and every change in Biblical or Holy Books is done for political reasons.  I know in one they took out Sodom and Gomorrah, it didn't happen, in the Old Testament; it's just a non-event, didn't happen, because it was politically incorrect for today.  And various things, like men lying with men, women with women, was a sin, that's kind of gone in a lot of the newer ones too, because they can't have any disharmony and disunity in this big, happy Utopia, in which we live.


And speaking of that, by the way, it's interesting that Amazon has got another book out there, and it says: protested in 2002 for advocating adult-child sex is still available on the site


Amazon is selling a self-published book defending pedophiles, sparking discussions about the retailer's obligation to vet items before they are sold in its online stores, and threats of boycott from Amazon customers if the book is not removed.


The book, " The Pedophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure: (A: There you go.) a Child-lover's Code of Conduct"


(A: See, so these, you know, drooling predatory pedophiles, call it love.  Eh?  These obsessed characters call it love.  But it's out there for the folk.  Now, of course, they'll probably say now that we've lost every other level or morality, and there were levels of morality too, there's no doubt about it.  That's how cultures did survive.  They had a common morality.  But it's now moral relativism.  And basically, any kind of sex or enjoyment is supposedly a choice, you know, and all that kind of stuff.  So, they're going all the way now.  The child pedophile is going all the way, like all the rest of them went.  And there's not much to stop them now.  Not much to stop them.  In fact, they even talked at the international censors committee meeting, in 2001, just before the towers went down, that it was time to push the envelope even further.  The public were ready for the next step.  And that's why you've got all these different comedies out there, supposedly, on particular proclivities towards sexual relations.  And you have to get a lot more of them too.  And you thought that censorship committees were there to guard you.  Like everything in this world, it's the opposite, folks.  It's the opposite.  So it says:)


The author's description (misspellings included) reads:


"This is my attempt to make pedophile situations safer for those juveniles that find themselves involved in them, by establishing certian rules for these adults to follow. I hope to achieve this by appealing to the better nature of pedosexuals, with hope that their doing so will result in less hatred and perhaps liter sentences should they ever be caught."


(A: So there you go, you know.  There you go.)


Amazon issued a statement that will no doubt fuel the outraged comments multiplying on the "Pedophile's Guide" Amazon page.  (A: They've got a whole page, eh.  Wow.) "Amazon believes it is censorship not to sell certain books simply because we or others believe their message is objectionable," it reads. "Amazon does not support or promote hatred or criminal acts, however, we do support the right of every individual to make their own purchasing decisions."


How about all the coming victims of these pervs?  Huh?  Who's going to stand up for their rights?  So that these predators can have their way?  I've already gone through all that rubbish put out by Kinsey, and what a weirdo he was, a guy who used fake data, fake statistics, and used prostitutes to pretend these were the average women in the world, and that became the Bible for every judge across the land to follow.  It changed society completely.  It was all B.S.  Bothersome stuff.  That's what it was.  That's what he was turning out.  And who was funding him?  The Rockefeller foundation.  The guys that swore to change American culture.  No kidding.  And I've gone through the video links for you all to watch, from a very good historian of this particular character.  And she's exposed an awful lot of the lies, and the fact that Kinsey, he hired these pervs, you know, these child lovers, to have sex with babies.  Babies.  With stopwatches to time them.  These are the creatures that were getting funded by Rockefeller foundation, one of the biggest foundations pushing your globalistic society, and helped to destroy the culture, totally, of the Americas.  Still going strong.  Working with the same guys, like the G20s and all these guys, and all these other foundations.  Most folk have no idea what they're up against.  It's a coordinated effort with all these organizations, which are really part of one big organization, that bypass governments.  Now they even use governments.  Governments today are their lackeys.  Back with more after this break.


Hi folks, we're back for the last part of Cutting Through the Matrix.  And we're getting handouts all the time from the media, as I say.  The days of any pretense of politicians serving the public is long gone.  We just get handouts and PR blurbs and stuff like that.  And sometimes like Britain, and I've read many on the air, they even release them in advance, of what a prime minister will say, will say, when he meets with so-and-so, next week or whatever; they actually give you the whole speech in advance.  Personally, I think we should just do away with the guys at the top, and give Oscars to the script writers and give them story writing cups or something to take home with them for being the best scriptwriter.  And it would save us money at the same time.  When they make up stories too, they're non-events basically.  Here's one here:


Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada says he is prepared to suffer any political backlash that comes his way for speaking out against anti-Israel rhetoric.


(A: And it goes on to say here:)


Harper told an audience Monday that while Israel is receptive to fair criticism, Canada is obligated to stand up for its ally when it comes under attack from others.


(A: But then he goes and equates criticism of Israel with antisemitism.  How does he get that?  How does he put the two together?  How can you criticize every other country for what it does or doesn't do, but you can't criticize this one, or you're anti, that's rubbish.  Then, you scroll down to see where he's speaking and it's a PR job.  Because I didn't see any massive demonstrations in Canada, shouting out about Israel or being anti-Semitic.  So what it is, it says:)


Harper made his remarks at the start of a two-day conference on antisemitism that is being held on Parliament Hill during Holocaust Education Week.


After his caucus meeting on Monday, Ignatieff  (A: That's the other guy.) criticized Harper for suggesting that Canada's recent failure to secure a seat on the UN Security Council can be blamed on the federal government's support for Israel.


This is what they're trying to make a story out of nothing.  I can remember when, I think it was Prime Minister Martin went over to Israel, when he came back from the United Nations where he worked for six months, that was the only leave he left from politics was six months at the UN and then back in to be the Prime Minister, unelected in fact.  He just took over from Chretien.  And the CBC showed a little two-minute blurb from Israel, and there's Martin talking to the Israeli Prime Minister.  And the Israeli Prime Minister had asked Canada to take the remaining Palestinians on mass over to Canada.  And they wanted Canadians to pay for it too.  Well, there's chutzpah for you, eh?  And I'll tell you, anyway, nothing much is happening in Canada, so here's a PR blurb handed out here, as he's pretending to stand up for something that's not even happening. 


Canada is the most laid-back country that there is.  It's too laid back.  It doesn't complain about much at all.  It doesn't complain about the prices going up.  It doesn't complain about their price of gas going up, taxes going up.  They're quite happy, it seems, most of them.  And no doubt, something has happened to them.  They used to complain about lots of stuff, but not anymore.  I think they're probably a model state like China, for the New World Order.  Something has been happening to them.  Mind you, Canada was the test population that was to be tested with GMO food for ten years in secrecy, according to what the government released.  They made a secret agreement with Monsanto that they would test it on Canadians.  And Canadians had it flooded on their food market.  Didn't know what they were eating, weren't told, until it broke out from Britain.  And of course, I'm sure they did all the test studies to see if they were dying faster now and had cancers, and were more stupid and all the rest of it.  That's the reality of transparent and more clarity in government, for the people. 


Anyway, from Hamish and myself, from Ontario Canada, it's Good Night, and may your god or your gods go with you.



Topics of show covered in following links:

EU Dictator of Eurotariat Says Age of Nation States is Dead

Great Leap Forward--G20 and the Redistribution of Wealth

Another Book on Amazon Promoting Pedophilia

Harper, Canada and Israel




Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:


"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3


"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)


Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)


Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)


"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"